Connect with us

Business

Labour knocks govt as FAAC payouts hit N10.4tn

Published

on

Nigeria’s three tiers of government received a total of N10.45tn from the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) between January and May 2026, representing a 25.85 per cent increase from the N8.30tn shared in the corresponding period of 2025, as the Nigeria Labour Congress and private sector stakeholders criticised governments at all levels over worsening living conditions, infrastructure decay and rising insecurity.

An analysis by The PUNCH showed that the allocations to the Federal Government, 36 states, the Federal Capital Territory, and 774 Local Government Areas were distributed from the gross government revenue of N13.76tn realised during the period, up by 4.32 per cent from N13.19tn recorded in the first five months of 2025.

The increase in distributable revenue occurred amid stronger Value Added Tax collections, higher oil-related tax receipts, and an aggressive drive by the Nigeria Revenue Service to achieve its revenue target of approximately N40tn for the federation.

Analysis of FAAC data in 2026 showed that the Federal Government received N3.72tn from the five-month allocation, while state governments got N3.56tn. Local governments received N2.51tn, while the 13 oil-producing states shared N673.17bn as derivation revenue.

A breakdown of monthly allocations showed that the amount shared rose from N1.96tn in January 2026 to N2.30tn in May 2026.

Month-on-month, allocations declined by 3.37 per cent in February to N1.89tn, then rebounded by 7.50 per cent to N2.04tn in March. The distributable pool increased further by 10.85 per cent in April to N2.26tn and rose by another 1.91 per cent in May to N2.30tn.

Compared with the corresponding months of 2025, January 2026 allocation increased by 15.09 per cent from N1.70tn to N1.96tn. February rose by 12.87 per cent from N1.68tn to N1.89tn, while March jumped by 28.86 per cent from N1.58tn to N2.04tn.

April recorded a 34.35 per cent increase from N1.68tn to N2.26tn, while May rose by 38.55 per cent from N1.66tn to N2.30tn, indicating stronger revenue mobilisation as the year progressed.

Gross government revenue also climbed steadily. It stood at N2.59tn in January, declined to N2.23tn in February, before rising to N2.36tn in March, N3.18tn in April, and N3.40tn in May.

See also  PENGASSAN stops gas, crude supply to Dangote refinery

The Federal Government emerged as the largest beneficiary of the five-month allocation with N3.72tn, exceeding the total allocation to local governments by N1.21tn or 48.2 per cent. State governments received N3.56tn, which was N1.05tn or 41.8 per cent higher than the N2.51tn allocated to local councils.

The gap between the Federal Government and states remained relatively narrow, with the Federal Government receiving N160.71bn more than states during the period, representing about 4.5 per cent.

Labour reacts

In a phone interview with The PUNCH, reacting to the development, the Assistant General Secretary of the Nigeria Labour Congress, Chris Onyeka, said the increase in revenue had not translated into improved welfare for Nigerians.

“It is not the quantum of revenue available to the government that translates to impact on the welfare of citizens and workers,” Onyeka said. “It is the willingness of the people who occupy positions of leadership that determines how these resources impact the lives of the citizenry.”

He accused the three tiers of government of failing to channel public resources into projects that improve citizens’ lives.

He lamented the political problem, stating: “The answer is simply that 99 per cent of those in government will not let it impact positively on the lives of Nigerians. Because if they do, our lives will not be the way they are. Infrastructure all over the nation has deteriorated significantly.”

However, some states are performing above board. According to the NLC official, “It is only in one or two states where you see improvement because the people occupying positions of leadership have decided to allow some of the resources to touch the lives of the people.”

The labour leader argued that insecurity remained the biggest indicator of government failure despite rising revenues. “You cannot talk about infrastructure development or the welfare of the citizenry if you cannot address insecurity. If I cannot move from point A to point B without having my heart in my mouth, then you cannot talk about any other thing. The Constitution talks about the security and welfare of citizens. Security is paramount,” Onyeka said.

He added, “If I cannot go to my farm and come back safely, if I plant and cannot return to harvest, then it has multiplier effects on the welfare of the citizenry. Nigerians are scared. As you are saving money, you are also saving money for ransom payments.”

See also  Petrol remains N865 per litre amid Dangote’s free delivery

Onyeka lamented that workers had not benefited from the increased allocations, citing soaring transportation, housing and food costs.

“We do not feel better off. We do not use better roads. We do not pay cheaper transport fares. We do not have better access to health care, education or nutrition. We cannot feed ourselves better. So how do you measure the impact?” he asked.

He further declared, “Nigeria is not working. Nigeria is not working.”

Also commenting, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, said some states had used increased revenues to support citizens, but many had failed to prioritise projects that directly improve livelihoods.

“Some states have invested in projects that really impact the lives of the people, such as providing mass transit, supporting farmers with fertiliser and inputs, investing in health care services and developing rural communities,” Yusuf said.

However, he noted that many governments focused on projects with limited impact on living standards. “Many states prefer to embark on physical projects people can see, like express roads, flyovers and airports. Those things are not bad, but their developmental impacts in terms of livelihoods and living standards are very limited,” Yusuf stated.

He warned against a situation where rising government revenues coexist with worsening poverty. “States should focus on things that directly impact livelihoods and welfare so that we do not have a situation where there is prosperity in terms of revenue and fiscal outcomes while so many people are left behind. Inclusion is very critical,” Yusuf said.

The economist also urged state governments to take greater responsibility for security, saying they should continue supporting security agencies rather than leaving the burden solely to the Federal Government.

See also  US-Iran war: Marketers, Dangote trade words over petrol price

New sharing formula

The growth in allocations comes months after the implementation of a new VAT sharing formula under the tax reforms signed into law by President Bola Tinubu. The reforms reduced the Federal Government’s VAT share from 15 per cent to 10 per cent while increasing the states’ share from 50 per cent to 55 per cent.

The PUNCH had earlier reported that states received N1.18tn from VAT revenue in the first quarter of 2026, an increase of N214.78bn or 22.35 per cent compared to the corresponding period of 2025.

The Federal Capital Territory also made history in January 2026 when it received N15.8bn from the VAT pool for the first time despite being a consistent contributor to VAT collections.

However, despite the improvement in allocations, revenue generation has remained below government expectations. The PUNCH previously reported that the Nigeria Revenue Service generated N7.44tn in the first quarter of 2026 against a target of N9.68tn, leaving a shortfall of N2.24tn and achieving a performance rate of 76.87 per cent.

The NRS has since intensified compliance enforcement. Speaking recently at a tax compliance workshop in Abuja, Executive Director of the Government and Large Taxpayer Directorate, Amina Ado, warned that unremitted taxes by ministries, departments, agencies, states and local governments could trigger direct deductions from their FAAC allocations.

Ado said, “Section 80 empowers the Accountant General of the Federation to deduct all unremitted revenues due from any MDA or government from its budgetary allocation and remit such deductions to the relevant tax authority, whether a federal or a state tax authority, after a specific due process has been followed.”

She added, “If a federal, state, or local government treats that withholding tax as someone else’s responsibility, the law provides a mechanism for that neglect to return immediately through deductions from allocations by the Accountant General of the Federation.”

According to her, the agency is targeting about N40tn in tax revenue and sees stronger compliance by public institutions as critical to achieving the goal.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Restoring fuel subsidy will reverse Nigeria’s economic gains

Published

on

The renewed call for the restoration of petrol subsidy under any guise demands a clear-eyed examination of what Nigeria has gained from reform and what the country would have to surrender by reversing course.

The scale of the problem is important to remember. In 2022, when Nigeria was struggling with declining oil production and weak revenues, the country spent about $10 billion on fuel subsidies. The World Bank also warned that the subsidy was consuming resources that could otherwise have gone into education, healthcare, infrastructure and social protection.

This is the system that the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu inherited and boldly decided to change.

At the Federal Government’s recent presentation of “Nigeria’s Reform Scorecard: The Benefits, Costs and Harms Prevented,” the Honourable Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Dr Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed that subsidy savings mobilised N15.8tn in resources for the Federation between June 2023 and December 2025.

Of this amount, approximately N5.43tn accrued to the Federal Government, N6.52tn to states and N3.88tn to local governments.

It is important to explain these figures honestly. The N15.8tn is not sitting in a government account as a separate pool of cash called “subsidy savings.” It represents resources released within the Federation’s wider fiscal system and made available across the three tiers of government.

The additional resources available to states and local governments have strengthened their capacity to meet salaries and pensions obligations and to invest in infrastructure and essential services, including primary healthcare, basic education, roads and other needs. At the federal level, the broader fiscal space created by the reforms has supported major investments and obligations that would have been considerably more difficult to sustain under the old subsidy regime.

The Federal Government’s Reform Scorecard records approximately N6.47tn in additional expenditure on strategic infrastructure, covering major investments in transport, housing, agriculture, security and other strategic projects. These include major national corridors such as the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway, and the Trans-Sahara Superhighway.

The reforms have also made room for significant investments in human capital and social support. Over 10 million Nigerian households have benefited from social transfers. The administration has also extended more than N400bn towards landmark social investment initiatives like the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, NELFUND (N223.8bn), the MOFI Real Estate Investment Fund, MREIF (N150bn) and the Nigerian Consumer Credit Corporation, CREDICORP (N50bn).

Renewed domestic and foreign investor confidence founded on the reforms has helped make the Nigerian stock market the world’s best-performing in 2026, pushed the external reserves to the highest level in almost 20 years, and helped the country grow oil production to exceed its OPEC quota for the first time in years.

The additional fiscal space has also supported wage adjustments, minimum-wage obligations and pensions, while expanding the capacity for investments in education, healthcare, agriculture, electricity, security and other critical areas of national development.

Nigeria is also entering a new phase in its petroleum sector, with marked expansion in domestic refining capacity. Reversing policy now will undermine this progress and introduce fresh uncertainty for investors at precisely the time Nigeria should be consolidating domestic refining and strengthening energy security.

See also  PENGASSAN-Dangote rift widens over salary suspension

Our Reform Scorecard also assesses the economic harm that the reforms have helped Nigeria avert. Had the subsidy regime remained unaddressed, petrol scarcity would have returned, pushing prices above N3,000 per litre on the black market. The legacy Ways and Means financing, which stood at about N30 trillion in May 2023 and has since been curtailed, would have doubled to N60 trillion or more. The Scorecard projects that, without the reforms, the inherited situation of 27 States unable to reliably pay salaries would undoubtedly have worsened.

There is another important argument being overlooked. Nigeria already carries a second energy subsidy, on electricity consumption, which cost the country an additional N3.14tn between June 2023 and December 2025. This subsidy helps bridge the gap between actual power production costs and the capped tariffs paid by most consumers. Reintroducing a petrol consumption subsidy on top of this would deal a double blow to Nigeria’s fiscal position.

The above illustrates an important point: restoring the subsidy would almost instantly return Nigeria to the economic conditions of 2022, recreating the same fiscal pressures, distortions, scarcity and incentives for arbitrage that made the old system unsustainable in the first place.

We are not claiming that the reforms have solved all of Nigeria’s economic challenges; there is indeed still much work to be done to translate improved fiscal capacity into better services, jobs, infrastructure and living standards. But the proper response to the hardship associated with reform is not to dismantle the reform; it is to accelerate the benefits – which remains what the Tinubu administration is resolutely focused on.The objective is clear: to move public resources away from subsidising consumption and towards investing in the Nigerian people and the productive foundations of lasting prosperity.

This is also why the debate over restoring subsidy must ultimately come down to hard choices. Do we restore petrol subsidy, or sustain student loans and consumer credit for young Nigerians? Do we restore subsidy, or preserve higher allocations to states and local governments? Do we restore subsidy, or continue funding roads, rail, power and security? Do we restore subsidy, or strengthen the fiscal capacity required to expand healthcare, education and social protection for vulnerable Nigerians?

It is equally significant that the Organised Private Sector and the wider economic community have cautioned against reversing the reform, recognising that fiscal sustainability, policy stability and a competitive downstream petroleum sector are essential to investment, job creation and economic growth.

Nigeria cannot build tomorrow’s economy by returning to yesterday’s unsustainable subsidy regime. We have moved beyond that model.

We do not downplay or deny the challenges associated with subsidy removal and other major reforms. President Bola Tinubu and his administration are daily working – and succeeding – at translating these sacrifices into improved living standards, stronger public services and greater economic opportunities for the Nigerian people.

Idris is the Minister of Information and National OrientationRestoring fuel subsidy will reverse Nigeria’s economic gains

The renewed call for the restoration of petrol subsidy under any guise demands a clear-eyed examination of what Nigeria has gained from reform and what the country would have to surrender by reversing course.

See also  US-Iran war: Marketers, Dangote trade words over petrol price

The scale of the problem is important to remember. In 2022, when Nigeria was struggling with declining oil production and weak revenues, the country spent about $10 billion on fuel subsidies. The World Bank also warned that the subsidy was consuming resources that could otherwise have gone into education, healthcare, infrastructure and social protection.

This is the system that the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu inherited and boldly decided to change.

At the Federal Government’s recent presentation of “Nigeria’s Reform Scorecard: The Benefits, Costs and Harms Prevented,” the Honourable Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Dr Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed that subsidy savings mobilised N15.8tn in resources for the Federation between June 2023 and December 2025.

Of this amount, approximately N5.43tn accrued to the Federal Government, N6.52tn to states and N3.88tn to local governments.

It is important to explain these figures honestly. The N15.8tn is not sitting in a government account as a separate pool of cash called “subsidy savings.” It represents resources released within the Federation’s wider fiscal system and made available across the three tiers of government.

The additional resources available to states and local governments have strengthened their capacity to meet salaries and pensions obligations and to invest in infrastructure and essential services, including primary healthcare, basic education, roads and other needs. At the federal level, the broader fiscal space created by the reforms has supported major investments and obligations that would have been considerably more difficult to sustain under the old subsidy regime.

The Federal Government’s Reform Scorecard records approximately N6.47tn in additional expenditure on strategic infrastructure, covering major investments in transport, housing, agriculture, security and other strategic projects. These include major national corridors such as the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway, and the Trans-Sahara Superhighway.

The reforms have also made room for significant investments in human capital and social support. Over 10 million Nigerian households have benefited from social transfers. The administration has also extended more than N400bn towards landmark social investment initiatives like the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, NELFUND (N223.8bn), the MOFI Real Estate Investment Fund, MREIF (N150bn) and the Nigerian Consumer Credit Corporation, CREDICORP (N50bn).

Renewed domestic and foreign investor confidence founded on the reforms has helped make the Nigerian stock market the world’s best-performing in 2026, pushed the external reserves to the highest level in almost 20 years, and helped the country grow oil production to exceed its OPEC quota for the first time in years.

The additional fiscal space has also supported wage adjustments, minimum-wage obligations and pensions, while expanding the capacity for investments in education, healthcare, agriculture, electricity, security and other critical areas of national development.

Nigeria is also entering a new phase in its petroleum sector, with marked expansion in domestic refining capacity. Reversing policy now will undermine this progress and introduce fresh uncertainty for investors at precisely the time Nigeria should be consolidating domestic refining and strengthening energy security.

See also  Tax reforms will modernise, boost economy – G24 chief

Our Reform Scorecard also assesses the economic harm that the reforms have helped Nigeria avert. Had the subsidy regime remained unaddressed, petrol scarcity would have returned, pushing prices above ₦3,000 per litre on the black market. The legacy Ways and Means financing, which stood at about ₦30 trillion in May 2023 and has since been curtailed, would have doubled to ₦60 trillion or more. The Scorecard projects that, without the reforms, the inherited situation of 27 States unable to reliably pay salaries would undoubtedly have worsened.

There is another important argument being overlooked. Nigeria already carries a second energy subsidy, on electricity consumption, which cost the country an additional N3.14tn between June 2023 and December 2025. This subsidy helps bridge the gap between actual power production costs and the capped tariffs paid by most consumers. Reintroducing a petrol consumption subsidy on top of this would deal a double blow to Nigeria’s fiscal position.

The above illustrates an important point: restoring the subsidy would almost instantly return Nigeria to the economic conditions of 2022, recreating the same fiscal pressures, distortions, scarcity and incentives for arbitrage that made the old system unsustainable in the first place.

We are not claiming that the reforms have solved all of Nigeria’s economic challenges; there is indeed still much work to be done to translate improved fiscal capacity into better services, jobs, infrastructure and living standards. But the proper response to the hardship associated with reform is not to dismantle the reform; it is to accelerate the benefits – which remains what the Tinubu administration is resolutely focused on.

The objective is clear: to move public resources away from subsidising consumption and towards investing in the Nigerian people and the productive foundations of lasting prosperity.

This is also why the debate over restoring subsidy must ultimately come down to hard choices. Do we restore petrol subsidy, or sustain student loans and consumer credit for young Nigerians? Do we restore subsidy or preserve higher allocations to states and local governments? Do we restore subsidy or continue funding roads, rail, power and security? Do we restore subsidy, or strengthen the fiscal capacity required to expand healthcare, education and social protection for vulnerable Nigerians?

It is equally significant that the Organised Private Sector and the wider economic community have cautioned against reversing the reform, recognising that fiscal sustainability, policy stability and a competitive downstream petroleum sector are essential to investment, job creation and economic growth.

Nigeria cannot build tomorrow’s economy by returning to yesterday’s unsustainable subsidy regime. We have moved beyond that model.

We do not downplay or deny the challenges associated with subsidy removal and other major reforms. President Bola Tinubu and his administration are daily working – and succeeding – at translating these sacrifices into improved living standards, stronger public services and greater economic opportunities for the Nigerian people.

Idris is the Minister of Information and National Orientation.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Dangote refinery expands free fuel delivery to four states

Published

on

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery says it has expanded its free petroleum products delivery initiative to Kano, Imo, Anambra and Nasarawa states, a move it says is expected to reduce distribution costs for independent petroleum marketers and create room for lower petrol prices.

According to a statement on Sunday, the initiative, which initially covered Lagos, Ogun, Rivers, Kaduna, Abuja and Delta states, is designed to bring petroleum products closer to marketers and retailers while eliminating the cost of transporting products over long distances from the refinery to different parts of the country.

By absorbing delivery costs, the refinery is reducing one of the major expenses embedded in the downstream petroleum products distribution chain.

Group Executive Director, Commercial Operations, Oil & Gas, WAEP and Fertiliser, Dangote Industries Limited, Fatima Aliko Dangote, said the initiative was aimed at ensuring that the benefits of domestic refining translated into savings for businesses and consumers.

“The value of domestic refining must ultimately be felt beyond the refinery gate. By absorbing the cost of delivering petroleum products to our customers, we are removing a significant component of the distribution burden and creating room for those savings to flow through the value chain to consumers. Our goal is to make fuel distribution more efficient, reduce avoidable costs and support more competitive pump prices across Nigeria.”

The expansion was reportedly welcomed by the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, which said the initiative would reduce some of the financial and logistical pressures confronting independent petroleum marketers and contribute to lower prices for consumers.

See also  Tax reforms will modernise, boost economy – G24 chief

National Publicity Secretary and Public Relations Officer of IPMAN, Chinedu Ukadike, was quoted as saying that the initiative addressed a longstanding challenge in the petroleum products distribution chain, where marketers commit substantial funds to product purchases and may then wait for extended periods before their orders are loaded and transported.

“This gesture, if sustained, will be able to alleviate the sufferings of independent marketers. There has been the issue of financial hold-up, whereby marketers pay for products and are not loaded for days and weeks, and they suffer unnecessary hardship bringing the product down,” he stated.

According to him, the refinery’s delivery arrangement reduces the period for which marketers’ funds remain tied up, improves cash flow and allows businesses to deploy their capital more efficiently.

Dangote said the reduction in distribution costs is particularly significant for marketers supplying areas far from the refinery, as the transportation of petroleum products over long distances attracts additional expenses associated with haulage, vehicle operations, driver costs, insurance, road risks and other logistics.

It was stated that removing or reducing such costs could improve the economics of supplying distant markets and provide marketers with greater room to compete on retail prices.

The initiative also reduces the operational risks associated with moving large volumes of petroleum products over long distances by taking products closer to their destination markets.

The expansion comes as Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector continues to adjust to increased domestic refining capacity and a more competitive market environment.

The Dangote refinery, with a capacity of 700,000 barrels per day, has been supplying refined petroleum products to the domestic market while also expanding its presence in international markets.

Continue Reading

Business

Banks account for 92% of NFIU suspicious reports

Published

on

The Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit has disclosed that banks, fintech companies and other reporting entities submitted 42,082 Suspicious Transaction Reports to the agency in 2025.

The figure was contained in the NFIU’s 2025 Annual Report, which highlighted continued risks to Nigeria’s financial system and increased regulatory monitoring of transactions.

The agency also received 41,716,214 Currency Transaction Reports and 10,513 Suspicious Activity Reports during the year.

“During the review period, the NFIU received a total of 41,716,214 CTRs, 42,082 STRs, and 10,513 SARs,” the report stated.

The NFIU said its reporting framework covers threshold-based transactions, suspicious transactions and activities, as well as regulatory submissions relating to anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism financing and counter-proliferation financing compliance.

It noted that it collaborates with the Central Bank of Nigeria, National Insurance Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering to ensure that reporting entities comply with applicable regulations.

Deposit Money Banks accounted for the bulk of STR filings, submitting 38,715 reports, representing about 92 per cent of the total received from the various sectors.

Other Financial Institutions submitted 2,185 STRs, while Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions accounted for 1,029. Capital market operators and insurance companies filed 104 reports, while Virtual Asset Service Providers, including cryptocurrency-related businesses, submitted 49.

Banks also dominated Suspicious Activity Reports, contributing 8,313 of the 10,513 filings recorded in 2025. Other Financial Institutions accounted for 1,816, capital market and insurance companies filed 295, while Virtual Asset Service Providers submitted 89. The DNFBP sector recorded no SAR during the year.

See also  Petrol remains N865 per litre amid Dangote’s free delivery

The report further showed that financial institutions filed more than 41.7 million Currency Transaction Reports. Deposit Money Banks accounted for 37,214,139 filings, equivalent to about 89.2 per cent of the total, while Other Financial Institutions submitted 4,212,466.

Capital market operators and insurance companies contributed 289,296 CTRs, while Virtual Asset Service Providers filed 313.

According to the NFIU, Section 11 of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act requires financial institutions to report transactions exceeding N5m for individuals and N10m for legal entities within seven days.

The agency added that Section 3(1) of the law mandates the reporting of incoming and outgoing transfers above $10,000 within 24 hours.

Data from the four quarters showed a steady rise in STR filings by banks. Reports increased from 9,134 in the first quarter to 9,658 in the second, 9,891 in the third and 10,032 in the fourth quarter.

Currency Transaction Reports from Deposit Money Banks followed a similar upward trend, rising from 7,040,493 in the first quarter to 8,197,292 in the second, 10,885,247 in the third and 11,091,107 in the fourth quarter.

Among Other Financial Institutions, STR filings stood at 451 in the first quarter and 432 in the second before climbing to 719 in the third and falling to 583 in the fourth.

The NFIU also reported increased activity among Virtual Asset Service Providers. The sector recorded no STRs during the first half of 2025 but filed 17 in the third quarter and 32 in the fourth quarter.

VASPs also submitted 28 SARs in the first quarter, 12 in the second, 24 in the third and 25 in the fourth. Their CTR filings emerged in the second half of the year, with 103 reports in the third quarter and 210 in the fourth.

See also  US emerges top supplier of crude to Nigeria — Report

The agency disclosed that reporting entities submitted 28,133,909 reports involving Politically Exposed Persons during 2025.

Deposit Money Banks accounted for most of the PEP filings, recording 7,263,557 in the first quarter, 5,658,079 in the second, 6,235,585 in the third and 8,225,572 in the fourth.

Other Financial Institutions recorded a significant increase in PEP reports, rising from just 12 in the first quarter to 617,286 in the fourth quarter. Capital market and insurance institutions submitted 28,561 reports, while VASPs recorded none.

The NFIU also disclosed that its Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions Division conducted joint on-site examinations of 29 reporting entities in the Federal Capital Territory.

The entities were drawn from the real estate, casino, precious metals and stones dealing, and consultancy sectors.

According to the report, the exercise resulted in 20 new registrations on the RapidAML portal and subscriptions to NIGSAC, alongside the submission of 1,029 Suspicious Transaction Reports.

Despite the increased compliance activity, the number of STRs received in 2025 was significantly lower than the previous year. STR filings fell by 40,061, from 82,143 in 2024 to 42,082 in 2025, representing a decline of about 48.8 per cent.

Suspicious Activity Reports also dropped by 12,851, from 23,364 in 2024 to 10,513 in 2025, representing a reduction of approximately 55 per cent.

The contrasting figures indicate that while reporting entities recorded significantly higher volumes of threshold-based transactions and PEP disclosures in 2025, suspicious transaction and activity reports declined sharply compared with the previous year.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending