Connect with us

Lifestyle

PHOTOS: HOW NIGERIA WAS SOLD TO THE BRITISH FOR £865,000 IN 1899

Published

on

This is not just the story of colonial conquest. It is the story of the first OIL WAR, a war not fought over petroleum, but over palm oil, in the territories that would later become Nigeria.

Before the first drop of crude was ever drilled in Oloibiri, there was already a fierce battle for control over a different kind of oil: the red gold of the tropics.

In the 19th century, as the Industrial Revolution thundered across Britain and Europe, the demand for lubricants to keep machines running was insatiable. And at the heart of that demand was palm oil, a sticky red substance extracted from the fruit of a native African tree. This oil was used to grease machines, produce candles, soaps, etc.

The Niger Delta, then part of the region Europeans called the “Oil Rivers,” was the world’s richest source of this commodity. For centuries, the same Delta had served as a major slave-exporting hub, but by the 1870s, as abolition gained ground, slaves were replaced by palm oil as the primary export. The coast once known for bondage was now valued for commerce. African traders, many of them former slaves or descendants of returnees, became immensely wealthy. One of the most famous among them was King Jaja of Opobo, a self-made merchant-king who built a thriving trade empire on the strength of palm oil and personal diplomacy. These African merchants understood global trade and negotiated directly with European companies.

But African prosperity was never allowed to grow unchecked for long. By the late 1800s, European commercial rivalry was boiling over into political intrigue. British, French, and German merchants vied for dominance in the West African market. In 1879, a Cornishman named George Taubman Goldie began consolidating several British trading firms into a single entity. He formed the United African Company (UAC). With this company, Goldie initially envisioned dominating the palm oil trade on the Niger River. After that, he envisioned something more than trade, he wanted sovereignty.

See also  Minister, deputy senate president mourn Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi

Through aggressive expansion, Goldie’s company secured treaties with local chiefs along the Niger and Benue Rivers, gaining de facto control of vast inland territories. By 1884, Goldie’s company operated about 30 trading posts and used its economic leverage to argue at the Berlin Conference (the infamous 1884–85 summit where European powers divided Africa among themselves) that Britain should be awarded exclusive rights to the Niger Basin.

The British won the argument. The next year, in 1886, Goldie’s company received a Royal Charter from the British Crown, becoming the Royal Niger Company (RNC), a private corporation with governmental powers, similar to the old British East India Company. It could make treaties, raise its own military force, collect taxes, administer justice, and govern the vast areas along the Niger and Benue Rivers.

In effect, Nigeria was not yet a British colony, it was a private corporate colony ruled by a for-profit company headquartered in London.

To the local chiefs, the new company agents spoke of free trade and mutual prosperity. But behind these assurances were binding English contracts designed to establish monopolies, giving the company exclusive trading rights and ceding sovereignty to the British Crown. This meant the chiefs could only sell palm oil to the Royal Niger Company. Any attempt to export independently was treated as economic rebellion. Many chiefs, including King Jaja of Opobo, resisted.

King Jaja of Opobo was one such rebel. Despite his previous cooperation with the British, he refused to be dictated to. When he began exporting palm oil directly to Liverpool merchants, he was arrested in 1887, exiled to the West Indies, and never saw his kingdom again. He died in 1891 on his way home, allegedly poisoned with a cup of tea.

By the 1890s, resistance was rising. In the kingdom of Nembe, in today’s Bayelsa State, a new monarch, King Koko Mingi VIII, ascended the throne in 1889. Koko was an educated Christian convert and former schoolteacher. But he soon found himself at odds with the Royal Niger Company’s chokehold on trade. Like Jaja before him, he tried to bypass the company’s monopoly by seeking commercial ties with the Germans in Kamerun. But the company retaliated by blockading his kingdom from its traditional markets.

See also  SOME HUSBANDS SEE THEIR WIVES AS “BABY FACTORIES” INSTEAD OF LOVING PARTNERS

Tired of negotiations and betrayal, King Koko struck back. On 29 January 1895, before dawn, he led over 1,000 warriors in a surprise attack on the Royal Niger Company’s heavily guarded headquarters at Akassa. In what became known as the Brass Raid, Koko’s forces captured the station, seized arms and ammunition, including a Maxim machine gun, and took 60 European hostages. Koko demanded that the British lift their monopoly and allow Nembe to trade freely.

The British government refused to negotiate. In response, King Koko executed about forty of the hostages, an act the British termed cannibalism, a fabrication meant to justify vengeance.

On 20 February 1895, the Royal Navy retaliated under Admiral Frederick Bedford, launching a brutal punitive expedition. They bombarded Nembe town (Brass) and burned it to the ground. Hundreds were killed. Survivors suffered famine and diseases such as smallpox.

King Koko went into hiding. The town of Brass was fined £500, a fortune at the time, and forced to surrender weapons and surviving hostages.

In 1898, King Koko, declared an outlaw and unable to rally sufficient support for further resistance, died by suicide in exile. Around the same time, Oba Ovonramwen of Benin was also deposed following the Benin Punitive Expedition in 1897, signalling the final collapse of powerful indigenous resistance in southern Nigeria.

Back in London, the public outcry over the Brass Massacre and the RNC’s excesses led to parliamentary pressure. The British Parliament opened an inquiry, but rather than punish the Royal Niger Company, the Crown did something far more significant, it decided that a private corporation could no longer be trusted with the government of a people.

See also  PHOTOS: WHO TRULY OWNS ILORIN – YORUBA OR FULANI?

In 1899, the British revoked the Royal Charter of the Royal Niger Company. But it did not come for free.
The British bought out the company’s rights, territories, and infrastructure for the sum of £865,000, the equivalent of £108 million today. That was the price Britain paid to acquire the territory that would become Nigeria.

It was not a conquest in the conventional sense, it was a transaction. Nigeria was, quite literally, sold.
And who sold it?

The man at the centre of the deal was Sir George Taubman Goldie, the imperialist who had envisioned and built the corporate company that took over Nigeria’s territories. In many ways, he was Nigeria’s unofficial founder, though he never ruled the colony formally. He sold Nigeria to the British Crown in 1899 for £865,000, and for his services to empire, he was later knighted.

On 1 January 1900, the Southern and Northern Protectorates were formally declared under British rule.
The company was gone. But its legacy of economic exploitation, monopolistic control, and indirect rule would persist.

The company itself didn’t die. It rebranded and evolved. The Royal Niger Company merged into what we know today as Unilever, a multinational that still trades in Africa.

This is not just a footnote in colonial history. It is the story of how an entire country people, kingdoms, resources, rivers, was commodified, negotiated, and sold. It reminds us that empire was not only built with gunboats, but also with contracts, shares, and profits.

Nigeria, long before independence, had already been bought and sold.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

WHERE CRITICAL THINKING IS ABSENT, RETROGRESSION BECOMES THE ORDER OF THE DAY

Published

on

A society that discourages questions, celebrates ignorance, and blindly defends outdated beliefs cannot expect to make meaningful progress.**

One of the biggest obstacles to human development is not necessarily a lack of natural resources, money, or opportunities. Sometimes, the greatest obstacle is the absence of critical thinking.

A society cannot move forward when its people are discouraged from questioning authority, examining evidence, challenging established beliefs, and demanding accountability.

Unfortunately, across many African societies, independent thinking is sometimes mistaken for disrespect, questioning religious authorities is labelled rebellion, and challenging political leaders is treated as an act of disloyalty.

This mentality creates an environment where people defend ideas without examining whether those ideas are beneficial to society.

## WHEN QUESTIONING BECOMES A PROBLEM

How can a society develop when asking questions is considered offensive?

How can corruption be defeated when citizens defend politicians based on political loyalty rather than performance?

How can education transform society when people are encouraged to memorise information instead of understanding, analysing, and applying knowledge?

How can Africa compete globally when scientific evidence, innovation, research, and rational thinking are sometimes pushed aside in favour of superstition and unquestionable traditions?

These are uncomfortable questions, but uncomfortable questions are sometimes exactly what a society needs.

## BLIND LOYALTY IS THE ENEMY OF PROGRESS

A responsible citizen should be able to question political leaders without being branded an enemy.

A person should be able to examine religious teachings without being insulted or threatened.

Cultural traditions should be respected, but traditions should not be immune to criticism, particularly when they conflict with human dignity, justice, equality, and social development.

See also  Brigadier Babafemi Ogundipe, the mostly unseen 'Vice President' to Aguiyi-Ironsi

No political leader, religious institution, cultural authority, or traditional belief should be above reasonable questioning.

Respect should never mean surrendering your ability to think.

## AFRICA NEEDS THINKERS, NOT JUST FOLLOWERS

Look at the societies making remarkable progress in science, technology, medicine, engineering, education, and industrial development.

Their progress is supported by investment in knowledge, research, innovation, institutions, accountability, and the freedom to challenge existing ideas.

Africa cannot solve modern problems with an unwillingness to question old assumptions.

We cannot continue blaming every national failure on spiritual forces while ignoring corruption, poor leadership, weak institutions, inadequate education, unemployment, and economic mismanagement.

Prayer may offer personal comfort to believers, but responsible governance, sound policies, education, scientific research, and accountability are essential to national development.

The future belongs to societies willing to learn, question, adapt, and improve.

## THE REAL QUESTION

Africa does not lack intelligent people. What it urgently needs is an environment where intelligence, curiosity, independent thought, and constructive criticism are encouraged rather than suppressed.

A society that fears questions will struggle to discover answers.

A society that rejects evidence will struggle to solve problems.

And a society that blindly protects outdated thinking will struggle to move forward.

**Critical thinking is not the enemy of religion, culture, or tradition. It is a necessary tool for examining ideas and making better decisions.**

The question is no longer whether Africa needs progress. The question is whether its people are willing to challenge the attitudes and systems that stand in the way.

**NEWSBREAK365 — Informing, Challenging Perspectives, and Encouraging Critical Conversations.**

See also  Damilola Mike-Bamiloye revealed how Dad rejected the plan to remake ‘Agbara Nla’

—

**JOIN THE CONVERSATION:**

What is holding Africa back the most?

1. Lack of critical thinking and independent reasoning.
2. Bad leadership and corruption.
3. Blind religious and cultural loyalty.
4. Poor educational systems.

Share your opinion. Let’s have an honest conversation.

#Newsbreak365 #CriticalThinking #AfricanDevelopment #Education #IndependentThinking #GoodGovernance #AfricaMustProgress

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

THE SPIRIT OF IGNORANCE: HOW IT DESTROYS CRITICAL THINKING, LIMITS HUMAN POTENTIAL AND HOLDS SOCIETY BACK

Published

on

Ignorance is not simply the absence of knowledge. Sometimes, it is the refusal to acquire knowledge, question established beliefs, or accept facts that challenge what we have been taught.**

One of the greatest obstacles to human development is a mindset that treats questioning as disrespect, independent thinking as rebellion, and new knowledge as a threat.

A person trapped in ignorance may defend what they do not understand, reject evidence that challenges their beliefs, and attack anyone who dares to ask difficult questions.

This is how ignorance becomes a powerful instrument of manipulation.

## How does the spirit of ignorance affect an individual?

**1. It destroys critical thinking.**

Instead of examining facts, people accept information without questioning its accuracy. They become followers rather than independent thinkers.

**2. It encourages blind obedience.**

People begin to obey authority, tradition, religious leaders, political figures, or popular opinions without considering whether their instructions are reasonable or beneficial.

**3. It limits personal development.**

When someone believes they already know everything, they close the door to learning, improvement, innovation, and personal growth.

**4. It makes people vulnerable to manipulation.**

Ignorance creates opportunities for dishonest politicians, religious manipulators, fraudsters, and other individuals who exploit people’s inability or unwillingness to question information.

**5. It encourages the rejection of uncomfortable truths.**

Some people would rather defend a familiar falsehood than accept an unfamiliar truth.

## How does ignorance affect society?

A society that discourages critical thinking creates an environment where misinformation spreads easily, accountability becomes difficult, and poor leadership can survive without sufficient scrutiny.

See also  SOME HUSBANDS SEE THEIR WIVES AS “BABY FACTORIES” INSTEAD OF LOVING PARTNERS

When citizens stop asking questions about education, healthcare, infrastructure, employment, security, and economic development, those responsible for delivering results face less pressure to perform.

No nation can achieve sustainable development simply by wishing for it. Progress requires knowledge, scientific thinking, practical solutions, innovation, responsible leadership, and citizens who are willing to question the status quo.

## The uncomfortable truth

Ignorance is not limited to people without formal education. An educated person can also be ignorant when they refuse to examine evidence, challenge their assumptions, or consider alternative perspectives.

Equally, questioning something does not automatically make someone intelligent. True critical thinking requires evidence, reason, intellectual humility, and a willingness to correct one’s mistakes.

**The greatest sign of intelligence is not knowing everything; it is having the courage to recognise what you do not know and the willingness to learn.**

Africa does not need more people who simply memorise information and repeat what they have been told. It needs people who can analyse, question, investigate, innovate, and demand accountability.

Because where critical thinking is absent, ignorance flourishes, manipulation becomes easier, and progress becomes difficult.

**A society that refuses to think will continue struggling with problems it has the intellectual capacity to solve.**

—

**NEWSBREAK365 EDITORIAL QUESTION**

Is ignorance more dangerous than poverty, or is ignorance one of the major reasons poverty, manipulation, and underdevelopment continue to thrive in many African societies?

Share your thoughts. Let’s have an honest conversation.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

THEY WENT THROUGH SCHOOL, BUT SCHOOL NEVER WENT THROUGH THEM: THE TRAGEDY OF CERTIFICATES WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING

Published

on

Education without critical thinking is one of the greatest contradictions of modern society.**

There is a painful reality in our society that deserves serious discussion: some people have spent years in classrooms, earned impressive academic qualifications, collected university degrees and proudly displayed certificates, yet still struggle with basic reasoning, independent thinking and common sense.

They went through primary school, secondary school and university. They passed examinations, graduated and acquired academic titles. But the bigger question remains: **Did education truly transform their minds?**

A certificate may prove that someone attended an educational institution and met certain academic requirements. However, it does not automatically prove wisdom, intelligence, emotional maturity, critical thinking or good judgement.

## The difference between schooling and education

Schooling and education are related, but they are not necessarily the same thing.

Schooling often involves attending classes, studying prescribed materials, writing examinations and obtaining qualifications.

True education should go much further. It should teach people how to question information, analyse situations, recognise manipulation, challenge outdated beliefs and make informed decisions.

An educated person should not simply accept everything because an influential individual said it. They should have the ability to examine evidence, consider different perspectives and reach reasonable conclusions.

Unfortunately, some people mistake memorisation for understanding and academic qualifications for intellectual superiority.

## When certificates become more important than knowledge

In many societies, academic titles are treated as symbols of superiority. People introduce themselves with their degrees, qualifications and professional achievements, sometimes expecting unquestionable respect simply because they have attended prestigious institutions.

See also  Brigadier Babafemi Ogundipe, the mostly unseen 'Vice President' to Aguiyi-Ironsi

But what happens when someone possesses several qualifications yet refuses to listen to opposing opinions?

What happens when academic achievements are accompanied by arrogance, prejudice, intolerance and an inability to think independently?

What happens when people use their education to intimidate others rather than enlighten them?

That is when we must question whether education is serving its true purpose.

## Critical thinking is the real test

A society cannot progress simply by producing graduates. It needs people who can identify problems, challenge injustice, demand accountability, question harmful traditions and develop practical solutions.

A person who cannot distinguish facts from propaganda is vulnerable to manipulation, regardless of how many certificates they possess.

A person who refuses to question misinformation is not demonstrating intellectual strength.

And someone who believes that having a degree automatically makes their opinions superior to everyone else’s has misunderstood the purpose of education.

## Africa needs educated minds, not just certificate collectors

Africa does not suffer from a shortage of people with academic qualifications alone. The continent also needs stronger institutions, responsible leadership, scientific thinking, innovation, accountability and citizens who are willing to question things that do not make sense.

Education should liberate the mind, not imprison it in blind conformity.

We need graduates who can think independently, challenge bad leadership, reject ignorance and contribute meaningfully to society.

We need people who understand that respect should not be demanded through academic titles but earned through character, knowledge, wisdom and responsible conduct.

## THE BIG QUESTION

You can graduate from a university without graduating from ignorance.

See also  PHOTOS: Dakakari Terracotta Sculptures: Guardians of Memory and Prestige

You can possess multiple degrees without possessing wisdom.

You can be academically qualified and still lack the ability to think critically.

**THEY WENT THROUGH SCHOOL, BUT SCHOOL NEVER WENT THROUGH THEM!**

Perhaps it is time we stopped measuring education only by the number of certificates hanging on people’s walls and started measuring it by the quality of their reasoning, decisions, behaviour and contributions to society.

**What is your opinion? Are we producing truly educated people, or are we producing people who are simply good at collecting certificates?**

Join the conversation.

#Education #CriticalThinking #AfricanEducation #Wisdom #CommonSense #IntellectualDevelopment #Newsbreak365

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending