Connect with us

News

Retired Soldiers Threaten Fresh Protest As Tinubu Plans Generous Benefits For Sacked Service Chiefs

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu’s exit benefit for sacked service chiefs has raised eyebrows, especially among retired and serving junior military personnel, many of whom say the system has abandoned them.

It was reports that Nigeria’s recently sacked Service Chiefs, General Christopher Musa (former Chief of Defence Staff), Air Marshal Hasan Abubakar (former Chief of Air Staff), and Vice Admiral Emmanuel Ogalla (former Chief of Naval Staff), are set to walk away with generous post-service benefits that include bulletproof vehicles, domestic aides, lifetime medical care, and other luxury privileges.

Their exit follows President Tinubu’s decision to overhaul the military hierarchy with the appointment of new service chiefs on Friday, October 24, 2025.

Under the new arrangement, General Olufemi Oluyede has been appointed as Chief of Defence Staff, replacing Musa; Major-General W. Shaibu is now Chief of Army Staff; Air Vice Marshal Sunday Kelvin Aneke takes over as Chief of Air Staff; and Rear Admiral I. Abbas becomes the Chief of Naval Staff. The Chief of Defence Intelligence, Major-General E.A.P. Undiendeye, retained his position.

The announcement, made through a statement by the President’s Special Adviser on Media and Public Communication, Sunday Dare, was described as part of efforts to “strengthen Nigeria’s national security architecture.”

What the Service Chiefs Will Receive

It was understands that the retirement benefits are outlined in the Harmonised Terms and Conditions of Service (HTCOS) for Officers and Enlisted Personnel of the Nigerian Armed Forces, approved and signed by President Tinubu on December 14, 2024.

According to the policy, each outgoing service chief is entitled to:

One bulletproof SUV or an equivalent vehicle, maintained and replaced by the military every four years.

A backup vehicle, such as a Peugeot 508, also maintained by the Service.

Five domestic aides — two service cooks, two stewards, and one civilian gardener.

An aide-de-camp or security officer, a personal assistant, and three service drivers.

A standard guard unit made up of nine soldiers for round-the-clock protection.

Free medical care for life, both in Nigeria and abroad.

Retention of personal firearms, which will only be retrieved upon the officer’s death.

They are also permitted to keep their military uniforms and accoutrements, which may be worn during official military ceremonies.

See also  Nnaji explains resignation, denies wrongdoing

It was understands that the policy further clarifies that such privileges will be forfeited if a retired officer accepts another publicly funded appointment, except where the President offers the position.

In such cases, the officer will only receive allowances commensurate with the new role rather than a full salary.

A section of the document reads: “Retirement benefits for CDS and Service Chiefs: The following benefits shall be applicable — one bulletproof SUV or equivalent vehicle to be maintained by the Service and replaced every four years; one Peugeot 508 or equivalent backup vehicle. Retention of all military uniforms and accoutrement; five domestic aides; one aide-de-camp/security officer; one special or personal assistant; three service drivers; a standard guard of nine soldiers; and free medical cover in Nigeria and abroad.”

While the document states that officers of Lieutenant-General rank and above are entitled to medical care worth up to $20,000 annually, analysts believe the actual benefits for the service chiefs far exceed that figure due to their positions and access to higher allowances.

‘We Are Forgotten’ – Junior Retirees Protest Welfare Disparity

However, the news of the lavish packages has sparked outrage among retired soldiers, particularly those from the lower ranks, who say they continue to live in poverty and neglect despite decades of loyal service to the country.

For them, the contrasting lifestyles between retired generals and junior personnel reveal a deep inequality within the Nigerian Armed Forces.

One of the aggrieved ex-soldiers, Sergeant Zaki Williams, who claimed to speak for over 700 retired soldiers, said on Sunday (today) that many of them have been waiting for years for their pension arrears and entitlements.

“I don’t really understand how our people in Nigeria do things,” he said, visibly upset.

“The people at the top always make rules to favour themselves. They don’t care about the poor or the junior ones who sacrificed everything for this country.”

Williams explained that several appeals and promises made by government officials over the years had amounted to nothing.

“Since they made those promises to us, we went back home and didn’t hear anything again. Everything just ended there,” he said. “We’ve been waiting till now, but nothing has happened.”

See also  FG secures $11.4bn World Bank loans in three years

‘We Can’t Build Homes While They Get Bulletproof Cars’

For Williams and his colleagues, life after service has been anything but comfortable. Many of them are unable to afford homes, pay school fees, or even access medical care.

“How can someone retire after 25 years of service and still not get his entitlement?” he asked. “Many of us can’t even build a house. The senior officers have houses, cars, and everything good, but the rest of us have nothing.”

He added that the little compensation some received was too small to rebuild their lives.

“If they give you ₦2m today, what can you do with it in this economy? You have a family to feed, children to train, and bills to pay,” he lamented. “We risked our lives for the nation, yet this is what we get.”

Another retired soldier, Abdul Isiak, echoed similar sentiments, accusing senior officers of frustrating efforts by the Ministry of Defence to address the plight of lower-ranking retirees.

“All these benefits they are giving to the generals are far more than what we have ever asked for. We are only asking for what is rightfully ours, our pensions, our gratuities. We’ve suffered too much,” he said.

According to him, many of his colleagues now depend on odd jobs to survive, while others have fallen into depression or died waiting for their entitlements.

“We have families, too. We fought for this country. It’s unfair that only the top brass get everything while the rest of us are forgotten,” he added.

Retired Soldiers Threaten Fresh Protests

Disappointed by years of neglect, some of the retirees said they were considering fresh protests to draw attention to their plight.

“Some of us said we should protest again, but others refused because they fear harassment,” Williams said.

“We told them that day that we were not going for another protest. If the government wants to help us, they should help us. If not, we’re done.”

He added that many of his colleagues have lost faith in the system and now simply “leave everything to God.”

See also  Rivers Assembly attacks Fubara over infrastructure collapse, N600bn savings

“We’ve cried and done our best. They promised us, but in the end, nothing happened. We haven’t seen anything,” he said quietly. “That’s why many of us are now silent.”

Fresh Round of Military Retirements Imminent

Meanwhile, reports have it that the Armed Forces are bracing for a wave of compulsory retirements following the appointment of new service chiefs.

According to the sources within the military said that more than 50 senior officers, including generals, brigadiers-general, air vice-marshals, and admirals, could be affected as part of the reorganisation that traditionally follows changes at the top.

A senior officer explained that the policy, a long-standing military tradition, dictates that any officer senior to the newly appointed service chiefs must retire immediately, since they cannot take orders from their juniors.

“It’s standard procedure. When a junior is appointed as service chief, those senior to him must leave. They cannot remain in the same structure and take orders from their junior,” the officer said.

Another insider estimated that about 100 officers across the Army, Navy, and Air Force could leave service in the coming weeks.

“Only officers from Course 41 will remain in service,” the source said. “The new CDS is from Course 39, while the Army, Air, and Naval chiefs are from Course 40. Those above them, from Courses 39 and 40, are expected to go.”

It was understands that this shake-up is expected to open new vacancies, paving the way for promotions and postings, as the military moves to restructure its command hierarchy under the new leadership.

The revelations have reignited a long-running conversation about equity, welfare, and reward systems within the Nigerian military.

While government officials insist that the retirement benefits of the service chiefs are standard practice, critics argue that such lavish privileges for a few at the top, amid neglect of thousands who fought in the trenches, highlight the deep class divide in the armed forces.

For many like Sgt. Williams, the question remains simple: “We are not asking for bulletproof cars. We just want our dignity back.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  FERMA unveils initiative to curb road crashes in Kogi

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Nnaji explains resignation, denies wrongdoing

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Boxer, Anthony Joshua discharged from hospital days after fatal accident that claimed the lives of two of his friends

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Rivers Assembly attacks Fubara over infrastructure collapse, N600bn savings

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  FERMA unveils initiative to curb road crashes in Kogi

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Rivers Assembly attacks Fubara over infrastructure collapse, N600bn savings

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending