Connect with us

News

Alleged Christian Genocide: US Congress split over Nigeria’s CPC designation

Published

on

Lawmakers, religious leaders, United States Department officials, and witnesses were divided in their views as the United States House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa on Thursday held an open hearing on President Donald Trump’s redesignation of Nigeria as “Country of Particular Concern” over alleged Christian genocide.

Following the redesignation, the President threatened that the US military would enter Nigeria “guns-a-blazing to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.”

The Chris Smith-led committee had convened the hearing to review the scope of religious persecution in Nigeria, potential policy responses, including targeted sanctions, humanitarian assistance, and collaboration with Nigerian authorities to prevent further violence.

The first set of panellists at the hearing held at Room 2172 of the Rayburn House Office Building and streamed live online were Senior Bureau Official of the Bureau of African Affairs, Jonathan Pratt, and Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour, Jacob McGee, who faced numerous questions posed by the lawmakers.

The second panel featured presentations by the Director of the Centre for Religious Freedom, Ms Nina Shea; Bishop Wilfred Anagbe of Makurdi Catholic Diocese in Nigeria; and Ms Oge Onubogu of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies.

Setting the tone for the hearing, Chairman Chris Smith highlighted that 89 per cent of all Christians martyred worldwide are in Nigeria, with over 52,000 Christians slaughtered since 2009.

He accused militant Fulani herdsmen of committing acts of rape, kidnapping, and murder with “total impunity” from Nigerian officials.

Smith argued the attacks were unequivocally “religiously motivated” as he blamed the previous administration for weakening U.S. pressure by removing Nigeria from the “Country of Particular Concern” list, despite recommendations from the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.

Furthermore, he emphasised that the U.S. will not be silent while people are persecuted and will not stop fighting until perpetrators are brought to justice.

He also pointed to the compelling and disturbing testimony of witnesses, such as Bishop Wilfred Anagbe of the Catholic Diocese of Makurdi, to underscore the severity of the crisis.

Giving his presentation, Senior Bureau Official of the Bureau of African Affairs, Jonathan Pratt, said the US was worried that the violent activities of extremist groups such as Boko Haram, ISIS West Africa, ISIS Sahel, Al-Qaeda affiliate Ansaru, and Lakurawa were now spreading beyond the North-East to other regions, particularly Nigeria’s Middle Belt.

“Terrorists, separatists, bandits and criminal militias in Nigeria are all over the country with ongoing attacks often deliberately targeting Christian communities,” Pratt said, adding that the violence in the Middle Belt reflects a “problem of prioritisation” by the government.

According to the US official, although Nigerian security forces are engaged in counter-terrorism operations and taking significant losses in the North-East, more needs to be done to protect vulnerable communities and hold perpetrators accountable.

“The administration’s approach intends to raise the protection of Christians to the top of Nigeria’s priorities, especially in the Middle Belt,” Pratt said.

He noted that Nigeria, as Africa’s largest democracy and a key regional partner, shares economic and security interests with the United States. Pratt said Washington welcomes Nigeria’s willingness to cooperate following its designation as a “Country of Particular Concern” and looks forward to seeing these commitments translated into concrete actions on the ground.

Pratt also revealed that the Trump administration is developing a plan to incentivise and compel the Nigerian government to strengthen security for Christian communities and improve religious freedom. The plan will involve engagement from the US State Department, Treasury and potentially the Department of War to bolster counter-terrorism and protection measures.

“The levels of violence and atrocities committed against Christians and communities of all faiths in Nigeria are appalling and threaten the universal right to religious freedom,” Pratt said. “We remain open to working together with the Nigerians, but we also expect the Nigerian government to deliver results on the ground as proof of their commitment to this universal right.”

Smith and Pratt’s initial remarks set the tone for a variety of reactions.

During the session, Representative John James, Representative of the people of Michigan’s 10th Congressional district, and a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, said the designation is necessary to address what he described as a worsening crisis for Christians in Nigeria.

“Nigeria is facing one of the gravest religious freedom crises in the world. I have visited and have seen firsthand the direness of the conditions in what is now the deadliest place on earth to be a Christian,” James said.

He detailed the extent of the violence. “Since 2019, nearly 17,000 Christians have been killed. In the first seven months of this year alone, hundreds more were murdered. These are not isolated tragedies, but a sustained pattern of religiously motivated violence, often ignored or even enabled by the Nigerian government.

See also  15 more officers arrested over alleged coup plot as detention figures exceed 40

“Extremist groups like Boko Haram, Fulani militants, and ISIS West Africa attack often without any meaningful intervention from authorities. The lack of response has created an atmosphere of impunity where Christians continue to live in constant threat and fear.”

James also referenced the detention of Nnamdi Kanu, saying, “Religious persecution is tied to political repression and weakening institutions in Nigeria. The detention of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is a clear example.

“In 2022, Nigeria’s Court of Appeals struck down the charges against him and ordered his release. The UN Working Group for Arbitrary Detention has also called for his unconditional release, yet he remains in solitary confinement in deteriorating health and recently had to represent himself in court.

“Nigeria has signalled that the law is optional and targeting Christians is fair game. Just hours ago this morning, despite the pleas and cries of Nigerian people and many Nigerian lawmakers, Kanu was convicted on all charges.”

In response to a question about the Nigerian government being infiltrated by extremist groups, Senior Bureau Official Jonathan Pratt of the US Department of State’s Bureau of African Affairs said, “I do not believe that the government of Nigeria has been infiltrated by jihadists.”

James pressed further on government response, asking, “because when you look at the selective enforcement of the rule of law, one might question if there is any favouritism or looking the other way when groups are being specifically targeted, despite the fact, as my colleague Moore mentioned, not enforcing the rule of law about weapons.

“My next question is, how has the Nigerian government reacted since President Trump’s country of particular concern designation announcement?”

Pratt replied, “They have taken the designation very seriously. There is a senior delegation here now.

“They will meet with the most senior officials of the US government this week, and we have already demarched the government in Abuja and here in Washington on the action plan, and I can say that the results so far have been positive in terms of cooperation.”

Speaking, Congressman Bill Huizenga criticised President Bola Tinubu’s administration for what he described as ongoing attacks by “radicalised Islamists” against Christians in Nigeria.

Huizenga, who said he grew up around Nigerians and has followed the country’s security challenges for years, accused both US lawmakers and the media of downplaying religious-related violence in Nigeria.

“I went to school with kids from Nigeria,” he said, pausing as he attempted to control his emotions.

“We’ve got neighbours who’ve been missionaries there, who have family there, who have friends there, who know this is going on.

“Yet, we’ve got not just the mass media, we’ve got people within the Congress denying that this is happening, or certainly de-emphasising it,” he said.

He said Christians, moderate Muslims and “anyone being terrorised by these radicalised Islamists in Nigeria” require stronger protection, arguing that the Nigerian government “is not doing enough.”

Huizenga also questioned the level of US humanitarian assistance to internally displaced persons in Benue and Taraba states, noting that Benue alone has “1.4 million” displaced people.

Concluding his remarks, he referenced a written submission from House Financial Services Committee Chairman, French Hill, who stressed the need for enforceable sanctions.

Similarly, A member of the United States House of Representatives, Johnny Olszewski, has expressed deep concern over the alleged inability of the Nigerian government to protect communities against insurgent attacks.

He stated, “The Nigerian government lacks the means to protect communities against groups that kill indiscriminately.

“To be clear, this does not abdicate the Nigerian government from responsibility.

“Muslims and Christians alike have lived under the constant threat of extreme groups like Boko Haram and ISIS West Africa for far too long. And so the real story here for me is not about Nigeria’s intent at the institutional level to persecute people based on faith.”

The lawmaker, who openly identified as a Christian, said the debate around Nigeria should not be framed as persecution by the government but as a critical “capacity problem” that has left millions exposed to extremist groups.

“Jesus Christ is my Lord and Saviour. I have no problem sharing that. I am also troubled by the state of religious freedom in Nigeria and around the world.

“So, I want to be clear upfront, violence against Christians in Nigeria is a serious issue. Christians are being massacred, and communities are living in constant fear. But this suffering is not just confined to one religious group,” he added.

Citing President Donald Trump’s senior adviser on Africa, Masabulo, the congressman noted that terrorism in Nigeria affects people irrespective of “colour, religion or tribe,” stressing that Muslims and Christians have equally endured persistent attacks from Boko Haram and ISIS-West Africa.

He, however, stressed that acknowledging this lack of capacity does not absolve Nigeria’s leaders of responsibility, warning that governance failures, corruption and neglect must be confronted.

See also  Electoral Act Amendment: Opposition protests as senators back manual results transmission

“A government’s duty is to protect its people. And when there’s a failure to do so, whether that’s neglect or corruption or governance, leaders must be held accountable. But capacity within Nigerian institutions to maintain peace is a real question,” Olszewski stated.

The lawmaker also questioned the effectiveness of US policy towards Nigeria, calling for more meaningful support rather than threats of sanctions or military action.

“And we should be asking what the US is doing to help Nigeria build that capacity. Are we offering real partnerships or just threatening airstrikes and sanctions? Or instead, are we thinking about technical support, training and investment in the institutions that prevent violence in the first place?

“So let’s work together to fix what is broken. And I appreciate the ranking member for opening up this hearing with additional support options,” he said.

His remarks come amid renewed global scrutiny of insecurity in Nigeria, following the recent designation by President Donald Trump of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern.

During the session, Representative Pramila Jayapal warned against framing Nigeria’s violence as targeting only one religious group.

“But I appreciate that people have also recognised it isn’t just the persecution of Christians. This is persecution of multiple groups. And I think we have to be careful not to portray it just as persecution of Christians.

“That feels to me simplistic, and it doesn’t account for the intersectional diversity of Nigeria,” she said.

Citing research on drivers of conflict in Nigeria’s Middle Belt, Jayapal added that violence had affected both Christians and Muslims alike. She also expressed concern over Trump’s response to a televised report.

“I’m very concerned that a day after President Trump saw a clip on Fox News about the persecution of Christians in Nigeria, he threatened to go guns-a-blazing in Nigeria and revoke all assistance,” she said, noting that such a move would jeopardise health programmes critical to combating malaria and HIV.

Jayapal pressed officials on the legality of any US military action in Nigeria. “Can you tell me under what authority the US military strikes inside of Nigeria?” she asked.

Jayapal questioned whether the administration had considered diplomatic options before Trump’s public comments.

“Don’t you think it would have been appropriate to have the task force discussion and the alternatives presented prior to the president going on Truth Social and saying we’re going to go guns a-blazing into Nigeria?” she asked.

Pratt responded that Washington had long been engaged in Nigeria-related security and development issues.

“We have been working on these problems in Nigeria for a long time. We have a lot of programmes of assistance in the country. They did undergo a foreign assistance review, but many of them continue, and we want to make sure that we are using them strategically to get the best outcomes,” he said.

Jayapal, in closing, criticised what she described as a confrontational approach. “I just wish we would actually stick to that playbook rather than bully and threaten a country that is extremely important to us and to the region,” she said.

Quoting former US Ambassador Kelly Currie, she added, “You cannot solve problems created by men with guns by turning to men with guns for the solution.”

Christianity is facing the threat of extinction in Northern and Middle Belt regions of Nigeria, Bishop Wilfred Anagbe of the Diocese of Makurdi warned in a testimony before the United States House Subcommittee on Africa on Thursday.

The bishop said the country is entering one of its darkest periods for Christians as killings, mass displacement and targeted attacks continue with “impunity.”

Before the lawmakers, Anagbe declared that “Christianity risks elimination in parts of Northern and Middle-Belt Nigeria within a very short time,” describing the violence as a systematic effort to wipe out Christian communities and erase their cultural and religious identity.

The bishop said the ongoing crises marked by killings, kidnappings and widespread destruction have intensified despite recent international attention, including the redesignation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern by US President Donald Trump.

He called that move “a serious, well-founded wakeup call.”

Reflecting on the deepening humanitarian catastrophe, he told US lawmakers, “Millions of displaced persons remain in camps, unable to return to their ancestral lands. This threatens cultural continuity, religious and economic survival.”

He added that women “endure sexual violence as a weapon,” warning that such tactics are designed to ensure that “no more Christians will be born from so many traumatised women.”

Anagbe recounted a series of recent violent incidents, including the May 22 attack on his hometown, where several of his relatives were killed.

“An entire convent of Reverend Sisters of the Order of St. Clare was displaced, along with the local Catholic parish,” he said.

He also described the attempted killing of one of his priests, Father Solomon Atongo, on May 24. “He was shot and left to die in the pool of his blood. Though he survived the attack, he is unable to walk freely because he has a broken bone.”

See also  Navy Officer Yerima Allegedly Bypasses Airport Screening, Attempts To Board Flight With Gun

The bishop referenced attacks across Plateau, Benue, Kaduna and Kogi, including the June 13 massacre in Yelwata, Benue State, where he said 278 people—men, women and children—were slaughtered.

“It took the prayers of the Holy Father, Pope Leo XIV, for the government in Nigeria to even acknowledge this evil,” he said.

He accused the Federal Government of failing to confront the crisis.

“The government of Nigeria’s silence and refusal to engage in the fates of continued killings and displacements has deepened feelings of abandonment among the people,” he warned.

The bishop asked lawmakers pointedly, “Who is killing the Muslims up north? Is there any Christian militia displacing millions and occupying lands in Nigeria?”

According to the bishop, extremist groups—including Fulani militants, Boko Haram and ISWAP—are now pushing further South, worsening food insecurity and creating one of the largest displacement crises in Africa.

“Violence is spreading southward, displacing millions and destroying farmland,” he noted.

Anagbe thanked the subcommittee for its continued attention and reiterated his gratitude to President Trump.

“On behalf of millions of Christians in Nigeria and in the diaspora, we want to thank President Donald Trump for his bold leadership in designating Nigeria as a CPC,” he said.

But he insisted that words must be followed by action.

Among other steps, he called for targeted sanctions, expanded humanitarian support for internally displaced persons, and the passage of the Nigerian Religious Freedom and Accountability Act.

“This point cannot be overemphasised because it is impunity that fuels the violence we suffer,” he told the committee.

He urged allies to challenge discriminatory laws in Nigeria and push for the elimination of blasphemy laws.

As he closed, Anagbe warned that time is running out for Christian communities. “The church alone cannot stop the killings. It requires coordinated political, military and humanitarian intervention.”

His final plea was solemn and urgent: “Mr Chairman and members, we cannot afford to wait any longer. Please enact concrete actions according to the CPC designation. We all know that inaction emboldens the extremists even more.”

However, Congresswoman Sara Jacobs described President Donald Trump’s recent threat to deploy military action in Nigeria as “reckless.”

She cautioned against framing the situation solely in religious terms.

“Distorting what’s happening into a solely religious narrative erases the real drivers of violence and makes it harder to implement effective solutions, and it can fuel violence against the very groups the Trump administration claims it wants to protect,” she said.

Jacobs added, “That’s why I’m alarmed by President Trump’s rhetoric about this violence and threats to go into Nigeria ‘guns-a-blazing’ and to wipe out terrorists.

“We are already receiving reports of increased tensions between Christian and Muslim populations following this rhetoric. President Trump’s threat is reckless, and any unilateral military action in Nigeria would be illegal.

“Congress has not authorised force in Nigeria to protect Christians, and any action without Nigeria’s consent violates international law.”

The congresswoman also warned that a military-led approach could worsen civilian casualties and impunity, potentially fueling violent extremism.

“We need to use more tools from our foreign policy toolbox if we’re serious about helping Nigeria protect its citizens.

“That means we need to leverage diplomacy and engage with Nigeria on how we can help support their response while pushing for important reforms within Nigeria’s institutions,” she said.

Jacobs further emphasised the importance of funding programmes aimed at preventing violence and addressing the root causes of conflict.

In response to a question about the Nigerian government being infiltrated by extremist groups, Senior Bureau Official Jonathan Pratt of the US Department of State’s Bureau of African Affairs said, “I do not believe that the government of Nigeria has been infiltrated by jihadists.”

James pressed further on government response, asking, “because when you look at the selective enforcement of the rule of law, one might question if there is any favouritism or looking the other way when groups are being specifically targeted, despite the fact, as my colleague Moore mentioned, not enforcing the rule of law about weapons.

“My next question is, how has the Nigerian government reacted since President Trump’s country of particular concern designation announcement?”

Pratt replied, “They have taken the designation very seriously. There is a senior delegation here now.

“They will meet with the most senior officials of the US government this week, and we have already demarched the government in Abuja and here in Washington on the action plan, and I can say that the results so far have been positive in terms of cooperation.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Pentagon restores name of US Pacific Command

Published

on

The Pentagon is set to restore the name of the US Indo-Pacific Command to the US Pacific Command, it said on Tuesday, reversing a 2018 decision.

The renaming will not change the command’s area of responsibility, which stretches from the western part of India to America’s Pacific coastline, the Department of War said in a statement.

Its “fundamental mission and its unwavering commitment to maintaining a free and open theatre alongside regional allies and partners” also remain unchanged, it added.

The name change “honours the command’s deep historical roots, fostering a sense of pride and collective spirit among all who serve in the Pacific,” the department said, without giving additional details.

The US Pacific Command was established by former President Harry Truman after World War II.

It operated under that name for over 70 years before being renamed as the US Indo-Pacific Command in 2018, in a nod to the growing importance of the Indian Ocean in US strategic thinking.

The 2018 name change also came as part of broader efforts by Washington to counter China’s growing influence across the Asia-Pacific domain.

AFP

See also  Tinubu heads to S’Africa, Angola for G20, AU summits
Continue Reading

News

Labour to engage FG on minimum wage review

Published

on

The Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress said they will restart negotiations with the Federal Government over a new national minimum wage, warning that workers can no longer cope with rising living costs as inflation continues to erode real incomes.

The unions are pushing for what they described as a “genuine living wage” to replace the current framework, which they said no longer reflects Nigeria’s economic realities, particularly sharp increases in food, transport, housing, and healthcare costs.

The position was contained in a joint address delivered at the 114th International Labour Conference in Geneva on Monday, where the unions also rejected any proposal to tax the minimum wage or impose additional fiscal burdens on low-income earners.

Nigeria’s current minimum wage of N70,000 was signed into law on 18 July 2024, in an agreement between organised labour and the federal government. President Bola Tinubu formally announced the wage on 19 July 2024, and it took effect on 29 July 2024.

The agreement originally set a three-year review cycle, shifting from the previous five-year arrangement. However, in January 2025, the Federal Government adjusted the framework, announcing that the minimum wage would now be reviewed every two years, effectively setting 2026 as the next review point.

In light of this, labour leaders said they intend to formally open discussions with the federal government ahead of the July 2026 wage renegotiation deadline, in a bid to prevent the delays that have often hindered previous minimum wage reviews.

“The current Act expires early next year, and we have announced that renegotiation will commence by July 2026 to avoid the painful delays of the past. As soon as we leave here, we shall write again to the government demanding the commencement of the process for renegotiating the national minimum wage,” the unions said.

See also  48-hour curfew imposed after attack on bar in Plateau, Jos

The labour leaders said workers are already under severe pressure from inflation, currency depreciation, and rising costs across essential services, arguing that official economic indicators do not reflect the daily realities of most households.

They warned that taxing the minimum wage would worsen poverty and deepen economic hardship at a time when many citizens are struggling to meet basic needs.

“We demand nothing less than a genuine living wage that reflects today’s harsh economic realities. We also demand immediate relief measures by governments at all levels until a new minimum wage is signed into law. We reject outright any attempt to tax the minimum wage or impose further burdens on the poor,” the unions said in their communiqué.

The unions stressed that the upcoming negotiations must go beyond nominal wage adjustments and instead focus on protecting real incomes, which they said have been steadily eroded by inflation.

They also urged federal and state governments to introduce short-term relief measures pending the conclusion of negotiations, warning that delays could heighten industrial tensions across the country.

Beyond wage concerns, the labour movement used the Geneva platform to highlight broader economic and social challenges, including insecurity, unemployment, and rising poverty levels.

They said insecurity in several parts of the country has made commuting increasingly dangerous for workers, with killings, abductions, and displacement affecting productivity and livelihoods.

According to the unions, nearly 2,000 people were killed in the first quarter of the year, while millions have been displaced, with entire communities and economic activities disrupted by violence.

See also  Tinubu heads to S’Africa, Angola for G20, AU summits

They warned that worsening insecurity could force workers to remain at home as a survival response, escalating tensions beyond traditional labour action if not urgently addressed.

The labour leaders also said about 65 per cent of Nigerians, estimated at roughly 150 million people, are currently living in multidimensional poverty, driven by inflation, job losses, and declining purchasing power.

They argued that while macroeconomic reforms are aimed at stabilisation, they have yet to translate into improved living standards for ordinary citizens.

As the 2027 general elections approach, the unions said they are developing a charter of demands to shape their engagement with political actors and inform their support for candidates, noting that  only political actors who commit to improved security, functional public services, wage reforms, and protection of labour rights would receive their backing.

The labour movement also raised concerns over alleged interference in union affairs in some states, accusing certain governments of undermining democratically elected labour leadership structures.

They emphasised that organised labour would resist any attempt to weaken union independence or impose external control on labour organisations.

As the current wage regime approaches its 2026 review window, the unions said their priority remains securing a wage structure that reflects economic realities and protects workers from further erosion of income.

They maintained that the outcome of the upcoming negotiations would determine whether Nigerian workers receive what they termed a “living wage” or continue to endure worsening economic hardship.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Ribadu, Akpabio advocate tech-driven border control over Insecurity

Published

on

The National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, and President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, on Tuesday called for the deployment of modern technology and stronger regional cooperation to strengthen Nigeria’s border security architecture and address growing security threats across the country.

FILE: Akpabio

They made the call at the opening of the 15th National Security Seminar organised by the Alumni Association of the National Defence College in Abuja.

Represented by the Director of Policy and Strategy at the Office of the National Security Adviser, Yazid Gbemudu, the NSA said Nigeria’s territorial integrity and national stability were closely tied to the effectiveness of its border security framework.

He noted that while Nigeria’s extensive land and maritime borders facilitated trade, regional integration and socio-economic development, they also exposed the country to threats including terrorism, arms trafficking, smuggling, human trafficking, irregular migration and other forms of transnational organised crime.

According to him, weak border governance creates vulnerabilities that can be exploited by criminal and terrorist networks, thereby undermining national security and development efforts.

“A major pillar of Nigeria’s contemporary border security framework is the National Border Management Strategy, which promotes an integrated border management approach.

“The strategy seeks to enhance intelligence collaboration, strengthen border infrastructure, improve surveillance capabilities and modernise border management processes,” he said.

Ribadu said the deployment of Border Management Information Systems and other technological solutions at key entry and exit points had improved data collection, traveller screening and migration monitoring.

“These initiatives demonstrate Nigeria’s commitment to aligning its border management practices with international standards,” he added.

See also  Share terror intelligence with security agencies, Presidency replies Ndume

The NSA stressed the need for the full implementation of an integrated border management system to improve coordination among security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

“Effective intelligence sharing, joint operations and harmonised border procedures are essential for addressing contemporary security threats,” he said.

He also advocated increased investment in technology-driven border security solutions.

“Expanding surveillance systems across land, maritime and coastal borders will significantly improve monitoring capabilities and reduce illegal cross-border activities.

“Modern challenges require modern solutions, including biometric identification systems, advanced border monitoring technologies and data-driven security frameworks,” Ribadu stated.

The NSA further emphasised the importance of regional and bilateral cooperation, noting that many of the security challenges confronting Nigeria’s borders were transnational in nature and required coordinated responses among neighbouring countries.

He also called for greater investment in border communities through sustainable development, improved infrastructure and economic opportunities to reduce their vulnerability to criminal exploitation.

“Strengthening Nigeria’s border security architecture is fundamental to ensuring national stability, protecting territorial integrity and promoting socio-economic development,” he said.

Ribadu, however, acknowledged challenges such as porous borders, inadequate infrastructure, limited technological capabilities and gaps in inter-agency coordination, saying they required urgent attention.

“Border security is a shared responsibility that requires the collective efforts of security agencies, government institutions, border communities and international partners,” he added.

Speaking at the event, Akpabio, who was represented by the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Defence, Ahmad Lawan, said Nigeria’s extensive land and maritime boundaries posed significant security challenges.

“As a country with extensive land and maritime boundaries, Nigeria faces significant challenges relating to border control, illegal migration, arms trafficking, smuggling and the infiltration of criminal and extremist elements.

See also  30 dead, 58 rescued in Niger boat mishap -NEMA

“It is, therefore, imperative that Nigeria prioritises the strengthening of its border security architecture through improved surveillance, enhanced infrastructure, better inter-agency coordination, technological innovation and stronger regional cooperation,” he said.

Akpabio noted that many of the security threats confronting Nigeria had transnational dimensions, making coordinated responses essential.

He stressed that peace and security remained prerequisites for meaningful national development.

“There can be no meaningful development without peace and security. Porous and poorly managed borders can become vulnerabilities that undermine national security efforts and national stability,” he said.

The Senate President also advocated a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach to addressing insecurity.

According to him, government institutions, security agencies, civil society organisations, the private sector, traditional institutions, the media and academia all have critical roles to play in safeguarding the country.

Earlier, the Acting President of AANDEC, Commodore Amatare Kpou (retd.), described the seminar as a key platform for promoting informed discourse on national security challenges and opportunities.

Kpou said the theme of the seminar, “Strengthening Nigeria’s Border Security Architecture for National Stability,” was timely, given the growing threats of irregular migration, smuggling, trafficking and other cross-border crimes.

He expressed confidence that the deliberations would generate useful recommendations for policymakers and contribute to efforts aimed at building a safer and more secure Nigeria.

Nigeria shares over 4,000 kilometres of land borders with neighbouring countries and an extensive coastline, making border security a critical component of national security.

Authorities have repeatedly identified porous borders as channels for terrorism, arms smuggling, human trafficking and other transnational crimes.

The Federal Government has in recent years intensified efforts to strengthen border management through technology, intelligence sharing and regional cooperation.

See also  EFCC releases Tambuwal from custody

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending