Connect with us

Lifestyle

Parents shouldn’t hide medical history from children — British-Nigerian urologist

Published

on

A London-based British-Nigerian consultant urological surgeon, Prof Francis Chinegwundoh, speaks with BIODUN BUSARI on his childhood experience and journey into the medical profession, among other issues

How was your childhood experience?

My dad came to the United Kingdom in the 1950s. He and my mum got married in London. They didn’t plan to stay in the UK, but something happened, and they ended up staying. Eventually, their four children, including me, were all doing very well at school.

With our academic performance, they decided we would stay rather than return to Nigeria, as other family friends had done. My parents thought going back would disrupt us.

What was growing up like among white children?

There were no majority-black schools. Every school then was predominantly white, with some black and Asian children. In those days, we lived in the mixed area of Balham, a suburb in south London. There was a majority of white people.

However, there were still quite a few black families from the Caribbean, West Africa, Asia, India, and Pakistan, and this made it a mixed area, and my siblings and I didn’t feel isolated because there were others like us. We went to school in a general environment, and the same applied to shops. It wasn’t much of a problem. It may have been different if we were not in London. Then and now, London is the most diverse part of the UK.

Did your parents influence your choice of medical career?

I guess I was about eight or nine years old when I started concentrating on medicine. Initially, it didn’t appeal to me, but there were television programmes that drew my interest. I can recall a programme called Emergency Ward 10 and another one called General Hospital. These were weekly soaps and programmes.

I just enjoyed those soap operas. I enjoyed the characters, and I started imagining and portraying myself as a doctor in those TV programmes. Then I remember getting one of the plastic toy sets. Then I decided that was what I wanted to do.

Academically, I was very strong. What my parents were interested in was my doing well in school. They didn’t focus on whether I should be a doctor or not. Of course, they were happy when I said I wanted to do medicine, but it was not something they pushed me into or suggested that I do. That impetus came from me. They encouraged me because I had the idea quite early on of what I wanted to do.

Can you share ideas about how your education was?

After primary school, I was able to attend a grammar school. Grammar schools are schools for academically bright students. These are free as opposed to private schools, which my parents could never have afforded. Private schools generally have very high academic standards, but they are expensive.

Grammar schools were a means of social mobility. They have very competitive exams. If you managed to get into a grammar school, then you were assured of an outstanding education, should you choose to take advantage of the opportunity.

I went to a grammar school. It was actually a Catholic school in south London called Salesian College. I did very well. I was second in class throughout. Then I applied to get into medical school. That was very competitive. You must be very good, with what we used to call O-Levels at that time, which are now called GCSEs.

You must have good grades for A-level. Then the support of your headmaster or headmistress, who would write a letter of support to buttress your application to medical school, was very important. Thankfully, I was able to secure entry to St. George’s Medical School, part of the University of London. It was in Tooting, south London.

What inspired you to pursue urology as an area of speciality?

It is quite a long journey. After I qualified at medical school at the age of 23, I was either 35 or 36 before I became a consultant urologist. It’s a long journey to reach consultant status in a surgical speciality. When you qualify, you do a series of house jobs or internships.

See also  Femi Robinson: The Iconic "Village Headmaster" and Pioneer of Nigerian Television

For two years, you rotate in general areas to have broad experience. After those two years, you then decide if you want to be a surgeon, physician, or general practitioner. You can even decide if you want to go to the army or the navy. There are exams to take for all these specialities.

For instance, if you want to be a surgeon, you must pass the exam of the Royal College of Surgeons. After passing the exam, you will enter a training programme. Under that training, you will still rotate in different areas. You might do some orthopaedics, cardiothoracic surgery, urology, or neurosurgery. This helps in getting experience in different surgical fields.

After these two or three years, you decide on the particular branch. It comes with competitive interviews, exams, written and published articles, journals presented, research, and so on, to secure a training post in your subspecialty.

I enjoyed urology as I found the consultants very amenable. I specialised in urology because it dealt with males and females as opposed to gynaecology, which deals with females only.

Based on your research, what is the correlation between black men and prostate cancer?

I have specialised in dealing with prostate cancer. I have been a consultant for almost 30 years. It was quite early when I took an interest in prostate cancer. I’ve seen a lot in my consultancy practice, and that led me to a lot of black men, making me wonder why I was seeing many black men with prostate cancer.

Then I decided to do some research in the late 1990s. I called the offices of the population census and surveys, basically the government statistical office in the UK, to know how many black men had prostate cancer. This statistical body said they didn’t know because there had not been any research into black men and prostate cancer in the UK.

That was why I embarked on doing the research. I was able to show and publish that black men were two times as likely to get prostate cancer as their white counterparts. I suspected something about our genetics, but exactly what we don’t know remains unknown.

So, having accepted the fact that black men have an increased risk of prostate cancer, we then focused on raising awareness in the community. For more than 25 years, I’ve been raising awareness that black men should be aware of their increased risk and therefore start getting themselves tested.

Unfortunately, prostate cancer is so common in Nigeria. I don’t think you’ll find any family where there are men over 50 and someone has not had prostate cancer. It’s the second most common cancer in men worldwide. In some countries, it’s number one, in others it’s number two. In fact, in the UK, more men get prostate cancer than women get breast cancer.

What should men, especially Nigerian men, do?

Get tested. Men should go for tests. I explain to men when I give talks that only men have a prostate gland, and it is usually the size of a small cherry or a walnut. It sits in front of the anus, in front of the back passage, deep inside the pelvis.

Its purpose is to produce the seminal fluid. So when a man climaxes, most of that fluid that comes out is prostate fluid. Some of it is sperm from the testicles, but most of that fluid is prostate fluid, which nourishes the sperm. So, it’s a sexual gland; it’s a sexual organ.

Secondly, the water pipe has to pass through it. So, the water pipe connecting the bladder to the penis, surrounding the exit of the bladder, is where the prostate lies. It surrounds the water pipe. As it gets bigger, which happens as you age, it begins to squeeze the water pipe.

So, most men will recognise that in their 40s, 50s, 60s onwards, the urinary flow becomes slower. When you’re very young, your urinary flow is very fast. As you age, the prostate begins to enlarge, and it squeezes the water pipe. Therefore, the flow becomes slow, and the bladder doesn’t empty as well.

See also  Political titans, Dangote attend El-Rufai mother’s burial

Most men over the age of 50 will have what we call benign prostate enlargement, where the prostate naturally squeezes the water pipe. Men will recognise this: the flow is slower; it takes them a longer time to pass urine. They have to go more often, and they have to get up at night. This is not to be confused with prostate cancer.

The problem with the prostate gland is that the symptoms of enlargement and squeezing of the water pipe are the same symptoms that may indicate prostate cancer, including difficulty in passing urine. It could be some sexual issues as well.

But very importantly, and I always emphasise this, you can have prostate cancer with no urinary symptoms whatsoever. So, if you’re waiting for urinary symptoms before you see your doctor, it may be too late.

Interestingly, in Nigeria, my colleagues tell me that 90 per cent of men with prostate cancer are already advanced. To find it when it’s early and still a small thing that can be dealt with very well, you have to have the blood test.

It’s a blood test called Prostate Specific Antigen. It’s like an early warning sign. So, I encourage men every year to have this blood test. If the blood test is raised, it leads to further investigations to see if the man has prostate cancer or not.

At what age is it advisable for men to have the test?

At 40 years of age. The reason is that you can have prostate cancer without any symptoms. In the UK, for example, I would say 80 to 90 per cent of men, when we find prostate cancer, it is still in the prostate. It has not spread anywhere.

Based on this, we can cure those men. Whereas in Nigeria, it is the opposite. About 80 to 90 per cent of men, by the time their cancer is diagnosed, it has already spread into the bones, into the pelvis, and into certain lymph glands.

One of the things we know about prostate cancer is that there is a hereditary element to it. So, if your father has prostate cancer, your risk is double. If your dad and maybe your brother have prostate cancer, your risk is quadrupled.

So, it’s very important to know your family history. Also, if it turns out that on your mother’s side, there is a history of breast cancer or cancer of the ovary, your risk as a male of getting prostate cancer is also high.

I emphasise this because when I was a child, various family friends would pass away. I would ask what they died from, and parents would say, ‘I don’t know’. So, there’s secrecy as to what they died from.

I encourage people to share their family histories. As a parent, if you have cancer of this or cancer of that, tell your children so they can start getting themselves tested earlier than they might otherwise have done. Family history is very important.

Can you briefly speak about your role as a medical legal expert?

It encompasses a whole range of things. For example, if you are riding a motorbike and you have an accident, maybe a car bumps into you, you fall over, and you might fracture your arm, leg, or pelvis, or even injure your penis or testicles, you will then seek compensation from the person who caused the accident.

Now, someone has to assess what injuries you’ve suffered and what the long-term effects of those injuries are. That’s where a medical legal expert comes in. So, I, as a urologist, would be asked to assess injuries to the testicles, injuries affecting one’s sex life. Maybe you’ve injured the kidney or something.

I would go through all the records, examine the man, and do a report. These are the injuries this person has suffered. This is going to be a permanent problem, or it’s a temporary problem, or we can get things better by doing this. That is one aspect: personal injury.

See also  Late Brig. Gen. Babafemi Olatunde Ogundipe

The other aspect is clinical negligence. If you, as a patient, come to me as a urologist and you allege that maybe your operation was done wrongly or there was a delay in your particular diagnosis, you go to a solicitor because you are aggrieved.

The solicitor has to employ someone, an expert in the area, to look through the entirety of the case and come to some sort of opinion as to whether indeed it was negligence or whether it was just bad luck. I will look at whether they breached their duty of care to you and caused you harm.

How do you manage all these roles?

I haven’t even mentioned that I’ve been running a cancer charity for the last 26 years. There’s a charity organisation called Cancer Black Care, which is based in London. It supports black people throughout their cancer journeys, helping them with getting information, navigating the social services system, and a whole lot.

What it means is that you have to be very efficient with your time. At the same time, you have to enjoy your family and friends. I enjoy travelling but over the years, I’ve managed to blend all these things.

When I deliver lectures, it is academic. I’m very adept at using computers and the latest software. I’ve started using artificial intelligence in some of my work. I’ve been paperless for up to 10 years.

How do you explain the magnet pulling Nigerian medical experts to the UK?

It is the pay and conditions of work. That is what it is. Everything here is very orderly. Every health service has its challenges, but they are completely different in magnitude from what obtains in Nigeria. Some of my colleagues in Nigeria are frustrated by having to work extremely long hours.

In the UK, no long hours, the pay is good, the education system is good. You don’t have to worry about electricity, whether at home or in the hospital. You don’t have to worry about water or buying a generator. Everything is designed to make your life comfortable and easy.

Education is a big pull as well. Education is free in the UK. You can pay extra for private education. But I think about 90 to 93 per cent of children in the UK are educated in the state system, while seven to 10 per cent are in the private system. Primary and secondary education is free in the UK.

The only time you start paying is when you go to university. Even at that, it is heavily subsidised by the government if you become a British citizen. So, people leave for professional reasons.

Then think of security reasons—you get it in the UK. The thing about medicine and nursing is that they are transferable skills. You can go anywhere in the world with those skills.

How did you feel when you became a Member of the Order of the British Empire?

It was in 2013. These awards are given to recognise your contributions, and it’s not something you apply for. It means some people notice your work and appreciate you. About four or five people will get nominated and scrutinised by a committee.

If you merit it, you get a letter from the palace. You have to keep it quiet for the two months until it’s officially announced and it’s in the media. So, it’s a secret kind of thing.

I was blessed that both my parents were able to come to Buckingham Palace, where I received the medal from Prince Charles (as he was called then), now King Charles III. I have always believed that hard work, determination, and focus bring rewards, and that was what I experienced.

So, I always advise and encourage everyone, especially youths, that your diligence for great work will be honoured and rewarded at one point or another if you don’t relent.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

Catholic bishops’ inconvenient truth

Published

on

Politics and religion often conflate into a toxic brew. So, it is with the storm over John Onaiyekan’s comments after the recent meeting between President Bola Tinubu and the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria. As the waves billow and swell, the encounter opens a window into the tremors in government rather than the cardinal’s intentions.

Instead of treating the bishops’ observations as sincere moral feedback from a respected institution, some of the administration’s vocal defenders responded with personal attacks, accusing the cardinal of partisanship and abuse of clerical privilege.

That reaction was unfortunate and avoidable.

No elected government claiming democratic credentials should treat independent criticism as hostility.

Yet the ferocious responses from the Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike; the President’s Special Adviser on Policy Communication, Daniel Bwala; and the SSA on Media, Temitope Ajayi, suggested Onaiyekan had committed a grave offence by saying the bishops told the President Nigeria was “bleeding,” that poverty was worsening, and many were struggling under economic reforms.

The cardinal’s fault was not fabricating facts but speaking publicly about an uncomfortable conversation.

He said the President disagreed, insisting the economy was improving and reforms were laying the foundation for recovery.

The bishops, he said, neither expected agreement nor sought to embarrass the President; they were discharging a moral duty to tell him what many Nigerians could not.

That should have ended the matter. Instead, critics turned a healthy exchange into a public quarrel. Bwala questioned the cardinal’s neutrality, alleging the church supported Peter Obi in 2023.

Ajayi dismissed the bishops as offering only one perspective. Wike argued that having taken sides in a past election disqualified the cardinal from impartiality and faulted the bishops for questioning INEC’s neutrality ahead of 2027 without stronger proof.

These points merit consideration. Religious leaders, like journalists and civil society actors, should aim for fairness as credibility rests on intellectual honesty. Achievements by government should be acknowledged. But fairness works both ways.

The administration’s defenders owe Nigerians an honest engagement with the bishops’ substance rather than attempts to discredit the messengers.

Who the cardinal voted for is irrelevant to whether millions of Nigerians are suffering. Hunger and inflation do not check party membership before striking families.

See also  Alleged rape: Nigerian Tiktoker admitted in Ogun health facility

One of the weakest responses to public criticism is to attack motives while avoiding the issues raised. That strategy failed to convince many Nigerians. Therefore, it is no surprise that support for Onaiyekan flowed from across civic space.

The Northern Youth Council said he reflected lived realities; the Middle Belt Forum called the attacks unfair; the Catholic Laity Council defended the church’s pastoral duty to speak for the vulnerable.

Former governor and minister Rotimi Amaechi, himself a Catholic, reminded the Presidency that bishops have every right to criticise governments and urged responses based on evidence, not indignation.

Even Orji Kalu, APC senator and former Abia State governor, threatened to resign from the party if the bishops were insulted, noting their similar interventions across Africa.

The public backlash appears to have prompted moderation. Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, reaffirmed the administration’s respect for the Catholic Church and promised deeper consultations.

That is the mature response expected of a confident government, and it should have been the first instinct.

The episode exposes a deeper problem.

With the 2027 elections on the horizon, there is a growing tendency in official circles to interpret every criticism through a partisan lens.

Independent institutions that refuse to sing from the government’s hymn book risk being branded hostile. Such defensiveness serves neither democracy nor good governance.

Onaiyekan’s sharper point was that too many people around the President paint an overly rosy picture of the country. Whether entirely fair, the observation highlights a real danger that administrations insulated by courtiers and loyalists risk mistaking praise for patriotism.

Presidents need more than briefings, official statistics and flattering presentations. They need uncomfortable truths from independent voices including economists, labour unions, journalists, business leaders, traditional rulers and religious organisations.

Governments that refuse to listen lose touch with the people they govern. That is why criticism is not the enemy of reform; silence is.

The Tinubu administration can rightly argue it inherited an economy in deep distress and that difficult choices were necessary. Removing the petrol subsidy and liberalising the foreign exchange market were politically costly but, many economists agree, economically inevitable.

See also  Tolani Quadri Oyebamiji “Sisi Quadri”: Life and Legacy of a Yoruba Comic Actor

The government has expanded fiscal space for states, created NELFUND, launched youth initiatives, and helped end the destructive cycle of prolonged ASUU strikes. These are notable achievements and deserve acknowledgement.

But governments are judged by citizens’ lived realities, not only by economic theory or improving macro indicators.

Foreign reserves have strengthened to $52 billion from about $3 billion, fiscal revenues rose to all-time highs, and the naira exchange rate has stabilised compared with the immediate post-reform shock.

Yet these gains have not delivered meaningful relief for the average Nigerian. Inflation remains punishing at over 15 per cent and above 37 per cent in at least 10 states; food and transport costs are soaring; healthcare and medication are costly; electricity tariffs and rent have escalated; small businesses struggle with high energy costs and expensive credit.

For too many families, over 70 per cent of income is spent on feeding alone. Multidimensional poverty affects 63 per cent of Nigerians, per the World Bank.

The bishops sought to communicate that reality. It cannot be dismissed by citing encouraging macro trends.

The reforms are also incomplete. A parallel foreign-exchange market persists, reflecting distortions and weak confidence.

Oil production remains below projections. Domestic refiners complain of inadequate crude supply even as the government extends Project Gazelle with a new $4.5 billion refinancing, raising concerns about future crude commitments while local refining capacity is planned to double.

External debt keeps rising, increasing exchange-rate exposure and debt-service obligations, which already consume half of revenues.

Terrorism, banditry and kidnapping continue to terrorise large swathes of the country, driving farmers from fertile lands and worsening food inflation.

Official and independent reports indicate that more than 628,000 people have been killed and over 2.2 million abducted since 2023, according to a BusinessDay report in June.

These are measurable national realities, not opposition talking points. Governments need independent voices to speak honestly about them.  No pushback can erase the fact that Nigeria is bleeding.

The Catholic Church has a long history of such moral witness. During military rule, bishops such as Olubunmi Okogie, an Emeritus Cardinal, condemned authoritarianism, corruption and human-rights abuses.

See also  Ghana’s tallest man dies at 33

Under democratic governments, the church continued to criticise administrations across the political spectrum over insecurity, governance failures and human suffering. Its loyalty has been to moral principles, not to any party.

Tinubu should not regard himself as uniquely persecuted, nor should his supporters mistake clerical witness for partisan politics.

Religious leaders are, firstly, citizens. They bury terrorism victims, counsel unemployed graduates, comfort widows and feed hungry families. If such leaders cannot speak about poverty, insecurity and governance, democracy becomes a farce.

Political parties are also inconsistent. Many who now defend petrol subsidy removal opposed it when it was proposed under President Goodluck Jonathan. Those who benefited from the freedom to criticise must not deny others the same liberty when roles reverse.

One of the most perilous governance tendencies is believing that criticism weakens government. On the contrary, governments make worse mistakes when they become prisoners of official optimism.

They need independent feedback to test whether policies yield intended outcomes. Economic models and official reports are necessary but insufficient; they must be complemented by honest input from labour, business, academia, the media, civil society and faith leaders. Without it, governments risk governing statistical abstractions rather than human realities.

It is encouraging that the administration now appears to be recalibrating. Akume’s pledge of deeper engagement deserves commendation.

Consultation, not confrontation, marks mature democratic leadership. The Presidency gains nothing by quarrelling with institutions focused on the country’s welfare.

Tinubu has often said he welcomes constructive criticism. He insisted that he sought the job and should not be pitied. This episode is a chance to prove it.

Labelling respected clerics as partisan for voicing uncomfortable truths suggests the administration may lack confidence in the transformative power of its own reforms. That is diminishing.

Nigeria’s problems are too serious for official defensiveness. Reform is a journey requiring constant feedback. The bishops fulfilled their civic and moral duty. The Presidency must perform its constitutional role by listening, not by silencing dissent.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

LACK OF TRUST IN MARRIAGE

Published

on

A marriage can survive difficult times, financial struggles, and disagreements—but when trust disappears, the relationship begins to lose its foundation.

When a husband no longer trusts his wife, or a wife no longer trusts her husband, even innocent actions can become suspicious. A simple phone call becomes a question. Coming home late becomes an accusation. A private conversation becomes a source of fear and jealousy.

Lack of trust creates emotional distance.

It produces constant suspicion, arguments, insecurity, resentment, and sometimes secretive behaviour. Instead of feeling safe with each other, couples begin to feel like enemies living under the same roof.

Trust is not built by controlling your spouse, checking their phone every minute, or constantly demanding explanations. Trust is built through honesty, faithfulness, transparency, consistency, and keeping your word.

If trust has been broken, don’t pretend everything is fine. Talk about it. Admit mistakes. Forgive where possible. Set healthy boundaries. And be willing to rebuild what has been damaged.

Remember: love may bring two people together, but trust helps keep them together.

💔 Don’t allow suspicion to destroy what communication and honesty can repair.

BUILD TRUST. BE FAITHFUL. BE HONEST. PROTECT YOUR MARRIAGE.

“Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour.”
— Ephesians 4:25 (KJV)

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Osun-Osogbo shrine worshippers shocked we did not die after touching deity — Cleric
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

LACK OF OPENNESS IN MARRIAGE

Published

on

A marriage can look beautiful on the outside and still be struggling on the inside when there is no openness between husband and wife.

When couples stop communicating honestly, keep secrets, hide their feelings, or are afraid to discuss important issues, emotional distance begins to grow. What starts as “I don’t want to cause a problem” can eventually become mistrust, resentment, loneliness, and constant misunderstanding.

Openness does not mean telling your spouse everything in a hurtful or careless way. It means creating a safe relationship where both partners can honestly talk about their feelings, concerns, mistakes, finances, expectations, struggles, and dreams without fear of unnecessary humiliation or condemnation.

A strong marriage requires:

• Honest communication — Talk about problems instead of allowing them to grow in silence.
• Trust and transparency — Avoid unnecessary secrecy that can damage confidence in the relationship.
• Active listening — Listen to understand, not simply to respond or attack.
• Emotional vulnerability — Let your spouse know when you are hurting, worried, disappointed, or afraid.
• Respect — Honesty should never become an excuse for insults, threats, or emotional abuse.
• Forgiveness — When mistakes are acknowledged, work together toward healing and restoration.

The Bible says:

“Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counsellors there is safety.” — Proverbs 11:14 (KJV)

And:

“Let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath.” — James 1:19 (KJV)

Marriage should be a place where two people can feel safe enough to communicate, honest enough to admit their weaknesses, and humble enough to work through their differences.

See also  Alleged rape: Nigerian Tiktoker admitted in Ogun health facility

Don’t allow silence, secrets, and suspicion to build walls between you and your spouse. Talk. Listen. Understand. Forgive. Grow together.

❤️ Openness builds trust. Trust strengthens intimacy. And healthy communication helps build a stronger marriage.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending