Connect with us

Business

Food security fears mount as UK farmers battle drought

Published

on

Giant dust clouds rose from a green-red combine harvester as it crawled across a parched field, a sign that something was awry with UK farmer John Pawsey’s land.

“It suddenly, completely dried out,” Pawsey said. For weeks the drought “just seems to have gone on for ever” on his farm in the eastern county of Suffolk.

English farmers have been contending with the driest July ever recorded by the Met Office weather agency — unwelcome news for those like Pawsey who have only seen paltry yields of crops such as oats, wheat and vetch.

Concern over food security has gripped Britain’s headlines amid a series of heatwaves this year.

“All of our fears were realised when we got our combines into the field and realised that actually the yield was … between 25 and 30 percent down,” Pawsey said.

His family has tilled the Suffolk soil since a Scottish great-grandfather moved there, one of many farm workers who flocked south following the late 19th century agricultural depression.

Like his ancestors, Pawsey, 62, is navigating a turbulent future.

“I am worried about the coming years,” he admitted.

The drought is the most recent weather-related challenge to hit the nation’s farmers over the past five years.

Food growers must learn to adapt, Pawsey urged, adding dynamic farmers should view the changing climate as an “opportunity.”

His organic farm has experimented with new crops, like fava beans and chickpeas more suited to hotter, drier climates, and techniques to build resilience such as pairing two different crops in the same field to force them to grow as they compete for space and nutrients.

See also  Lagos govt cracks down on illegal trading under bridges

The government needs to support farmers in “making a transition” towards using similar methods, Pawsey argued.

Food security expert Timothy Benton endorses farming less intensively, saying “a more circular, diverse farming system” would be more secure and less dependant on imports of such things as fruits and fertilisers.

“Climate impacts will become greater,” Benton told AFP, adding “food systems will have to change”.

“We’re not investing enough in the forms of technological innovation to address a larger crisis,” he said.

Benton argued: “Food is not just food, it’s what you grow, produce and the products and processes needed to bring it to the general population.”

– Different menu –

Climate change could also force Britain to change its eating habits, said Nicola Cannon, professor at the Royal Agricultural College. She has been growing soya with the aim of introducing it to more British farms.

Dinnertime staples have been hit especially hard by the drought. This year’s pea yield was only “50 percent of what we wanted,” Cannon said.

They had little chance to grow, as there has been “very little moisture since March,” she added.

On Pawsey’s Suffolk farm, an entire crop of quinoa failed.

“We just had no rain,” he said. “The only things that started growing were docks (leaves) and thistles.”

Shortages of certain foods may result if drought conditions continue, National Farmers’ Union president Tom Bradshaw told the BBC.

“We have taken our food supply for granted for far too long,” he warned.

Lower yields make farming less profitable, meaning farmers will lack capital to invest in adaptation and experimenting with new crops.

See also  CAC processes 10,000 daily registrations after AI rollout

Buying seasonal British produce gives “farmers more market certainty which allows them to invest in adaptations,” Cannon said.

“We’ve invested too much in worrying about wheat genetics and not enough about farming systems,” expert Benton said.

“Food security is national security,” Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s spokesperson said earlier this week.

The government has promised “record investment in water infrastructure, including nine new reservoirs,” they added.

Adapting food systems will require greater state intervention, Benton added.

“Change will be much more expensive,” he said, warning that “things are going to get worse in the decades ahead.”

Pawsey said that if weather trends continue, “farmers will go out of business.”

“It’ll either mean higher prices or the government will have to continue to support farmers,” he said.

AFP

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Return of subsidy could lead to ₦2,000/Litre Petrol, ₦3,000/$ exchange rate, FG warns

Published

on

The Federal Government has strongly defended its decision to eliminate fuel subsidies, warning that reinstating the policy would trigger severe economic instability, driving petrol prices above ₦2,000 per litre and pushing the exchange rate toward ₦3,000 per US dollar.

Speaking at a press briefing in Abuja on Thursday, October 8, addressing fuel pricing and growing public calls for subsidy reinstatement, the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, cautioned that returning to subsidies would destabilize fiscal progress.

“Return subsidy, and the sequence is familiar. Weaker revenues invite a sovereign credit downgrade. As the rating agencies themselves have already signalled, and you can read all their reports, that would put at risk the upgrade we have recently earned, including our first from S&P in 14 years,” Oyedele stated.

“Borrowing becomes costlier, capital leaves, reserves fall, naira weakens. The progress on inflation, which has allowed the central bank to begin lowering interest rates, will be put at risk. Our estimate is that the exchange rate could approach ₦3,000 per dollar within months. And the so-called subsidised petrol will cost at least ₦2,000 per litre. This is well above what Nigerians pay today.”

Oyedele emphasized that a reinstated subsidy would ultimately be funded through inflationary fiscal measures, delayed public earnings, or increased taxation.

“However, it is described, a subsidy must be financed through salaries and pensions not paid on time, through higher taxes, or through the printing of money, like we saw before this current administration. Over 30 trillion naira was printed. That’s inflation we’re dealing with. It wasn’t even just about the reform. Each of these has done great harm before,” Oyedele added. “Short-term relief, but with long-term fragility, is the most expensive money a government can spend.”

See also  NNPC, NUPRC remit N322bn, $116.9m after Tinubu order

Addressing critics demanding a return to subsidized pricing over three years after President Bola Tinubu announced the end of the regime, the minister challenged proponents to provide viable, mathematically sound alternatives.

“We remain open to ideas, but any credible proposer should answer three questions. Number one, what will it cost? Number two, how will it be funded sustainably? Number three, what pump price will it deliver? We will engage in good faith with any proposer that shows its arithmetic,” Oyedele declared.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

TUC reveals how FG can raise workers’ salaries without new minimum wage, read details

Published

on

The Trade Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC) has told the Federal Government that it does not need to wait for the next review of the national minimum wage before improving the salaries of its workers.

TUC President, Comrade Festus Osifo, said the government could independently increase the salaries of federal workers or raise the pay of the least-paid employees without waiting for a new Minimum Wage Act.

Osifo made the position known Wednesday evening while speaking at a press briefing in Abuja after the National Administrative Council (NAC) meeting of the labour centre.

According to him, the minimum wage should be regarded as a statutory wage floor and not a ceiling that prevents government or employers from paying workers substantially above the prescribed minimum.

He said, “Government does not even need to wait for a new Minimum Wage Act to be signed before government will take care of its workers.

“Government can wake up today and say, ‘Okay, I want to pay the least-paid worker in the Federal Government payroll N200,000,’ for example. They could say, ‘Let the least-paid worker be N400,000,’ for example, and graduate it upwards.

“Is that only the minimum wage for government to do that? No. That is not really the function of a minimum wage.”

Osifo argued that employers in several sectors already pay considerably above the statutory minimum, noting that the salaries of university graduates employed by banks, food and beverage companies and oil and gas firms are generally determined by the value of the jobs rather than the national minimum wage.

See also  FirstHoldCo Seeks Shareholders Approval on N1 Trillion Capital Base in Bold Balance Sheet Fortification

“If you are a university graduate and you are to be employed in a bank, are they going to start you from the minimum wage? The answer is no. The pay you will earn is much above minimum wage,” he said.

He added that the same principle applied to major companies in the food and beverage sector.

“If you are a university graduate and you are to be employed in the food and beverage industry, if you are to be employed by Nestlé, if you are to be employed by Cadbury, they are not going to look at minimum wage,” he said.

The TUC president also cited the oil and gas sector, where he said companies such as Shell, Chevron and TotalEnergies would ordinarily negotiate remuneration based on the nature and value of the jobs rather than the statutory wage floor.

“They are going to be talking about living wage,” he said.

Osifo therefore urged the Federal Government to take immediate steps to improve workers’ incomes rather than leaving employees to wait for the next statutory minimum wage review.

He said TUC had already engaged government officials on the issue, including the Minister of Finance and the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, as part of efforts to push for measures that would improve workers’ welfare.

“For us, you don’t really need a new minimum wage to take care of your employees in several sectors. That is not how it is done,” he said.

The labour leader also maintained that allowances could be reviewed independently of the minimum wage, stressing that workers should not be left to bear the full weight of economic reforms until 2027.

See also  Petrol may hit N1,000/litre as Dangote hikes price

He said, “Allowances don’t need a minimum wage conversation, and even salaries, government on its own can actually push the salaries of workers up, even without minimum wage conversation.”

The current national minimum wage of N70,000 was signed into law in 2024 for a three-year period. Osifo said organised labour was already preparing for the next review, but stressed that government had options for improving workers’ welfare before then.

He further cited Ghana as an example of a country where government does not necessarily wait for a new minimum wage before taking measures to improve workers’ pay.

“Government can decide to pay whatever it takes to take care of its employees. Employers can decide to do way above what is there at the minimum threshold,” he said.

Source: tribuneonlineng.com

Follow Politics

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Customs explains why shortlisted candidates await training invitations

Published

on

The Nigeria Customs Service has said candidates whose names appeared on its published recruitment list are not automatically guaranteed appointment, explaining that final screening is still ongoing before successful applicants are admitted for training.

The clarification followed complaints by some candidates who claimed they successfully completed the Computer-Based Test, physical examinations and initial screening, accepted their appointments through the official recruitment portal and saw their names published as successful candidates, but had yet to receive invitations for training scheduled to commence on Friday.

The affected candidates, according to a report by SaharaReporters, include more than 500 applicants who said they had been left uncertain about their status after invitations to the training reportedly stopped on Monday.

Some of the candidates claimed they had resigned from their previous jobs and incurred other expenses after believing that their appointments had been secured.

However, the Customs spokesman and Deputy Comptroller of Customs, Abdullahi Maiwada, told The PUNCH exclusively on Wednesday that the publication of a candidate’s name did not amount to a final appointment into the service.

Maiwada said candidates must pass the physical screening and other requirements before they can be admitted into the training college and eventually commissioned as officers.

“I will start my response first with a question. Did anyone who complained to you inform you that they have been issued an appointment letter? So that means the process is still ongoing. Secondly, the essence of screening is to have a physical examination of successful candidates.

“Let me explain so that you would have proper context. The essence of screening is either for candidates to be screened in or screened out, and they are just simple issues. It is either you have not met the criteria to be offered an appointment letter into Customs or to be ushered into training college. If anyone fails this, they will be dropped,” he said.

See also  NNPC, NUPRC remit N322bn, $116.9m after Tinubu order

The spokesman said age, academic credentials, medical fitness and drug use were among the requirements that could determine whether a candidate progressed to the next stage.

He explained, “Those criteria are simple. Age is very important. If your age is above the threshold, you will be disqualified. If there are inconsistencies in your credentials, you will be disqualified. If there are forgeries detected, you will be disqualified.

“If we see you with drugs, any element of drugs except tobacco and beer, you will be disqualified. If you have medical issues that wouldn’t warrant you to undergo that rigour, you would also be disqualified.”

Maiwada stressed that even admission into the training college would not make a candidate a Customs officer, saying applicants must successfully complete the training and satisfy academic, physical and character requirements before commissioning.

He said, “The fact that your name came out and you are invited for screening doesn’t qualify you to be a Customs officer. Even with that, you are going for training. And you will go for the training. It is when you pass the requirements that you will be commissioned as an officer. Anything before that, you are still not an officer.

“Someone can go to the Nigerian Defence Academy and still fail. It is not everyone who comes out who passes or is a flying lieutenant. And even if you find yourself in training college, you are still not a Customs officer. Until the day you pass out successfully and you are able to withstand all the rigours.

See also  Inflation drops to 18.02% in six-month streak

“Academic exercises will be done, and you must come out well in character and learning. Exams will be conducted.”

The spokesman said the service could not justify spending public resources to train candidates who had already failed basic eligibility requirements. He said drug screening was particularly important because the Customs Service conducts annual drug tests for serving officers, regardless of rank.

“If someone is into drugs and he is disqualified, do we have to waste our resources taking him to training college before disqualifying him? No! These are criteria that are so simple. You have forgery and the like, and you want to be allowed into the system.

“If you see what we saw with medical records, you will be scared for this country. The rate at which boys are into drugs, you will be scared. Is this the future? The service runs drug tests for every officer every year, no matter your ranking. So if we can do that to persons in the system, what do you think we would do to persons outside it?” Maiwada said.

The ongoing controversy is linked to the Nigeria Customs Service’s 2024/2025 recruitment exercise, which began with an advertisement published on December 27, 2024.

The Service declared 3,927 vacancies across the Superintendent, Inspectorate and Customs Assistant cadres and received 573,680 applications.

After several stages of screening and verification, 3,852 candidates were selected, representing only 0.67 per cent of the applicants, or about one successful candidate for every 148 applicants.

The successful candidates comprised 1,275 Superintendents, 367 Inspectors and 2,210 Customs Assistants. The Service later conducted medical documentation and physical screening before inviting candidates who passed the subsequent stage for basic training scheduled to begin on October 9, 2026, at the Customs Training College.

See also  FirstHoldCo Seeks Shareholders Approval on N1 Trillion Capital Base in Bold Balance Sheet Fortification

Maiwada’s explanation means that candidates whose names appeared in the published list may still be subject to further verification before they receive final appointment letters, proceed through training and are eventually commissioned as Customs officers.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending