Connect with us

News

US withdrawal from WHO makes world ‘unsafe’ — Official

Published

on

The World Health Organisation (WHO) chief warned Tuesday that Washington’s decision to withdraw from the UN health agency was dangerous for the United States and the rest of the world alike.

US President Donald Trump signed an executive order just hours after returning to the White House on January 20, 2025, ordering his country’s exit from the WHO.

With the one-year withdrawal process due to reach completion next week, WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told reporters he deeply regretted the move.

“Withdrawal from WHO is a loss for the United States, and it’s also a loss for the rest of the world,” he said, speaking from his agency’s Geneva headquarters.

The withdrawal, he warned, “makes the US unsafe… and makes the rest of the world unsafe, so it’s not really the right decision.”

Tedros highlighted that “there are many things that are done through WHO that benefit the US… especially the health security issues.”

“That’s why I said the US cannot be safe without working with WHO,” he said.

“I hope the US will reconsider its decision and rejoin.”

WHO’s chief legal officer, Steve Solomon, said it was a bit unclear when exactly the withdrawal would be official.

He explained to reporters that the WHO constitution does not include a withdrawal clause, but that Washington made arrangements in 1948, reserving the right to withdraw under certain conditions.

One condition was that it would need to give one year’s notice, and the second was that it would need to “meet its financial obligations to the organisation in full for the current fiscal year,” he said.

See also  Passengers evacuated from plane at major airport after bomb threat

But currently, “the US for 2024 and 2025 is in arrears on its payments,” he said, without giving figures, adding that the WHO member states would need to consider, “Has the condition been fulfilled?”

At a time when dramatic cuts to international aid budgets have hit health systems worldwide hard, Tedros stressed that “funding is very important for our organisation, for WHO to really deliver”.

But he insisted that when calling for the US to return to the WHO fold, “it’s not about money.”

“What matters most is solidarity, cooperation, and for the whole world to prepare itself for any eventualities,  to a common enemy like a virus, like Covid,” he insisted.

“The best immunity is solidarity.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Ex-military chief gives reasons bandits kidnap people

Published

on

Former Field Commander of Operation Safe Haven, OPSH, Maj. Gen. Anthony Atolagbe, rtd, says bandits kidnap people to use them as human shields from the military.

General Atolagbe made this revelation on Tuesday when he featured in an interview on Arise Television’s ‘Prime Time’.

He was speaking about the rising insecurity confronting the country.

“The bandits have a pattern of taking people into their enclave, just to use them as sex slaves, but also as shields for negotiation.

“What I can say also is that I will not be able to dwell on specifics. But in Sambisa, some abducted people were freed. In fact, the first thing that happened was that over 100 of them escaped, based on the heat that was brought on the adversary.

“Now, what is playing out is that these guys are being dislodged, and when they are dislodged, and they lose contact with all these women and these men that are running, who are sex slaves and liberals for them within the theater or wherever they are in their enclaves, what happens is that they try to move to other locations where they think they will be safe.

“And the next thing is to start looking for who they can also grab and bring into their new locations.

“The other side is that it is also another strategy by those that are expecting the arrival of the military that are coming into their enclaves to come and chase them out by using some of these people as human shields when the military approach their location.

See also  Passengers evacuated from plane at major airport after bomb threat

“So you see that the analysis has brought it out that they have a pattern that they always want to take people into their enclave, not just to use them as slaves or whatever, but they will also want to use them to negotiate,” the retired military officer said.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

War: Federal govt begins evacuation of Nigerians from Iran

Published

on

The Federal Government has commenced the evacuation of Nigerians who wish to leave Iran, escorting them across the Armenian border to ensure their safety as tension continues to escalate in the Middle East.

The development was disclosed on Tuesday by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM), Abike Dabiri-Erewa, in a post shared on her X handle.

According to her, officials of the Nigerian Embassy in Tehran are coordinating the evacuation process and assisting Nigerians willing to depart the country.

The evacuees are being escorted to the Armenian border where arrangements have been made to facilitate their safe passage.

The evacuation comes amid growing concerns over the security situation in the region following a series of coordinated military strikes on Iran by the United States and Israel on February 28.

The strikes reportedly triggered retaliatory missile and drone attacks across parts of the Middle East, raising fears of a broader regional conflict.

Despite the rising tension, Dabiri-Erewa reassured that no Nigerian in Iran has been affected by the ongoing hostilities.

She also noted that embassy officials remain stationed at the border to receive and assist Nigerians who decide to leave the country.

“Willing Nigerians being escorted across the Armenian border by officials of the Nigerian embassy in Iran for safe passage. No Nigerian in Iran has been affected by the war as officials remain at the border to receive all who want to leave,” she wrote.

This comes due to the ongoing military strikes between U.S, Israel and Iran.

See also  Insurgency: FG, US company plan delivery of 12 attack helicopters

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Insurgency: FG knows every terrorist by name, says Gumi

Published

on

Kaduna-based Islamic scholar Sheikh Abubakar Gumi has stirred debate by claiming that the Nigerian government already knows the identities and hideouts of terrorists across the country. Speaking in a recent DRTV interview, he said his interactions with armed groups are coordinated closely with security agencies.

Gumi addressed rumours that he negotiates with bandits on his own, stressing the involvement of police, military, and other officials. “The government knows every terrorist by name and by location. I don’t go alone to negotiate I go with the police, military, and other security agencies,” he said.

The cleric revealed that some of his efforts take him deep into forests and remote communities, sometimes even accompanied by local women. “I would go to the Emirs. In fact, when we went to one forest, I even went with women into the bush,” he added.

Gumi has long advocated dialogue as a tool to reduce violence, often sparking controversy for interacting with groups considered enemies of the state. He argued that these efforts complement security operations rather than replace them, highlighting the importance of negotiation alongside law enforcement.

Observers note that Gumi’s approach underscores the complexity of addressing Nigeria’s insecurity, where military action alone may not suffice. His collaboration with traditional leaders and security agencies demonstrates a hybrid strategy aimed at curbing violence and encouraging disarmament.

Despite these efforts, insecurity remains high in several northern states, prompting debate on whether dialogue initiatives have tangible results. Critics argue that without accountability and transparency, negotiations could inadvertently legitimise armed groups.

See also  Invasion Threats: US Looking For Opportunity To Establish Base In Nigeria — Dambazau

Gumi’s statements have reignited national conversations on counterterrorism strategies, with many Nigerians discussing the balance between dialogue, intelligence gathering, and military action. His insights suggest that tackling terrorism in Nigeria may require innovative approaches that merge community engagement with formal security measures.

thesun.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending