Connect with us

News

Olubadan and Mrs Ajimobi deny plot to impeach Makinde

Published

on

The Olubadan of Ibadanland, Oba Rashidi Ladoja, and the widow of the late Governor Abiola Ajimobi, Florence, have denied purportedly inducing members of the state House of Assembly, through its Speaker, Adebo Ogundoyin, to begin an impeachment process against Governor Seyi Makinde.

Ogundoyin became the centre of the alleged plot on Tuesday morning after members of the state House of Assembly issued individual statements to absolve themselves of any knowledge of discussions between the Speaker and both the Olubadan and Ajimobi’s wife.

In his viral statement, the Chief Whip of the state assembly, Gbenga Oyekola, had revealed that Ogundoyin was invited by the Olubadan and Mrs Ajimobi.

The statement quoted the Olubadan as advising the Speaker on his governorship ambition and offering to secure a House of Representatives ticket for him under the APC “along with the necessary funds to prosecute the election.”

The Speaker was reported to have declined the offer.

Ogundoyin was also said to have been invited by the former governor’s wife on the same subject matter.

“He said he was offered money but declined and did not collect anything from them,” Oyekola’s statement read.

The chief whip claimed that the invitations were aimed at disrupting the peace in the state and creating division within the state House of Assembly to pave the way for the alleged impeachment of Makinde.

“I was never invited, never consulted, and was not part of any such meetings or arrangements. I cannot and will not be disloyal to my boss, Governor Seyi Makinde,” Oyekola stated.

Like Oyekola, many other lawmakers of the state assembly followed suit, declaring their unwavering loyalty and support for Makinde while dissociating themselves from alleged plans to remove the governor.

In his reaction, the Olubadan, through his media aide, Adeola Oloko, warned against dragging the throne into dirty politics.

The statement refuted the claim that the monarch was planning to unseat Makinde.

It read, “To say the least, this is a lie. You don’t have to be a former governor or distinguished senator to know that a monarch has no power to impeach a local government chairman, let alone a state governor.

“This becomes intriguing when, less than 24 hours earlier, former Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose alleged the state governor’s purported plot to remove the Olubadan.

“Today, it is the Olubadan who allegedly wants to impeach the governor. So, who is fooling whom? Don’t drag the Olubadan throne into dirty politics.”

On her part, Mrs Ajimobi denied alleged financial inducements aimed at influencing members of the state assembly to impeach Makinde.

Speaking through her media office, Ajimobi described the claims as “entirely false, baseless, and a deliberate act of disinformation” intended to tarnish her image, de-market her and mislead the public.

The statement read, “At no time did Ajimobi convene, attend or participate in any such meeting with any individual or group for the purpose of discussing impeachment or destabilising the state government.”

See also  BREAKING: Anambra Assembly suspends lawmaker over social media posts

She said the attempt to link her name to the allegations was “malicious political propaganda aimed at bringing her into disrepute, particularly among the people of the state and beyond.”

The statement further read, “Activities of the Peoples Democratic Party in Oyo are of no concern to me. Linking me to such a plot could only be borne out of mischief and deliberate reverse propaganda to malign my reputation.”

Ogundoyin, the man in the eye of the storm, also denied allegations that he received money from All Progressives Congress proxies in the state to facilitate the impeachment of Makinde, describing the claim as false and politically motivated.

Ogundoyin acknowledged that he was presented with “juicy offers and opportunities,” which he said he immediately declined.

He said, “No money exchanged hands at any meeting. The rumour was fabricated to tarnish my image and destabilise the state government and legislature.

“I was presented with juicy offers and opportunities, but I declined without hesitation because nothing can sway my conscience or weaken my loyalty to the governor, the party and the people we were elected to serve.

“I remain fully committed to upholding the integrity of this House and will not be part of any agenda aimed at destabilising the government we built.”

The Speaker reaffirmed his unwavering loyalty to the governor and the ruling PDP in the state, adding that “no one would succeed in driving a wedge between him and the administration or derail the collective mandate they were elected to uphold.”

On his visit to the Olubadan, the Speaker said it was “purely consultative and took place weeks earlier.”

He said he met the monarch to inform him of his governorship ambition and seek his blessings, noting that the visit was rooted in respect and tradition.

Ladoja’s son, Shola, however, threatened to release evidence over meeting claims if the Oyo Speaker failed to do “the right thing.”

Shola wrote on X, “I was the one who took Debo Ogundoyin to Kabiyesi (my father) because he begged me to. Dear Chief Whip, you have just been used as a tool by a coward and a liar. I will release receipts if Debo doesn’t do the right thing. All because of his selfish ambitions to be governor.”

However, in another post, he said, “My recent tweet was deleted because I realised a lot of people thought I meant a payment receipt. No. I meant receipt of our conversations.

“Debo, on March 25, begged me to take him to my father to back him for the gubernatorial ambition, which I was very hesitant to do.

“Kabiyesi only advised him on how to go about the screening and prayed for him. Whoever is spreading this rumour only wants to create a rift between Kabiyesi and His Excellency. Please leave us out of this.”

Meanwhile, a cross-section of lawmakers of the Oyo Assembly, in conversations with The PUNCH, claimed that the Federal Government was engineering the impeachment plot because Makinde was opposed to President Bola Tinubu.

They argued that the plot was aimed at unsettling Makinde ahead of the 2027 election.

See also  Backstreet abortion: How ‘Egusi Aije’ ruins lives, destroys women’s future in Ogun

It’s script – APC

The Oyo State chapter of the APC dismissed the alleged involvement of President Tinubu and others in the plot.

According to a statement by the Oyo APC Publicity Secretary, Olawale Sadare, the alleged impeachment plot against Makinde was “a badly written script aimed at distracting the general public and also attracting undue sympathy for the governor, who faces imminent political retirement as a result of his own ego and naivety.”

It added, “Governor Makinde ought to have been impeached long ago if the state House of Assembly members were alive to their responsibilities, in view of several cases of abuse of office which have been recorded against him since May 2019.”

The statement further read, “Governor Makinde just decided to get some of his yes-men to implement a badly written script aimed at offering him a soft landing in the minds of some gullible supporters, including those who have put their political future in his hands, especially now that it is almost certain that he (Makinde) might not have a political party to sponsor any candidate in the 2027 general elections.

“Sadly, an informed source had it that the impeachment story was sold to mitigate the effects of the revelation made by the former governor of Ekiti State, Ayodele Fayose, about the plan to dethrone the Olubadan of Ibadanland, Oba Ladoja (Arusa I), but the fact remains that no external person is interested in an impeachment process against a governor who has already reached a cul-de-sac.

“Meanwhile, no amount of blackmail or propaganda can save Governor Makinde from impeachment, as we believe that his false alarm would serve as an eye-opener to the whole world that he has skeletons in the cupboard.”

A member of the House of Representatives, Abass Adigun (Agboworin), dismissed the alleged plot to impeach Makinde as dead on arrival.

Agboworin, in a statement by his Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Mayowa Okekale, described those behind the alleged plot as “agents of destabilisation, whose mission is to create unnecessary tension within the state and weaken the unity of the Peoples Democratic Party in the state.”

Ex-Speaker challenges Ogundoyin

Meanwhile, a former Speaker of the Oyo Assembly, Adeolu Adeleke, has called on Ogundoyin to cease “peddling rumours” and provide the public with the identities of those allegedly plotting to remove Governor Makinde.

Adeleke spoke against the backdrop of claims by Ogundoyin that he was offered financial inducements and a political platform by the APC to orchestrate the governor’s removal.

Adeleke queried, “Ogundoyin must clarify his comments involving the Olubadan, Oba Rashidi Ladoja, and Mrs Florence Ajimobi. The Speaker must identify the persons who attempted to compromise him with cash. He must disclose who he met with in Lagos regarding the supposed impeachment.

See also  Adeleke warns IBEDC ahead of Osun power regulator takeoff

“The discrepancy between the Speaker’s words at yesterday’s (Monday’s) stakeholders’ meeting and today’s (Tuesday’s) press release is suspicious. Was he coerced into levelling allegations against Kabiyesi Ladoja? Or is this a calculated attempt to gain political leverage for his own governorship ambitions?”

Adeleke urged Ogundoyin to “speak up” or risk being labelled a coward by history.

Olubadan dethronement plot real – Fayose

Former Ekiti State Governor, Ayodele Fayose, on Tuesday, insisted that Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, is not relenting in an alleged plot to dethrone Ladoja.

He made this known during a solidarity visit to the Olubadan at his Bodija private residence in Ibadan, the state capital.

The PUNCH reports that Fayose had earlier claimed that Makinde was planning to dethrone the monarch.

Fayose said, “I am in Ibadan to identify with the traditional institution. The truth about the whole saga will soon be revealed.”

The former governor insisted that his claims were based on credible information, adding that he stood firmly by earlier revelations regarding developments surrounding the Ibadan traditional institution.

He said, “I stand by everything I have said. My disclosures were not speculative but based on facts available to me and insights from reliable sources.”

Fayose alleged that there was a deliberate agenda against the monarch, stressing that “although the outcome of such moves remains uncertain, there have been coordinated efforts behind the scenes.”

The former governor also revisited his earlier claim that Makinde received N50bn, adding that the issue, initially raised by a commissioner, was later substantiated with evidence.

Fayose said, “There were plans to query the Olubadan over his alleged role in an aborted coronation. Recent developments within the last 48 hours suggest that there is more to the matter than meets the eye.”

According to him, Makinde may continue to take steps aimed at undermining the traditional institution, noting that the governor had installed a number of traditional rulers during his administration.

While expressing confidence in the institution of the Olubadan, Fayose said the monarch “has a date only with destiny and God,” adding that Makinde’s tenure is nearing its constitutional end.

“Time will catch up with everyone, and that moment is fast approaching,” he added, while also questioning the governor’s succession outlook, describing it as uncertain and “more like a gamble than a well-defined transition.”

Responding, the Olubadan, Oba Ladoja, expressed appreciation to Fayose for raising the alarm over the alleged plot, thanking him for bringing the matter to public attention.

Ladoja said, “Thank you for the visit. Thank you for alerting us. I thank you very much.”

He, therefore, assured that the matter would be handled internally, emphasising the role of elders in resolving disputes within Ibadan.

“We still have elders in Ibadan. We will resolve the family affairs. We will resolve it amicably because Ibadan people love their monarch,” Ladoja said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Germany deports 137 Nigerians in five chartered flights

Published

on

Germany deported at least 137 Nigerian citizens in five documented chartered operations between February and June 2026, according to reports sighted by The PUNCH.

The documented arrivals comprised 27 Nigerians deported in February, 37 deported directly by Germany as part of a 50-person joint European Union operation in March, and 24, 23 and 26 Nigerians deported in April, May and June, respectively, according to figures contained in reports monitored by the DERS Team and Refugees4refugees.org.

The figures indicate an increase in the use of chartered flights to return Nigerians from Germany and other European countries, with several of the operations involving cooperation among European states.

On February 18, 2026, a batch of 27 Nigerians arrived at the Lagos Cargo Airport following a deportation operation from Germany.

According to Refugees4refugees.org, the flight was operated by World2fly and departed Stuttgart before arriving in Lagos shortly before 2 pm.

The report said the operation was primarily enforced by Germany, although one person, described as severely ill and mentally unfit, was transferred from Slovakia to join the 26 people deported from Germany.

It also identified Baden-Württemberg as a major participant in the operation and said Stuttgart had hosted both the December 2025 and February 2026 deportation operations to Nigeria.

The report further alleged that while some of those deported had serious health conditions, others had lived and worked in Germany for several years.

It cited the case of a single mother and her three children who were deported from the Sindelfingen district in Stuttgart despite reportedly having documentation relating to their residence status.

See also  Kano warns ACF against parallel elders council

According to the report, the family subsequently returned to Germany after intervention by a volunteer and confirmation from local foreign authorities that the deportation had been made in error.

Furthermore, the February deportation also coincided with Nigeria’s participation in preparations for the Voluntary National Review of the Global Compact for Migration ahead of the 2026 International Migration Review Forum in New York.

The DERS Team said that Nigerian government agencies did not send representatives to receive the deportees at the airport, adding that the returning Nigerians were subsequently transported away from the airport without adequate assistance.

On March 10, another 50 people were deported to Nigeria in a joint EU operation hosted by Germany in cooperation with Spain, Austria and Belgium.

Germany accounted directly for 37 of the deportations, according to the figures provided.

The operation was described as the largest single deportation involving Nigerians in the three years referenced in the report.

A further 24 Nigerians, including women and a minor, were deported on April 9 on a chartered flight from Frankfurt organised through Frontex and German authorities, according to the supplied data.

In May 2026, another batch of 23 deportees was returned to Nigeria, while 26 Nigerians arrived in Lagos on June 17 following another routine chartered deportation flight.

Taken together, the five documented batches amounted to 137 Nigerians returned to the country between February and June 2026.

The figures highlight the continued use of organised charter flights in the enforcement of migration decisions involving Nigerians in Europe.

Migration rights advocates have, however, continued to argue that deportation policies should be accompanied by adequate safeguards for vulnerable people and proper procedures to prevent wrongful removal.

See also  Borno attack: Army General, terrorists killed, Tinubu mourns

While migration is as old as time itself, identified underlying factors driving irregular migration include conflict, exploitation, climate-related pressures and economic inequality.

Migration is the permanent or temporary movement of people from one place to another, changing their home. It can happen within a country or across borders, shaping populations, cultures, and job markets.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Adeyemi demands media, lawyers’ presence before Reps probe on PFIPC scandal

Published

on

The House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee investigating the controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council is yet to decide where it will question the council’s self-appointed Director-General, Adeniyi Adeyemi, a source familiar with the committee’s proceedings has disclosed.

The development comes as Adeyemi insisted that his lawyers and journalists must be present before he submits to questioning by the House committee.

The committee, chaired by the lawmaker representing Kanke/Kanam/Pankshin Federal Constituency of Plateau State, Yusuf Gagdi, is probing how the PFIPC secured official office accommodation within the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of more than N1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act despite allegedly having no legal existence.

The investigation has attracted significant public attention following allegations that the council operated within government structures despite lacking legal recognition, raising concerns about possible lapses in public financial management and institutional oversight.

Adeyemi, who has been in police custody over the controversy surrounding the council, is expected to appear before the committee this week, following testimonies from several senior government officials.

However, as of Sunday, the venue for the much-anticipated session remained unsettled.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to discuss the committee’s proceedings with the media, confirmed the development in response to an inquiry by The PUNCH.

Asked whether the committee had chosen a venue for Adeyemi’s appearance, the source simply replied, “No decision yet.”

The development followed the committee’s hearings with key government officials, including the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack; the Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Tanimu Yakubu; the Director of Banking Services at the Central Bank of Nigeria, Hamisu Abdullahi; and representatives of the Inspector-General of Police.

The officials’ testimonies reportedly raised questions about how Adeyemi allegedly presented himself as the head of the PFIPC and secured recognition and access within government circles.

Adeyemi had, through his lawyers, indicated his willingness to appear before the committee publicly and respond to questions concerning the allegations.

However, Gagdi said the committee would determine the venue for the session at a later date.

Meanwhile, the Coalition of United Political Parties has rejected the findings of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on the PFIPC controversy, describing the investigation as inadequate and calling for a broader and transparent inquiry.

In an interview with our correspondent, CUPP spokesperson, Agu Bryan, said the ICPC’s report, which reportedly cleared the Presidency of wrongdoing while indicting Adeniyi Adeyemi, failed to answer critical questions about how an allegedly non-existent government agency was able to operate at such a high level.

“The ICPC probe of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council which exonerated the Presidency and indicted Adeniyi Adeyemi is nothing short of a charade,” Bryan said.

He argued that the report appeared to portray Adeyemi as having operated almost entirely alone, despite the scale of activities attributed to him.

See also  Reps minority caucus seeks urgent economic, political reforms

According to Bryan, such an operation could not have continued without assistance or enabling actions by officials within government institutions.

“As Nigerians, we know that someone could not have operated an alleged high-profile agency of such magnitude without enablers, either within the Presidency or across the government agencies involved,” he said.

Bryan called for a broader examination of the roles allegedly played by government institutions referenced in Adeyemi’s correspondence, including the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation.

He particularly cited the testimony of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, that her office failed to conduct due diligence on some of the documents associated with the controversial council.

The coalition also questioned how the PFIPC allegedly found its way into the national budget if, as reported by the ICPC, it had no legal foundation.

CUPP said the National Assembly and relevant government ministries owed Nigerians an explanation over how funds were appropriated to an organisation whose legal status had allegedly not been established.

“The National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, which appropriated funds to an agency that, according to the investigation, never existed as a creation of law, also owes Nigerians an explanation,” Bryan said.

He asked who within the Ministry of Budget and National Planning processed the budget line attributed to the PFIPC and what verification mechanisms were applied before public funds were appropriated.

CUPP also raised questions about the alleged recruitment of hundreds of staff and the extent to which Adeyemi was granted access to official government activities.

Bryan said the issues went beyond determining whether Adeyemi forged documents, arguing that investigators should establish how he allegedly gained access to government processes and institutions.

The controversy escalated after investigators reportedly established that a signature attributed to the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, was forged.

CUPP said the finding should prompt investigators to examine other official documents and correspondence allegedly used by Adeyemi.

“It is commendable that the House and the Police have established that the signature of the Chief of Staff to the President was allegedly forged. But that raises another critical question: how many other documents, official correspondences and signatures allegedly used by Adeyemi were also forged?” Bryan asked.

He said Nigerians deserved to know the full extent of the alleged deception and whether officials responsible for verifying the credentials of individuals dealing with public institutions failed in their duties.

The coalition further questioned how the PFIPC allegedly acquired sufficient official recognition to participate in government processes and appear in the national budget.

“How did a supposedly non-existent agency attain such a level of official recognition and attention that it found its way into the national budget?” he asked.

CUPP also called for Adeyemi to be given a fair opportunity to defend himself before the House committee, arguing that a transparent confrontation with the evidence could help determine whether other individuals or institutions were involved.

See also  BREAKING: Ladoja to be crowned 44th Olubadan September 26

“Was Adeyemi given fair hearing thus far? Has he been given the privilege to appear before the Yusuf Gagdi-led Ad hoc Committee of the House of Representatives probing the matter to be interrogated and directly answer questions?” Bryan said.

He invoked the legal principle nemo judex in causa sua—that no person should be a judge in his own cause—in arguing that the investigation should be conducted independently and transparently.

Bryan said anything short of an open and impartial investigation would fail to satisfy public expectations.

He also criticised the ICPC’s handling of the matter and called for independent professional bodies to be considered if the Federal Government was genuinely interested in establishing the facts.

“If President Tinubu is determined to unravel the truth, independent organisations or bodies like the NBA, West African Bar Association or international or private investigators should be allowed to come in and take over the investigation,” Bryan said.

He accused federal security and anti-corruption agencies of lacking sufficient independence to investigate the controversy objectively, a claim the agencies have not accepted.

The House committee’s inquiry follows mounting concerns over how Adeyemi allegedly operated the PFIPC, secured government recognition and participated in official engagements despite questions over the organisation’s legal status.

The controversy has also drawn attention to the roles of several government institutions whose officials allegedly interacted with Adeyemi or processed documents connected to the council.

The committee is expected to hear directly from Adeyemi as it seeks to establish how the PFIPC was created, how it operated, who recognised it and whether public funds were allocated or expended in connection with its activities.

 

 

His appearance before the committee could therefore prove significant in determining whether the alleged scheme was the work of an individual or involved officials and institutions within government.

Adeyemi demands media

Adeyemi, through his lawyer, Ademola Oyedokun, had on Wednesday rejected the House committee’s decision to question him at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The committee subsequently attempted to question him on Thursday, but Adeyemi declined to respond to its questions, prompting the lawmakers to reschedule the interrogation for Monday.

However, a family source said Adeyemi had informed the committee that he would only submit to questioning if journalists and his legal representatives were allowed to be present.

“They eventually rescheduled to Monday and my brother told them that when they are coming, they should come with the media, otherwise he will not grant them audience.

“Initially, they agreed to come with the media, but later they said they would not be coming with any media. They said if he refuses to grant them audience, they will go ahead and conclude their investigation and it will be said that he was the one who failed to grant them audience,” the source said.

The development came a day after Adeyemi’s family raised concerns over an attempt by members of the House committee to question him in police custody without his lawyers present.

Adeyemi’s brother, Peter, alleged that the detained promoter declined to answer questions because his legal representatives were absent.

“The Reps committee came and wanted to interrogate him, but he refused. They are still there trying to make him talk without any of his lawyers being present. We are crying out loud so that the right thing would be done.

“He has stated that he wants to be quizzed the same way others who have accused him have spoken. It’s not that he is not willing to state his side of the story,” he said.

When contacted on whether the police were aware of the committee’s proposed visit and whether the lawmakers would be granted access to Adeyemi, the police spokesperson, Ani Ineidu, said visitors would be allowed provided they met the necessary requirements.

“Yes, if they have necessary documents. I’m not aware if they have relevant documents or authorisation, but if they fulfil the conditions, everybody who is under police custody has a right to visitors.

“So, in a case like this, if they have that right, they will be granted access,” Ineidu said.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, Oyedokun said his client welcomed the House investigation into the alleged establishment and operations of the PFIPC but opposed what he described as a closed-door interrogation.

“We have read that the committee intends to interview our client at an undisclosed date and place. We ask it, respectfully, to think again.

“Everyone else in this matter has been heard in public, and what has been said about our client was said in public. He should be allowed to answer in the same place it was said,” the lawyer stated.

The committee had on Tuesday announced that it would question Adeyemi at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The Chairman of the committee, Yusuf Gagdi, said the arrangement was necessary to avoid interfering with ongoing investigations by the Nigeria Police Force, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission.

Gagdi said the committee had invited Adeyemi but was informed by the police that he remained in custody pursuant to a court order.

He added that the National Assembly would not act in a manner that undermined the judiciary or violated the principle of separation of powers, stressing that lawmakers lacked the authority to override an existing court order directing Adeyemi’s detention.

 

 

The committee is investigating allegations surrounding the creation and operations of the PFIPC, including claims of impersonation, forgery, financial impropriety and the unlawful use of government facilities and official insignia.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

PHOTOS: Osun-Osogbo: Priestess defends 10-year-old Arugba, dismisses child abuse claims

Published

on

The Araba of Osogbo, Ifáyemí Elébuibón, has defended the tradition of selecting a young maiden as the Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, describing the role as a privilege rather than child abuse.

This is as a priestess and custodian of Osun Osogbo also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.


Osun-Osogbo: Priestess

Elébuibón spoke in a video interview posted on Sunday by Yoruba cultural content creator, Wàá Ṣeré, amid discussions surrounding the age and responsibilities of the 10-year-old Arugba, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi.

Arugba is the young maiden chosen to carry the sacred calabash during the annual Osun-Osogbo Festival procession to the Osun Sacred Grove.

Alimot, a member of the royal family of the Ataoja of Osogbo, was selected through traditional Ifa divination in March 2025.

She carried the sacred calabash for the first time during this year’s procession to the Osun Sacred Grove on Friday, after she was unable to do so during the 2025 festival because of her young age.


10-year-old Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi carries the sacred calabash at Osun Osogbo festival…Photo Credit: Dewunmi Lagos

Explaining the role and its benefit, Elébuibón said the Arugba served as a spiritual intermediary between the Osun deity and the people.

He added that the responsibility was not determined by biological age.

“You see those people saying all that? They lack understanding. They don’t know. Whoever says the Arugba is too young—this one is ten years old, but some started at five!

See also  Borno attack: Army General, terrorists killed, Tinubu mourns

“The role the Arugba plays is a role of spiritual maturity, not about physical age. What the Arugba does for the town and the community is what the white man calls a ‘medium’—an intermediary between the Orisa and the people,” he said.

Elébuibón said the young maiden could communicate the wishes of the deity to the people because of the spiritual significance attached to the position.

“As young as she is, provided she remains pure and undefiled by any man, she can wake up one morning and say, ‘Mother Osun said this and that, do this, do that, don’t do this.’”

He added that the Arugba’s spiritual development was not necessarily tied to her physical age.

“Very soon, she will mature spiritually far beyond her biological age because the Orisa themselves nourish and care for them. Her role is not about age; what she does is not about age.”


FILE: Ifayemi Elebuibon

A female priestess and culture custodian, in another video posted by culture content creator Olamide Oseyifunmii, also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.

According to her, the chosen maiden must be a virgin and is expected to observe certain taboos associated with the role.

“Whomever Ifa chooses becomes the Arugba. The Arugba must be a girl who remains untouched, pure, and a virgin. That is strictly what the Arugba must be,” she said.

She rejected the description of the practice as child abuse, saying the young girls selected for the role were traditionally protected and treated with care.

See also  BREAKING: Ladoja to be crowned 44th Olubadan September 26

“Being selected as the Arugba carries taboos and honours; it is not what Westerners label as ‘child abuse’.”

The priestess said the Arugba was not expected to carry heavy loads apart from the sacred calabash during the annual procession.

She also explained the spiritual significance attached to the young maiden, saying devotees who bow before the Arugba were not worshipping the child but honouring the Osun deity believed to be represented through her.

“They were bowing to the divine spirit of Osun Ewuji inside her and upon her head,” she said.

The 2026 Osun-Osogbo Festival, which began on August 7, is being held at the Osun Sacred Grove in Osogbo, Osun State, and will run until August 19.

The annual festival, centred on the Osun deity, is one of Nigeria’s major traditional and cultural festivals and attracts worshippers, tourists and cultural enthusiasts from Nigeria and beyond.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending