Connect with us

News

See what caused Abuja-Kaduna train derailment

Published

on

The Nigerian Safety Investigation Bureau has revealed that poor infrastructure maintenance and operational lapses were the primary causes of the Abuja-Kaduna train derailment that occurred on August 26, 2025.

The bureau’s preliminary report, released on Wednesday, slightly differs from the Nigeria Railway Corporation’s earlier explanation and sheds light on long-standing systemic failures.

The NSIB disclosed that 21 passengers sustained varying degrees of injuries, not 20 as initially claimed by the NRC. Fortunately, no fatalities were recorded. According to the report, the injured passengers received first aid before being evacuated to hospitals for further treatment.

The accident involved NRC’s train number AK1, powered by locomotive CDD5c2 2701, which derailed at the Asham section of the Abuja-Kaduna rail corridor around 11 am that morning. The derailment caused carriages to overturn, sending passengers scrambling for safety. Eyewitnesses described the incident as chaotic, with some fearing it was a terrorist attack before realising it was an accident.

In the immediate aftermath of the accident, the NRC attributed the derailment to human error, excessive speeding, and misapplication of the emergency brake system.

However, the NSIB’s preliminary report paints a very different picture.

According to the bureau, the derailment was largely linked to neglected infrastructure, including a broken point clip and an unserviceable automatic switch mechanism at Asham Station. With the equipment inoperative, railway staff were forced to manually operate and lock the switch — a risky procedure that set the stage for disaster.

When the train passed over the defective section, the front coaches began to shake violently before derailing, damaging over 300 sleepers, destroying hundreds of track fasteners, and inflicting heavy damage on parts of the signalling system.

See also  Banditry: Abdulrazaq pushes back as PDP demands emergency rule in Kwara

The NSIB noted that the faulty infrastructure had been flagged in an earlier derailment at the same location just 13 months prior. At that time, only superficial repairs were carried out on the damaged sleepers. “The occurrence was the second derailment at Asham Station within 13 months,” the report said. “Some sleepers damaged in the previous incident were only patched, rather than being properly replaced.”

Beyond infrastructure problems, the Bureau highlighted operational weaknesses within the NRC. Personnel had undergone only initial training, with no formal refresher courses to update their skills. Critical operational and maintenance tools such as OEM spare parts, CCTV cameras, clocks, and other communication devices were either unavailable or left in disrepair.

The bureau’s report stressed that the lack of adequate infrastructure and training meant that staff were ill-prepared to manage risks effectively. On the day of the derailment, the shunter cleared the train to proceed manually, despite the faulty switch. The result was a devastating derailment that shook public confidence in the nation’s rail system.

Though no lives were lost, the injuries sustained by 21 passengers highlighted the consequences of systemic neglect. “Official records confirmed 21 passengers sustained minor to major injuries, some passengers were evacuated without recourse to local health facilities,” the report noted.

The NSIB issued several immediate safety recommendations to prevent future derailments and improve the reliability of rail services in Nigeria. These include immediate replacement of all derailment-affected sleepers to ensure track stability, replacement of all point switches at Asham Station and across the Abuja-Kaduna route with reliable OEM parts.

See also  SEE FULL LIST: US suspends immigrant visa processing for Nigeria, Ghana, 73 other countries

Others include addressing all caution zones along the corridor to reduce the risk of further accidents, regular refresher training for NRC personnel to maintain high safety and operational standards, restoration of all defective monitoring and communication equipment to OEM standards, including CCTV systems, clocks, and signalling systems.

The Director of Public Affairs and Family Assistance at the NSIB, Bimbo Oladeji, explained that the preliminary report represents early findings and is subject to further analysis. “The final report will present detailed conclusions and additional recommendations to enhance rail safety in Nigeria,” he said.

Oladeji added that the NSIB is committed to conducting a thorough investigation that not only identifies immediate causes but also addresses the systemic issues threatening the safety of Nigeria’s growing rail transport sector.

The Abuja-Kaduna rail corridor has long been regarded as a strategic transport link, serving thousands of commuters daily. However, the derailment has once again raised concerns over the state of Nigeria’s railway infrastructure. For passengers, the incident has revived memories of past tragedies and heightened anxiety over the safety of train travel.

Industry experts believe that unless urgent reforms are implemented, the NRC risks further eroding public trust. Analysts note that the Abuja-Kaduna line, which has already suffered from terrorist attacks and vandalism in recent years, cannot afford additional safety failures.

The NSIB’s preliminary findings highlight a pressing need for systemic reforms in Nigeria’s rail operations. Infrastructure must be maintained to OEM standards, personnel must receive regular training, and critical safety equipment must be restored and upgraded.

See also  Five things to know as Africa hosts its first G20 summit

While passengers can take some comfort that no lives were lost in the latest derailment, the incident underscores the high cost of neglect. If Nigeria is to expand its rail network and make it a reliable alternative for mass transit, the safety lapses that contributed to the August derailment must be urgently addressed.

The bureau’s final report, expected in the coming months, is anticipated to provide more comprehensive guidance for ensuring that rail travel in Nigeria meets international safety standards.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Sultan backs Sharia law in Oyo, Ekiti

Published

on

President-General, Nigeria Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) and Sultan of Sokoto, Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar III, has expressed support for the establishment of an Independent Shariah Arbitration Panel in Ekiti and Oyo states.

But the Aare Ona Kakanfo of Yorubaland, Gani Adams, condemned the attempt to introduce Sharia in the South West, saying it is alien to Yoruba culture and religious beliefs.

The 20th Sultan of Sokoto and the spiritual leader of Nigeria’s Muslims also expressed concern about the spate of intolerance and disregard for the rights of Muslims, especially in the southern part of the country. He noted that Muslims in the South West had been denied their constitutional rights to a Shariah Court of Appeal.

In a statement, yesterday, by the Deputy National Legal Adviser of NSCIA, Haroun Eze, the traditional ruler lamented the unwarranted resistance and objections from political and traditional quarters to the Muslim community’s efforts to establish an Independent Shariah Arbitration Panel in Ekiti.

He said this was coming barely a few weeks after the announcement on the inauguration of a Shariah panel in Oyo generated “unnecessary anxiety, thereby leading to its indefinite postponement.

“The Independent Arbitration Panel, which is a voluntary platform designed solely for the resolution of civil and marital disputes among consenting Muslims, was to fill the inexplicable vacuum created by the failure of the political elite in the South West to establish Sharia courts, as allowed by the Nigerian Constitution, in South West, despite the huge population of Muslims in the region,” Sultan said.

See also  Banditry: Abdulrazaq pushes back as PDP demands emergency rule in Kwara

According to the monarch, such scenarios as the denial of the rights of female students to wear the Hijab despite a Supreme Court judgment, are nothing but calculated attempts to prevent Muslims in the region from practising their faith.

Speaking during the 2025 Oodua festival at Enuwa Square, Ile-Ife, Osun State, yesterday, Adams stressed that the introduction of Sharia was to destabilise the Yoruba land by religious fanatics and fundamentalists. He emphasised that while Saudi Arabia is an Islamic kingdom where Sharia aligns with religious teachings and is widely accepted, Nigeria remains a nation where the constitution guarantees freedom of religion.

According to him, Saudi Arabia is a good example of an Islamic kingdom that practises Sharia law according to the Holy Quran. He said: “The Saudis also adhere strictly to the law, and they are happy because Sharia law is in tandem with their religious beliefs and teachings. But Nigeria is a secular nation where the constitution allows every citizen to practise whatever religion they believe in freely without any intimidation.

“Sharia law is alien to our culture and religious beliefs in Yoruba land; therefore, those religious fanatics masquerading as Muslims should stay away from acts that could set Yorubaland on fire.”

Meanwhile, berating the recent influx of Islamic State’s West Africa Province (ISWAP) in the South West, Adams called on the federal and state government to intensify efforts to tackle insecurity in the region. Adams further expressed the readiness of the Oodua People’s Congress (OPC) to partner other security groups in curbing the scourge in Yoruba land.

See also  Retired police officer offers viral navy officer, Yerima part of his pension

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Statement on the Rejection of Sharia Law in South-West Nigeria

Published

on

The Sultan of Sokoto and the leadership of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) must clearly understand this position: the Yoruba people of South-West Nigeria do not need, want, or accept Sharia law as a governing system in their land.

Yoruba society is uniquely pluralistic. In most families across the South-West, Christians, Muslims, and traditional worshippers coexist peacefully under the same roof. This interwoven family structure is one of our greatest strengths. Introducing Sharia law into such a setting would place families on a collision course, fracture long-standing relationships, and undermine the shared values that have sustained our people for generations.

It is important to ask a fundamental question: Is it compulsory or by force that Muslims must live under Sharia law? Many Muslims across the world practice their faith peacefully without imposing religious law on diverse societies. Faith should be a personal conviction, not a political weapon.

Any attempt—direct or indirect—to Islamise the South-West against the will of its people will be firmly resisted through lawful and collective means, because the Yoruba are not a monolithic religious bloc. Our philosophies, cultures, and worldviews are distinct. We cherish family unity, tolerance, and mutual respect above religious extremism.

Let it be clearly stated: the Yoruba are not religious bigots, nor are we extremists. We are a civilized people who value progress, coexistence, and peace. We reject anything that may plunge our land into chaos, division, or bloodshed. Therefore, those advocating Sharia governance should restrict such ambitions to regions where it is openly accepted. The people of the South-West are not interested.

See also  Retired police officer offers viral navy officer, Yerima part of his pension

Nigeria is constitutionally a secular state, and the implementation of Sharia law as a state system directly contradicts the principles of secularism, equal citizenship, and fundamental human rights. If Nigeria intends to remain united, no religious legal system should be imposed on unwilling populations.

Furthermore, the practical outcomes of Sharia implementation in parts of Northern Nigeria raise serious concerns. These include:

Persistent insecurity and terrorism

Banditry and mass kidnapping

Ethnic and religious tensions

Widespread poverty and hunger

High levels of illiteracy

Deep social inequality and segregation

These realities cannot be ignored, and they offer no justification for exporting such a system to the South-West.

To our Muslim brothers and sisters in the OduduwaYorubaterritory: peaceful coexistence is our collective responsibility. We must not allow the mistakes and crises of other regions to destabilize our homeland. The Yoruba way has always been dialogue, tolerance, and mutual respect—and we intend to preserve it.

Leave the Oduduwa Yoruba land as it is. Let us live in peace.

Ire oooo.

Signed
Comrade Oyegunle Oluwamayowa Omotoyole (Omayor)
Oduduwa Nation Home-Based Youth Leader.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Sultan-Led NSCIA Slams Southern Resistance To Sharia Panels Establishment

Published

on

The Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) under the leadership of its President-General and Sultan of Sokoto, His Eminence, Alh. Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, has expressed concern over alleged intolerance and disregard for the rights of Muslims, especially in the southern part of the country.

A statement signed by NSCIA deputy national legal adviser, Imam Haron Muhammed Eze, on Wednesday, said the most recent of this development emanated from Ekiti state where the efforts of the Muslim community to set up an Independent Sharia (Arbitration) panel was met with resistance and objections from both political and traditional quarters.

It added that this came a few weeks after the announcement of the inauguration of a Sharia panel in Oyo state generated anxiety and led to its indefinite postponement.

The Independent Sharia Panel is a voluntary platform designed solely for resolution of civil and marital disputes among consenting Muslims.

According to the statement, the Arbitration and the Sharia Court of Appeal, just like the Customary Court of Appeal are provided in section 275 of the 1999 constitution (as amended) of the Republic of Nigeria confirming the legality of both initiatives.

It added that the NSCIA strongly supported the establishment of the Independent Sharia Arbitration Panel in Ekiti and Oyo States for the intended purpose, especially where the Muslims in the states have been denied their constitutional right to a Sharia Court of Appeal in all the states of South-West Nigeria.

The group, while disapproving of the Supreme Court judgement, said their judgements are nothing but calculated attempts to prevent Muslim in the region from practicing their faith.

See also  Five things to know as Africa hosts its first G20 summit

The NSCIA stressed that the council cannot find any legal justification for the resistance. It called on governors and traditional authorities in the southern part of the country, particularly the South-West, to ensure that the constitutional rights of Muslims in their respective domains are preserved and protected.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending