Connect with us

News

Nearly $3bn spent on Eurobond debt servicing under Tinubu

Published

on

The Federal Government has spent about $2.93bn servicing Eurobond debt across eight quarters under President Bola Tinubu, according to an analysis of external debt-service records published by the Debt Management Office.

The data, covering Q3 2023 to Q2 2025, show that Eurobond obligations alone accounted for 31.5 per cent of Nigeria’s total external debt service of $9.32bn over the two years.

More striking is the structure of the payments: interest charges consumed $2.43bn out of the $2.93bn spent on Eurobonds, meaning that 83 per cent of all Eurobond servicing in the period went to interest rather than principal.

This reflects the costliness of Nigeria’s dependence on commercial borrowing and suggests that expensive debt will remain a major burden on government finances for several years.

Tinubu assumed office in May 2023, making Q3 2023 the first full quarter under his administration. That quarter was also the most expensive within the two-year window, as Nigeria redeemed a maturing Eurobond.

The country paid a total of $943.66m in Eurobond obligations in Q3 2023, comprising a $500m principal redemption and $443.66m in interest. Nigeria’s total external-debt servicing for the period stood at $1.39bn, meaning Eurobonds alone accounted for 67.8 per cent of the entire foreign-debt bill that quarter.

It remains the quarter with the highest Eurobond share under the Tinubu administration. In Q4 2023, Eurobond servicing fell sharply as no principal was due. The government paid $148.57m, all of it interest, while total external-debt servicing amounted to $943.17m, and Eurobonds accounted for just 15.8 per cent of the total in the quarter.

Nigeria’s Eurobond obligations resumed their upward climb in Q1 2024, when the government paid $282.57m in interest. Total external-debt servicing for the quarter was $1.12bn, giving Eurobonds a 25.2 per cent share.

The pattern strengthened in Q2 2024, when Eurobond interest payments rose to $293.73m. With total foreign-debt servicing at $1.12bn, Eurobonds accounted for 26.2 per cent. These two quarters showed a reappearance of heavy commercial-debt costs within Nigeria’s external obligations, even outside redemption periods.

A significant spike appeared in Q3 2024, when Eurobond servicing hit $427.72m. This was entirely interest payment, and it pushed Eurobond payments to 31.9 per cent of the total external-debt service of $1.34bn. Q3 quarters are increasingly emerging as heavy repayment windows due to the structure of Nigeria’s Eurobond coupons, and 2024 followed that pattern.

The cost dropped again in Q4 2024, mirroring the drop in Q4 2023. Eurobond servicing stood at $148.57m, while total external-debt service was $1.08bn. This placed the Eurobond share at 13.8 per cent, the lowest in the two-year period.

However, the relief was short-lived. Eurobond obligations surged back to $427.72m in Q1 2025, matching the level recorded in Q3 2024. Nigeria’s total external debt servicing for the quarter reached $1.39bn, placing the Eurobond share at 30.7 per cent.

The repeated spikes in Q3 2024 and Q1 2025 highlight the growing weight of interest charges on Nigeria’s fiscal operations and the clustering of Eurobond coupons around similar maturity cycles. In Q2 2025, the most recent quarter in the records, Eurobond servicing fell to $260.07m, entirely interest.

Nigeria’s total external-debt servicing was $932.10m, giving Eurobonds a 27.9 per cent share. The PUNCH observed that Nigeria is spending far more on servicing existing Eurobonds than on reducing the underlying principal.

Of the $2.93bn spent on Eurobonds, only $500m went toward reducing the debt stock; the remaining $2.43bn was consumed by interest. The data also show that Eurobonds took between 13.8 per cent and 67.8 per cent of Nigeria’s total external-debt service in each quarter under review.

Further analysis by The PUNCH showed that Nigeria’s Eurobond commitments stood at $17.32bn as of June 2025, accounting for 36.86 per cent of the country’s total external debt, according to the data from the DMO.

This marks an increase from $15.62bn in June 2023, when Eurobonds represented 36.19 per cent of external debt. The data show that Nigeria’s Eurobond stock rose by $1.70bn between the two periods — a 10.88 per cent increase — indicating the country’s growing exposure to high-interest commercial debt.

In September, the Federal Executive Council approved plans to raise $2.3bn through Eurobond sales as part of the 2024–2025 borrowing plan, with an additional $1.1bn set aside to refinance maturing foreign obligations. The National Assembly also endorsed the foreign borrowing.

By November, Nigeria raised $2.35bn from international investors through a dual-tranche Eurobond issuance that attracted a record $13bn in bids, the Debt Management Office said in a statement.

The offer, split between a 10-year and a 20-year note, represents Nigeria’s largest order book in the international capital market and comes as the Federal Government moves to plug its 2025 fiscal deficit and broaden its funding sources amid ongoing fiscal and monetary reforms.

The Eurobond comprised $1.25bn due in 2036 and $1.10bn due in 2046, with the 10-year note priced at 8.63 per cent and the 20-year at 9.13 per cent.

According to the DMO, the sale drew participation from investors in the United Kingdom, North America, Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Nigeria, cutting across fund managers, pension and insurance funds, hedge funds, banks, and other financial institutions.

The agency said the $13bn orderbook was “the largest ever” for Nigeria, reflecting strong appetite from a broad mix of buyers. The notes will be listed on the London Stock Exchange, FMDQ Securities Exchange Limited, and the Nigerian Exchange Limited.

In the DMO statement, President Bola Tinubu said the investor response showed continued confidence in the Nigerian economy and reaffirmed the country’s credibility in global debt markets.

“We are delighted by the strong investor confidence demonstrated in our country and our reform agenda. This development reaffirms Nigeria’s position as a recognised and credible participant in the global capital market,” Tinubu was quoted as saying.

Also, the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, said the outcome underscored international trust in the government’s reform drive and commitment to fiscal stability.

DMO Director-General, Patience Oniha, said tapping long-term financing through the Eurobond market aligned with the strategy of supporting economic growth while reducing pressure on short-term domestic borrowing.

“Nigeria’s ability to access the Eurobond Market to raise long-term funding needed to support the growth agenda of President Bola Tinubu is a major achievement for Nigeria and is consistent with the DMO’s objectives of supporting development and diversifying funding sources,” Oniha said in the statement.

According to the DMO, proceeds from the issuance will be used to finance the 2025 budget deficit and meet other government funding needs. The transaction was arranged by Chapel Hill Denham, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, and Standard Chartered Bank as joint bookrunners, while FSDH Merchant Bank acted as financial adviser.

Nigeria last accessed the Eurobond market in December 2024, when it raised $2.2bn. The latest issuance, achieved amid tight global credit conditions and rising borrowing costs, signals that the country still has access to external financing despite the fiscal pressures it faces.

Nigeria’s foreign exchange reserves are projected to rise to $45bn by the end of 2025, driven by strong investor confidence following the country’s successful $2.3bn Eurobond issuance, according to investment house CardinalStone.

It also estimated that Nigeria’s year-end debt level would rise to N166.7tn (42.2 per cent of GDP). In a separate assessment, Comercio Partners described the Eurobond’s success as a “positive signal” for Nigeria’s fiscal outlook.

However, it warned that the gains could be undermined if exchange rate instability resurfaces.

“On one hand, the inflow boosts external reserves, provides fiscal breathing space, and enhances the government’s capacity to meet short-term obligations. On the other hand, it raises exposure to foreign exchange risk and heightens interest burdens in hard currency,” Comercio Partners said.

Experts react

Financial analysts have offered mixed assessments of Nigeria’s rising reliance on Eurobond borrowing, warning that while the instruments provide quick access to capital, they also carry cost and refinancing risks that could strain government finances if not managed prudently.

Reacting to the DMO data showing that Nigeria spent $2.93bn servicing Eurobonds across eight quarters—83 per cent of which went to interest—investment professionals said the country must balance ease of access with long-term repayment pressures.

The Managing Director/CEO of Arthur Stevens Asset Management Limited, Olatunde Amolegbe, said Eurobonds would continue to feature in Nigeria’s financing mix because of their speed and flexibility.

He noted that governments typically use a combination of debt options, explaining that “there will always be a need to have a mix of debt instruments depending on cost, timing, and speed of execution.”

Amolegbe said Eurobonds remain attractive because they are “relatively easy sources of debt” and usually free of the “onerous conditions” that accompany multilateral loans, even when the latter appear cheaper.

He added that borrowing was unavoidable for countries with large infrastructure needs, stressing that Nigeria’s concern should be disciplined deployment and repayment capacity. “Inasmuch as those funds are being deployed appropriately and we maintain the ability to meet repayment terms, then it’s not much of an issue,” he said.

A Lagos-based economist, Adewale Abimbola, downplayed the risks, arguing that Nigeria had maintained a strong repayment history. According to him, “I don’t think there’s any significant risk. Nigeria has always been meeting its Eurobond obligations,” citing the recent oversubscription as evidence of investor confidence.

Abimbola said borrowing was acceptable if tied to productive projects and warned that excessive domestic borrowing could crowd out private investment.

He argued that external commercial debt remained viable as long as interest-rate and exchange-rate exposures were controlled. “As long as interest, market, and exchange-rate risks are carefully managed, I don’t see any risk,” he said, adding that the recent currency recovery meant “currency risk will almost be inexistent if reforms are sustained.”

He noted that Eurobonds are inherently costlier because “commercial loans have higher interest compared to bilateral or multilateral loans,” referencing Nigeria’s latest issuance priced at 8.75 per cent for the 10-year and 9.25 per cent for the 20-year notes.

Finance professional and research analyst, Dayo Adenubi, offered a more cautious view, describing Eurobonds as “market-driven financing” that gives governments and corporates faster access to long-term capital but at a high cost.

He explained that repayment terms are dictated by investors and investment banks, which price the issuer’s credit risk. “It’s easy to get, but it’s more expensive,” he said. Adenubi warned that Eurobonds delay the principal burden until maturity, which encourages serial refinancing.

“You pay coupons semi-annually and the principal at maturity, so it postpones the day of judgement,” he said, noting that most issuers “use a new one to refinance once it’s time to pay.”

He cautioned that failure to achieve the expected returns on projects funded by Eurobonds could lead to distress. “If the projects do not turn out as successful as forecasted, there’s risk of default, which can get very ugly,” he said, pointing to Ghana, Sri Lanka, and Kenya as recent cautionary tales.

According to him, while multilateral loans remain cheaper and domestic borrowing theoretically easier, Eurobonds require disciplined macroeconomic management to avoid refinancing traps. “If the economy improves and the government’s finances improve, you can refinance with better terms,” he said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Pope Leo names Nigeria among countries witnessing Christian persecution

Published

on

The head of the Catholic Church and Sovereign of the Vatican City, Pope Leo XIV, has named Nigeria among countries where Christians face frequent attacks, alongside Bangladesh, Mozambique, and Sudan

On Sunday, the pontiff took to his official X account to express concern over recurring attacks on Christian communities and places of worship across the globe, calling for prayers for peace and unity among all believers

“In various parts of the world, Christians suffer discrimination and persecution, I think especially of Bangladesh, Nigeria, Mozambique, Sudan, and other countries from which we frequently hear of attacks on communities and places of worship. God is a merciful Father who desires peace among all His children!” he wrote.

He also called for prayers for the families of Kivu in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where recent massacres have claimed civilian lives.

“Let us pray that all violence may cease and that believers may work together for the common good,” the pontiff added.

The statement comes amid international scrutiny of Nigeria following US President Donald Trump, on October 31, designated Nigeria a “Country of Particular Concern” over alleged Christian genocide, warning that the Nigerian government must stop the killings or the United States would deploy troops “to wipe out the jihadists.”

The Federal Government has repeatedly denied claims of a systematic “Christian genocide”, describing such allegations as false, misleading, and a distortion of Nigeria’s security challenges.

Adding to the debate, US Congressman Riley Moore, on Sunday, faulted President Bola Tinubu’s claims that Nigeria does not encourage religious persecution, asserting that the reality on the ground contradicts the President’s public statements.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Obaseki failed Edo, Oshiomhole replies PDP

Published

on

Senator Adams Oshiomhole has said that Edo State Governor, Monday Okpebholo, inherited an “abandoned state,” noting that the immediate past administration under Governor Godwin Obaseki carried out numerous groundbreaking ceremonies for projects that yielded little tangible results.

Oshiomhole, a former governor of the state, made the remarks on Sunday in Benin while responding to claims by the state People Democratic Party that Okpebholo’s first year in office was “a waste.”

He criticised the PDP, calling it a “dead party” that failed to deliver meaningful results during its tenure.

“I don’t know why the media still quotes the PDP, which is a dead party. I urge journalists to rely on verifiable facts from events they cover across the state rather than statements that lack credibility,” Oshiomhole said.

The senator highlighted that Governor Okpebholo had undertaken impactful projects within his first year, including the ongoing flyover construction at Ramat Park, designed to ease traffic congestion in a busy area of the state.

He noted that the economic value of reduced travel time and fuel savings cannot be overstated.

Numerous road projects currently under construction across Edo State, Oshiomhole added, demonstrate the administration’s commitment to development, dismissing suggestions that such projects are mere political propaganda.

On education, Oshiomhole accused the previous administration of neglect, leaving many schools with insufficient teachers and dilapidated facilities.

He said Governor Okpebholo has begun rehabilitating these schools, restoring conducive learning environments, and recruiting 5,000 teachers.

The senator also lauded increased funding for higher institutions, noting that Ambrose Alli University and Edo University, Iyamho, now receive subventions that have been restored or expanded by the current administration.

“I must commend Okpebholo for raising AAU’s monthly subvention from N41m to N500m, helping resolve long-standing academic disruptions. Edo University, Iyamho, now receives N250m monthly, a strategic investment in higher education,” he said.

Oshiomhole praised the governor’s humility, firm leadership, and ability to hire and fire when necessary, saying these traits have restored discipline in government. “Action speaks louder than words,” he added.

Speaking on federal issues, the senator emphasised that while his role in the National Assembly is national in scope, he remains committed to advocating key projects in Edo State.

He recalled prioritising the reconstruction of the Benin–Auchi–Okene road, which had deteriorated to the point where motorists were stranded for hours. Both he and Governor Okpebholo had pressed President Bola Tinubu to explore funding mechanisms beyond the annual budget, and the road is now under construction.

The comments by Oshiomhole come in response to criticisms by Edo PDP Chairman Dr Tony Aziegbemi, who described Okpebholo’s first year as “wasted,” accusing the administration of policy paralysis, institutional decay, and economic mismanagement. Aziegbemi claimed the government had failed to sign Certificates of Occupancy, stalled private investment, and left local councils owing salaries and pensioners.

He further alleged that while other states were consolidating reforms, driving innovation, and expanding growth, Edo had returned to the pre-Obaseki era, “an age defined by ignorance, propaganda, and prebendal politics,” and accused the Okpebholo administration of destroying EdoGIS, which had brought order and transparency to land administration.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

COP30: Presidency, Obi clash over 423-man Nigeria delegation

Published

on

The Presidency on Sunday defended the size and spread of Nigeria’s delegation to COP30, saying the climate talks require officials from many ministries and agencies to protect the country’s interests.

The Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Mr. Temitope Ajayi, argued that climate negotiations cut across energy, finance, environment, transport, agriculture and security, making a narrow team disadvantageous.

Responding to inquiries by our correspondent, Ajayi said, “Because of the multidisciplinary and multidimensional nature of the climate subject, you will typically see government officials from different agencies who are representing the government’s interest across different subject-matter areas.

“It is so because the issues being discussed are vast and the government must be represented at every point to advance the Nigerian government’s position.”

His comments come hours after the presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 election, Mr. Peter Obi, accused the Tinubu-led government of what he called a “stunning display of misplaced priorities” for sending a 749-member delegation to COP30.

A breakdown of the delegates list shared by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and seen by The PUNCH shows that 749 names carry Nigeria’s party badge across the “Parties” and “Parties overflow” lists, an categorisation that includes civil society, private-sector actors, academics and partners who registered under Nigeria.

However, the number of delegates from government entities was around 423. This includes the Federal Ministry of Environment, NCCC, NESREA, NOSDRA, NiMet, NIHSA, other clearly labelled federal MDAs such as Finance, Trade, Power, Solid Minerals, Agriculture & Food Security, Housing, Water Resources & Sanitation, Marine & Blue Economy, Works/Transport/Aviation), the National Assembly/Presidency/FCTA, state governments, and named regulators/SOEs such as NNPC Ltd, NUPRC, NMDPRA, NPA, NCAA, NRC.

Obi had argued that China, the world’s second-largest economy with a population of over 1.4 billion, sent 789 delegates to the event held in Belém, Brazil.

In a Saturday post on his official X handle titled ‘In Delegations, Nigeria competes well,’ the former Anambra State Governor said, “Again, in a bitter twist of irony, we thank Nigeria for having the third-largest delegation at COP30, with 749 delegates, similar to China with 789 delegates.

“While Nigeria needs to have a strong voice in global climate discussions, this spectacle comes at a heavy cost to our people, with about 150 million living in multidimensional poverty, struggling daily with food insecurity, inadequate healthcare, and limited access to basic services.

“Yet, our leaders travel in large numbers, funded by taxpayers, attending climate talks abroad while the citizens they are meant to serve continue to suffer.

“Compared to China, which had about the same contingency, China has a high HDI, while Nigeria has a low one, with a key measure of life expectancy at the lowest 54 years, against China’s 79 years.”

Obi noted that China’s GDP stands at $18.74tn, while Nigeria’s is a little over $200bn, barely one per cent of that size.

He said China’s GDP per capita is about $13,300, whereas Nigeria’s is about 10 per cent of that.

According to him, 63 per cent of Nigerians live in multidimensional poverty, which is about 150 million people, the highest number in the world, facing deprivations in health, education, and living standards, while it is only 3.9 per cent in China; meanwhile, China’s population is about seven times larger than ours.

“This stark contrast illustrates why Nigeria should not be sending a delegation of this size. The human and financial resources expended on hundreds of officials travelling abroad could instead be directed toward urgent social investments at home, improving healthcare, education, and living conditions to lift our people out of poverty,” Obi stated.

Nigeria’s party list for COP30 contains at least 1,452 names, drawn from the National Council on Climate Change, the Federal Ministry of Environment, other MDAs, the National Assembly, state governments, banks, oil and gas firms, consultancies, universities, and dozens of non-governmental organisations.

Many are recorded as “guests of the nominating entity” or as having “paid relationships/contracts with an affiliate,” indicating private or project funding rather than federal sponsorship.

Responding to uproar over Nigeria’s delegate size at the global event, Ajayi said most attendees worldwide are non-state actors, whose names are nonetheless counted under their countries of origin.

“A larger majority of attendees at COPs are usually CSOs, activists and private sector players. It is called the Conference of Parties for a reason. Participants are listed against their countries where they registered from,” he explained.

“If people from Environmental Right Action are attending, for example, and I know a number of friends from climate-focused non-governmental organisations in Brazil, their attendance will be registered against Nigeria because that is their country of origin and where they registered from. Does it mean the government paid for them? They are not sponsored by the government,” he added.

He said the same applies to prominent Nigerian business leaders who choose to attend the summit.

“If Dangote, Tony Elumelu or Kola Adesina, for example and other actors in the energy sector are attending COP, does it mean they are part of the government delegation or sponsored by the government?” he asked.

The aide faulted what he called “shallow commentary” around COP attendance, insisting that Nigeria must show up strongly where decisions on climate finance, carbon markets and energy transition are taken.

“There must be context and nuance to this type of analysis,” he added.

Another senior official in the presidency simply stated, “Not all those people who went there were sponsored by the government.”

In 2023, Nigeria’s delegation size at the COP28 Summit in Dubai attracted harsh criticism.

At the time, Ajayi noted that the delegates, who included those from Nigeria’s oil-producing Niger Delta region, were at the Summit to promote their respective causes.

However, the number of Nigerian delegates grew from 1,411 at COP28 to 1,453 at COP30.

An analysis of the delegate list published by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change revealed that 1,453 Nigerians registered for COP30, cutting across federal and state governments, parliament, academia, private sector and civil society. Seven hundred and forty-nine delegates are from various government agencies.

The single largest bloc was the core climate agencies including officials of the Federal Ministry of Environment, the National Council on Climate Change, NESREA, NOSDRA, NiMet, NIHSA and related climate-change project desks, comprising hundreds of directors, technical officers and advisers.

Energy and extractive regulators such as NNPC Ltd., NUPRC, NMDPRA, Gas Aggregation Company Nigeria Ltd, PTDF and HYPREP were also on the delegation, alongside marine, ports, rail, aviation and water-resources agencies tied to blue-economy and decarbonisation plans.

Several states, including Lagos, Rivers, Delta, Kogi, Oyo, Kaduna, Borno, Nasarawa, Cross River and Akwa Ibom registered commissioners, permanent secretaries, climate directors and lawmakers.

National Assembly members and aides, finance, trade, power, solid minerals, agriculture, housing and youth MDAs, universities, standards bodies and development commissions were also on the list.

Asides from government agencies, private-sector energy and finance players, NGOs, youth and women’s networks, media organisations and professional bodies, as well as staff of Nigerian missions abroad were also on the list.

Most entries were tagged “guest of the nominating entity”, with others marked as contract/affiliate staff or partners and sponsors.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending