Connect with us

News

Abuja face-off: Wike allies, military veterans differ over calls for sanctions

Published

on

Allies of the Federal Capital Territory Minister, Nyesom Wike, and a coalition of retired military officers on Friday took opposing positions over whether a naval officer Lt. Ahmed Yerima, should face sanctions following his confrontation with the minister at a disputed Abuja land.

Wike and the naval officer clashed on Tuesday over the land purportedly belonging to a former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Zubairu Gambo (retd).

The minister accused the retired military chief of carrying out illegal development on the land and confronted Yerima for allegedly assaulting personnel of the Federal Capital Development Authority, who had gone to halt the ongoing construction.

In a viral video seen by Saturday PUNCH, Wike questioned the military officers’ presence on the disputed land, insisting that the ex-naval chief had no legal documents to back his claim to the property.

However, Yerima told the minister that he and his men were acting on superior orders and could not vacate the land as demanded.

Briefing journalists ahead of the FCT Executive Council meeting on Thursday, Wike condemned what he described as the retired naval chief’s impunity in deploying serving officers to guard the disputed property.

Responding to critics who faulted his visit to the site, the minister said he could not sit idly as a public officer while government officials were being attacked.

‘Tinubu must sack or redeploy Wike’

Speaking at a press conference in Kaduna on Friday, the military veterans slammed the FCT minister and described his actions as “demeaning,” “unacceptable,” and “a direct insult to the Armed Forces and the Commander-in-Chief.”

The coalition, comprising retired generals and other senior military officers from the Army, Air Force, and Navy, called on President Tinubu to sack or redeploy the minister.

The group warned that should the President fail to act, it would “mobilise and occupy” the FCT ministry until Wike was removed.

Delivering the main address, a member of the Board of Trustees of the coalition, Col. Yusuf Ibrahim (retd.), said it was embarrassing for Wike to call the naval officer a fool in the viral clip.

He argued that the naval officer was acting on lawful instructions, adding that insulting him amounted to belittling state authority.

“Not everyone is worthy of certain offices they occupy. We are taken aback that a public office holder could call an officer ‘a fool’ on camera. If Wike was responsible, shouldn’t he have engaged the Chief of Naval Staff privately rather than trying to disgrace a very senior retired general? Who the hell is Wike?” Ibrahim queried.

See also  Gunmen attack national park service office in Oyo, kill five

He added that Wike must apologise to the Nigerian Armed Forces, the young officer involved, and President Tinubu.

Corroborating this, another member of the coalition, Dr. Awwal Abdullahi, who introduced himself as a Deputy Veteran Commander at the briefing, accused the minister of showing a pattern of hostility toward military personnel.

He said, “If the President refuses to sack Wike, we will mobilise and occupy the Ministry of FCT until he is removed.”

Abdullahi described the veterans’ gathering as a representation of the entire retired military community.

He argued that removing the minister would not harm the administration, adding that the veterans could no longer tolerate what they described as Wike’s arrogance.

But speaking with Saturday PUNCH, the Senior Special Assistant on Publicity and Communications to the FCT Minister, Lere Olayinka, said the military veterans’ demand was within their constitutional right.

He added that the minister had clarified his position on Thursday and there was no need for further comments on the matter.

‘Naval officer should be probed’

Throwing its weight behind the minister, a civil society group, the National Coalition for Democratic Integrity, called for an investigation into the conduct of the naval officer.

The coalition said appropriate disciplinary measures consistent with military ethics should be imposed on the officer if found culpable.

The President of the NCDI, Kiki Kiki, in a statement on Friday, condemned the officer’s actions, which he said was grossly disrespectful to a senior government official representing the President.

He noted that obstructing the minister and other officials from performing their duties was a direct affront to the principles of civilian oversight and constitutional order, which are the foundation of Nigeria’s democracy.

Kiki added that the officer’s actions also undermined the core values of discipline and respect that define the military profession.

“Such conduct, if left unchecked, risks sending the wrong signal to the public and to the rank and file within the security services that insubordination and contempt for civil authority can be tolerated. That would set a dangerous precedent.

“We must be unequivocal in condemning the deplorable and utterly unacceptable conduct of Officer Yerima against the FCT Minister. No individual in uniform or in public office is above the law or beyond accountability.

“The dignity of civilian leadership must be respected, not as a matter of ego, but as a safeguard for the order and stability of our democracy,” he added.

Similarly, another group, the Northern Christian Youth Professionals, described the incident as “a grave violation of democratic order” and a dangerous precedent that could undermine civilian authority, the core of constitutional governance.

See also  FG to borrow N800bn via February bonds

In a statement issued on Friday and signed by its Chairman, Isaac Abrak, NCYP argued that preventing a minister from accessing land under his jurisdiction “is ultra vires, unconstitutional, and an affront to the authority of the President,” whose mandate the minister exercises on behalf of Nigerians.

NCYP noted that the land in question was not a military installation but private property reportedly linked to a retired naval admiral, emphasising that no law empowers serving military personnel to guard private estates or obstruct a sitting minister performing official duties.

The group described the alleged deployment as “an egregious overreach of military authority.”

While faulting some of Wike’s comments during the exchange, NCYP insisted that the minister’s tone did not justify what it called “a constitutional breach” by the naval officer and those who authorised his deployment.

The group called on President Bola Tinubu to investigate the deployment of naval personnel to the property and discipline all officers involved.

It also urged Wike to apologise to the military institution for any inappropriate language, while insisting that the Navy must apologise to the FCT Administration and ensure no officer is deployed to block civil authorities again.

Kachikwu defends Wike

Meanwhile, former presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Dumebi Kachikwu, said the Wike–Yerima clash reflected a deeper national intolerance.

Speaking at a press briefing in Abuja on Friday, Kachikwu argued that the controversy exposed growing national intolerance and a tendency to justify illegality once the target was a disliked public figure.

He accused a “vocal minority” of driving the outrage, asserting that their reaction was shaped not by the facts of the incident but by longstanding resentment toward Wike.

Describing the uproar as “unacceptable,” Kachikwu urged President Tinubu to intervene, noting that the behaviour of some senior officials, including the Minister of Defence, suggested they had “taken sides” without proper context.

He said, “Speaking on this odious saga between Wike and Yerima is extremely difficult because it is another example of a very vocal minority having their say and their way.

“Everyone tries to avoid this vocal minority, especially when they are baying for blood, and in this case, they believe they finally have the minister where they want him, defenceless.

“Today I weep for Nigeria because we are becoming a nation fuelled by hate for anything government. Their hatred for this man, perceived as a bully and the President’s bulldog, has clouded their judgement.”

See also  SSANU and NASU extend ultimatum on Strike

Questioning selective judgment, Kachikwu argued that both Wike and the naval officer had been provoked during the clash, yet public anger focused solely on the minister.

He maintained that Wike acted in his official capacity as FCT minister and presidential representative, insisting that the officer had obstructed legitimate government work while acting on the instructions of a retired general.

Military sources rule out sanctions

Meanwhile, indications suggest that Yerima may not face any disciplinary action despite the public attention the incident has generated.

The Minister of Defence, Mohammed Badaru, said the government was investigating the matter but stressed that military personnel on legitimate duty would not be punished.

The minister’s clarification came in response to strong reactions from ex-military chiefs, including former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai (retd.), who demanded that Wike apologise to Tinubu, the Nigerian Armed Forces, and the officer involved.

Buratai, in a Facebook post on Tuesday night, described Wike’s conduct as inappropriate and disrespectful to the military.

Speaking in a separate interview with our correspondent on Friday, senior military officials, who requested anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly, ruled out sanctions for the naval officer, insisting he acted within military procedure.

One officer said, “The Nigerian Armed Forces operate strictly within the legal framework of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which defines the limits of both civil authority and military engagement.

“Once troops are lawfully deployed under approved orders, their allegiance is to their operational command and the Constitution, not to any transient expression of political will.”

Another senior officer reinforced this stance, saying the officer fulfilled his obligation to the military leadership.

“He did what the military leadership instructed,” the officer said.

“The legality of military action is guided by orders, not optics. Once deployed, an officer’s duty is to protect life, maintain order, and uphold the Constitution within clearly defined rules of engagement.

“Political intrusion into that space, however well-intentioned, undermines not only command authority but also the delicate balance of Nigeria’s internal security framework.”

He added, “The military’s authority rests not on intimidation, but on discipline; not on display, but on duty.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Belgian parliament to legislate to allow police to enter homes to facilitate undocumented migrant removals

Published

on

Belgian police will soon be able, in conjunction with the Immigration Office (DVZ), to enter the homes of undocumented migrants who pose a threat to public order or national security. This is set out in a bill drafted by the Belgian Asylum and Migration Minister, Anneleen Van Bossuyt (Flemish nationalist N-VA), and Justice Minister Annelies Verlinden (Flemish Christian democrat CD&V), which has now been approved by the House Home Affairs Committee. The proposal still needs to be OKed during a plenary session of the lower house of the Belgian parliament.

Home searches like these are controversial. The aim is to make it easier to deport people residing here illegally and who persistently refuse to cooperate with efforts to facilitate their return.

The new law will make this possible. Following entry into the home, the police may place the person in question – that is, the individual who poses a threat to public order or national security – under administrative detention. However, prior authorisation from an investigating judge is required to enter the home.

Speaking to press agency Belga, Minister Van Bossuyt referred to this as “an historic breakthrough” and had previously said that this “is the final piece in a firm but humane return policy”.

“This is not a witch-hunt against people who have international protection or are simply in the country illegally (..) The law sets out clear conditions, and a search of a home can only take place with the authorisation of an investigating judge.”

(Overly) broad definitions

The bill did, however, attract a great deal of comment and was extensively discussed in parliament.

See also  SSANU and NASU extend ultimatum on Strike

The opposition, the federal police, investigating judges and lawyers alike were highly critical. They believe that the exact meaning of ‘a threat to public order or national security’ has not been defined clearly enough.

“It will be up to the investigating judge to determine whether someone poses a threat to public order or national security,” says Van Bossuyt. “The judge will independently assess whether that person poses such a threat. That is a crucial test.”

Minister Van Bossuyt finds the debate strange: “The concepts of public order and national security feature in many parts of our legislation. Nowhere is a specific list provided of what they entail.” What is more, according to Van Bossuyt, the Council of State, which vets Belgian draft legislation, has explicitly stated that it is not desirable to define these concepts, as they may evolve over time.

“When the Justice Minister drafts new legislation, she isn’t asked how judges should apply that law, is she?” Van Bossuyt notes.

Van Bossuyt has also tabled an amendment to her own bill: “We have given investigating judges more time to reach a decision, from 5 days to 7.”

She emphasises that their role is not merely reduced to that of a ‘rubber-stamp judge’: “The investigating judge will absolutely not be a rubber-stamp judge, precisely because they play such a crucial role in assessing whether someone poses a threat or not. They will have access to the full case file.”

What about minors?

Another point of criticism concerns the rights of minors. According to critics, these are not sufficiently safeguarded. Government party Les Engagés (Francophone centrist) was only prepared to vote for the bill if greater protection for minors was provided.

See also  Jigawa sacks 22 over Ramadan feeding scam

“When authorising a search of a home, the investigating judge must determine all the conditions under which that search may take place,” explains Van Bossuyt. “If, for example, children are present, the investigating judge can stipulate that the search must take place during school hours. In that case, the likelihood of children being present is very low.”

The investigating judge may also, for example, require a psychologist to be present during the search, says Van Bossuyt. “So, the possible presence of minors has certainly been taken into account.”

The minister also points to the responsibility of the person who poses a threat to public order or national security: “It is that person who is making life difficult for those children,” says the minister.

Desperately needed, according to Van Bossuyt

Government party, Les Engagés, did not secure all the amendments it had requested, so MP Xavier Dubois boycotted the second reading. However, his group leader, Aurore Tourneur, did defend the amendments in the House Home Affairs Committee.

This enabled the majority to approve the bill after all, with the support of the Flemish liberal opposition party Anders. Although they, too, called for further amendments.

The left-wing opposition parties voted against. The far-right Vlaams Belang abstained. According to MP Francesca Van Belleghem, the law has been “so watered down by coalition negotiations that it will have virtually no effect in practice”.

‘This was a sensitive bill for several government parties: that’s no secret. In practice, there was an absolute need for this,’ concludes Van Bossuyt.

The bill must now be put to a vote during a plenary session, where the law can be definitively approved.

See also  President Trump threatens to ‘go in and kill’ Hamas if the group doesn’t stop killing in Gaza

Speaking to Belga, the minister warned local authorities that have already announced they will not permit home visits, such as Leuven. “Be fully aware of what that choice means. If you refuse to implement this law and things go wrong, do not point the finger at the federal government afterwards. Because then you will be jeopardising the safety of your own residents” she said.

Source: VRT.BE

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Trump rules out new Iran attack before US midterm elections

Published

on

President Donald Trump ruled out Thursday attacking Iran before the US midterms on November 3, saying Washington was holding “productive discussions” with Tehran.

Trump’s announcement on his Truth Social platform followed a surge in oil prices driven by media reports suggesting potential new US strikes prior to the elections.

“I want to make it clear to everybody that, while Iran is in very bad condition, both economically and militarily, and while the Blockade will remain in full force and effect…we will not be attacking Iran at any time prior to the Midterm Elections,” he wrote.

“We are having productive discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he added.

The Atlantic magazine reported on Wednesday that the White House had asked the Pentagon to develop options to strike Iranian targets that could be used before the midterms.

The New York Times said Thursday the plans were being developed despite Trump’s “ambivalence.”

The surge in crude oil prices has also been fueled by persistent tensions in the Strait of Hormuz — a strategic chokepoint for the global oil trade — as well as hostilities between Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis and Saudi Arabia.

Polls suggest American voters are strongly dissatisfied with fuel prices, which have soared since US-Israeli strikes against Iran on February 28 triggered the conflict.

Brent North Sea crude, the international benchmark, rallied to as high as $105.88 a barrel on Thursday before retreating to $104.28.

– Putin vows to help –

Russian President Vladimir Putin promised Thursday to “do everything” to help end the Middle East war when he met Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian for talks ahead of a regional summit, Russian media reported.

See also  50% of Nigerian clinics lack capacity to treat snakebite – Report

“We are ready to do everything that is in our power to contribute to the settlement of this situation,” Putin said after arriving in Turkmenistan for a summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) that starts Friday in the Caspian Sea resort of Avaza.

He added that Iran had made “real efforts to end the war,” according to Russian news agencies.

Russia and Iran have reinforced diplomatic and military links since Russia launched its offensive in Ukraine in February 2022, becoming increasingly reliant on each other.

Trump has repeatedly insisted in recent weeks that the United States has effectively won the Iran war, despite ongoing unrest and a recent security threat that forced the withdrawal of American bombers from a base in England.

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian insisted Tehran was “engaged in dialogue, but every time we negotiate with the United States, they attack again”, Iranian state media quoted him as saying at the talks with Putin.

Pezeshkian said the Islamic republic wanted to see a “final framework” to end the war.

But he accused the United States of “trying to impose its policies and views on all countries”.

“If the United States insists on pursuing a unilateral approach, a resolution will not be possible,” he said, according to state media.

– Approaching election –

The midterm elections will shape the final two years of Trump’s presidential term as his Republican Party risks losing its current grip on Congress.

Although Trump is not on the ballot, he is holding numerous rallies in an attempt to limit the damage or even turn the political tide.

See also  States rush to deploy forest guards as insecurity deepens

Trump has warned he faces a possible third impeachment if Democrats retake the House of Representatives, and the White House is preparing for a slew of investigations into corruption and abuse of power.

The US president also sought to calm a furor on Thursday over his comments at a rally earlier this week that Iran could “take out” the cities of Los Angeles and San Diego.

The 80-year-old blamed the “fake and artificial news” for misinterpreting the remarks, which Democrats pounced on.

“In actuality, what I was talking about was that a temporary increase in the price of Gasoline is a small price to pay for Iran not having a Nuclear Weapon and, if you want to see a big price, can you imagine what it would be like if they bombed San Diego and/or Los Angeles?” Trump said on Truth Social.

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

INEC displays voter register, begins PVC distribution ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

The Independent National Electoral Commission has commenced the display of the preliminary register of voters and distribution of Permanent Voter Cards across states as part of preparations for the 2027 general elections.

The seven-day exercise, which begins on Friday and runs through October 15, will allow registered voters to verify their details, raise claims and objections, and collect PVCs from the first phase of the Continuous Voter Registration conducted between August and December 2025.

In Plateau and Sokoto states, the respective Resident Electoral Commissioners announced that the exercise would take place at Registration Area centres, with PVC collection continuing at INEC offices at the local government level after the display period.

In a statement by the Plateau REC, Prof. Sam Egwu, made available to journalists in Jos on Thursday, the commission said the exercise was pursuant to Section 19(1) of the Electoral Act 2026, which mandates it to display the voter register not less than 90 days before the general elections.

He said, “The Independent National Electoral Commission, Plateau State, wishes to inform the good people of Plateau State that the commission will commence display of the Preliminary Register of Voters, attend to the hearing of claims and objections as well as collection of Permanent Voters Cards (PVCs) simultaneously in all the 207 Registration Areas in the state, from the 9th to 15th of October 2026 (7 days and weekends inclusive). Time is 9 am -3 pm daily.”

The statement asked all registered voters to take advantage of the opportunity to check their details.

See also  U.S. attacks Venezuela, captures President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores

“All registered voters are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity to carefully check information they provided, such as their names, photographs, date of birth, polling units and other relevant registration details to make necessary claims and objections within this stipulated period as an accurate voter register is important for free and credible elections,” the REC said.

He further disclosed that PVCs from the first phase of the CVR exercise conducted from August 18, 2025 to December 10, 2025, would be available for collection during the exercise.

In Sokoto, the REC, Umar Garba, while briefing journalists on the commission’s preparations for the 2027 general elections, said the exercise was part of INEC’s activities ahead of the 2027 elections.

Garba, who was at the Nigeria Union of Journalists Press Centre, said the commission was committed to ensuring that eligible voters were given the opportunity to verify their registration details and collect their PVCs.

“The Independent National Electoral Commission will commence the display of the preliminary register of voters for claims and objections, as well as the distribution of Permanent Voter Cards from the 9th to the 15th of October 2026,” Garba said.

He said PVCs relating to lost or damaged cards, transfers, updates and registrations conducted during the second and third phases of the CVR were not yet ready for collection.

Garba said the commission would announce when the affected PVCs became available.

He added that after the exercise at the Registration Area level ended on October 15, distribution would continue at INEC offices in the 23 local government areas of the state.

See also  Judge okays El-Rufai’s medical treatment in custody

“This will enable eligible voters who could not collect their cards at the Registration Area level to do so,” he said.

On security, Garba said INEC had continued to take the advice of security agencies into consideration throughout the voter registration process.

“Throughout the registration of voters held recently, the commission took the advice of security agencies very seriously. This contributed to a safe process without any casualties,” he said.

He assured eligible voters that INEC would work to ensure that PVCs were distributed across the state.

On internally displaced persons, Garba said the commission was engaging security agencies to establish the number of IDPs in Sokoto and determine how they could participate in the 2027 elections.

“The commission is always talking with security agencies to ascertain the number of IDPs in the state. We are working to ensure that they vote once they are in official and recognised camps,” he said.

The REC also said INEC would release the total number of registered voters in Sokoto State at the appropriate time.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending