Connect with us

News

Presidency Explains Nigeria-UK Migration Agreement, Warns Against Misinformation

Published

on

UK Trade Envoy, Florence Eshalomi and Nigeria’s Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji Ojo

The Bola Ahmed Tinubu-led administration has clarified details surrounding the migration partnership between Nigeria and the United Kingdom, dismissing claims that the agreement compels Nigeria to accept foreign nationals.

It was reports that the clarification was contained in a statement issued by the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga.

According to the Presidency, the Memorandum of Understanding signed during the visit of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu does not require Nigeria to receive non-citizens.

The statement emphasised that only verified nationals of each country would be repatriated under the agreement.

“Nowhere in the 12-page memorandum is Nigeria required to accept foreign nationals other than Nigerians,” the statement said.

The MoU, signed by Nigeria’s Minister of Interior and the UK Home Secretary, is aimed at promoting safe, orderly, and regulated migration between both countries.

The presidency noted that it also seeks to strengthen cooperation in tackling irregular migration and related offences.

The government explained that returnees must undergo multiple layers of identification and verification before repatriation.

Where errors occur, such individuals would be returned to the requesting country at its own cost, the presidency noted.

Onanuga said the agreement provides that all returnees must be treated with dignity and respect, in line with international human rights standards, adding that it also allows individuals to appeal deportation decisions under applicable domestic and international laws.

The Presidency stressed that Nigeria has not ceded control over its immigration processes, pointing out that under the agreement, the Nigeria Immigration Service retains sole authority to issue travel documents and manage all entry procedures.

The full statement reads: “It has become necessary to debunk the raft of misinformation assailing the migration partnership between Nigeria and the United Kingdom, as contained in the Memorandum of Understanding signed by the two nations on the sidelines of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s historic state visit to the UK.

“The memorandum on immigration cooperation, like other memoranda signed, aimed to strengthen the partnership between Nigeria and the United Kingdom.

“Nigeria’s Minister of Interior and the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Government of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland signed the Migration MoU.

See also  PHOTOS: Rasheedat Ajibade presents WAFCON medal, awards to Pastor Olukoya, wife

“The MoU establishes a framework to facilitate a regulated and safe migration flow between the two countries and to encourage further bilateral cooperation in the fight against irregular migration and associated acts by citizens of each country, in accordance with their respective immigration and citizenship laws and extant international treaties, conventions, protocols, agreements, and charters.

“Nowhere in the 12-page memorandum is Nigeria required to accept foreign nationals other than Nigerians. Nationals to be repatriated must have undergone multiple levels of identification and verification, and, where errors occur, they are returned to the requesting country at the requesting country’s cost.

“Under the agreement, Nigeria and the United Kingdom will work together to secure the dignified return of their nationals who do not, or no longer, have the right to enter or remain in the territory of the other country.

“A clear condition in the MoU is that the returnees concerned are bona fide nationals of the country and are treated with dignity and respect, with due regard to their human rights and fundamental freedoms.

“Law enforcement officers in each country will take the necessary action to protect the interests and well-being of citizens of either party and to mitigate conflict triggers related to migration matters.

“A key provision in the MoU is that the migrant to be returned must carry his legally acquired personal belongings to the country of destination, unlike in the past when migrants left with nothing.

“Article 12 further reinforces this good deal: “Every returnee will be given ample opportunity to make adequate arrangements for the transfer or disposal of his property in the territory of the requesting party, under the supervision of the mission of the requested party.”

“Another provision is that where a return is being considered, and the person has made a claim under relevant domestic or international human rights legislation, that claim will be considered in line with the provisions under the party’s respective domestic legislation. The appeal may relate to circumstances in which the foreign nationals have been lawfully resident in the territory of the requesting party for most of their lives and socially and culturally integrated in the territory of the requesting party. Another ground of appeal may be where the nationals would face significant obstacles to their integration into the country to which they are to be deported.

See also  PHOTOS: Fire guts Borno restaurant

“Article 9 of the MoU sets out the conditions for the migrant’s return.

“Before departure, identification checks will be carried out by the officers of the requested party in the territory of the requesting party and on arrival by the competent authorities of the requested party. The requesting party will coordinate all returns with the officers of the requested party.

“A return may be conducted by means of a scheduled aircraft or an aircraft chartered specifically for this purpose by the authorities of the parties; the requesting party will provide the flight details and particulars of each returnee five (5) working days before the date of return.

“A return will be conducted using an original, valid passport, or, if the requesting party can biometrically match a returnee to a visa application made in the territory of the requested party, then an expedited process will be permissible, via which the requesting party will facilitate the return or repatriation using a UK Letter (UKL).

“If a returnee cannot be biometrically matched to a visa application by the requesting party, but there is otherwise strong evidence to confirm nationality, including a copy of a passport, a passport number or a national identity card, then an expedited process will again be permissible via which the requesting party will facilitate return or repatriation using a UK Letter (UKL).

“Should the requested party not be satisfied with a returnee’s identity within five (5) working days of submission of the UK Letter (UKL) to Nigerian authorities, detailed reasons should be presented to the requesting party why the identity cannot be satisfied. In these circumstances, removal will be deferred.

“If subsequent evidence shows that a returnee who has been returned is not a national of the requested party, the requesting party will take the person back to its territory at the requesting party’s cost and by the most efficient means possible. The request for the return of the person referred to in Article X will be made within ten (10) working days following the return exercise and carried out within fourteen (14) working days after acceptance of the request.”

See also  Jigawa welcomes collaboration to empower vulnerable women

“Article 9, subsection 3, shows that Nigeria has not ceded to the UK the right to document the repatriated person.

“The section says: It shall be the sole responsibility of the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) to issue and handle, as is necessary under Nigerian domestic legislation, any Nigerian documentation (including the digital acknowledgement of receipt of a UK Letter) ahead of the notified date of return as stated in the UK Letter. This shall be distinct from the UK Letter process and remains the sole right and responsibility of Nigerian authorities, including the handling of the
travel document and any onward transmission required from the issuing office to enable entry.

“Article 11 deals with returnee reintegration assistance. It states that every returnee will be able to access basic on-arrival and reintegration assistance in the territory of the requested party.

“Short-term assistance may include airport reception, accommodation, onward transportation, care and provision packs and small cash assistance. Medium-term assistance can include support to find and reunite with family; support in obtaining the in-country documentation required, signposting to local services, and the potential provision of mental well-being and counselling services (if required).

“Longer-term assistance may allow access to a Returnee Education and Entrepreneurship Fund to enable sustainable reintegration. Support may include accessing the local job market, setting up a business, accessing vocational training or further education, and assistance with legal migration opportunities.

“Should the parties’ domestic legislation regarding the provision of reintegration support to all or certain categories of returnees change, or should the overarching non-legally mandated package of reintegration support change, the parties will inform each other as soon as is practicable.”

” The MoU, similar to those signed in 2012, 2017, and 2022, is for an initial period of five years, renewable for a further five-year period, as may be agreed by the parties.

“We reiterate that media organisations should seek clarification when uncertain about any issue to avoid misinforming the public.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

PHOTOS: Daughter Of 48th Ooni of Ife dies at 102

Published

on

Alhaja (Princess) Rafatu Ademinure Awofisayo, the last surviving child of the 48th Ooni of Ife, Oba Ademiluyi Ajagun Lawarikan I, has passed away at the age of 102.

It was reports that she died peacefully in early April 2026, according to family sources.

Reacting to her death, the Ooni of Ife, Oba Ogunwusi, described her passing as the close of a long chapter in the town’s history. In a statement through his media office, he spoke about her role in preserving her father’s legacy and her efforts in promoting unity among people of different beliefs in the community.

Princess Awofisayo was born into the Otutu Royal Compound of the Lafogido Ruling House in Ile-Ife.

She remained the only surviving direct child of her father, who ruled between 1910 and June 1930.

With her passing, many see it as the end of a living link between present-day Ile-Ife and its early 20th-century royal history.

She started her education at Salvation Army Elementary School in Ile-Ife and later continued at Saint Paul’s Anglican Church Elementary School in Aiyegbaju, Olopo, after her father’s death. She was raised by her mother, Olori Elizabeth Odunlade Ige Ademiluyi, and became involved in small-scale trading from a young age, dealing in items such as mats, kolanuts and palm oil.

In 1942, she got married to the late Alhaji Jimoh Elutide Awofisayo, a farmer and cocoa trader from Ilode in Ile-Ife. Over time, she became well known within the Muslim community in Ifeland and held several titles, including Iya Adinni, which was her most recognised position.

See also  ‘We mixed raw flour with water to stay alive'- Kaduna Christian rescued from kidnappers den recount ordeal

She is survived by six children, along with many grandchildren and great-grandchildren. The family has not yet announced details of her burial.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

Peace talks: Iran has rejected our terms – US VP, JD Vance

Published

on

US Vice President and leader of the American delegation to the US-Iran peace negotiations, JD Vance, has shared updates regarding the discussions that have taken place so far.

He indicated that Iran has dismissed the conditions proposed by the United States.

Numerous media outlets report that neither side has made progress despite engaging in talks for over 21 hours in the capital of Pakistan.

While Iran’s foreign ministry has accused the US of imposing unreasonable demands and illegal requests, the US has stated that it has been ‘quite flexible, quite accommodating,’ yet Iran has refused to accept the terms.

“I won’t delve into all the specifics because I prefer not to negotiate in public after we have spent 21 hours negotiating privately,” the US Vice President informed reporters.

“However, the fundamental requirement is that we need to see a clear commitment from them that they will not pursue a nuclear weapon, nor will they seek the means to rapidly develop one.

“This is the primary objective of the President of the United States, and it is what we have aimed to accomplish through these negotiations.

“Once more, their nuclear program, as it stands – the enrichment facilities they previously possessed – have been dismantled.

“The essential question remains, do we observe a genuine commitment from the Iranians to refrain from developing a nuclear weapon, not just at this moment, not merely two years from now, but in the long term? We have yet to witness that. We remain hopeful that we will.”

See also  ‘We mixed raw flour with water to stay alive'- Kaduna Christian rescued from kidnappers den recount ordeal

When asked if the discussions yielded any form of framework, and whether the matter of Iranian frozen assets was addressed, Vance responded, “Certainly those topics were discussed.”

“However, we simply could not reach a point where the Iranians were prepared to accept our conditions.

“I believe we were quite flexible. We were very accommodating.

“The President instructed us to approach this with good faith and to make our utmost effort to secure a deal. We adhered to that, and regrettably, we were unable to make any progress.”

Discussions between both countries will resume on Sunday as Pakistan endeavors to facilitate a successful resolution among them.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

Russia, Ukraine Easter ceasefire collapses

Published

on

Attempts to enforce a temporary Easter ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine broke down on Saturday, as both sides traded accusations of breaches in a war that has now stretched into its fourth year.

Russian President Vladimir Putin had announced the truce on Thursday, following an earlier proposal by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The ceasefire was scheduled to last 32 hours, beginning at 4:00 p.m. on Saturday and ending late Sunday.

However, the agreement quickly unraveled. Ukrainian military authorities reported at least 469 violations of the ceasefire, citing continued air raids, drone strikes, artillery shelling, and attacks on both military positions and civilian areas.

According to Ukrainian officials, Russian operations during the period resulted in at least four fatalities and dozens of injuries.

In response, Ukraine also launched drone attacks that reportedly ignited a fire at an oil storage facility and caused structural damage in parts of southern Russia.

Despite the renewed hostilities, both countries carried out a limited humanitarian exchange, with each side releasing 175 prisoners of war, along with 14 civilians. One of the freed Ukrainian soldiers, Maksym, who had spent four years in captivity, described his release as surreal, expressing relief at regaining his freedom after years of detention.

Efforts to reach a diplomatic resolution remain stalled, complicated by ongoing geopolitical tensions and disagreements over territorial control.

Ukraine has indicated willingness to consider freezing the conflict along existing frontlines, while Russia insists on full control of the Donetsk region, a demand Kyiv continues to reject.

The protracted conflict has led to massive human and material losses, with hundreds of thousands of casualties and millions displaced. It remains the most deadly war in Europe since the Second World War.

See also  SEE FULL LIST: IG deploys new AIGs, CPs in major police re-organisation

While Russia made rapid territorial gains in the early stages of the invasion, its advances have slowed significantly since late 2025, with Moscow currently holding just over 19 percent of Ukrainian territory.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending