Connect with us

Business

Dangote imported 1.46bn litres blended gasoline – NMDPRA

Published

on

The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority has revealed a growing reliance by Dangote Petroleum Refinery on imported gasoline blendstock, mainly to boost its refined fuel production, The PUNCH reports.

Latest industry data obtained from the NMDPRA’s Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Statistics for May 2026 and analysed by our correspondent on Sunday showed that the 650,000 barrels-per-day refinery imported about 1.46 billion litres of intermediates and gasoline blendstock between January and May this year, despite receiving volumes of domestic and imported crude oil.

The industry report showed that the refinery continued to supplement crude oil processing with imported intermediates, helping it sustain daily petrol production of 44.7 million litres and achieve an average capacity utilisation of 101.25 per cent in May.

It also indicates that the refinery continued to rely on imported intermediates and gasoline blendstock to optimise production of Premium Motor Spirit despite increased access to crude oil supplies.

The PUNCH reports that gasoline blendstock refers to intermediate petroleum products used in refining operations to produce finished petrol that meets required quality and environmental specifications.

The product, rather than being sold directly to consumers, serves as an intermediate feedstock that is blended with other refinery streams and additives to produce Premium Motor Spirit that meets required quality, octane and environmental specifications.

The blendstocks can be mixed with products generated from crude oil refining to increase petrol output, improve fuel quality and enhance refining flexibility. Common gasoline blendstocks include reformate, alkylate, naphtha and other high-octane blending components.

By introducing gasoline blendstocks into the refining process, a refinery can increase the volume of finished petrol produced without relying solely on crude oil inputs. This can be particularly useful when domestic demand is strong or when refiners seek to maximise returns from specific products.

In the case of Dangote Refinery, the NMDPRA data suggest that imported blendstocks may be helping the facility sustain high petrol output and reach its nameplate capacity of 650,000 barrels per day.

An analysis of the report by our correspondent showed that Dangote Refinery imported 658.31 million litres of gasoline blendstock in January, 306.89 million litres in February, 102.35 million litres in March, 147.37 million litres in April and 240.59 million litres in May.

The cumulative volume imported during the five-month period stood at approximately 1.46 billion litres. The latest data showed that after three consecutive months of decline between January and March, the refinery increased its blendstock intake in April and May, signalling stronger feedstock purchases as production activities expanded.

The May volume of 240.59 million litres represented a 63.3 per cent increase from the 147.37 million litres imported in April. The development comes as the refinery sustained high utilisation rates and continued to dominate Nigeria’s domestic fuel supply market.

See also  42% of SMEs can’t last a month without income — Moniepoint

According to the NMDPRA report, the refinery operated at an average capacity utilisation of 101.25 per cent in May, underscoring strong operational performance at the facility.

The report further showed that the refinery produced an average of 44.7 million litres of Premium Motor Spirit per day during the month. Out of the total PMS produced, about 41.5 million litres per day were supplied to the domestic market, while closing stock stood at 9.4 million litres.

The refinery also produced 24.5 million litres of Automotive Gas Oil, commonly known as diesel, daily. Of this volume, 18.2 million litres were supplied locally while 6.5 million litres were exported. For aviation fuel, the refinery recorded daily production of 21.9 million litres. Domestic supply stood at 2.8 million litres per day, while exports reached 17.5 million litres daily.

Further analysis of the NMDPRA data showed that the refinery continued to receive a combination of domestic and imported crude oil feedstock. In May, domestic crude supplied to refineries stood at 15.84 million barrels, while imported crude accounted for 2.08 million barrels, bringing total crude receipts to 17.92 million barrels.

This compares with total crude receipts of 18.37 million barrels in April, made up of 17.96 million barrels of domestic crude and 410,000 barrels of imported crude. The figures suggest that despite improvements in local crude supply, imported feedstocks and intermediates remain an important component of the refinery’s operations.

On a comparison of imported gasoline feedstock and capacity output, the data suggests that Dangote Petroleum Refinery is increasingly deploying imported gasoline blendstock as a strategic feedstock to maximise petrol production and sustain operations at levels close to, and even above, its installed refining capacity.

Total crude receipts increased from 9.53 million barrels in January to a peak of 20.92 million barrels in March before moderating to 17.92 million barrels in May.

In January, when crude receipts stood at 9.53 million barrels, Dangote recorded its highest gasoline blendstock import volume of the year at 658.31 million litres. The high level of imports during the period likely reflected efforts by the refinery to supplement feedstock availability and maintain product output as crude supply arrangements were still being stabilised.

As crude supplies improved in February and March, the refinery’s dependence on imported blendstock declined sharply. Total crude intake rose to 13.11 million barrels in February and further to 20.92 million barrels in March, while gasoline blendstock imports dropped from 306.89 million litres in February to just 102.35 million litres in March, the lowest level recorded during the five-month period.

See also  FG to disburse ₦6.3bn interest-free loans to 21,000 flood victims

The pattern suggested that increased access to crude oil reduced the refinery’s immediate need for imported gasoline components, allowing more products to be generated directly from refining operations.

However, the trend changed again in April and May. Despite maintaining strong crude receipts of 18.37 million barrels in April and 17.92 million barrels in May, the refinery increased its intake of gasoline blendstock from 147.37 million litres in April to 240.59 million litres in May, representing a 63.3 per cent rise within one month.

The increase coincided with some of the refinery’s strongest operational performance indicators since the commencement of production.

According to the NMDPRA report, Dangote Refinery achieved an average capacity utilisation rate of 101.25 per cent in May, surpassing its installed nameplate capacity. The refinery also produced 44.7 million litres of Premium Motor Spirit daily during the month, while supplying 41.5 million litres per day to the domestic market.

With a nameplate processing capacity of 650,000 barrels per day, the refinery would require about 20.15 million barrels of crude to operate at full capacity throughout a 31-day month. However, total crude receipts in May stood at 17.92 million barrels, below that threshold.

Yet, despite receiving less crude than the volume theoretically required for full-capacity operations, the refinery still reported utilisation above 100 per cent, suggesting that imported intermediates and gasoline blendstock played a complementary role in boosting finished product output.

The latest statistics also highlighted the continued absence of contributions from state-owned refineries. According to the report, the Port Harcourt Refining Company, Warri Refining and Petrochemical Company and Kaduna Refining and Petrochemical Company were all classified as being under shutdown status as of May 2026.

Their inactivity leaves Dangote Refinery as the country’s major operational refining hub and the largest supplier of locally refined petroleum products.

The refinery’s growing reliance on gasoline blendstock imports comes amid ongoing efforts by the Federal Government to achieve energy security, reduce dependence on imported refined products, and increase domestic refining capacity.

Since commencing large-scale operations, the Dangote Refinery has significantly altered Nigeria’s fuel supply landscape by reducing petrol imports and increasing local production, although the latest figures indicate that imported intermediates continue to play a strategic role in sustaining output levels.

With PMS production remaining above 44 million litres daily and blendstock imports rising again in May, the refinery appears to be strengthening its feedstock position as it seeks to consolidate its role in supplying Nigeria’s fuel requirements and expanding exports to regional markets.

Commenting, a Professor of Energy at the University of Lagos, Dayo Ayoade, explained that gasoline blendstocks are unfinished petroleum streams imported by refineries to enhance fuel quality, optimise operations and increase output.

See also  Recapitalised banks poised to drive Nigeria’s $1trn economy ambition

Ayoade, speaking in an interview on Sunday, noted that the importation of blendstocks could help refineries produce higher-quality fuel that complies with modern environmental standards.

He further explained that the strategy also enables refineries to maximise the efficiency of their processing units and sustain production levels.

He said, “Gasoline feedstocks are unfinished petroleum streams such as straight run naphtha, butane, reformate, fluid catalytic gasoline and different types of streams that are basically combined and blended eventually to meet the regulatory standards of Premium motor spirit, which the Petroleum Industry Act alludes to.

“This is actually common practice all over the world; there is no issue. It is not cheating or any problems. Like all refineries in the world, blended gasoline feedstock will allow a refinery to improve the quality of its petroleum products, e.g., Euro V quality fuel that has low sulphur, which is the acceptable type of fuel we need in the market now.”

The energy expert added that the feedstocks provide flexibility for refiners to adjust output in response to market demand.

He added, “It is also used to optimise the operational base of the refinery because they use it to maximise the output of the refinery units like the catalytic crackers or hydrocarbon crackers to ensure that they are producing.

“The refinery also wants the secondary unit to work at full capacity so when they import the kind of blends, it will allow the refinery to continue to work, especially where crude supply is not as stable as you would want it to be.”

However, Ayoade said the key concern should be the economic implications of continued importation, particularly its impact on foreign exchange. He warned that the development could also fuel misconceptions about the refinery’s operations.

“Basically, that feedstock gives the refinery the option of flexibility too. They keep adjusting the mixtures to produce different products which are needed for the domestic and international markets.

“It is not a bad thing. The only issue is what is likely the production impact. There are larger consequences of costs. The refinery is now at capacity, but the importation means we are leaking foreign exchange.

“So money is leaving Nigeria to buy things from international markets and then being exposed to the risks of the international market. The importation also allows detractors or enemies of the refinery to say that the refinery is importing finished PMS, which is not true.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Restoring fuel subsidy will reverse Nigeria’s economic gains

Published

on

The renewed call for the restoration of petrol subsidy under any guise demands a clear-eyed examination of what Nigeria has gained from reform and what the country would have to surrender by reversing course.

The scale of the problem is important to remember. In 2022, when Nigeria was struggling with declining oil production and weak revenues, the country spent about $10 billion on fuel subsidies. The World Bank also warned that the subsidy was consuming resources that could otherwise have gone into education, healthcare, infrastructure and social protection.

This is the system that the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu inherited and boldly decided to change.

At the Federal Government’s recent presentation of “Nigeria’s Reform Scorecard: The Benefits, Costs and Harms Prevented,” the Honourable Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Dr Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed that subsidy savings mobilised N15.8tn in resources for the Federation between June 2023 and December 2025.

Of this amount, approximately N5.43tn accrued to the Federal Government, N6.52tn to states and N3.88tn to local governments.

It is important to explain these figures honestly. The N15.8tn is not sitting in a government account as a separate pool of cash called “subsidy savings.” It represents resources released within the Federation’s wider fiscal system and made available across the three tiers of government.

The additional resources available to states and local governments have strengthened their capacity to meet salaries and pensions obligations and to invest in infrastructure and essential services, including primary healthcare, basic education, roads and other needs. At the federal level, the broader fiscal space created by the reforms has supported major investments and obligations that would have been considerably more difficult to sustain under the old subsidy regime.

The Federal Government’s Reform Scorecard records approximately N6.47tn in additional expenditure on strategic infrastructure, covering major investments in transport, housing, agriculture, security and other strategic projects. These include major national corridors such as the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway, and the Trans-Sahara Superhighway.

The reforms have also made room for significant investments in human capital and social support. Over 10 million Nigerian households have benefited from social transfers. The administration has also extended more than N400bn towards landmark social investment initiatives like the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, NELFUND (N223.8bn), the MOFI Real Estate Investment Fund, MREIF (N150bn) and the Nigerian Consumer Credit Corporation, CREDICORP (N50bn).

Renewed domestic and foreign investor confidence founded on the reforms has helped make the Nigerian stock market the world’s best-performing in 2026, pushed the external reserves to the highest level in almost 20 years, and helped the country grow oil production to exceed its OPEC quota for the first time in years.

The additional fiscal space has also supported wage adjustments, minimum-wage obligations and pensions, while expanding the capacity for investments in education, healthcare, agriculture, electricity, security and other critical areas of national development.

Nigeria is also entering a new phase in its petroleum sector, with marked expansion in domestic refining capacity. Reversing policy now will undermine this progress and introduce fresh uncertainty for investors at precisely the time Nigeria should be consolidating domestic refining and strengthening energy security.

See also  Recapitalised banks poised to drive Nigeria’s $1trn economy ambition

Our Reform Scorecard also assesses the economic harm that the reforms have helped Nigeria avert. Had the subsidy regime remained unaddressed, petrol scarcity would have returned, pushing prices above N3,000 per litre on the black market. The legacy Ways and Means financing, which stood at about N30 trillion in May 2023 and has since been curtailed, would have doubled to N60 trillion or more. The Scorecard projects that, without the reforms, the inherited situation of 27 States unable to reliably pay salaries would undoubtedly have worsened.

There is another important argument being overlooked. Nigeria already carries a second energy subsidy, on electricity consumption, which cost the country an additional N3.14tn between June 2023 and December 2025. This subsidy helps bridge the gap between actual power production costs and the capped tariffs paid by most consumers. Reintroducing a petrol consumption subsidy on top of this would deal a double blow to Nigeria’s fiscal position.

The above illustrates an important point: restoring the subsidy would almost instantly return Nigeria to the economic conditions of 2022, recreating the same fiscal pressures, distortions, scarcity and incentives for arbitrage that made the old system unsustainable in the first place.

We are not claiming that the reforms have solved all of Nigeria’s economic challenges; there is indeed still much work to be done to translate improved fiscal capacity into better services, jobs, infrastructure and living standards. But the proper response to the hardship associated with reform is not to dismantle the reform; it is to accelerate the benefits – which remains what the Tinubu administration is resolutely focused on.The objective is clear: to move public resources away from subsidising consumption and towards investing in the Nigerian people and the productive foundations of lasting prosperity.

This is also why the debate over restoring subsidy must ultimately come down to hard choices. Do we restore petrol subsidy, or sustain student loans and consumer credit for young Nigerians? Do we restore subsidy, or preserve higher allocations to states and local governments? Do we restore subsidy, or continue funding roads, rail, power and security? Do we restore subsidy, or strengthen the fiscal capacity required to expand healthcare, education and social protection for vulnerable Nigerians?

It is equally significant that the Organised Private Sector and the wider economic community have cautioned against reversing the reform, recognising that fiscal sustainability, policy stability and a competitive downstream petroleum sector are essential to investment, job creation and economic growth.

Nigeria cannot build tomorrow’s economy by returning to yesterday’s unsustainable subsidy regime. We have moved beyond that model.

We do not downplay or deny the challenges associated with subsidy removal and other major reforms. President Bola Tinubu and his administration are daily working – and succeeding – at translating these sacrifices into improved living standards, stronger public services and greater economic opportunities for the Nigerian people.

Idris is the Minister of Information and National OrientationRestoring fuel subsidy will reverse Nigeria’s economic gains

The renewed call for the restoration of petrol subsidy under any guise demands a clear-eyed examination of what Nigeria has gained from reform and what the country would have to surrender by reversing course.

See also  FG to disburse ₦6.3bn interest-free loans to 21,000 flood victims

The scale of the problem is important to remember. In 2022, when Nigeria was struggling with declining oil production and weak revenues, the country spent about $10 billion on fuel subsidies. The World Bank also warned that the subsidy was consuming resources that could otherwise have gone into education, healthcare, infrastructure and social protection.

This is the system that the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu inherited and boldly decided to change.

At the Federal Government’s recent presentation of “Nigeria’s Reform Scorecard: The Benefits, Costs and Harms Prevented,” the Honourable Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Dr Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed that subsidy savings mobilised N15.8tn in resources for the Federation between June 2023 and December 2025.

Of this amount, approximately N5.43tn accrued to the Federal Government, N6.52tn to states and N3.88tn to local governments.

It is important to explain these figures honestly. The N15.8tn is not sitting in a government account as a separate pool of cash called “subsidy savings.” It represents resources released within the Federation’s wider fiscal system and made available across the three tiers of government.

The additional resources available to states and local governments have strengthened their capacity to meet salaries and pensions obligations and to invest in infrastructure and essential services, including primary healthcare, basic education, roads and other needs. At the federal level, the broader fiscal space created by the reforms has supported major investments and obligations that would have been considerably more difficult to sustain under the old subsidy regime.

The Federal Government’s Reform Scorecard records approximately N6.47tn in additional expenditure on strategic infrastructure, covering major investments in transport, housing, agriculture, security and other strategic projects. These include major national corridors such as the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway, and the Trans-Sahara Superhighway.

The reforms have also made room for significant investments in human capital and social support. Over 10 million Nigerian households have benefited from social transfers. The administration has also extended more than N400bn towards landmark social investment initiatives like the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, NELFUND (N223.8bn), the MOFI Real Estate Investment Fund, MREIF (N150bn) and the Nigerian Consumer Credit Corporation, CREDICORP (N50bn).

Renewed domestic and foreign investor confidence founded on the reforms has helped make the Nigerian stock market the world’s best-performing in 2026, pushed the external reserves to the highest level in almost 20 years, and helped the country grow oil production to exceed its OPEC quota for the first time in years.

The additional fiscal space has also supported wage adjustments, minimum-wage obligations and pensions, while expanding the capacity for investments in education, healthcare, agriculture, electricity, security and other critical areas of national development.

Nigeria is also entering a new phase in its petroleum sector, with marked expansion in domestic refining capacity. Reversing policy now will undermine this progress and introduce fresh uncertainty for investors at precisely the time Nigeria should be consolidating domestic refining and strengthening energy security.

See also  Nigerian Kobo and Naira Coins (1991–1993 Series): A Glimpse into Monetary Heritage (PHOTOS)

Our Reform Scorecard also assesses the economic harm that the reforms have helped Nigeria avert. Had the subsidy regime remained unaddressed, petrol scarcity would have returned, pushing prices above ₦3,000 per litre on the black market. The legacy Ways and Means financing, which stood at about ₦30 trillion in May 2023 and has since been curtailed, would have doubled to ₦60 trillion or more. The Scorecard projects that, without the reforms, the inherited situation of 27 States unable to reliably pay salaries would undoubtedly have worsened.

There is another important argument being overlooked. Nigeria already carries a second energy subsidy, on electricity consumption, which cost the country an additional N3.14tn between June 2023 and December 2025. This subsidy helps bridge the gap between actual power production costs and the capped tariffs paid by most consumers. Reintroducing a petrol consumption subsidy on top of this would deal a double blow to Nigeria’s fiscal position.

The above illustrates an important point: restoring the subsidy would almost instantly return Nigeria to the economic conditions of 2022, recreating the same fiscal pressures, distortions, scarcity and incentives for arbitrage that made the old system unsustainable in the first place.

We are not claiming that the reforms have solved all of Nigeria’s economic challenges; there is indeed still much work to be done to translate improved fiscal capacity into better services, jobs, infrastructure and living standards. But the proper response to the hardship associated with reform is not to dismantle the reform; it is to accelerate the benefits – which remains what the Tinubu administration is resolutely focused on.

The objective is clear: to move public resources away from subsidising consumption and towards investing in the Nigerian people and the productive foundations of lasting prosperity.

This is also why the debate over restoring subsidy must ultimately come down to hard choices. Do we restore petrol subsidy, or sustain student loans and consumer credit for young Nigerians? Do we restore subsidy or preserve higher allocations to states and local governments? Do we restore subsidy or continue funding roads, rail, power and security? Do we restore subsidy, or strengthen the fiscal capacity required to expand healthcare, education and social protection for vulnerable Nigerians?

It is equally significant that the Organised Private Sector and the wider economic community have cautioned against reversing the reform, recognising that fiscal sustainability, policy stability and a competitive downstream petroleum sector are essential to investment, job creation and economic growth.

Nigeria cannot build tomorrow’s economy by returning to yesterday’s unsustainable subsidy regime. We have moved beyond that model.

We do not downplay or deny the challenges associated with subsidy removal and other major reforms. President Bola Tinubu and his administration are daily working – and succeeding – at translating these sacrifices into improved living standards, stronger public services and greater economic opportunities for the Nigerian people.

Idris is the Minister of Information and National Orientation.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Dangote refinery expands free fuel delivery to four states

Published

on

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery says it has expanded its free petroleum products delivery initiative to Kano, Imo, Anambra and Nasarawa states, a move it says is expected to reduce distribution costs for independent petroleum marketers and create room for lower petrol prices.

According to a statement on Sunday, the initiative, which initially covered Lagos, Ogun, Rivers, Kaduna, Abuja and Delta states, is designed to bring petroleum products closer to marketers and retailers while eliminating the cost of transporting products over long distances from the refinery to different parts of the country.

By absorbing delivery costs, the refinery is reducing one of the major expenses embedded in the downstream petroleum products distribution chain.

Group Executive Director, Commercial Operations, Oil & Gas, WAEP and Fertiliser, Dangote Industries Limited, Fatima Aliko Dangote, said the initiative was aimed at ensuring that the benefits of domestic refining translated into savings for businesses and consumers.

“The value of domestic refining must ultimately be felt beyond the refinery gate. By absorbing the cost of delivering petroleum products to our customers, we are removing a significant component of the distribution burden and creating room for those savings to flow through the value chain to consumers. Our goal is to make fuel distribution more efficient, reduce avoidable costs and support more competitive pump prices across Nigeria.”

The expansion was reportedly welcomed by the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, which said the initiative would reduce some of the financial and logistical pressures confronting independent petroleum marketers and contribute to lower prices for consumers.

See also  Petrol nears N1,400/litre as Dangote hikes price

National Publicity Secretary and Public Relations Officer of IPMAN, Chinedu Ukadike, was quoted as saying that the initiative addressed a longstanding challenge in the petroleum products distribution chain, where marketers commit substantial funds to product purchases and may then wait for extended periods before their orders are loaded and transported.

“This gesture, if sustained, will be able to alleviate the sufferings of independent marketers. There has been the issue of financial hold-up, whereby marketers pay for products and are not loaded for days and weeks, and they suffer unnecessary hardship bringing the product down,” he stated.

According to him, the refinery’s delivery arrangement reduces the period for which marketers’ funds remain tied up, improves cash flow and allows businesses to deploy their capital more efficiently.

Dangote said the reduction in distribution costs is particularly significant for marketers supplying areas far from the refinery, as the transportation of petroleum products over long distances attracts additional expenses associated with haulage, vehicle operations, driver costs, insurance, road risks and other logistics.

It was stated that removing or reducing such costs could improve the economics of supplying distant markets and provide marketers with greater room to compete on retail prices.

The initiative also reduces the operational risks associated with moving large volumes of petroleum products over long distances by taking products closer to their destination markets.

The expansion comes as Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector continues to adjust to increased domestic refining capacity and a more competitive market environment.

The Dangote refinery, with a capacity of 700,000 barrels per day, has been supplying refined petroleum products to the domestic market while also expanding its presence in international markets.

Continue Reading

Business

Banks account for 92% of NFIU suspicious reports

Published

on

The Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit has disclosed that banks, fintech companies and other reporting entities submitted 42,082 Suspicious Transaction Reports to the agency in 2025.

The figure was contained in the NFIU’s 2025 Annual Report, which highlighted continued risks to Nigeria’s financial system and increased regulatory monitoring of transactions.

The agency also received 41,716,214 Currency Transaction Reports and 10,513 Suspicious Activity Reports during the year.

“During the review period, the NFIU received a total of 41,716,214 CTRs, 42,082 STRs, and 10,513 SARs,” the report stated.

The NFIU said its reporting framework covers threshold-based transactions, suspicious transactions and activities, as well as regulatory submissions relating to anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism financing and counter-proliferation financing compliance.

It noted that it collaborates with the Central Bank of Nigeria, National Insurance Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering to ensure that reporting entities comply with applicable regulations.

Deposit Money Banks accounted for the bulk of STR filings, submitting 38,715 reports, representing about 92 per cent of the total received from the various sectors.

Other Financial Institutions submitted 2,185 STRs, while Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions accounted for 1,029. Capital market operators and insurance companies filed 104 reports, while Virtual Asset Service Providers, including cryptocurrency-related businesses, submitted 49.

Banks also dominated Suspicious Activity Reports, contributing 8,313 of the 10,513 filings recorded in 2025. Other Financial Institutions accounted for 1,816, capital market and insurance companies filed 295, while Virtual Asset Service Providers submitted 89. The DNFBP sector recorded no SAR during the year.

See also  Recapitalised banks poised to drive Nigeria’s $1trn economy ambition

The report further showed that financial institutions filed more than 41.7 million Currency Transaction Reports. Deposit Money Banks accounted for 37,214,139 filings, equivalent to about 89.2 per cent of the total, while Other Financial Institutions submitted 4,212,466.

Capital market operators and insurance companies contributed 289,296 CTRs, while Virtual Asset Service Providers filed 313.

According to the NFIU, Section 11 of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act requires financial institutions to report transactions exceeding N5m for individuals and N10m for legal entities within seven days.

The agency added that Section 3(1) of the law mandates the reporting of incoming and outgoing transfers above $10,000 within 24 hours.

Data from the four quarters showed a steady rise in STR filings by banks. Reports increased from 9,134 in the first quarter to 9,658 in the second, 9,891 in the third and 10,032 in the fourth quarter.

Currency Transaction Reports from Deposit Money Banks followed a similar upward trend, rising from 7,040,493 in the first quarter to 8,197,292 in the second, 10,885,247 in the third and 11,091,107 in the fourth quarter.

Among Other Financial Institutions, STR filings stood at 451 in the first quarter and 432 in the second before climbing to 719 in the third and falling to 583 in the fourth.

The NFIU also reported increased activity among Virtual Asset Service Providers. The sector recorded no STRs during the first half of 2025 but filed 17 in the third quarter and 32 in the fourth quarter.

VASPs also submitted 28 SARs in the first quarter, 12 in the second, 24 in the third and 25 in the fourth. Their CTR filings emerged in the second half of the year, with 103 reports in the third quarter and 210 in the fourth.

See also  After Elumelu’s rebuke, Delta gov aide offers UBA staff member N500,000, ambassadorial deal

The agency disclosed that reporting entities submitted 28,133,909 reports involving Politically Exposed Persons during 2025.

Deposit Money Banks accounted for most of the PEP filings, recording 7,263,557 in the first quarter, 5,658,079 in the second, 6,235,585 in the third and 8,225,572 in the fourth.

Other Financial Institutions recorded a significant increase in PEP reports, rising from just 12 in the first quarter to 617,286 in the fourth quarter. Capital market and insurance institutions submitted 28,561 reports, while VASPs recorded none.

The NFIU also disclosed that its Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions Division conducted joint on-site examinations of 29 reporting entities in the Federal Capital Territory.

The entities were drawn from the real estate, casino, precious metals and stones dealing, and consultancy sectors.

According to the report, the exercise resulted in 20 new registrations on the RapidAML portal and subscriptions to NIGSAC, alongside the submission of 1,029 Suspicious Transaction Reports.

Despite the increased compliance activity, the number of STRs received in 2025 was significantly lower than the previous year. STR filings fell by 40,061, from 82,143 in 2024 to 42,082 in 2025, representing a decline of about 48.8 per cent.

Suspicious Activity Reports also dropped by 12,851, from 23,364 in 2024 to 10,513 in 2025, representing a reduction of approximately 55 per cent.

The contrasting figures indicate that while reporting entities recorded significantly higher volumes of threshold-based transactions and PEP disclosures in 2025, suspicious transaction and activity reports declined sharply compared with the previous year.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending