Connect with us

News

Former Chief of Defence Staff, General Lucky Irabor faults Wike over squabble with soldier

Published

on

The Minister of Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike’s face-off with the young naval officer, Lieutenant Ahmed Yerima, has continued to generate different opinions.

A former Chief of Defence Staff, General Lucky Irabor, on Thursday, faulted Wike over his verbal exchange with the Naval Officer.

Irabor spoke at the 21st All Nigeria Editors Conference (ANEC) in Abuja.

He said the minister committed an offence against the state, adding that he had no right to make such remarks.

He said, “Just a few days ago, we saw an incident between the Honorable Minister of the FCT and a military officer. And there have been a number of representations that I have read in the media, which I thought that some of us got it right, others did not.

“They missed the point. And I am including the representation of a SAN, which I think missed the point. Now, what is it? The uniform is not about who is wearing it.

“The uniform represents the authority of the states. Whether it is a small boy or not, it is the authority of the states. It is even worse when it is a commissioned officer who has a presidential commission.

“And so, when you make such disparaging comments, you have desecrated the oath. What you have told the Commander-in-Chief and the authority that invested that position in him is that they are fools.

“So, it is wrong. And I think that for the media… In any case, the law has two ends. For those, we also studied law, hands on their head.

“But again, in military law, we also taught that for you to be able to establish a crime, there are two elements. Actus reus and mens rea. Actus reus, meaning was this thing done?

See also  Trump threats: Violent extremists, not religion, behind Nigeria’s crisis – Soyinka

“Is there something that was done? And then the mens rea, what is the intention behind it? So, when a SAN says that the minister has authority over land and it is not the duty of the soldier, that is not the issue.

“Now, if you have any reason to believe that what the young man is doing is a channel, that is the law. So, you are desecrating the oath; it has not left the realm of what the officer was doing. It is an offense against the state.”

He argued that citizens have lost the educational traction to know how to treat military officers in uniform. He tasked the media to highlight the values of good citizenship and patriotism.

“So, this is what you, the media, must try to highlight. I know that over the years, we have lost our educational traction. See, these are things that primary school pupils, secondary school pupils ought to know.

“That people like us don’t do anymore. The whole essence of contracts, alright? The contracts that you have with the states. That every individual has ceded his rights to the states because of things like this.

“So that we will not, at every front line, take laws into our hands. It is not a jungle. So, if the state has designated certain establishments and they get them in uniform, only to be able to easily recognize them,” he said.

Moreso, he pointed out that even he, as a military officer, lacked the powers to lay his hands on any officer because it is against the law.

See also  Nigeria needs new Constitution, not amendments – Ezekwesili

“But assuming I was wearing a uniform today, it’s a different matter entirely. The officer asks a question. If you see him tomorrow wearing a uniform, you will not see him.

“So, what distinguishes the police, the military, and other agencies is the uniform. And so, respect and honour the uniform. And that’s what we should tell our children.

“That every Nigerian, when you see them, are they doing what is right? They may not be doing what is right. But then, it is not your duty to not lay your hands on them. Otherwise, we will be in a jumble.

“That’s exactly what’s happening. That counter-terrorism has become a ding-dong thing. If you go to a studio meeting, nobody knows what is right and what is wrong.

“What was done with good intention is misinterpreted. Because of things like that. And that is why I thought that since we are talking about media, terrorism, and national security, we should address the complexities.

“This is a part of the complexities. That would give a wrong impression to those. Tomorrow, people will now think that when you see a military man, you slap him.

“It is a jumble. Why would you do that to a policeman? I, as a general, can’t slap my soldier. I can’t touch him.

“I can’t use my hand on him. If I do that, either I apologize to him, or I will be disciplined. The same thing across the world,” he added.

He argued that even in the United States, citizens do not go around fighting officers because they know the implications.

“When police brutalize a citizen in the U.S., do you see people going around trying to fight them?.

See also  Impeachment storm: Fubara says no notice as two lawmakers pull out

“Because they respect the uniform. But is he misusing the uniform? Yes. Will he be dealt with? Yes.

“So let us get a distinction. I thought it would be a good opportunity to do so. As I conclude, what I need us to take away is that we are reminded yesterday that as editors of the media organizations, because we are dealing with national security issues, you are the last man standing.”

General Irabor also threw his weight behind the military Safe Corridor programme in the war against insecurity in the country.

The retired General said there is nothing wrong with the programme.

Irabor, who was responding to a question on the programme, said that there was no truth in the claims that repentant armed men were integrated into the country’s armed forces.

According to him, “On Operation Safe Corridor, I think, again, the development of Operation Safe Corridor has been misinterpreted completely.

“There is nothing wrong. I support Operation Safe Corridor. I supported it yesterday, I will support it today, I will support it tomorrow.”

He explained that the programme is like a prison for the offenders. He also added that most of the recruits of Boko Haram or other groups don’t even know what the ideology of the group is.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Sultan backs Sharia law in Oyo, Ekiti

Published

on

President-General, Nigeria Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) and Sultan of Sokoto, Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar III, has expressed support for the establishment of an Independent Shariah Arbitration Panel in Ekiti and Oyo states.

But the Aare Ona Kakanfo of Yorubaland, Gani Adams, condemned the attempt to introduce Sharia in the South West, saying it is alien to Yoruba culture and religious beliefs.

The 20th Sultan of Sokoto and the spiritual leader of Nigeria’s Muslims also expressed concern about the spate of intolerance and disregard for the rights of Muslims, especially in the southern part of the country. He noted that Muslims in the South West had been denied their constitutional rights to a Shariah Court of Appeal.

In a statement, yesterday, by the Deputy National Legal Adviser of NSCIA, Haroun Eze, the traditional ruler lamented the unwarranted resistance and objections from political and traditional quarters to the Muslim community’s efforts to establish an Independent Shariah Arbitration Panel in Ekiti.

He said this was coming barely a few weeks after the announcement on the inauguration of a Shariah panel in Oyo generated “unnecessary anxiety, thereby leading to its indefinite postponement.

“The Independent Arbitration Panel, which is a voluntary platform designed solely for the resolution of civil and marital disputes among consenting Muslims, was to fill the inexplicable vacuum created by the failure of the political elite in the South West to establish Sharia courts, as allowed by the Nigerian Constitution, in South West, despite the huge population of Muslims in the region,” Sultan said.

See also  Ondo council chair seeks monarchs’ support to fight insecurity

According to the monarch, such scenarios as the denial of the rights of female students to wear the Hijab despite a Supreme Court judgment, are nothing but calculated attempts to prevent Muslims in the region from practising their faith.

Speaking during the 2025 Oodua festival at Enuwa Square, Ile-Ife, Osun State, yesterday, Adams stressed that the introduction of Sharia was to destabilise the Yoruba land by religious fanatics and fundamentalists. He emphasised that while Saudi Arabia is an Islamic kingdom where Sharia aligns with religious teachings and is widely accepted, Nigeria remains a nation where the constitution guarantees freedom of religion.

According to him, Saudi Arabia is a good example of an Islamic kingdom that practises Sharia law according to the Holy Quran. He said: “The Saudis also adhere strictly to the law, and they are happy because Sharia law is in tandem with their religious beliefs and teachings. But Nigeria is a secular nation where the constitution allows every citizen to practise whatever religion they believe in freely without any intimidation.

“Sharia law is alien to our culture and religious beliefs in Yoruba land; therefore, those religious fanatics masquerading as Muslims should stay away from acts that could set Yorubaland on fire.”

Meanwhile, berating the recent influx of Islamic State’s West Africa Province (ISWAP) in the South West, Adams called on the federal and state government to intensify efforts to tackle insecurity in the region. Adams further expressed the readiness of the Oodua People’s Congress (OPC) to partner other security groups in curbing the scourge in Yoruba land.

See also  Northern insecurity troubling me the most- President Tinubu

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Statement on the Rejection of Sharia Law in South-West Nigeria

Published

on

The Sultan of Sokoto and the leadership of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) must clearly understand this position: the Yoruba people of South-West Nigeria do not need, want, or accept Sharia law as a governing system in their land.

Yoruba society is uniquely pluralistic. In most families across the South-West, Christians, Muslims, and traditional worshippers coexist peacefully under the same roof. This interwoven family structure is one of our greatest strengths. Introducing Sharia law into such a setting would place families on a collision course, fracture long-standing relationships, and undermine the shared values that have sustained our people for generations.

It is important to ask a fundamental question: Is it compulsory or by force that Muslims must live under Sharia law? Many Muslims across the world practice their faith peacefully without imposing religious law on diverse societies. Faith should be a personal conviction, not a political weapon.

Any attempt—direct or indirect—to Islamise the South-West against the will of its people will be firmly resisted through lawful and collective means, because the Yoruba are not a monolithic religious bloc. Our philosophies, cultures, and worldviews are distinct. We cherish family unity, tolerance, and mutual respect above religious extremism.

Let it be clearly stated: the Yoruba are not religious bigots, nor are we extremists. We are a civilized people who value progress, coexistence, and peace. We reject anything that may plunge our land into chaos, division, or bloodshed. Therefore, those advocating Sharia governance should restrict such ambitions to regions where it is openly accepted. The people of the South-West are not interested.

See also  Ondo council chair seeks monarchs’ support to fight insecurity

Nigeria is constitutionally a secular state, and the implementation of Sharia law as a state system directly contradicts the principles of secularism, equal citizenship, and fundamental human rights. If Nigeria intends to remain united, no religious legal system should be imposed on unwilling populations.

Furthermore, the practical outcomes of Sharia implementation in parts of Northern Nigeria raise serious concerns. These include:

Persistent insecurity and terrorism

Banditry and mass kidnapping

Ethnic and religious tensions

Widespread poverty and hunger

High levels of illiteracy

Deep social inequality and segregation

These realities cannot be ignored, and they offer no justification for exporting such a system to the South-West.

To our Muslim brothers and sisters in the OduduwaYorubaterritory: peaceful coexistence is our collective responsibility. We must not allow the mistakes and crises of other regions to destabilize our homeland. The Yoruba way has always been dialogue, tolerance, and mutual respect—and we intend to preserve it.

Leave the Oduduwa Yoruba land as it is. Let us live in peace.

Ire oooo.

Signed
Comrade Oyegunle Oluwamayowa Omotoyole (Omayor)
Oduduwa Nation Home-Based Youth Leader.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Sultan-Led NSCIA Slams Southern Resistance To Sharia Panels Establishment

Published

on

The Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) under the leadership of its President-General and Sultan of Sokoto, His Eminence, Alh. Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, has expressed concern over alleged intolerance and disregard for the rights of Muslims, especially in the southern part of the country.

A statement signed by NSCIA deputy national legal adviser, Imam Haron Muhammed Eze, on Wednesday, said the most recent of this development emanated from Ekiti state where the efforts of the Muslim community to set up an Independent Sharia (Arbitration) panel was met with resistance and objections from both political and traditional quarters.

It added that this came a few weeks after the announcement of the inauguration of a Sharia panel in Oyo state generated anxiety and led to its indefinite postponement.

The Independent Sharia Panel is a voluntary platform designed solely for resolution of civil and marital disputes among consenting Muslims.

According to the statement, the Arbitration and the Sharia Court of Appeal, just like the Customary Court of Appeal are provided in section 275 of the 1999 constitution (as amended) of the Republic of Nigeria confirming the legality of both initiatives.

It added that the NSCIA strongly supported the establishment of the Independent Sharia Arbitration Panel in Ekiti and Oyo States for the intended purpose, especially where the Muslims in the states have been denied their constitutional right to a Sharia Court of Appeal in all the states of South-West Nigeria.

The group, while disapproving of the Supreme Court judgement, said their judgements are nothing but calculated attempts to prevent Muslim in the region from practicing their faith.

See also  FG defends passport price hike to N100,000, N200,000

The NSCIA stressed that the council cannot find any legal justification for the resistance. It called on governors and traditional authorities in the southern part of the country, particularly the South-West, to ensure that the constitutional rights of Muslims in their respective domains are preserved and protected.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending