Connect with us

News

Kwara massacre: Survivors traumatised after deadly attack in Woro, soldiers occupy deserted community

Published

on

At about 5pm on a dark evening penultimate Tuesday, motorcycles began streaming into Woro. By nightfall, gunfire echoed through its narrow streets, homes were ablaze and residents were fleeing into surrounding forests. Today, soldiers patrol the empty settlement, but fear — not security — defines daily life in the agrarian community left shattered by one of the deadliest attacks in recent memory, DARE AKOGUN and TOHEEB OMOTAYO report

Armoured Personnel Carriers now stand where children once played at dusk. At the entrance to Woro in Kaiama Local Government Area of Kwara State, soldiers in combat gear stop the few vehicles daring enough to approach the once-bustling agrarian settlement.

Police officers man inner checkpoints, rifles slung across their shoulders, eyes fixed on the tree lines stretching into thick forests that link Kaiama, Baruten and the Benin Republic. Despite the heavy security presence, Woro remains deserted.

No smoke rises from cooking fires. No traders display grains and vegetables along the federal road that cuts through the settlement. Mud houses that survived the flames stand with doors ajar, abandoned in haste.

Many others have been reduced to blackened skeletons, their zinc roofs twisted by heat. Days after the February 3, 2026 attack that left more than 200 residents dead, fear has outweighed assurances provided by security patrols.

“The people are afraid to return to Woro after experiencing such a tragic incident,” Comrade ZulQharnain Shero Musa, Special Assistant to the Chairman of Kaiama Local Government Area, told The PUNCH. “Many of them feel the place is still not safe despite the military presence.”

Survivors are scattered across neighbouring communities — in Kaiama town, Baruten and parts of Niger State. At the Wawa Internally Displaced Persons camp in Borgu LGA of Niger State, families shelter under makeshift structures.

Relief materials have begun to arrive, including bags of rice and maize, mattresses, clothing and medical supplies. Officials were seen distributing food items to women and children, many still visibly shaken.

But relief supplies cannot silence the trauma of that evening.

“It was a dark Tuesday night for us in Kaiama,” Musa said. “What happened was painful and devastating. Around 5pm, the assailants came.”

He said the attack followed weeks of tension after unknown men reportedly visited Woro under the guise of religious outreach.

“They came to preach a strange doctrine that does not align with Islam or Christianity,” Musa said. “They tried to force it on the people, but the community rejected it. We told them they could practise their religion, but not impose it.”

See also  Did Goodluck Jonathan Arrest You? – Isaac Fayose Blasts Tinubu Over Sowore’s Arrest

According to him, a letter delivered in January to the village head had raised concerns.

“The Emir read it and forwarded it to the DSS and the palace of the Emir of Kaiama. We do not know how the attackers found out that the letter had been shared,” he added.

By Tuesday evening, survivors said the men returned in overwhelming numbers.

“They came two on each motorcycle — hundreds of them,” Musa recalled. “They were armed with sophisticated weapons. There was no security presence nearby.”

A 22-year-old survivor, Aliyu Abdul Hamid Jogodo, popularly known as Omo Salka, said the attackers moved through the town without resistance.

“The attackers stormed Woro and went straight to the Emir’s palace,” he said. “They began shooting indiscriminately, killing people and burning shops.

“They killed many of my friends. One of them was Malam Buhari, whose death I will never forget. They also kidnapped my friend’s mother and killed my boss’s brother, Dr Muhammad Yusuf, the officer in charge of the Woro Primary Health Care Centre. The pain is unbearable.”

Another resident, Abdulrasheed Taofiq, 30, gave a similar account.

“They came into the town on many motorcycles and headed directly to the village head’s house,” he said. “After that, they began gathering people and setting houses and shops on fire. Gunshots were everywhere. There was no way out.”

What followed, according to multiple accounts, was a coordinated assault.

“They cordoned off the village and moved from house to house,” Musa said. “They brought people out, tied their hands behind their backs and executed them.”

The Emir’s palace was also attacked.

“They went to the Emir’s house, brought out his children and one of his wives. They executed the children and kidnapped the second wife. By about 6pm, the house was set ablaze,” Musa said.

A 35-year-old resident identified simply as Tunde offered further clarification.

“The Emir has two wives,” Tunde said. “The first wife was not at home when the attackers stormed the palace. The second wife was kidnapped. They killed all his children and burnt his house.

“The Emir was not at the palace during the attack. He was outside Woro when the assailants arrived.”

Sources confirmed that the monarch survived and is currently in hiding in Kaiama town after his palace was razed. Efforts to speak with him were unsuccessful.

For residents attempting to flee, the federal road became another danger zone.

“Motorists on the busy road were stopped. People inside vehicles were attacked and killed,” Tunde said.

See also  Health workers’ strike grounds hospitals

Our correspondent saw a burnt commercial truck conveying sacks of maize and guinea corn along the road.

Explaining the incident, Tunde said the vehicle stepped on a landmine while attempting to enter Woro.

“The bomb was buried on the road and was not noticeable. The explosion was massive and delayed the Army’s rescue efforts,” he said. “The soldiers had to retreat to a nearby village. The vehicle was burnt to ashes.”

As the attack unfolded, survivors reported seeing an aircraft overhead.

“A white helicopter flew over the village. It circled and left without intervening. After it left, the killings continued from about 6pm to 8pm,” Musa said.

He added that when another aircraft, believed to be military, later returned, the attackers retreated into the forest, only to re-emerge under cover of darkness.

“They came out again at night,” he said. “The killings continued until about 2am.”

By dawn, the scale of the massacre began to emerge. As of Friday, more than 200 bodies had been buried in mass graves at different locations.

“First it was 30, then 68, then 75,” Musa said. “Later it rose to 162. Now the number recorded is over 200. Some bodies were recovered days later.”

Survivors believe the figure may be higher.

“From what we are seeing and hearing, the number could be more than 300,” Aliyu said.

Abdulrasheed gave an even higher estimate. “Between two days ago and now, we counted 321 bodies in the community,” he claimed.

Musa said more than 100 people were abducted during the attack.

“Over 100 people were kidnapped, and there have been no traces of them,” he said. “During search operations, more bodies have been found in the bush.”

Another survivor, who requested anonymity for security reasons, said the attackers disguised themselves.

“They dressed like soldiers and wore full armour. There was even a woman among them carrying ammunition,” she said. “We did not suspect anything at first.”

She recalled seeing them pass her shop along the Kaiama-Woro road.

“Minutes later, we heard gunshots. That was when we realised they were not soldiers. Everyone started running.”

Some of her relatives were abducted.

“My seven-year-old stepsister, who has a chronic illness, was taken during a family event in Woro. Another sister was also abducted. I do not know how the little one will survive in the forest,” she said.

She also recounted the ordeal of a trader popularly known as “Iya Bag.”

“They tried to break into her house but failed. They set it on fire, thinking everyone inside was dead. The family escaped through a back window, but she lost everything,” she said.

See also  PHOTOS: We’re repositioning Ogun as Nigeria’s leading destination for culture, tourism – Gov Abiodun

The violence reportedly spread to neighbouring Nuku village. Even days later, residents said they heard distant gunshots in the early hours of Thursday, fuelling fears that more victims were killed in the surrounding forest.

Aliyu described how he survived.

“When the shooting started, I ran into the bush. I stayed there until morning before returning,” he said.

Abdulrasheed also recounted his escape. “I ran into a nearby house and hid,” he said.

Both men said nearly all residents had fled.

“Almost everyone has left,” Aliyu said. “People packed what they could carry and fled.”

Hospitals in Kaiama and New-Bussa have continued to treat injured survivors. A source familiar with the situation said many victims were in serious condition but responding to treatment.

The Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, has sent a delegation to the area as part of ongoing security and assessment operations. Security has since been reinforced across the Kaiama axis, with soldiers patrolling adjoining roads and border communities.

Yet the deserted homes reflect a deeper crisis — trust in safety has not returned.

“There is illegal mining in the forest,” a community member who requested anonymity said. “The group known locally as the Mahmuda terrorists have built houses there. Farmers can no longer go to their fields.”

Woro’s farmlands, once the backbone of its economy, now lie untended. Dry-season crops remain unharvested, and livestock have either strayed or been stolen.

For many families, returning would mean confronting both trauma and the destruction of their livelihoods.

At the IDP camps in Wawa and other host communities, displaced residents gather in prayer. Children cling to their mothers, while men speak quietly about relatives still missing.

“We have never seen anything like this,” Musa said.

Aliyu appealed for urgent intervention. “The government should assist our community with security and relief materials. We are pleading for help,” he said.

Abdulrasheed added, “Security agencies should remain in the community and support those whose homes and property were destroyed.”

In Woro, fresh graves dot the outskirts of the village. The scent of burnt timber lingers in the dry air as security operatives continue their patrols.

Until the abducted return and residents regain confidence to rebuild, Woro remains not only under guard, but in mourning.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Starmer slams Man United’s co-owner Ratcliffe over immigration comments

Published

on

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has described comments about immigration made by Manchester United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe as “offensive and wrong”, after the billionaire businessman said the UK had been “colonised by immigrants”.

Sir Jim, founder of chemicals giant Ineos, made the remarks during an interview with Sky News at the European Industry Summit in Antwerp, Belgium.

He argued that high immigration and rising welfare costs were placing pressure on the country’s economy.

“You can’t have an economy with nine million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in,” he said. “The UK has been colonised by immigrants, really, hasn’t it?”

He also claimed the UK population had risen from 58 million in 2020 to 70 million today.

However, the Office for National Statistics estimates show the population was 66.7 million in mid-2020 and 69.4 million in mid-2025 — an increase of about 2.7 million.

As reported by the BBC, responding on Wednesday evening, the prime minister said Britain was “a proud, tolerant and diverse country” and called on Sir Jim to apologise.

A Downing Street spokesperson said the comments “play into the hands of those who want to divide our country”.

Sir Jim also suggested that political leaders would need to be prepared to take unpopular decisions to address immigration and welfare.

“If you really want to deal with the major issues of immigration… you’re going to have to do some things which are unpopular, and show some courage,” he said, adding that the prime minister faced a “tough job”.

The remarks prompted criticism from across the political spectrum. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey described them as “totally wrong” and “out of step with British values”. Labour MP Stella Creasy said Sir Jim did “not seem to understand the contribution” immigrants make to the country.

See also  Ex-Ondo SDP governorship candidate, Akingboye, dies

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said Britain had undergone “unprecedented mass immigration” that had changed many communities, adding that while Labour may “try to ignore that”, Reform would not.

Fan groups linked to Manchester United also condemned the comments. The Manchester United Supporters Trust said no supporter should feel excluded because of their race, religion, or background, adding that senior leadership should unite fans rather than marginalise them.

The Manchester United Muslim Supporters Club said it was “deeply concerned”, arguing that the term “colonised” echoed language used in far-right narratives that portray migrants as invaders.

Anti-racism organisations Kick It Out and Show Racism the Red Card described the remarks as divisive. At the same time, The 1958 Group of supporters called them “very ill-advised” and criticised Sir Jim for commenting on UK affairs while living in Monaco.

Sir Jim, 73, acquired a 27.7% stake in Manchester United in 2024 and has overseen significant restructuring at the club, including hundreds of redundancies and managerial changes.

He acknowledged some of his decisions had been unpopular but said they were necessary to “get the big issues sorted out”.

According to the Sunday Times Rich List, Sir Jim is the seventh richest person in the UK, with an estimated net worth of £17bn. He reportedly moved to Monaco in 2020.

The BBC has approached Ineos and Manchester United for comment.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Sweden raises income requirement for citizenship applicants

Published

on

Sweden has announced plans to tighten its citizenship requirements, including raising the income threshold for applicants as part of a broader overhaul of its naturalisation rules.

As reported by Economic Times and sighted by PUNCH Online on Thursday, under the proposed changes, people seeking Swedish citizenship would be required to have lived in the country for at least eight years, up from the current five-year requirement.

In addition, applicants would need to demonstrate a stable monthly income of more than 20,000 Swedish crowns (about $2,225).

“These requirements are much tougher than the situation as it is today because currently there are basically no requirements (to become a citizen).

“Anyone with a criminal record, either in Sweden or abroad, ‍will have to wait longer before they can apply.

“Someone who had served a four-year prison sentence, ‍for example, ⁠would have to ⁠wait 15 years before being able to apply for citizenship,” Migration Minister Johan Forssell said.

The government also said candidates would have to pass a language and culture test designed to assess their knowledge of Swedish society and their ability to communicate in the national language.

Officials say the measures are intended to strengthen integration and ensure that new citizens are financially self-sufficient and familiar with Sweden’s social and civic norms.

Supporters argue that stricter standards will promote long-term stability and shared values.

Critics, however, warn that the tougher requirements could make it harder for immigrants to fully integrate and may disproportionately affect lower-income workers and families.

The proposals are expected to be debated in parliament before any changes take effect.

Continue Reading

News

Cybercrime Act being used to suppress free speech — NBA president

Published

on

The President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Afam Osigwe, SAN, has raised concerns over the alleged misuse of the Cybercrimes Act to suppress free speech in Nigeria, describing it as a deliberate muzzling of expression under the pretext of combating cybercrime and defamation.

In an interview on ARISE Television’s Prime Time programme on Wednesday, Osigwe criticised what he described as the weaponisation of the law against critics, journalists, activists and ordinary citizens who voice dissent online or offline.

He said individuals are being charged, investigated and detained for alleged cybercrimes or criminal defamation, even in cases where such offences are ordinarily bailable.

According to Osigwe, the judiciary is complicit in this trend.

“Free speech is being muzzled in Nigeria under the guise of charging people to court and investigating them for cyber crime and criminal defamation.

“Even when the matters are ordinarily bailable, judges and magistrates are increasingly appearing to be tools in the hands of politicians and ‘big men’ and refuse bail even where there is no basis for not granting bail,” he said.

The NBA president warned that such actions transform the courts into “an oppressive tool.”

“This is a violation of the right to freedom of expression and an abuse of the democratic space.

“Because these public office holders should be held to a higher standard of accountability, and if they deprive people of the ability to criticise and hold them to account, then democracy dies.

“If our judges become willing tools in giving them that which they desire, which is to put those people out of circulation, then there’s something wrong and the judiciary becomes a willing tool in the hands of the oppressors and thereby becomes an oppressor itself,” he said.

See also  FG approves N25m housing loan for perm secs

Osigwe’s remarks come amid ongoing debates about the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act.

Originally enacted in 2015 and amended in 2024, the law seeks to address online fraud, cyberterrorism and related offences.

However, critics argue that provisions of the Act criminalising “cyberstalking” remain vaguely worded and are frequently misused to target journalists, activists and other citizens for sharing opinions or exposing corruption.

Continue Reading

Trending