Connect with us

Business

FG seeks fresh $1.5bn World Bank loan

Published

on

The Federal Government has opened discussions with the World Bank for three new loans totalling $1.5bn, even as Nigeria’s public debt climbed to a record N166.79tn at the end of June 2026.

Documents obtained from the World Bank show that the proposed financing comprises three separate $500m facilities for climate resilience, social protection and early childhood development.

The most immediate is a proposed $500m additional financing for the Agro-Climatic Resilience in Semi-Arid Landscapes project, known as ACReSAL. The World Bank has fixed October 29, 2026, as the estimated date for consideration by its board. The borrower is the Federal Republic of Nigeria, while the Federal Ministry of Environment is the implementing agency.

The financing would raise the size of ACReSAL from its previously approved $700m to $1.2bn, entirely financed through the International Development Association, the World Bank’s concessional financing arm.

The document said, “The Government of Nigeria has requested AF of $500m to scale up demonstrated project results and strengthen the institutional, operational and financing arrangements needed to sustain integrated landscape management.”

The additional financing is expected to support landscape restoration, watershed rehabilitation, erosion and flood management, irrigation and drainage, water harvesting and storage, reforestation and other climate-resilient interventions.

Of the additional $500m, $310m is proposed for dryland management, $165m for community climate resilience and $25m for institutional strengthening and project management.

ACReSAL currently operates across 19 northern states and the Federal Capital Territory and is targeted at land degradation, water insecurity, climate vulnerability and declining agricultural productivity.

The World Bank said desertification and land degradation affected an estimated 43 per cent of Nigeria’s land area, while failure to address climate change could reduce gross domestic product by about 2.6 per cent annually by 2030 and as much as 6.7 per cent by 2050.

The second proposed loan is another $500m IDA credit for the Household Prosperity and Empowerment-Social Protection Project.

Unlike the ACReSAL facility, the HOPE-SP project is at an earlier stage of preparation. Its technical design review is expected on October 30, 2026, while the World Bank has tentatively fixed March 16, 2027, as its approval date. The Federal Ministry of Finance is listed as the borrower, while the Federal Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction will implement the programme.

The project has an estimated cost of $500m, comprising a $420m results-based programme and an $80m investment project financing component, with the entire financing expected from IDA.

It is designed to establish regular social assistance for poor and vulnerable households, while gradually shifting financing responsibility towards federal and state budgets.

The World Bank document said the programme would establish “a sustainable social assistance to poor and vulnerable households, financed increasingly from federal and state budgets and delivered through strengthened state and local government systems.”

The proposed programme would finance targeted unconditional and conditional cash transfers, modernise the social registry, integrate the National Identification Number into the social protection information system and strengthen implementation at federal, state and local government levels.

The lender said Nigeria spent only 0.14 per cent of GDP on social safety-net programmes in 2021, compared with a global average of 1.5 per cent and 1.2 per cent among lower-middle-income countries.

See also  ‘It’s not only akara,’ Remi Tinubu defends comments, says FG also supports tomato, pepper sellers

The bank also painted a grim picture of household welfare, estimating that the proportion of Nigerians living in poverty had increased from 40 per cent in 2019 to 56 per cent in 2023 and could reach 62.5 per cent in 2026. It attributed the deterioration to several factors, including the pandemic, inflation, natural disasters and conflict, while noting that fuel subsidy removal and exchange-rate reforms worsened living costs in the short term.

The third proposed $500m facility is for the Nigeria Early Childhood Development programme, with an estimated approval date of March 15, 2027, a day before the proposed HOPE-SP approval. Its technical design review is also scheduled for October 30, 2026.

The Federal Ministry of Finance is the borrower, while the Federal Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning is expected to implement the programme.

The project would cover all 36 states and the FCT and seek to improve access to an integrated package of health, nutrition, early learning, childcare, water and sanitation, and other services for children aged zero to five.

It would be financed through $500m IDA credit, consisting of a $400m programme-for-results component and $100m investment project financing component.

The World Bank said the intervention had become necessary because “40 percent of children under five are stunted, fewer than half are developmentally on track, 36 percent of children aged 36 to 59 months attend organised early learning,” with poor rural households carrying much of the burden.

Debt jumps

The proposed borrowing comes as fresh figures from the Debt Management Office show that Nigeria’s total public debt rose by N14.39tn within one year, from N152.40tn in June 2025 to N166.79tn at the end of June 2026.

That represented an increase of 9.44 per cent year-on-year. Measured in dollars, however, the expansion was considerably larger. Public debt jumped by $21.27bn, or 21.35 per cent, from $99.66bn to $120.93bn over the same period.

The divergence reflects, among other factors, the stronger naira used in valuing the June 2026 external debt. The DMO applied an official exchange rate of N1,379.1842/$ in June 2026 compared with N1,529.2105/$ a year earlier. Consequently, dollar-denominated debt rose much faster than its naira equivalent.

On a quarterly basis, the debt stock increased by N7.44tn, or 4.67 per cent, from N159.35tn in March 2026 to N166.79tn in June.

In dollar terms, it rose by $5.98bn, or 5.20 per cent, from $114.95bn at the end of March. The June figures show that domestic liabilities remained the larger component of the debt portfolio.

Domestic debt stood at N91.59tn, representing 54.91 per cent of total public debt, while external debt amounted to N75.20tn, or 45.09 per cent. Domestic debt increased by N11.04tn, or 13.70 per cent, from N80.55tn in June 2025. In dollar terms, it climbed 26.07 per cent from $52.67bn to $66.41bn.

Between March and June 2026 alone, domestic debt rose by N4.19tn, or 4.79 per cent, from N87.40tn.

External debt moved from $46.98bn in June 2025 to $54.52bn in June 2026, an increase of $7.54bn or 16.05 per cent. Its naira value, however, rose by only N3.35tn or 4.66 per cent, from N71.85tn to N75.20tn because of the exchange-rate effect.

Quarter-on-quarter, external debt increased by $2.62bn or 5.05 per cent from $51.90bn in March to $54.52bn in June. Its naira equivalent increased by N3.25tn or 4.51 per cent.

See also  Vietnam seeks stronger trade, agricultural ties with Nigeria

The Federal Government remained responsible for the overwhelming majority of the portfolio. Its domestic debt stood at N87tn in June, while states and the FCT owed N4.59tn domestically. Federal Government external liabilities were N65.77tn, compared with N9.42tn owed externally by states and the FCT.

Treasury bills

A closer examination of the Federal Government’s domestic liabilities shows that the growth was increasingly driven by Treasury bills and conventional naira bonds.

FGN domestic debt rose from N76.59tn in June 2025 to N87tn in June 2026, an increase of N10.41tn or 13.60 per cent. It also increased by N4.12tn or 4.97 per cent in the second quarter alone.

FGN bonds remained the dominant instrument at N64.84tn, accounting for 74.53 per cent of Federal Government domestic debt. The figure included N41.47tn in conventional naira bonds, N22.11tn in securitised Ways and Means advances and N1.27tn in domestic dollar bonds.

But Treasury bills recorded the sharpest absolute expansion. Outstanding Nigerian Treasury Bills jumped from N12.76tn in June 2025 to N19.48tn in June 2026, an increase of N6.72tn or 52.64 per cent within one year. Their share of Federal Government domestic debt consequently rose from 16.67 per cent to 22.39 per cent.

The increase was also concentrated in the second quarter. Treasury bills rose by N2.92tn, or 17.60 per cent, from N16.57tn in March to N19.48tn in June. Conventional FGN naira bonds increased by N4.94tn or 13.54 per cent year-on-year to N41.47tn and by N2tn or 5.08 per cent between March and June.

In contrast, the securitised Ways and Means balance declined from N22.72tn in March to N22.11tn in June, a reduction of N613.34bn or 2.70 per cent. Promissory notes also fell substantially, dropping from N1.73tn in June 2025 to N1.22tn in June 2026, a 29.81 per cent reduction.

FGN Savings Bonds, by contrast, rose 33.78 per cent from N91.53bn to N122.45bn, although they still represented just 0.14 per cent of domestic Federal Government debt.

Loans hit $20.73bn

The DMO figures further show why the proposed $1.5bn facilities are significant for Nigeria’s creditor profile. Nigeria’s outstanding debt to the World Bank Group reached $20.73bn at the end of June 2026, comprising $19.12bn owed to IDA and $1.61bn to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

The combined exposure increased by $1.34bn or 6.93 per cent from $19.39bn in June 2025, when IDA debt stood at $18.04bn and IBRD debt at $1.35bn.

The rise accelerated during the second quarter of 2026. World Bank exposure increased by $907.09m, or 4.58 per cent, from $19.82bn in March to $20.73bn in June. IDA alone increased by $733.08m during the quarter, while IBRD exposure rose by $174.01m.

At $20.73bn, the World Bank Group accounted for about 38 per cent of Nigeria’s entire $54.52bn external debt stock at the end of June. IDA was by far Nigeria’s single largest identified external creditor, with its $19.12bn exposure alone equivalent to roughly 35 per cent of the country’s external debt.

Nigeria’s overall multilateral debt stood at $24.76bn, or 45.42 per cent of external debt. This means World Bank obligations accounted for roughly 84 per cent of the country’s multilateral debt.

See also  Benue Launches Free Digital Training for 23,000 Youths to Fight Joblessness

The remainder included $2.17bn owed to the African Development Bank, $1.01bn to the African Development Fund, $406.41m to the Islamic Development Bank and $314.98m to the International Fund for Agricultural Development, among others.

Commercial debt was almost as large as multilateral borrowing, reaching $23.16bn and representing 42.47 per cent of external liabilities. Eurobonds alone accounted for $18.55bn.

Other commercial obligations included $1.87bn owed to First Abu Dhabi Bank, $835.78m to Afreximbank and a $1.5bn First Abu Dhabi Bank total return swap.

Bilateral debt was considerably smaller at $6.61bn, representing 12.12 per cent of the external portfolio. China remained the largest bilateral source, with $4.91bn owed to the Export-Import Bank of China and another $573.53m to the China Development Bank. France accounted for $906.23m.

The creditor mix has shifted over the past year. In June 2025, multilateral institutions accounted for 49.36 per cent of Nigeria’s external debt, compared with 45.42 per cent in June 2026, despite an increase in their nominal exposure.

This reflects faster growth elsewhere in the external portfolio, particularly commercial borrowing. Eurobond liabilities increased from $17.32bn in June 2025 to $18.55bn in June 2026, while Nigeria also accumulated sizeable syndicated and other commercial obligations during the period.

The PUNCH earlier reported that former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar demanded a full reconciliation of Nigeria’s public debt, including new borrowings, Treasury Bills and controversial charges contained in the latest external debt-service records, as the country’s debt stock climbed to N166.79tn.

Atiku also demanded an apology from the President Bola Tinubu administration over the hardship Nigerians have experienced since the removal of the petrol subsidy and other economic reforms introduced in 2023.

The demands were contained in a statement on Saturday by Phrank Shaibu, Director of Strategic Communications of the African Democratic Congress Presidential Campaign Council.

“A government that says more money is coming in must explain why it keeps borrowing and why the people paying for its policies cannot see the promised gains,” Atiku said.

He urged the government to “identify the old debt newly recorded, the foreign debt whose naira value rose with the exchange rate, and every new loan contracted since he assumed office.”

Atiku also questioned the cost of servicing the country’s debt, arguing that rising obligations were limiting resources available for public services and development.

Reacting to the rising World Bank commitments to Nigeria, Lagos-based economist Adewale Abimbola said loans from multilateral institutions such as the World Bank are largely concessionary, with interest rates typically below market levels and longer repayment tenors.

He noted that the critical question is not whether Nigeria should be borrowing, but whether the loans are structured and deployed effectively. “If it’s concessionary and tied to viable projects with medium-term revenue prospects, I don’t think it’s a bad idea,” Abimbola explained. “Borrowing isn’t bad; what matters is utilisation.”

He stressed that the economic impact of such loans depends on how well they are channelled into projects that can generate sustainable growth, strengthen revenue, and improve public services over time.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

FG disputes World Bank’s N7.7tn interest payments, read details

Published

on

The Federal Government has faulted the World Bank’s assessment of Nigeria’s debt position, dismissing concerns that interest payments of N7.7tn in the first half of 2026 threaten the country’s debt sustainability.

The Federal Ministry of Finance described reports that interest payments amounted to 124 per cent of Federal Government revenue during the period as misleading, arguing that the calculation relied on incomplete revenue figures and included debt obligations serviced on behalf of state governments.

The ministry stated its position in a statement issued on Sunday and shared on X by the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele.

According to the ministry, Nigeria’s fiscal position had improved, with revenue growing faster than interest payments.

It said, “The Federal Ministry of Finance has noted recent analysis and public commentary which, citing the World Bank’s October 2026 Nigeria Development Update, claims that Federal Government interest payments reached 124 per cent of revenue in the first half of 2026. This conclusion is misleading, for three reasons.”

The response followed reports based on the World Bank’s October 2026 Nigeria Development Update, which put Federal Government revenue at N6.2tn and interest payments at N7.7tn in the first half of the year.

An analysis of the published figures by The PUNCH showed that interest payments represented approximately 124.2 per cent of revenue, exceeding revenue by N1.5tn. The ratio was calculated from the figures published by the World Bank and was not expressly stated in the report.

However, the ministry argued that the calculation compared obligations covering multiple tiers of government with revenue attributed solely to the Federal Government.

“The interest figure includes debt the Federal Government services on behalf of other tiers of government, including external loans to states. Measuring this against federal revenue alone overstates the ratio, which is only meaningful when debt and revenue cover the same level of government,” it said.

The ministry also argued that the revenue figure excluded income earned by government agencies and enterprises but not yet remitted to the Treasury.

It added that statutory payment schedules meant some taxes were collected predominantly in the second half of the year, making first-half revenue an incomplete basis for assessing annual debt obligations.

According to the ministry, the interest-to-revenue ratio stood at 156 per cent in the first half of 2025, compared with approximately 124 per cent in the corresponding period of 2026.

It said the full-year debt-service-to-revenue ratio had fallen below 60 per cent, compared with 97 per cent before the current administration’s reforms, describing the reduction as evidence of improved fiscal management.

The ministry further stated that Federal Government revenue rose by 72 per cent, from N3.6tn in the first half of 2025 to N6.2tn in the corresponding period of 2026, while interest payments increased by 38 per cent, from N5.6tn to N7.7tn.

See also  Vietnam seeks stronger trade, agricultural ties with Nigeria

Consequently, it said, the interest-to-revenue ratio declined by about 32 percentage points, while the gap between interest payments and revenue narrowed from N2tn to N1.5tn.

“This is the result of reforms working, not a sign of fiscal distress,” the ministry declared.

It also rejected the use of a six-month fiscal snapshot as a definitive measure of debt sustainability, arguing that full-year projections provided a more appropriate assessment.

“The same World Bank report projects Nigeria’s full-year 2026 debt service, covering both interest and principal, at 46 per cent of revenue. This is the appropriate benchmark, and a guide to avoid the invalid conclusions being drawn,” the statement read.

The ministry also defended the Federal Government’s borrowing programme, insisting that all loans obtained by the current administration were lawful and duly approved.

It maintained that every naira borrowed fell within the limits authorised by the National Assembly under the 2026 Appropriation Act and the approved borrowing plan.

According to the statement, government borrowing complied with the Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007 and the Debt Management Office (Establishment) Act 2003, while details of the country’s debt obligations were regularly published by the Debt Management Office.

However, despite challenging the World Bank’s assessment and questioning the basis of the interest-to-revenue calculation, the ministry did not provide revised revenue and interest-payment figures or an alternative ratio to substantiate its position.

W’Bank’s $1.25bn loan

Meanwhile, the Federal Government will begin repaying the principal on a $1.25bn World Bank loan in December 2031, with the final instalment on one of the facilities due in June 2060, according to financing agreements reviewed by The PUNCH.

The facility, secured under the Nigeria Actions for Investment and Jobs Acceleration Development Policy Financing programme, is intended to support reforms aimed at expanding access to credit, improving electricity supply, strengthening trade competitiveness and increasing government revenue.

The PUNCH reported in July 2026 that the World Bank had approved the $1.25bn facility amid public concerns over Nigeria’s rising debt burden and calls for the Federal Government to reduce external borrowing.

In an earlier statement, the Washington-based bank said it had approved the Nigeria Actions for Investment and Jobs Acceleration Development Policy Financing operation to support Nigeria’s transition towards a more inclusive growth model that would stimulate growth and create jobs.

The bank said the operation would support reforms to strengthen the foundations for growth and competitiveness.

“These include deepening capital markets, modernising the regulatory framework for the digital economy and e-governance, advancing power sector reforms to accelerate electrification, lowering trade barriers in line with Nigeria’s ECOWAS and AfCFTA commitments to help ease price pressures, improving access to quality agricultural seeds, and strengthening domestic revenue mobilisation,” the statement added.

The loan was the second-largest single World Bank facility secured by Nigeria under President Bola Tinubu, after the $1.5bn Reforms for Economic Stabilisation to Enable Transformation Development Policy Financing approved in June 2024.

See also  Dangote Refinery appoints new CEO David Bird

Documents reviewed by The PUNCH showed that the $1.25bn financing comprises a $750m concessional credit from the International Development Association and a $500m loan from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, both institutions of the World Bank Group.

Differing repayment periods

Principal repayments on both facilities will begin on December 15, 2031, but their maturity dates differ. The IDA credit is scheduled to be fully repaid by June 2051, while the IBRD loan runs until June 2060.

The IDA provides concessional financing to low-income countries on more favourable terms, while the IBRD lends primarily to middle-income and creditworthy lower-income countries on market-linked terms.

The agreements were signed on behalf of Nigeria by the Minister of Finance, Taiwo Oyedele, on October 6, 2026, while the World Bank’s Country Director, Mathew Verghis, signed on June 30, 2026.

According to Schedule 2 of the IDA financing agreement, Nigeria will repay 2.5 per cent of the $750m credit every six months, beginning on December 15, 2031, and ending on June 15, 2051.

This amounts to $18.75m in principal repayments every six months, or $37.5m annually during full repayment years, excluding interest and other applicable charges.

For the $500m IBRD facility, the repayment schedule provides for semi-annual principal instalments of 1.72 per cent from December 15, 2031, through December 15, 2059, followed by a final instalment of 1.96 per cent on June 15, 2060.

The regular instalments amount to approximately $8.6m every six months, while the final principal payment is about $9.8m.

Combined, the facilities will require principal repayments of approximately $27.35m every six months between December 2031 and June 2051, equivalent to $54.7m annually during full repayment years.

The repayment obligations will extend across several administrations, with the final principal payment on the IBRD facility falling due nearly 34 years after the agreements were signed.

The schedules cover principal repayments only and do not represent the total cost of borrowing, which will also include interest and applicable charges.

Under the IBRD agreement, the interest rate is determined by the reference rate plus a variable spread. The IDA credit carries an interest charge calculated using the reference rate plus a variable spread, less 250 basis points.

The IDA agreement states, “The Interest Charge is the Reference Rate plus the Variable Spread minus 250 basis points,” subject to applicable rate limits and possible conversions.

The IBRD loan also attracts a front-end fee of 0.25 per cent, equivalent to $1.25m, as well as an annual commitment charge of 0.25 per cent on the undisbursed balance.

For the IDA credit, the agreement provides for a maximum annual commitment charge of 0.5 per cent on the undisbursed financing balance.

The documents do not specify a fixed dollar amount for total interest payments over the repayment period. The eventual borrowing cost will therefore depend on the applicable rates and other contractual provisions.

See also  CBN ends cash deposit limit for bank customers

The $750m IDA credit is structured for disbursement in a single tranche, subject to the World Bank’s assessment of Nigeria’s economic policies and implementation of the agreed reforms.

The $500m IBRD facility is divided into two withdrawal tranches of $249.375m each, with the remaining $1.25m allocated to the front-end fee.

Release of the second tranche depends on satisfactory progress in implementing the programme, maintaining an adequate macroeconomic framework and completing agreed policy actions.

Under the IBRD agreement, if the government fails to take satisfactory corrective measures within 90 days of receiving notice from the bank, the lender may cancel part or all of the undisbursed balance.

Both agreements have a closing date of December 31, 2027.

Areas of reforms

The agreements identify two broad areas of reform: improving access to financial credit, digital services and electricity, and strengthening competitiveness through trade, taxation and agricultural reforms.

Among the measures recognised are the Investment and Securities Act 2025, the National Integrated Electricity Policy, electricity metering reforms and regulations facilitating private investment in interconnected mini-grids.

The government also committed to implementing trade reforms under the African Continental Free Trade Area, including the gradual liberalisation of 90 per cent of tariffs on goods from African countries over 10 years.

Other measures include removing import bans on specified essential food products and inputs, reducing import adjustment taxes on selected commodities by at least 25 per cent in 2026, and progressively eliminating applicable adjustment taxes between 2027 and 2036.

On taxation, the agreements recognise the introduction of mandatory electronic invoicing for Value Added Tax, a 15 per cent minimum effective tax rate for large companies and multinational enterprises, and an increase in the maximum personal income tax rate from 24 to 25 per cent.

The financing arrangements also impose reporting and accountability requirements on the government.

Nigeria is required to maintain dedicated dollar accounts for receiving the proceeds and ensure that equivalent amounts are reflected in its budget management system.

The Federal Ministry of Finance must report the amounts received, relevant account details and records of transactions to the World Bank within 30 days of each withdrawal

The agreements also require the accounts to be audited by auditors of the Central Bank of Nigeria acceptable to the World Bank. Certified audit reports must be submitted within four months of withdrawal and made publicly available.

The financing is intended to support Nigeria’s economic reform programme, with disbursement conditional on satisfactory implementation of the agreed measures and maintenance of an adequate macroeconomic policy framework.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Why I’m Always Afraid When Funke Akindele Calls Me For Job – Jide Kosoko

Published

on

Veteran Nollywood actor, Jide Kosoko, has spoken about the intense work ethic of actress and filmmaker, Funke Akindele.

It was reports that Kosoko made this known during an interview on the African A-List podcast.

The veteran actor explained that working with Akindele can be demanding because she pays close attention to details and is willing to repeat scenes several times until she is satisfied with the outcome.

According to Kosoko, the filmmaker can shoot a particular scene as many as 15 times, a process that requires actors to remain patient and prepared to perform repeatedly.

He described Akindele as an exceptionally hardworking person whose energy is difficult to match, even for a man.

He also mentioned that she is left-handed while discussing some of the things he has observed about her.

He said during the interview: “Funke is very hardworking, even if you are a man you can’t match her energy. She is left-handed. Whenever Funke calls me for a job I am always scared, you can shoot a scene 15 times. And She may come the following day thinking of shooting another scene, but then she will say “We have to shoot those scenes again because of the plates they brought.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  NNPC confirms successful new oil well discovery
Continue Reading

Business

WHY DO WE VALUE FOREIGN PRODUCTS MORE THAN OUR OWN? THE MINDSET HOLDING AFRICA BACK

Published

on

Africa is rich in natural resources, creativity, culture, and entrepreneurial talent. Yet one uncomfortable question continues to deserve our attention: **Why do we sometimes trust products made abroad more than products made by our own people?**

Consider this scenario: a Nigerian entrepreneur produces shoes, clothing, cosmetics, food, or household products locally. Some consumers immediately question the quality. But when a similar product carries a foreign label, those same consumers may suddenly see it as more fashionable, prestigious, or desirable.

Is the foreign product necessarily better, or have we developed a mindset that automatically associates foreign with quality and local with inferiority?

## The Psychology of Foreign Products

In many African markets, foreign brands are associated with prestige, social status, and international recognition. For some consumers, owning imported products is not merely about functionality; it is also about how those products make them appear in the eyes of others.

This creates a difficult environment for local entrepreneurs. They must compete not only on price and quality but sometimes also against perceptions that are deeply rooted in consumer behaviour.

However, it would be unfair to claim that all foreign products are better or that all locally made products meet acceptable standards. Consumers have legitimate reasons to demand durability, safety, reliability, attractive packaging, and value for money.

The real challenge is to ensure that local manufacturers can compete on a fair playing field.

## How This Mindset Can Affect African Economies

When locally produced goods struggle to attract consumers, businesses may find it harder to expand, invest in modern equipment, hire workers, and develop new products.

See also  Benue Launches Free Digital Training for 23,000 Youths to Fight Joblessness

Strong local industries can create employment, develop technical skills, support farmers and suppliers, and keep more economic activity within a country. Countries that successfully build globally competitive industries generally combine investment, innovation, infrastructure, quality control, and consumer confidence.

Africa cannot build a stronger manufacturing base through slogans alone. It requires practical action from governments, businesses, financial institutions, and consumers.

## Local Manufacturers Must Also Take Responsibility

Supporting African businesses should not mean accepting poor-quality products simply because they are locally made.

Manufacturers must take responsibility for improving their standards, customer service, packaging, product safety, and innovation. Governments must tackle barriers such as unreliable electricity, expensive financing, inadequate infrastructure, and unfair competition.

Consumers, meanwhile, should judge products by their actual quality and value rather than automatically dismissing them because of their country of origin.

**Patriotism should encourage excellence, not protect mediocrity.**

## Can Africa Change This Mindset?

The answer begins with education, investment, accountability, and a willingness to give good local products a fair chance.

African entrepreneurs need opportunities to prove themselves. Consumers need reliable products they can trust. Governments need policies that make local production more competitive.

The goal should not be to reject everything foreign. International trade brings technology, ideas, competition, and useful products. The goal should be to build African industries strong enough to compete with the best in the world.

## The Big Question for Our Readers

Why do some consumers proudly display foreign brands but hesitate to support products made in their own countries?

Is it a genuine concern about quality, a desire for social status, a lack of trust in local manufacturers, or a combination of these factors?

See also  ‘It’s not only akara,’ Remi Tinubu defends comments, says FG also supports tomato, pepper sellers

**Newsbreak365 wants to hear your opinion.**

Would you choose a quality Nigerian-made product over an imported alternative if both offered similar quality and value for money?

Join the discussion in the comments. Your perspective matters.

*Newsbreak365 — Real News. Real People. Real Issues.*

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending