Connect with us

News

Counter-insurgency campaigns: US votes $413m for security operations in Nigeria, others

Published

on

The United States plans to spend  N587 billion ($413.046m) on counter-insurgency operations in Nigeria and other African countries in 2026 amid worsening security conditions across West Africa.

The allocation is contained in the US National Defence Authorisation Act for Fiscal Year 2026, obtained by The PUNCH on Thursday. The funds were approved under Title XLIII – Operation and Maintenance.

The security budget for the US Africa Command comes against the backdrop of the Christmas Day attacks on terrorists’ hideouts in Sokoto State by the Donald Trump administration.

On Tuesday, AFRICOM delivered a consignment of military equipment to Nigerian security agencies as part of ongoing efforts to strengthen security operations across the country.

The NDAA 2026 is a comprehensive bill that outlines defense policy priorities and authorises $901 billion in annual military spending, with a 4 per cent pay raise for troops. AFRICOM requested $413.046m and the same amount was authorised, but the Act did not provide a breakdown of how the funds would be spent.

The Act was signed into law by President Trump on December 18, 2025, marking the 65th consecutive annual authorisation.

The $413m budget for security operations comes as West Africa continues to grapple with insurgency, banditry and violent extremism.

In Nigeria, insurgency in the North-East and banditry in the North-West persist, even as piracy and other maritime crimes remain concerns in the Gulf of Guinea.

Mali is under persistent attacks by jihadist groups, while northern Benin has witnessed a spillover of violence from the Sahel.

Other commands and activities listed under the operation and maintenance category of the NDAA include the United States European Command with a $385.744m budget, United States Southern Command with $224.971m, US Forces Korea with a $77.049m allocation, Cyberspace Activities (Cyberspace Operations),  $331.467m and Cyberspace Activities (Cybersecurity), $550.089m.

The subtotal for operating forces under operation and maintenance in the Act stands at $39.999b.

The Act also provides for the establishment of an Assistant Secretary for African Affairs within the US Department of State.

The office, according to the Act, will oversee matters relating to sub-Saharan Africa and coordinate the implementation of US foreign policy in the region.

In addition, the Appropriation Act establishes a Bureau of African Affairs, to be headed by the Assistant Secretary, to manage US foreign policy implementation and assistance to sub-Saharan Africa.

“(5) BUREAU OF AFRICAN AFFAIRS. (A) ESTABLISHMENT: There shall be in the Department of State a Bureau of African Affairs, which shall perform such functions related to implementation of United States foreign policy and assistance to sub-Saharan Africa as the Under Secretary for Political Affairs may prescribe.”

‘’(B) HEAD: The Assistant Secretary for African Affairs shall be the head of the Bureau of African Affairs.

‘’(9) ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR AFRICAN AFFAIRS: (A) ESTABLISHMENT. There shall be in the Department of State an Assistant Secretary for African Affairs who shall be responsible to the Secretary of State, acting through the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, for “(i) matters relating to sub-Saharan Africa; and “(ii) such other related duties as the Secretary may from time to time designate.

“(B) Responsibilities: In addition to the responsibilities described under subparagraph (A), the Assistant Secretary for African Affairs shall maintain continuous observation and coordination of all matters pertaining to implementation of United States foreign policy in sub-Saharan Africa,” the Act partly read.

See also  Disu declares total war on police corruption, impunity

The Act further mandates assessments of Russia’s military strategy, objectives and force posture affecting African countries.

This includes a review of Russia’s overseas military basing, logistics capabilities and infrastructure used to project power on the continent, as well as the implications for US contingency plans under AFRICOM, US Central Command and US European Command.

“An assessment of the military strategy objectives and force posture of Russia that affect countries in Africa;  A description of Russia’s overseas military basing, military logistics capabilities, and infrastructure to project power.

“An analysis of the impact of such an action on the ability of the Armed Forces to execute contingency plans of the Department of Defence, including those in the area of responsibility of United States European Command or in support of operations and crisis response in the areas of responsibility of United States Central Command and United States Africa Command.’’

“The reduction of the risk of executing contingency plans of the Department of Defence, including contingency plans conducted by United States Central Command and United States Africa Command,” the Act stated.

Commenting on the development, a security analyst and Chief Executive Officer of Beacon Consulting, Kabir Adamu, said the funding and policy moves reflected growing geopolitical rivalry in Africa, driven largely by economic interests.

Adamu said Africa, particularly West Africa and the Sahel, had become a strategic arena due to insecurity, weak state control and the presence of critical resources.

According to him, Russia and China have expanded their influence across Africa through military cooperation and economic engagement, forcing the United States to reassess its posture on the continent.

‘’First, if you look at the Monroe Doctrine, the US area of influence is its immediate neighbourhood, particularly South America and related regions.

“That is why it moved against Venezuela and also issued threats to Cuba. The other aspect relevant to this discussion is the geopolitical rivalry between the US and Russia.

“In almost all locations where the US has economic interests, Russia and China are already ahead of it. The same applies to Africa. What the US is now trying to do is to catch up.’’

“Russia and China have, in practical terms, taken over much of Africa through their economic interests. In China’s case, it uses loans and other forms of financial assistance to keep Africa within its sphere of influence. The challenge for the US is how to come in and catch up, and it is unlikely that Russia and China will remain passive while the US attempts to do so.’’

The counter-intelligence and security risk consultant predicted intense rivalry among the US, China and Russia.

“We are, therefore, going to see an intense period of geopolitical rivalry among these three countries. We do not yet know where the United States intends to establish this bureau. If I were to hazard a guess, Nigeria is a likely option, given the renewed US interest in the country.

See also  PSC opens portal for recruitment of 50,000 police constables

“Nigeria offers strategic advantages for the United States. Beyond its resources, Nigeria allows the US to monitor neighbouring countries, particularly Sahelian states such as Niger, especially because of uranium deposits there. Not long ago, the US had to leave Niger.

“If the US can establish a presence in Nigeria, it would still be able to keep an eye on developments in the Sahel. If not Nigeria, other possible locations are in East Africa. Congo is an example, especially given recent efforts to negotiate a peace agreement there.’’

He added, “Overall, until we know the exact location where the bureau will be established, it will be difficult to draw firm conclusions about the nature of the geopolitical rivalry that will emerge. However, wherever the US chooses to engage in Africa, China and Russia are already ahead in terms of economic interests.

“As stated in the budget, the US will also attempt to assess Russia’s current involvement. Part of that assessment will likely be to develop its own strategy to gain advantages.

“This can force countries to capitulate, but it may also trigger local pushback, and these are issues we should be watching closely. My view is that the primary interest is economic, not military.

“The rivalry is driven by economic interests, particularly access to rare earth minerals such as lithium. There may be other narratives, including claims about stopping Christian genocide in Nigeria, but the Nigerian government has been clear that such a narrative is false and that there is no Christian genocide.

“If you analyse what happened on December 25, the attacks occurred in locations without significant Christian populations. If the aim were to protect Christians, one would expect action in places like Plateau State or Benue State. In fact, officials in Benue have said that after the Sokoto attack, bandits began moving into the state as a result.

“So, the notion of intervention to end Christian genocide is flawed. The interest is economic. One key issue journalists and the National Assembly must raise when it resumes is the nature of any agreement entered into with the American government. Nigerians deserve to know the contents of such agreements.

“We need clarity. If the agreement is economic, it should be made public. If it is military, it should also be made public. “

Adamu, however, stressed that the rivalry was largely economic, noting that access to critical minerals and long-term influence, rather than direct military confrontation, remained the primary drivers of engagement by global powers in Africa.

He said, “Finally, Nigeria’s foreign policy is based on strategic autonomy. This means Nigeria keeps itself open to relations with any country that offers strategic advantages. Given the current global order and recent US policies, we should expect a rise in what I would describe as multilateral diplomacy.

“This will involve different approaches by the three global powers across different continents. The US will act as it does in its backyard and in Europe, but Russia and China will not remain silent. We are likely to see a complex geopolitical rivalry among these powers, including in Africa.”

Security analyst Chidi Omeje pointed out that the evolving relationship between Nigeria and the US should be viewed strictly through the lens of partnership and collaboration, rather than dominance or repression.

See also  Rivers assembly resumes sitting after six-month suspension

Omeje said the current engagements with the US, including through AFRICOM, reflect mutual respect and dignity, noting that this aligns with Nigeria’s long-standing demand to be treated as an equal partner in addressing security challenges.

According to him, many of Nigeria’s security threats are linked to global terrorist networks, stressing that groups operating in the Sahel and Lake Chad regions are not purely local, but part of wider international movements.

He argued that such transnational threats require international cooperation, making partnerships with global powers necessary.

“The key issue here now is that we are now on the level of partnership, not on invasion or any kind of dominance, so we are talking about partnership. The other day, AFRICOM sent some materials to the Nigerian armed forces. This is about partnership and no longer the issue of threats or repression or display of supremacy and the like, so whatever we are doing with them that is based on respect and dignity and partnership is always welcome.

“The issues we are dealing with are actually problems associated with the global terrorist network, and if it is a global terrorist network, partnership and collaboration are welcome.”

Omeje expressed reservations about Russia’s growing security engagements in Africa, saying Moscow lacks the reach and capacity to effectively address Nigeria’s security challenges, given its ongoing war in Ukraine.

Army-US cooperation

In a related development, the Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Waidi Shaibu, has called for deeper strategic cooperation between the Nigerian Army and the United States Army to effectively address Nigeria’s evolving and complex security challenges.

The COAS stated this on Wednesday when the US Defense Attaché to Nigeria, Lt. Col.  Semira Moore, paid him a courtesy visit at the Army Headquarters in Abuja.

Shaibu commended the United States Government for its enduring partnership and sustained support to the Nigerian Army, noting that the NA has benefitted significantly from American military professionalism and institutional expertise.

The COAS stressed that the Nigerian Army remains eager to leverage the extensive experience of the US Army in both kinetic and non-kinetic operations.

He, therefore, advocated the expansion of cooperation in areas aimed at enhancing operational effectiveness, institutional capacity, doctrine development, and strategic capability.

According to him, international military partnerships remain critical in complementing Nigeria’s internal security architecture and advancing sustainable peace and stability across the country.

Moore expressed appreciation for the cordial and mutually beneficial relationship between the two armies. She reaffirmed her commitment to strengthening existing ties while exploring new areas of collaboration, particularly in capacity building, intelligence sharing, and joint operational planning.

The Defense Attaché also disclosed that the United States remains committed to supporting the Nigerian Army in key non-kinetic areas, including humanitarian assistance and troop welfare initiatives, which she noted are essential for sustaining morale and operational effectiveness in the field.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FG deploys mining marshals for intelligence gathering, compliance monitoring

Published

on

The Federal Government has deployed Mining Marshals for intelligence gathering, compliance monitoring and operational oversight in the solid minerals sector.

This was disclosed in a statement issued on Tuesday by the Commander of Mining Marshals Operations and Assistant Commandant of Corps, Attah Onoja.

Onoja stated that the deployment is part of efforts to strengthen enforcement against illegal mining activities.

“The Mining Marshals are now participating in investigations, intelligence gathering, compliance monitoring and fact-finding missions conducted by the Federal Ministry of Solid Minerals Development.

“As part of the initiative, the Mining Marshals recently joined ministry officials on operational visits to mining sites in Nasarawa and Plateau states.

“The operations were carried out under the leadership of the Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dele Alake,” the statement read.

The statement said that the operations were aimed at strengthening monitoring, regulatory compliance and operational oversight within the sector.

It read, “The team was led on different occasions by the Permanent Secretary of the ministry, Engr. Faruk Yusuf Yabo, who represented the minister during the field engagements.

“During one of the operational and fact-finding missions, the Commander of the Mining Marshals, ACC Attah John Onoja, accompanied ministry officials to a mining site allegedly being illegally exploited.

“The visit was part of efforts to verify allegations of unlawful mining activities, assess compliance with extant mining regulations and obtain field-based information necessary for administrative, regulatory and possible enforcement actions.”

“The delegation also included senior ministry officials such as Engr. Frank Odoom, Director of Special Duties; Engr. Imam A. Ganiyu, Director of Mines Inspectorate; Andrew Zubiri, Director of Legal Services; and Ibrahim Abdulmajeed J., representing the Director General of the Mining Cadastre Office.”

See also  Security crisis: Tinubu, Macron hold talks as US fact-finders arrive

According to the statement, the engagements created an important feedback mechanism between government authorities and mining communities.

It added that the engagements enabled concerns relating to illegal mining, environmental practices, security challenges and regulatory compliance to be communicated directly to authorities.

It further stated that the Mining Marshals have continued to support the ministry’s operations through “intelligence support, operational collaboration and inter-agency coordination across mining communities nationwide.”

Continue Reading

News

Outrage as EFCC operatives assault UNIUYO doctor, workers over medical report

Published

on

Outrage has followed the alleged assault and arrest of four staff members of the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Akwa Ibom State, including the Deputy Chairman, Medical Advisory, Effiong Ekpe, a professor of cardiothoracic surgery, during an investigation involving the verification of a medical report submitted by a fraud suspect.

The incident followed a visit to the hospital by operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Tuesday.

PUNCH Online reported that the EFCC operatives arrived at the hospital premises in the afternoon and attempted to arrest a staff member, leading to resistance from workers and other hospital personnel.

Eyewitnesses alleged that the operatives later called for reinforcement and that additional officers fired shots into the air to disperse workers who gathered at the scene.

According to PUNCH Online, the operatives eventually took away Ekpe, and three other staff members.

Some persons were reportedly injured during the incident, while phones were said to have been damaged as workers tried to record the scene.

In a statement obtained by PUNCH Metro on X on Tuesday, the EFCC admitted that its operatives visited the hospital to authenticate a medical report submitted by a suspect standing trial before Justice M.A. Onyetunu of the Federal High Court in Uyo over alleged fraud involving several microfinance banks, including the University of Uyo Microfinance Bank.

“The suspect had presented a medical report which required authentication by the UUTH management. The Commission wrote two different letters, dated March 11, 2026, and April 20, 2026, to the hospital management to this effect without receiving any response,” the agency stated.

See also  PSC opens portal for recruitment of 50,000 police constables

The anti-graft agency noted that its investigating officer later visited the hospital to follow up on the request but still received no response.

“As a last resort, operatives of the commission visited the chief medical director of the hospital on Tuesday to make further enquiries, only to be locked in with a false alarm and subjected to an unprovoked attack by misguided staff of the facility who pelted them with stones and other dangerous objects,” the statement added.

The EFCC also alleged that the hospital management shut the gates against its operatives despite intervention from the police.

“Police authorities in Akwa Ibom State advised the CMD to open the hospital gates to enable the operatives to exit the premises peacefully, but the entreaties were turned down,” it said.

The agency insisted that its operatives acted professionally and did not disrupt hospital activities. It also warned that obstructing lawful investigations could attract legal consequences.

Meanwhile, medical doctors and health workers at the hospital have declared an indefinite strike over the incident.

The chairman of the Nigerian Medical Association in Akwa Ibom State, Dr Aniekan Peters, reportedly directed doctors across the state to suspend services, while the Joint Health Sector Unions also announced a total shutdown of hospital activities in protest.

Speaking on the development, the Public Relations Officer of the NMA in the state, Dr Gabriel Eyo, described the incident as an attack on the hospital and its workers.

“In the early hours of this morning, masked men wearing EFCC jackets stormed into the hospital premises, walked into the office of the Deputy Chairman of the Medical Advisory Committee, Prof. Effiong Ekpe, and beat him to a pulp,” Eyo alleged.

See also  Pastor Adeboye predicts his own death

“They dragged him like a common criminal. When members of staff, students and other health workers tried to resist them, they shot sporadically into the air and dispersed the crowd with tear gas,” he added.

‘Eyo said Ekpe, a professor of cardiothoracic surgery, ‘was allegedly injured during the incident.’

“Whatever he did, there is a due process for this kind of thing. Even criminals are not treated this way. The only thing that should have been done would have been to send an invitation, which was not done,” he stated.

He added that the incident was traumatic for workers and patients, noting that the NMA had begun an indefinite strike in protest.

Reacting to the claims, the Commissioner of Police in Akwa Ibom State, Baba Azare, said police officers only accompanied the EFCC officials to verify the operation after the hospital management contacted him.

“The EFCC went for an arrest in the hospital this morning, and the CMD called me to verify if my men were among those in the hospital,” he said.

Azare explained that he later confirmed from the EFCC that the officers were acting on a court order linked to an ongoing case.

“I called the CMD and advised him to open the gate for them to carry that man because it is a legitimate duty,” he added.

The incident has also sparked reactions on social media, with several Nigerians criticising the EFCC’s conduct and describing it as an excessive use of force.

One X user, Richard David, questioned the agency’s priorities, writing, “When EFCC claimed that they did not know CBEX officials who scammed nearly one million Nigerians were operating, some of you were talking down on the victims. Now the EFCC has burst the safe haven of a hospital where your sick loved ones are and you are shouting?”

See also  Osinbajo to chair summit on justice, community restoration in Kaduna

Another X user, identified as @Shaibu, described the incident as “shameful and disgraceful.”

“You came to the hospital requesting their expertise, and somehow you are trying to justify intimidation. Even if the doctor or healthcare worker is the suspect, the EFCC can only arrest when they have a warrant. Choosing not to cooperate with the EFCC is not a crime,” the user wrote.

Another X user, @MaduforUch2532, argued that hospitals operate under strict protocols and security procedures.

“A hospital is not a criminal hideout. Medical institutions have protocols, patient privacy obligations and security procedures. Staff reacting to unidentified masked men within hospital premises is not surprising,” the user stated.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Coup plotters reached out for spiritual cover — Cleric

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday watched a video recording in which an Islamic cleric, standing trial over the coup plot, told investigators that he warned the suspected conspirators that their plan would fail and that they would eventually be betrayed.

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik also ordered a joint trial-within-trial to determine the voluntariness of statements and video recordings the prosecution sought to tender against the six defendants.

The ruling followed objections by defence lawyers, who argued that the statements were obtained in violation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act and the Anti-Torture Act.

The Federal Government had on April 22 arraigned six defendants, including a retired major-general, over allegations of treason, terrorism, money laundering and conspiracy to overthrow President Bola Tinubu’s government.

The defendants are Maj-Gen Mohammed Ibrahim Gana (retd.); Navy Capt Erasmus Ochegobia Victor (retd.); police inspector Ahmed Ibrahim; Presidential Villa electrician Zekeri Umoru; Bukar Kashim Goni; and a Zaria-based Islamic cleric, Sheikh Abdulkadir Sani.

They all pleaded not guilty to the 13 charges.

At Monday’s proceedings, prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), informed the court that the fourth prosecution witness remained in the witness box and applied for the playback of a video recording containing the alleged statement of the sixth defendant, Sani.

In the video played in open court, Sani said he knew the alleged ringleader, Col Maaji, for less than one year and was introduced to him through a man identified as Sanda.

The cleric said Sanda approached him for prayers concerning a planned coup and informed him that his “oga” needed spiritual guidance and divination over the success of the operation.

According to Sani, after conducting prayers, he informed them that the operation would fail.

“I warned them the coup would fail,” he said in the recording.

He added that he also told them that two persons involved in the alleged conspiracy would eventually betray the group.

Sani further stated that Sanda later returned with another request for prayers “so that the two individuals would not betray the group.”

The cleric said money was subsequently transferred to him for prayers and charity, while the names of persons allegedly involved in the plot were also sent to him for inclusion in the prayers.

According to him, shortly after the prayers commenced, Sanda informed him that Col Maaji had not been seen for four days.

He added that he later learnt through media reports that arrests had been made over an alleged coup plot.

See also  NSIB - Six injured in Abuja–Kaduna train derailment (PHOTOS)

Sani, however, maintained in the video that the money transferred to him was not payment for supporting a coup.

“The money was meant for prayers,” he told investigators.

He also admitted that he understood a coup to mean a military overthrow of government, but claimed he did not report the alleged plot because he did not know who to report to.

The cleric narrated that he was later arrested after visiting the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission over restrictions placed on his bank account.

According to him, he discovered that the account had been flagged when he attempted to make withdrawals from the money sent to him.

He said that after contacting an EFCC deputy director, he was invited to the commission’s office, where he explained that the funds were meant for prayers.

Sani also stated in the recording that he did not make any statement relating to a coup while in EFCC custody.

Before the end of the video, the cleric confirmed that nobody assaulted or tortured him and that his “statements were made voluntarily.”

Following the playback, Oyedepo applied to tender extra-judicial statements allegedly made by the first to fifth defendants before a Special Investigation Panel and military police authorities, alongside Sani’s statement before military investigators.

The move was strongly opposed by lawyers representing all six defendants.

Muhammed Ndayako (SAN) appeared for the first defendant, while Paul Erokoro (SAN), A.H. Shehu, C.D. Okafor, M.A. Ibrahim, Olalekan Ojo (SAN), and Sanusi Musa (SAN) represented the other defendants.

The defence lawyers argued that the statements and accompanying video recordings were not voluntarily made and failed to comply with safeguards provided under the ACJA.

Some of the lawyers also relied on provisions of the Anti-Torture Act, 2017, alleging oppression, inducement and coercion during interrogation.

Counsel for the second defendant argued that his client was neither informed of his right to legal representation nor granted access to counsel before his statement was recorded.

The fourth defendant’s lawyer further argued that the video failed to establish whether his client’s legs were free during interrogation, insisting that coercion could not be ruled out.

Ojo, counsel for the fifth defendant, urged the court to order separate trial-within-trial proceedings for each defendant since all the accused persons were disputing the voluntariness of their statements.

Responding, Oyedepo said the prosecution was “not afraid of a trial within a trial.”

See also  Project Focus: Kano-Maradi Railway

He, however, urged the court to conduct a single joint proceeding instead of separate hearings for each defendant.

After listening to the arguments, Justice Abdulmalik ruled that the court would conduct “a joint trial within a trial to determine the voluntariness of the statements.”

The judge subsequently adjourned the matter till May 12 for continuation of proceedings.

The prosecution had alleged that the defendants planned to attack the Presidential Villa, detain Tinubu and other top government officials, and take control of strategic institutions.

Investigators also alleged that no fewer than 32 vehicles were procured for covert operations linked to the alleged plot.

Relatives protest

Meanwhile, relatives and sympathisers of military officers standing trial over the coup plot staged a peaceful protest at the Federal Ministry of Justice in Abuja on Monday, demanding an open trial and the release of the detained suspects.

The demonstrators, who converged on the ministry’s entrance, chanted solidarity songs and displayed placards bearing inscriptions such as “Tinubu Release Our Heroes,” “Lt Col C Chima 419 Witness,” and “AGF, Stop the Kangaroo Court Martial Now.”

Security personnel, including operatives of the Nigeria Police Force, however, prevented the protesters from gaining access to the ministry premises, restricting them to the entrance gate.

The protest comes amid growing criticism over the handling of the coup trial, particularly after journalists were barred last week from covering proceedings involving some of the accused officers.

Addressing journalists during the protest, the leader of the demonstrators, Justice Isimili, said many of those present were relatives of the detained officers who travelled from different parts of the country.

“Many of the people who turned out today are relatives of our heroes. Some of them came from Jos, Kano and Sokoto to protest the continued detention of the alleged coup suspects who are our fathers, uncles and brothers.

“All we are asking is for the President, who is our father, to temper justice with mercy. We want him to come to our aid. Many of us have not been able to rest or do anything because of our loved ones who are still being held.”

He condemned what he described as the secretive nature of the ongoing court-martial proceedings.

“We want an open trial instead of what they are doing in the name of court martial, where family members, journalists and the public are denied access to the court proceedings. All we are interested in is their freedom,” he added.

See also  Senate reconvenes today as Electoral Act triggers uproar

Another protester, Abdullahi Kale, who claimed he travelled from Sokoto for the demonstration, alleged that the continued detention of the suspects was creating the impression that northern military officers were being targeted.

“No freedom, no second term. If the President and the AGF fail to release them, we will mobilise the North against Tinubu’s re-election,” he threatened.

A female protester, Habibat Muhammad, who carried her one-year-old child, Abba, on her back, also appealed for leniency.

Speaking in Hausa, she lamented that life had become difficult for many of the affected families since the suspects were arrested about eight months ago from their homes and military formations.

Responding to the protesters, a director in the ministry, who declined to disclose her name, urged the demonstrators to remain calm and orderly.

According to her, the ministry had yet to receive any formal letter detailing their grievances and demands.

“This is what we told them. They should go back and put their house in order before coming back.

“When you return, let only two persons come with your letter. But if you insist on coming as a group like you did today, it will be misrepresented to mean another thing.”

When pressed to reveal her identity, the official declined.

“On this issue, I can’t give a name. I am just a director in the ministry. What I have only come to offer them is an explanation, which has been done. That is all,” she stated.

The latest protest adds to earlier demonstrations by families of the detained officers, who have repeatedly demanded either their release or immediate arraignment in a transparent and public court process.

The controversy surrounding the trial deepened two weeks ago when journalists were barred from covering bail proceedings involving six of the suspects at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Court officials, backed by operatives of the Department of State Services, reportedly ordered reporters out of the courtroom shortly before proceedings began.

The suspects are facing charges bordering on treason, terrorism, money laundering and failure to disclose information.

While some serving military officers are being tried before a court-martial in Abuja, others are facing trial in civilian courts.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending