Connect with us

Politics

Read how power struggles threaten Ondo APC’s unity ahead of primaries

Published

on

The race to 2027 has begun, but within the Ondo APC, it is already turning into a battle of survival. Behind official assurances of unity lies a widening struggle for control, influence, and party tickets that could shape the state’s political direction long before the general election, writes PETER DADA

The Independent National Electoral Commission has scheduled political parties’ primaries for the 2027 general elections to hold between April 23 and May 30, 2026. The commission also directed parties to submit their digital membership registers at least 21 days before their respective primary dates—a process already underway.

In line with Section 84(2) of the Electoral Act 2026, political parties are required to adopt either direct primaries or the consensus method in selecting candidates for elective positions. This means all parties participating in the 2027 general elections must choose their flagbearers through one of the two approved modes.

Preparations have since gathered momentum, with aspirants declaring interest in presidential, governorship, National Assembly and state assembly contests. However, in Ondo State and seven other states with off-cycle governorship elections, only presidential, National Assembly and state assembly polls will be conducted.

In the Sunshine State, the All Progressives Congress remains the dominant political force, bolstered by a wave of defections from other parties. This dominance has fueled intense competition among aspirants, driven by the widespread belief that securing the party’s ticket significantly boosts chances of victory in the general election.

Despite this advantage, internal divisions persist within the party. Factions loyal to Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa, Minister of Interior Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, and supporters of the late former governor Rotimi Akeredolu continue to jostle for influence. However, none of the groups has openly opposed the re-election bid of President Bola Tinubu, indicating a shared front at the national level despite underlying state-level tensions.

With political parties required to adopt either the consensus or direct primary mode, there are growing concerns among some aspirants that neither option may favour those outside the governor’s camp. As a result, several contenders—particularly serving members of the National and State Assemblies—have reportedly taken their battle to Abuja, seeking automatic tickets from the All Progressives Congress leadership, amid fears that the state-controlled process may work against them.

Apart from Jimoh Ibrahim, who has since secured a diplomatic appointment, other incumbent federal lawmakers from Ondo State are said to be intensifying lobbying efforts at the Presidential Villa and the party’s National Secretariat in a bid to secure endorsement over the state leadership.

Sources within the party also revealed that some aspirants, who are not current legislators, are being pushed forward by influential power brokers in Abuja, in some cases against the preference of Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa. The governor, it was gathered, is under increasing pressure to accommodate these interests despite having his own preferred candidates, particularly in the Ondo South Senatorial District.

The situation has reportedly heightened tensions within the party. At a recent APC stakeholders’ meeting held in Ore, Odigbo Local Government Area, supporters of various aspirants stormed the venue, apparently poised to resist any attempt by the governor to publicly endorse a preferred candidate. The meeting, which was presided over by Aiyedatiwa, could have degenerated into violence, but the governor refrained from naming any candidate.

Meanwhile, the Ondo South senatorial seat remains vacant following Ibrahim’s diplomatic appointment, with political actors awaiting the Independent National Electoral Commission to announce a date for a by-election.

A party source said the struggle over candidacy has become a major burden on the governor, noting that competing interests from Abuja have complicated his efforts to manage expectations.

See also  Immigration hikes passport fees to N100,000, N200,000

The source said, “The issue of candidacy in the forthcoming primary has become a burden on the governor, although he has his own preferred candidates but some aspirants are being given to him by order from Abuja, he has no option than to accept them. This certainly nullifies whoever he had promised automatic ticket. One thing that is sure is that many of those national and state assembly members may not get the party ticket, as many were cede to him (governor), being the party leader in the state , that’s why all of them are rushing to Abuja if they can get the ticket.

“Second thing is that some of the aggrieved members and aspirants are ready planning to leave the party or involve in anti-party activities if the choosing of the candidate is based on personal vendetta rather than popularity of the aspirants at their respective senatorial districts or federal constituencies.”

However, concerns persist that some of the governor’s preferred aspirants lack widespread support among party members and constituents in their respective senatorial districts and federal constituencies. Analysts warn that imposing unpopular candidates could prove costly for the All Progressives Congress in the general election, especially as some well-known aspirants have reportedly vowed to contest and win, with or without the party’s ticket.

Findings further indicate that the lingering disunity within the party has led Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa to sideline certain members perceived as political adversaries. Those most affected are loyalists of the Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, as well as supporters of the late former governor, Rotimi Akeredolu. Aspirants within these camps are said to be mobilising for a showdown, holding frequent strategy meetings across Ondo State.

There are also growing fears of a turbulent post-primary period, with observers warning that unresolved grievances could undermine the party’s chances in the general election. Historically, internal crises within the APC have created openings for opposition parties in the state.

Last week’s meetings between Bola Tinubu, the leadership of the National Assembly, and APC governors on the forthcoming primaries—where governors were empowered to oversee the process in their respective states—appear to have dealt a major blow to the ambitions of many anti-Aiyedatiwa APC members in Ondo State. National Assembly members who had relied on securing automatic tickets from Abuja have also been visibly disappointed. This development has disrupted several political calculations and permutations ahead of the primaries.

A reliable party source indicated that the situation has become less complex for Governor Aiyedatiwa. Although some aspirants were allegedly imposed on him by powerful interests in Abuja, he may still find ways to support his preferred candidates during the primaries, regardless of the mode of the exercise. However, this development carries the risk of deepening divisions within the party, as aggrieved aspirants and members of the anti-Aiyedatiwa faction may resort to anti-party activities during the general election unless decisive reconciliation efforts are undertaken by the governor and party leadership. To avert this, Governor Aiyedatiwa and the new party chairman, Mr. Kolawole Babatunde, need to initiate genuine reconciliation moves.

The source further revealed that the governor has preferred candidates, particularly in the Ondo South Senatorial District—his home district—whom he intends to support for party tickets. However, upon learning of this, some aspirants from the district, along with hundreds of their supporters, reportedly stormed the APC stakeholders’ meeting held on Sunday, April 19, in Ore, Odigbo Local Government Area. The meeting, presided over by the governor, nearly turned violent as protesters warned against the endorsement of any aspirant as the governor’s preferred candidate ahead of the primaries. Tensions were only defused when the governor refrained from naming any candidate.

See also  Crackdown: US set to deport 79 Nigerians on criminal list

Meanwhile, the Ondo South senatorial seat remains vacant following the diplomatic appointment of its former occupant, Jimoh Ibrahim. Political contenders are now awaiting the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to announce a date for the bye-election.

According to the source:

“The issue of candidacy in the forthcoming primaries has become a burden for the governor. While he has his preferred candidates, others are being imposed on him from Abuja, leaving him with little choice but to accommodate them. The meeting convened by President Tinubu with governors and National Assembly members has further strengthened the governors’ influence over the primaries. This effectively nullifies any prior promises of automatic tickets to federal lawmakers, meaning many current legislators may not secure party nominations.

“Another implication is that aggrieved aspirants and party members are already considering defecting or engaging in anti-party activities if candidate selection is perceived to be driven by personal interests rather than popularity within their constituencies.”

There are also concerns that some of the governor’s preferred aspirants lack widespread support among party members and constituents. Imposing such candidates could undermine the party’s chances in the general election, especially as some popular but sidelined aspirants have reportedly vowed to contest—and potentially win—even without the APC ticket.

Further findings suggest that internal divisions within the party have intensified, with the governor allegedly sidelining members perceived as political opponents. Those most affected are individuals loyal to certain ministers and to the late Rotimi Akeredolu. Aspirants within this group are reportedly preparing for a political showdown, holding frequent strategy meetings across the state.

Many observers fear that the Ondo APC may face a turbulent post-primary crisis. Without effective conflict resolution, the party risks entering the general election deeply divided, which could significantly weaken its chances at the polls.

A similar scenario played out ahead of the 2019 general elections, when aggrieved party members defected or engaged in anti-party activities, leading to electoral losses in some senatorial districts and federal constituencies. Many believe a repeat is possible, as some disaffected aspirants are already exploring alternative political options.

Despite these concerns, Governor Aiyedatiwa sought to calm tensions at a recent stakeholders’ meeting by avoiding any public endorsement of candidates. Instead, he appealed for unity and party loyalty, urging aspirants to prioritise collective interest over personal ambition.

He further encouraged members to remain committed regardless of the outcome of the primaries, stressing that political success often requires patience and perseverance.

He said, “I am aware that many of you have individual ambitions — whether for the State House of Assembly or the National Assembly—but there is a paramount collective goal, and that is the re-election of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in 2027. I therefore urge you to remain loyal and committed to the party, whether you win or not. There is always a time for everyone. Only one person can emerge at a time.

“There was a time I contested for the House of Representatives and did not get it. I also contested for the Senate; although I won the primary election conducted in the state, the party’s national leadership later granted an automatic ticket to the incumbent. Yet, I did not leave the party. In 2016, I was shortlisted for the deputy governorship ticket but was not eventually selected. Still, I remained a committed member. Today, I am the governor. So, there is time for everyone.”

In the same vein, the Director of Media and Publicity of the APC in Ondo State, Steve Otaloro, downplayed fears of a post-primary crisis, assuring that whichever mode is adopted for the forthcoming primaries will be credible and widely accepted.

See also  APC plans appearance as US Congress debates ‘Christian genocide’ today

According to him, the party has established internal mechanisms to ensure a smooth and transparent process.

“The mode of primary for the APC in Ondo State will ultimately be decided through the party’s internal processes, in line with constitutional provisions and guidelines. What is critical is not necessarily the method adopted—whether direct primary or consensus—but the credibility of the process,” he said.

Otaloro stressed that both options are constitutionally recognised and must be implemented in a transparent, inclusive, and fair manner to all aspirants.

“Once the process is open and credible, it will naturally command acceptance among stakeholders and party faithful, thereby reducing the likelihood of rancour. The APC in Ondo State has the institutional capacity and leadership maturity to manage this effectively,” he added.

“Our collective priority is to ensure unity, uphold democratic principles, and strengthen the party ahead of the forthcoming electoral engagements.”

However, a group within the party, the Progressive Network for Tinubu, has warned against the imposition of unpopular candidates, insisting that the consensus option must reflect the will of the people.

The group’s Director-General, Olumide Obadele, said internal selection processes must prioritise popularity and grassroots support to avoid electoral setbacks.

“I believe strongly that the consensus approach, if properly applied, should produce the most popular candidate. Imposing an unpopular candidate could weaken the party’s chances at the polls,” he said, warning that voters are increasingly driven by popularity rather than financial influence.

He expressed confidence, however, that party leaders would not undermine the process by imposing candidates lacking public support.

“I can tell you, for free, that the consensus approach is the best approach we can use in politics. The indirect approach, for me, is too expensive. If you don’t have the funds or deep pockets, you cannot pursue it.

“But with the consensus idea, the most popular candidate emerges. Nobody will put forward an unpopular candidate because that would lead to failure in the election. It is a game of popularity. In the past, someone who was not popular but had deep pockets could succeed. But now, it is a game of popularity.”

Also weighing in, political scientist Muyiwa Aloba urged Governor Aiyedatiwa to tread carefully in managing the party’s internal tensions.

Aloba noted that while internal disputes were common in political parties, effective conflict management remained critical to electoral success.

“The only problem human beings have is that people don’t learn from history. What is happening now in Ondo APC is not new. Similar issues occurred during the administration of Rotimi Akeredolu, and poor crisis management contributed to the party’s losses in the 2019 elections,” he said.

He advised the governor to adopt an inclusive approach, accommodate diverse interests within the party, and prioritise unity ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“Conflicts are part of politics, but how they are managed will determine the party’s success,” he added.

“I will only advise the governor to learn from history, I will advise him, as a leader of the party in the state, to forget the past, accommodate and manage every interest and groups in the party if he wants the party to win well in the next year general election.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Adelabu backs down, seeks APC reconciliation ahead of 2027 in Oyo

Published

on

The former Minister of Power and All Progressives Congress governorship aspirant in Oyo State, Bayo Adelabu, on Thursday backed down from pursuing legal action over the party’s governorship primary, urging the APC leadership to initiate a comprehensive reconciliation process ahead of the 2027 election.

Adelabu, in a statement released in Ibadan, the state capital, said his decision was not due to a lack of evidence, confidence or conviction, but was taken in the interest of the party’s progress ahead of the 2027 elections.

He explained that the decision followed a meeting with some party leaders and representatives of his loyalists and supporters from across the 33 local government areas and 351 wards in the state.

The PUNCH reports that some Oyo APC governorship aspirants have been at loggerheads with the state and national executive members of the party over the nomination of Sharafadeen Alli as the party’s governorship candidate for the 2027 election.

They alleged that Alli, who represents Oyo South Senatorial District in the National Assembly, was imposed on them.

Adelabu, in his statement, said that as a loyal and committed member of the APC, he had decided not to pursue an appeal within the party or institute legal proceedings over the process at this time.

The former minister said, “This decision is not because of a lack of evidence, confidence or conviction. Neither should it be interpreted as an act of surrender or an indication that my aspiration to serve as governor of Oyo State is a do-or-die affair.

See also  Adeleke alleges rigging threat, challenges Oyetola

“Rather, I have chosen, in the interest of peace, party stability and the larger future of the APC in the state, not to further escalate the matter through avenues that may deepen existing divisions and undermine the cohesion of our great party.

“More importantly, our respected national chairman, during his recent visit to Oyo, openly acknowledged that there were errors, unfairness and injustice associated with aspects of the primary election process.

“We believe that an acknowledgement or apology, though important, cannot and should not substitute for the necessary correction where the opportunity to address the grievances still exists.”

He expressed concern that many loyal members had invested years of their lives, enormous personal resources, time, energy and political capital in building the APC.

Many of them, according to him, now felt that their sacrifices, votes and preferences had been disregarded and that candidates who did not necessarily reflect the popular choices of party members had emerged without a transparent declaration of the primary results.

“Their grievances are genuine and must not be dismissed as merely the product of the influence or persuasion of any particular aspirant.

“Indeed, many party members are deeply convinced that their own votes, sacrifices and preferences were disregarded, and some may not readily accept appeals from the aspirants they supported.

“Rather, names of selected individuals were subsequently entered on the INEC electronic portal as the party’s candidates for the 2027 general elections.

“This development has effectively produced candidates without the transparent publication of the actual results upon which such nominations were supposedly based.

See also  Lawyer reveals why Davido should apologise to Okpebholo over WAEC result troll

“The concerns arising from this process cut across the governorship, senatorial, House of Representatives and state House of Assembly nominations.

“We agreed that the absence of publicly declared and verifiable results has understandably generated serious concerns about the transparency, credibility and integrity of the nomination process.

“We also affirmed that substantial documentary materials, authenticated collation records and video evidence exist which, in our considered view, raise serious questions about aspects of the process and the eventual outcomes.”

He asked the national leadership of the party to restore confidence, rebuild trust and return cohesion and unity to the party.

“The national leadership of our party must therefore appreciate that the responsibility for reconciliation cannot simply be transferred to aspirants.

“The APC has important work to do to restore confidence, rebuild trust and return cohesion and unity to the party in the state,” he said.

The former minister urged the national leadership of the APC to urgently initiate a comprehensive, sincere and credible reconciliation process covering all categories of nominations and genuinely engaging all affected stakeholders.

“Members who feel wounded, betrayed or alienated must be deliberately engaged and reassured, not merely through appeals, but through concrete actions that demonstrate that their loyalty, sacrifices and contributions still matter.

“The implications of the present situation must not be underestimated. Electoral victory cannot be secured merely by entering names on an electronic portal or announcing candidates.

“Elections are won through the trust, enthusiasm, commitment and active participation of party members and supporters, particularly at the grassroots,” he added.

See also  Tinubu To Sign Amended Electoral Act In February — Akpabio

Adelabu insisted that his aspiration to serve as the state governor was driven by a genuine desire to contribute more directly to the development, prosperity and progress of Oyo State and its people.

“My aspiration to serve as Governor of Oyo State has never been, and will never be, a do-or-die project. By the grace of Almighty God, I have been privileged to serve at the highest levels of both the private and public sectors, and for these opportunities, I remain profoundly grateful.

“However, as human beings, we may propose, but Almighty God ultimately disposes according to His divine will and perfect timing.

“While recent developments may have delayed the realisation of this aspiration, I remain firmly convinced that what may be delayed by human actions cannot be denied by Almighty God. God’s time, indeed, remains the best,” the former minister stressed.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

APC, opposition clash over FG’s $1bn household palliative ahead of 2027

Published

on

The All Progressives Congress and opposition parties have clashed over the Federal Government’s $1bn Household Prosperity and Empowerment Social Protection Project, with the opposition alleging that the initiative is designed to influence voters ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The opposition parties, including the African Democratic Congress and National Democratic Congress, questioned the timing of the programme, which was launched in Abuja on Wednesday amid growing political activities ahead of the elections.

However, the APC rejected the allegations, insisting that the initiative was a genuine effort by the Bola Tinubu administration to tackle poverty and provide sustainable economic support for vulnerable Nigerians.

The Federal Government said the programme was designed to move Nigeria’s social protection system beyond short-term palliatives to sustainable economic empowerment and self-reliance.

Launched under the theme, “From Palliatives to Pathways,” the initiative targets vulnerable households by improving beneficiary identification, providing immediate support during economic shocks and creating pathways for households to graduate from poverty.

The programme was unveiled by the First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, who said the economic reforms of the Tinubu administration had made continued support for vulnerable Nigerians necessary.

“Under the leadership of His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, our nation is implementing far-reaching reforms to strengthen the economy, lay a solid foundation for sustainable growth, and shared prosperity,” she said.

She added that many families continued to face difficulties despite the ongoing reforms, stressing that the HOPE-SP project would provide “immediate stabilisation assistance” while placing vulnerable households on a path to recovery, empowerment and self-reliance.

The Federal Government said the programme would target about 7.6m vulnerable households, with eligible beneficiaries expected to receive a one-off digital shock-response payment of N40,000. Beneficiaries are to be selected from the National Social Register and verified with their National Identification Numbers.

The launch also featured the unveiling of other components of the government’s new social protection architecture, including the One-Humanitarian-One Poverty Response System, the Emergency Cash Transfer Programme and a ministerial blueprint for humanitarian affairs and poverty reduction.

The Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction, Dr Bernard Doro, said the government was moving away from fragmented interventions and reactive palliatives towards a system that would identify vulnerable households, assess their needs and track their progress towards economic self-reliance.

He disclosed that more than N600bn had been disbursed in cash transfers to vulnerable Nigerians over the past three years, reaching slightly more than 10m households.

ADC raises concerns

However, opposition parties said the timing of the new intervention raised questions, particularly with the 2027 elections less than a year away.

The African Democratic Congress described the $1bn programme as a reaction to the economic hardship Nigerians had experienced under the Tinubu administration and linked its launch to the growing popularity of the party’s presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar’s proposal for a targeted production subsidy.

In a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, on Thursday, the party questioned why the government was only now making a major financial commitment to social protection after years of complaints from Nigerians over rising food, transport and energy costs.

The party said the government had previously insisted that there was no money to adequately cushion the effects of its economic reforms but had now found $1bn for a new intervention as elections approached.

“Why did the poor only become visible when their votes become valuable?” the ADC asked.

The party also questioned the funding and administrative structure of the programme, particularly the role of the First Lady in unveiling a Federal Government intervention.

“Is this a Federal Government programme or a project of the First Lady?” the party asked, demanding clarification on the budget head or financing arrangement under which the money was approved, the institution responsible for accounting for the funds and who would ultimately answer to the Auditor-General and the National Assembly.

See also  Full Details - Fubara withdraws from Rivers APC governorship primary

The ADC said it supported genuine efforts to protect vulnerable Nigerians but argued that palliatives could not substitute for policies that restored purchasing power and expanded economic opportunities.

It further accused the administration of attempting to address the consequences of its economic policies through what it described as a politically motivated intervention ahead of the 2027 elections.

Timing wrong — NDC

Also reacting, the Nigeria Democratic Congress said it welcomed any genuine intervention aimed at improving the welfare of Nigerians but questioned the timing of the HOPE-SP launch.

The party’s National Publicity Secretary, Osa Director, told our correspondent that the proximity of the elections made the development open to political interpretation.

“We welcome every move directed at addressing the challenges facing our people. However, with elections just a few months away, one may wonder why the government is just realising the need for this intervention.

“The timing will definitely elicit questions that the ruling party and the government in power may be unwilling to answer,” he said.

On its part, the Social Democratic Party was more direct in its assessment, describing the initiative as a voter-inducement strategy packaged as an empowerment programme.

The party’s spokesman, Rufus Aiyenigba, told The PUNCH that the intervention amounted to “a household votes prospecting outreach,” although he added that such an initiative could not guarantee electoral victory.

The opposition criticism comes against the backdrop of the administration’s wider social protection efforts since the removal of petrol subsidy and the unification of the foreign exchange market, policies which the government has repeatedly defended as necessary for economic recovery.

The government has maintained that its latest social protection framework is intended to ensure that vulnerable Nigerians are not left behind as economic reforms take effect.

APC defends project

However, the ruling All Progressives Congress dismissed the opposition’s allegations, arguing that the proximity of the 2027 elections did not mean the government should suspend its responsibilities to Nigerians.

APC Director of Publicity, Bala Ibrahim, said the Federal Government had a duty to continue implementing programmes designed to improve the welfare of citizens irrespective of the electoral calendar.

“Because an election is coming does not mean the government should fold its arms and shy away from its responsibilities. It is supposed to continue,” Ibrahim said.

According to him, the fact that an intervention would be delivered close to an election did not automatically make it an electoral inducement.

“Whether or not there is an election coming, the government is doing what it ought to continue doing. There is nothing wrong with extending the strategy in such a way that the dividends of democracy will come to the people as close as possible to the time of the election.

“That is strategic timing. It is not corruption. It is not anything that is done deliberately to change the hands of the clock,” he said.

Reacting to the opposition’s claim that the intervention was designed to woo voters, Ibrahim said there was nothing inherently wrong with government initiatives gaining public support, provided they were legitimate.

“If they say it is done with a view to wooing voters, what is wrong with wooing voters as long as what is done is legitimate?” he asked.

The APC spokesman said the Federal Government’s intervention programmes had been in development before the 2027 election season and that their implementation should not be interpreted solely through the political calendar.

“Democratic dividends going to the people are works in progress. They have been in the plan, and the timing has just come at this material time when the election is close by. I don’t see anything wrong with that,” he added.

See also  Tinubu To Sign Amended Electoral Act In February — Akpabio

The controversy over the HOPE-SP places the Tinubu administration’s latest social protection initiative at the intersection of two competing narratives.

The government’s argument that it is strengthening social protection to shield vulnerable Nigerians from economic shocks, and the opposition’s contention that the intervention is coming at a politically convenient time.

For the government, the immediate challenge will be to demonstrate that the $1bn programme is transparently funded, fairly implemented and capable of producing measurable improvements in the lives of its intended beneficiaries.

The opposition parties, meanwhile, are likely to continue scrutinising the programme as the country moves closer to the 2027 elections.

Atiku challenges Tinubu

Meanwhile, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar challenged the government of President Bola Tinubu to reconcile conflicting figures on the number of households reached under its expanded cash-transfer programme.

Atiku said the contradiction between the government’s earlier claim that 15 million vulnerable households had been reached and a more recent figure of “slightly over 10 million households” raised serious questions about the programme’s implementation and the government’s management of public funds.

In a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, on Thursday, the ADC presidential candidate asked the Federal Government to explain what happened to the five million households missing from the latest figure.

“On July 16, 2026, the Presidency officially declared that expanded cash transfers had reached 15 million vulnerable households. It repeated essentially the same figure on August 2, 2026. Yet on August 26, 2026, the Minister of Humanitarian Affairs suddenly told Nigerians that only ‘slightly over 10 million households’ had been reached.

“So, where did five million households go? These are not opposition figures. They are Tinubu’s figures contradicting Tinubu’s figures,” the statement read in part.

The former Vice President also questioned the financial figures associated with the programme, saying the government’s reported expenditure did not appear to correspond with the number of beneficiaries and the amount each household was expected to receive.

According to him, qualifying households are to receive ₦25,000 monthly for three months, amounting to ₦75,000 per household.

He argued that if 10 million households received the full three-month payment, the total would amount to about ₦750bn, while payment to 15 million households would exceed ₦1.1tn.

Atiku said the Federal Government’s reported expenditure of just over ₦600bn requires further explanation.

“How many received one tranche, two tranches or all three? How many payments failed or were reversed? How many names were merely lifted from an existing social register and presented as evidence of actual payment?” he asked.

The ADC presidential candidate insisted that inclusion in a social register should not be treated as proof that beneficiaries actually received government funds.

“A name on a social register is not a bank alert. Counting people in a database is not the same thing as proving money reached them,” he stated.

Atiku called on the Federal Government to publish detailed records of the payments, including verified beneficiary households, payment tranches, state-by-state distribution figures, failed transactions and reversals.

He also demanded an independent audit of the programme, saying Nigerians should be able to verify how the reported hundreds of billions of naira were spent.

“If ₦600bn truly moved, then government must show the trail: unique verified households, payment tranches, state-by-state distribution, failed transactions, reversals and an independent audit,” he said.

The former vice president’s criticism comes against the backdrop of the Federal Government’s expanded social protection measures, which the Tinubu administration has presented as part of its response to the rising cost of living and the economic difficulties confronting vulnerable households.

The cash-transfer programme was expanded following the removal of the petrol subsidy and the resulting increase in transportation, food and other household costs.

See also  Auditor-General indicts CBN over recycled N29.7bn dirty banknotes

The government has repeatedly argued that targeted social interventions are necessary to cushion the effects of economic reforms on poor and vulnerable Nigerians.

Atiku, however, said government should focus more on reducing the underlying cost pressures driving households into poverty than on expanding the number of people receiving palliatives.

“Beyond the arithmetic lies a bigger indictment. A government boasting that tens of millions of households require emergency cash transfers should not be congratulating itself. It should be explaining why its economic policies pushed so many people into desperation,” he added.

He accused the government of worsening the financial pressure on households through higher fuel, transport, food and energy costs.

“Tinubu has turned poverty into a government programme: make fuel expensive, transport rises; transport rises, food rises; food rises, medicine becomes expensive; the family basket shrinks,” Atiku said.

He added that businesses were also facing higher energy and logistics costs, while workers had lost purchasing power.

“When millions become poorer, government registers them as ‘vulnerable,’ gives some of them cash and calls it reform.

“That is not prosperity. It is the industrial production of poverty followed by the bureaucratic management of the poor,” he argued.

The ADC chieftain contrasted the administration’s cash-transfer strategy with his proposed approach to reducing the cost of living, particularly through intervention in the domestic petroleum value chain.

He said his proposed policy would involve a targeted, capped and transparent intervention designed to lower fuel and transportation costs at source.

“This is precisely why Atiku proposes a targeted, capped and transparent intervention in the domestic petroleum value chain. It is designed to reduce fuel and transportation costs at source,” he said.

According to him, reducing fuel costs would have a wider impact across the economy by lowering transportation and logistics expenses for farmers, traders, manufacturers and households.

“When petrol becomes cheaper, the bus driver spends less, the farmer moves produce more cheaply, the trader pays less for haulage, businesses face lower logistics costs and the savings travel through the economy to the family kitchen,” he said.

He argued that the difference between his proposal and the Tinubu administration’s approach was that his plan would seek to tackle the causes of rising household expenses rather than compensate people after the damage had been done.

“Tinubu waits until poverty enters the home and arrives with a cash-transfer form. Atiku wants to reduce the cost pressures that drove the family into poverty in the first place,” he said.

The former vice president said a credible anti-poverty programme should ultimately reduce the number of people dependent on government assistance rather than expand the pool of beneficiaries.

“A serious anti-poverty policy should reduce the number of people needing palliatives, not celebrate how many millions have become vulnerable,” he said.

He also accused the Federal Government of applying a different standard of accountability to opposition proposals and its own expenditure.

“The same government that demands every kobo of Atiku’s proposed intervention cannot ask Nigerians to accept its own hundreds of billions on faith. That is not accountability. It is hypocrisy armed with a calculator,” Atiku said.

He called on the government to reconcile the conflicting beneficiary figures and provide verifiable evidence of the payments made.

“Until the Tinubu administration reconciles these figures and produces a verifiable payment trail, Nigerians are entitled to keep asking: where did the five million households disappear to?

“Did they graduate from poverty, vanish from the social register, or simply disappear because government propaganda ran ahead of the truth?,” he asked.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Suspected thugs disrupt Ondo Speaker’s impeachment bid

Published

on

Members of the Ondo State House of Assembly on Thursday held a parliamentary meeting as part of moves to impeach the Speaker, Olamide Oladiji.

However, the lawmakers’ plan to carry out the impeachment on the floor of the House was unsuccessful following the appearance of three unknown men, alleged to be political thugs, at the Assembly complex.

It was gathered that it took the intervention of policemen from the state command to drive the men out of the complex.

The legislators, however, continued with a parliamentary meeting on the premises of the Assembly complex.

One of the legislators, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the meeting was strategic and centred on the removal of the Speaker, adding that “the man is gone already.”

He alleged that the unknown men were thugs sent to prevent the plenary from holding.

“He (the embattled Speaker) sent thugs to the Assembly to attack us, but he was disappointed. We sent them out, but we did not hold plenary again. But we will still meet to impeach him,” he stated.

The Assembly has been engulfed in crisis for the past few weeks, with 21 of its 26 members reportedly signing a notice for the Speaker’s impeachment over allegations of financial misconduct.

The Speaker was accused of diverting N44m meant for the reordering of the budget of the Ondo State Oil Producing Areas Development Commission.

Consequently, the aggrieved lawmakers gave the Speaker a deadline to resign or face impeachment on the floor of the House.

See also  Full Details - Fubara withdraws from Rivers APC governorship primary

However, the impeachment move was stalled following interventions by Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa and the leadership of the All Progressives Congress.

Oladiji has denied the allegations, insisting that nothing of such happened.

Speaking with our correspondent on the telephone shortly before the meeting, the Chairman of the House Committee on Information, Olatunji Fabiyi, said the impeachment would be carried out “definitely.”

He said, “We have been hearing news that we have abandoned the process. This is a lie and misinformation. We are still on it; he can’t be our Speaker again.

“Although the governor has been speaking with some of us, that does not stop the impeachment. There is no going back.”

Reacting, the embattled Speaker denied sending thugs to the Assembly, saying the men were members of his constituency who came to the complex for another purpose and had no intention of disrupting the lawmakers’ activities.

Oladiji also insisted that the matter had been resolved and that there was no longer any impeachment process.

He said, “There’s nothing like an impeachment process because the issue has been resolved and there is no impeachment.

“The governor and other leaders of the party have already intervened, and today we were supposed to have our parliamentary meeting.

“I have about three of my youth leaders whom I invited to come and pick up forms for recruitment, but, unknowingly to them, they did not know what was going on in the House of Assembly.

“Some of the members approached them and asked them why they were at the House of Assembly. They are not new and have been coming to the House of Assembly, but they insisted that they did not want to see them on the premises.

See also  1,000 abducted Nigerians: Families beg as kidnappers go silent

“I came out of my office and tried to pacify the members, telling them that they were my people who had been coming to the House of Assembly and had not harassed any member. But they said they did not want them and asked them to leave.

“So, there is nothing like an impeachment notice. There is nothing like an impeachment process, and we were able to resolve the whole matter.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending