Connect with us

News

Olubadan and Mrs Ajimobi deny plot to impeach Makinde

Published

on

The Olubadan of Ibadanland, Oba Rashidi Ladoja, and the widow of the late Governor Abiola Ajimobi, Florence, have denied purportedly inducing members of the state House of Assembly, through its Speaker, Adebo Ogundoyin, to begin an impeachment process against Governor Seyi Makinde.

Ogundoyin became the centre of the alleged plot on Tuesday morning after members of the state House of Assembly issued individual statements to absolve themselves of any knowledge of discussions between the Speaker and both the Olubadan and Ajimobi’s wife.

In his viral statement, the Chief Whip of the state assembly, Gbenga Oyekola, had revealed that Ogundoyin was invited by the Olubadan and Mrs Ajimobi.

The statement quoted the Olubadan as advising the Speaker on his governorship ambition and offering to secure a House of Representatives ticket for him under the APC “along with the necessary funds to prosecute the election.”

The Speaker was reported to have declined the offer.

Ogundoyin was also said to have been invited by the former governor’s wife on the same subject matter.

“He said he was offered money but declined and did not collect anything from them,” Oyekola’s statement read.

The chief whip claimed that the invitations were aimed at disrupting the peace in the state and creating division within the state House of Assembly to pave the way for the alleged impeachment of Makinde.

“I was never invited, never consulted, and was not part of any such meetings or arrangements. I cannot and will not be disloyal to my boss, Governor Seyi Makinde,” Oyekola stated.

Like Oyekola, many other lawmakers of the state assembly followed suit, declaring their unwavering loyalty and support for Makinde while dissociating themselves from alleged plans to remove the governor.

In his reaction, the Olubadan, through his media aide, Adeola Oloko, warned against dragging the throne into dirty politics.

The statement refuted the claim that the monarch was planning to unseat Makinde.

It read, “To say the least, this is a lie. You don’t have to be a former governor or distinguished senator to know that a monarch has no power to impeach a local government chairman, let alone a state governor.

“This becomes intriguing when, less than 24 hours earlier, former Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose alleged the state governor’s purported plot to remove the Olubadan.

“Today, it is the Olubadan who allegedly wants to impeach the governor. So, who is fooling whom? Don’t drag the Olubadan throne into dirty politics.”

On her part, Mrs Ajimobi denied alleged financial inducements aimed at influencing members of the state assembly to impeach Makinde.

Speaking through her media office, Ajimobi described the claims as “entirely false, baseless, and a deliberate act of disinformation” intended to tarnish her image, de-market her and mislead the public.

The statement read, “At no time did Ajimobi convene, attend or participate in any such meeting with any individual or group for the purpose of discussing impeachment or destabilising the state government.”

See also  Lawyer petitions Chief of Air Staff over personnel’s invasion of disputed Abuja property

She said the attempt to link her name to the allegations was “malicious political propaganda aimed at bringing her into disrepute, particularly among the people of the state and beyond.”

The statement further read, “Activities of the Peoples Democratic Party in Oyo are of no concern to me. Linking me to such a plot could only be borne out of mischief and deliberate reverse propaganda to malign my reputation.”

Ogundoyin, the man in the eye of the storm, also denied allegations that he received money from All Progressives Congress proxies in the state to facilitate the impeachment of Makinde, describing the claim as false and politically motivated.

Ogundoyin acknowledged that he was presented with “juicy offers and opportunities,” which he said he immediately declined.

He said, “No money exchanged hands at any meeting. The rumour was fabricated to tarnish my image and destabilise the state government and legislature.

“I was presented with juicy offers and opportunities, but I declined without hesitation because nothing can sway my conscience or weaken my loyalty to the governor, the party and the people we were elected to serve.

“I remain fully committed to upholding the integrity of this House and will not be part of any agenda aimed at destabilising the government we built.”

The Speaker reaffirmed his unwavering loyalty to the governor and the ruling PDP in the state, adding that “no one would succeed in driving a wedge between him and the administration or derail the collective mandate they were elected to uphold.”

On his visit to the Olubadan, the Speaker said it was “purely consultative and took place weeks earlier.”

He said he met the monarch to inform him of his governorship ambition and seek his blessings, noting that the visit was rooted in respect and tradition.

Ladoja’s son, Shola, however, threatened to release evidence over meeting claims if the Oyo Speaker failed to do “the right thing.”

Shola wrote on X, “I was the one who took Debo Ogundoyin to Kabiyesi (my father) because he begged me to. Dear Chief Whip, you have just been used as a tool by a coward and a liar. I will release receipts if Debo doesn’t do the right thing. All because of his selfish ambitions to be governor.”

However, in another post, he said, “My recent tweet was deleted because I realised a lot of people thought I meant a payment receipt. No. I meant receipt of our conversations.

“Debo, on March 25, begged me to take him to my father to back him for the gubernatorial ambition, which I was very hesitant to do.

“Kabiyesi only advised him on how to go about the screening and prayed for him. Whoever is spreading this rumour only wants to create a rift between Kabiyesi and His Excellency. Please leave us out of this.”

Meanwhile, a cross-section of lawmakers of the Oyo Assembly, in conversations with The PUNCH, claimed that the Federal Government was engineering the impeachment plot because Makinde was opposed to President Bola Tinubu.

They argued that the plot was aimed at unsettling Makinde ahead of the 2027 election.

See also  Yakubu Gowon revealed that the East was misled over Aburi Accord

It’s script – APC

The Oyo State chapter of the APC dismissed the alleged involvement of President Tinubu and others in the plot.

According to a statement by the Oyo APC Publicity Secretary, Olawale Sadare, the alleged impeachment plot against Makinde was “a badly written script aimed at distracting the general public and also attracting undue sympathy for the governor, who faces imminent political retirement as a result of his own ego and naivety.”

It added, “Governor Makinde ought to have been impeached long ago if the state House of Assembly members were alive to their responsibilities, in view of several cases of abuse of office which have been recorded against him since May 2019.”

The statement further read, “Governor Makinde just decided to get some of his yes-men to implement a badly written script aimed at offering him a soft landing in the minds of some gullible supporters, including those who have put their political future in his hands, especially now that it is almost certain that he (Makinde) might not have a political party to sponsor any candidate in the 2027 general elections.

“Sadly, an informed source had it that the impeachment story was sold to mitigate the effects of the revelation made by the former governor of Ekiti State, Ayodele Fayose, about the plan to dethrone the Olubadan of Ibadanland, Oba Ladoja (Arusa I), but the fact remains that no external person is interested in an impeachment process against a governor who has already reached a cul-de-sac.

“Meanwhile, no amount of blackmail or propaganda can save Governor Makinde from impeachment, as we believe that his false alarm would serve as an eye-opener to the whole world that he has skeletons in the cupboard.”

A member of the House of Representatives, Abass Adigun (Agboworin), dismissed the alleged plot to impeach Makinde as dead on arrival.

Agboworin, in a statement by his Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Mayowa Okekale, described those behind the alleged plot as “agents of destabilisation, whose mission is to create unnecessary tension within the state and weaken the unity of the Peoples Democratic Party in the state.”

Ex-Speaker challenges Ogundoyin

Meanwhile, a former Speaker of the Oyo Assembly, Adeolu Adeleke, has called on Ogundoyin to cease “peddling rumours” and provide the public with the identities of those allegedly plotting to remove Governor Makinde.

Adeleke spoke against the backdrop of claims by Ogundoyin that he was offered financial inducements and a political platform by the APC to orchestrate the governor’s removal.

Adeleke queried, “Ogundoyin must clarify his comments involving the Olubadan, Oba Rashidi Ladoja, and Mrs Florence Ajimobi. The Speaker must identify the persons who attempted to compromise him with cash. He must disclose who he met with in Lagos regarding the supposed impeachment.

See also  You Don’t Want America To Speak On Your Terrorism Issues, But You Want Our Money – US Mayor Knocks Nigerians

“The discrepancy between the Speaker’s words at yesterday’s (Monday’s) stakeholders’ meeting and today’s (Tuesday’s) press release is suspicious. Was he coerced into levelling allegations against Kabiyesi Ladoja? Or is this a calculated attempt to gain political leverage for his own governorship ambitions?”

Adeleke urged Ogundoyin to “speak up” or risk being labelled a coward by history.

Olubadan dethronement plot real – Fayose

Former Ekiti State Governor, Ayodele Fayose, on Tuesday, insisted that Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, is not relenting in an alleged plot to dethrone Ladoja.

He made this known during a solidarity visit to the Olubadan at his Bodija private residence in Ibadan, the state capital.

The PUNCH reports that Fayose had earlier claimed that Makinde was planning to dethrone the monarch.

Fayose said, “I am in Ibadan to identify with the traditional institution. The truth about the whole saga will soon be revealed.”

The former governor insisted that his claims were based on credible information, adding that he stood firmly by earlier revelations regarding developments surrounding the Ibadan traditional institution.

He said, “I stand by everything I have said. My disclosures were not speculative but based on facts available to me and insights from reliable sources.”

Fayose alleged that there was a deliberate agenda against the monarch, stressing that “although the outcome of such moves remains uncertain, there have been coordinated efforts behind the scenes.”

The former governor also revisited his earlier claim that Makinde received N50bn, adding that the issue, initially raised by a commissioner, was later substantiated with evidence.

Fayose said, “There were plans to query the Olubadan over his alleged role in an aborted coronation. Recent developments within the last 48 hours suggest that there is more to the matter than meets the eye.”

According to him, Makinde may continue to take steps aimed at undermining the traditional institution, noting that the governor had installed a number of traditional rulers during his administration.

While expressing confidence in the institution of the Olubadan, Fayose said the monarch “has a date only with destiny and God,” adding that Makinde’s tenure is nearing its constitutional end.

“Time will catch up with everyone, and that moment is fast approaching,” he added, while also questioning the governor’s succession outlook, describing it as uncertain and “more like a gamble than a well-defined transition.”

Responding, the Olubadan, Oba Ladoja, expressed appreciation to Fayose for raising the alarm over the alleged plot, thanking him for bringing the matter to public attention.

Ladoja said, “Thank you for the visit. Thank you for alerting us. I thank you very much.”

He, therefore, assured that the matter would be handled internally, emphasising the role of elders in resolving disputes within Ibadan.

“We still have elders in Ibadan. We will resolve the family affairs. We will resolve it amicably because Ibadan people love their monarch,” Ladoja said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Police comb forest after terrorists abduct NECO students in Borno

Published

on

The Borno State Police Command has deployed security operatives to Lassa community in Askira/Uba Local Government Area following the abduction of an unspecified number of students writing the National Examinations Council examinations by suspected terrorists.

PUNCH Online had earlier reported that the attackers stormed the school at about 9 a.m. on Monday, shooting sporadically before abducting students and women selling food items within the school premises.

Confirming the deployment to PUNCH Online, the spokesperson for the Borno State Police Command, Nahum Daso, said security operatives confronted the attackers, preventing a larger-scale abduction.

“Around 9 a.m. in the morning, ISWAP attacked Lassa Day Secondary School. They shot sporadically. An unspecified number of students have been abducted.

“Security forces confronted them. For now, we have an unspecified number of students who were abducted. The CP deployed the Area Commander in Askira/Uba. They are currently combing the bush,” Daso said.

The Special Adviser to Adamawa State Governor, Ahmadu Fintiri, on Media and Strategy, Mr Solomon Kwamagar, a resident of Lassa, also confirmed the incident to PUNCH Online on Monday morning.

He disclosed that the attackers arrived on motorcycles and invaded the school.

“Today is Lassa market day. I was informed that they came through the market on motorcycles and went to Government Day Secondary School, Lassa. They shot and killed one teacher and took away all the students who were in their classrooms,” he said.

Kwamagar added, “Lassa in Borno State is predominantly inhabited by my people, the Margi. We are in both Adamawa and Borno states. I am from Lassa, but I chose to reside in Madagali Local Government Area of Adamawa State.”

See also  Akpabio warns governors against abusing state police

He further said, “I’m still making contacts to ascertain the total number of students and teachers who were kidnapped from the school.”

Earlier, the President of the Borno South Youth Alliance, Samaila Kaigama, told PUNCH Online that the attackers wore military and forest guard uniforms.

“Yes. There was an attack on students writing NECO exams. The terrorists came around past nine. They passed the military checkpoint. They wore military and forest guard attire. They shot sporadically,” he said.

Kaigama said one teacher was killed while another sustained gunshot injuries.

“They killed one teacher from Chibok. They shot another, but not dead yet. They also kidnapped some students and women selling on the school premises. The numbers are not yet out,” he said.

When contacted, the Chairman of Askira/Uba Local Government Area, Mada Saidu, declined to comment.

“I am very busy now. We are in a situation,” he said.

Efforts to obtain comments from the state Commissioner for Information and Internal Security, Usman Tar, were unsuccessful as he neither answered calls nor responded to messages.

However, residents who spoke to PUNCH Online claimed that two teachers and one student were killed during the attack.

“They killed two teachers and one female student. The student was shot in her mouth,” a resident who requested anonymity said.

On May 16, PUNCH Online reported that 42 students and pupils were abducted after suspected Boko Haram terrorists attacked Mussa Primary and Junior Secondary School in Askira/Uba Local Government Area.

The senator representing Borno South, Ali Ndume, had said the abductees comprised four students of Government Day Secondary School, 28 primary school pupils and 10 children abducted from their homes.

See also  Lawyer petitions Chief of Air Staff over personnel’s invasion of disputed Abuja property

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

NASS sends state police bill to 36 states’ assemblies

Published

on

The National Assembly is set to transmit the Constitution Alteration Bill seeking the establishment of state police to the 36 state Houses of Assembly this week, marking the next critical stage of one of Nigeria’s most far-reaching security reforms.

The development comes days after the Senate passed the landmark constitutional amendment, with lawmakers now racing to secure the approval of at least 24 state legislatures before the bill can be transmitted to President Bola Tinubu for assent.

Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Publicity, Yemi Adaramodu, disclosed the development in an exclusive interview with The PUNCH on Sunday, saying all the necessary arrangements had been concluded for the transmission.

According to him, the state legislatures and governors were already awaiting the bill following consultations held ahead of its passage by the National Assembly.

“The bill for the creation of state police will get to the states this week. The states’ speakers have met and are awaiting the bill from the National Assembly.

“The state governors are expecting it too, even with their presence in the Senate chamber when the bill was being considered and passed,” Adaramodu said.

The planned transmission signals the beginning of the final constitutional hurdle for the proposed amendment, which requires endorsement by not less than two-thirds of the 36 state Houses of Assembly in line with Section 9 of the 1999 Constitution before it can become law.

Momentum has continued to build behind the proposal since the Senate approved the amendment after a clause-by-clause consideration of the report presented by the Senate Committee on the Review of the Constitution, chaired by Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin.

The legislation seeks to establish a dual policing structure that will empower state governments to establish and maintain police services within their jurisdictions while preserving the constitutional responsibilities of the Nigeria Police Force over national security matters such as terrorism, border security, cybercrime, arms trafficking and other federal offences.

To address longstanding concerns over possible abuse by state governments, lawmakers incorporated several safeguards into the bill, including provisions prohibiting state police authorities from targeting individuals or groups for criticising governments and empowering the Federal Government to intervene in cases involving threats to national security, breakdown of public order or violations of fundamental human rights.

See also  Court sustains arrest warrant against ex-minister Sadiya Farouq

The proposed reform has received unprecedented backing from governors, speakers of state legislatures and major political stakeholders across the country.

The Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures in Nigeria had earlier endorsed the bill, with its Chairman and Speaker of the Delta State House of Assembly, Emomotimi Guwor, assuring Nigerians that all state houses of assembly would give the proposal diligent consideration.

Several governors have also welcomed the amendment, describing it as a timely response to worsening insecurity across the federation.

Among them, Benue State Governor, Hyacinth Alia, described the Senate’s passage of the bill as a landmark step towards strengthening Nigeria’s security architecture, arguing that state police would possess a better understanding of local terrain and community dynamics, thereby improving intelligence gathering and response to criminal activities.

Similarly, the Forum of Progressive Speakers of State Legislatures under the All Progressives Congress pledged to facilitate speedy ratification in APC-controlled houses of assembly while promising robust oversight mechanisms to ensure professionalism and respect for human rights.

The Labour Party also threw its weight behind the proposal, describing the Senate’s action as a significant milestone in the quest to strengthen internal security through community-based policing.

Though it acknowledged concerns over possible abuse by governors, the party expressed confidence in the constitutional safeguards embedded in the amendment.

The proposal also attracted opposition from the Peoples Redemption Party, which questioned the timing of the initiative and urged Nigerians to reject it, arguing that the current administration lacks the credibility to oversee such a fundamental restructuring of the country’s policing system.

Despite the reservations expressed by critics, the planned transmission of the bill to the states this week is expected to trigger deliberations across the 36 Houses of Assembly, where lawmakers will conduct public hearings, stakeholder engagements and legislative scrutiny before voting on the constitutional amendment.

If at least 24 state assemblies endorse the proposal, it will pave the way for President Bola Tinubu’s assent, potentially ending decades of debate over the decentralisation of policing and ushering in what many stakeholders believe could be the most significant reform of Nigeria’s internal security architecture since the return to democratic rule in 1999.

See also  Yakubu Gowon revealed that the East was misled over Aburi Accord

Meanwhile, the Senate on Sunday defended the passage of the state police bill, insisting that its passage, which 84 senators supported, is a response to Nigeria’s worsening security challenges.

The upper chamber said the bill emerged from years of consultations, public engagements, and broad national consensus, stressing that it would be wrong to delay the proposal for political calculations ahead of the 2027 general election.

The position comes amid growing debate over the constitutional amendment bill, with supporters arguing that decentralising policing will improve security at the grassroots, while critics fear that state police could be abused by governors to intimidate political opponents.

Defending the Senate’s decision in a statement issued by his media office on Sunday, the Leader of the Senate, Opeyemi Bamidele, said the proposal was “purely a child of necessity and not of political expediency as well as a product of national consensus and not of cynicism.”

He maintained that the establishment of state police had become a matter of urgent national importance that should not be sacrificed because of anyone’s political ambition.

According to him, the process leading to the passage of the bill did not begin recently but evolved through extensive constitutional review engagements involving key stakeholders across the country.

Despite some dissenting views, Bamidele said observations had shown that Nigerians largely welcomed the passage of the bill with the belief that it would significantly improve security at the sub-national level.

He said, “The state police proposal was part of memoranda submitted to the Senate Ad hoc Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution. The memorandum had been subjected to a rigorous process and multi-tiered consultation across the federation due to its sensitive nature.

“During this process, the National Assembly broadly consulted the executive, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, the Conference of Speakers of the State Legislatures of Nigeria and the leadership of the Nigeria Police, among others.

“In July 2025, the National Assembly conducted public hearings in all geopolitical zones, and the participants overwhelmingly approved it.

“At each level of our consultation, nearly all stakeholders embraced the State Police Bill in the light of stark realities we are facing today.”

The Senate Leader said the Nigerian Police actively contributed to the drafting of the constitutional amendment by offering recommendations that helped lawmakers build safeguards against potential abuse of state police by political actors.

See also  ‘I will kill any terrorist who enters P’Harcourt,’ says Asari-Dokubo

According to him, those recommendations formed part of accountability and oversight mechanisms embedded in the legislation to ensure that state police operate within constitutional limits.

He added that the willingness of the Nigerian Police to support the proposal underscored its strategic importance in addressing insecurity at the local and state levels.

Beyond the contributions of the police hierarchy, Bamidele said the bill was subjected to extensive debates in both chambers of the National Assembly before its eventual passage.

He noted that support for the legislation cut across party lines.

He said: “Even though the APC is the majority, there are members of opposition parties – PDP, ADC, NDC and Labour Party – that exercised their discretion in favour of the Bill, mainly in the national interest and not on a parochial basis.

“In the Senate, for instance, 84 out of 109 members voted clause by clause in support of the Bill. This accounted for 77.06 per cent approval at the Senate alone.”

Bamidele argued that security should transcend political affiliations, noting that countries facing security threats often unite behind reforms aimed at strengthening national safety.

Globally, he said, security “is a collective public good that benefits citizenry across ethnic, political and religious divides.

“Political actors elsewhere always throw off their togas of partisanship and parochialism to support initiatives that will boost and reinforce national security.”

He, therefore, urged opposition parties to contribute constructive ideas that would strengthen peace and stability across the federation rather than oppose initiatives solely on political grounds.

Bamidele also challenged opposition parties and leaders to come forward with ideas that would deepen the peace and stability of the federation.

“Even when they disagree on some grounds, they are under obligations to provide credible and useful ideas that can make our nation better and greater. Unfortunately, they have not passed this critical test of opposition democracy,” Bamidele said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

Chaos as flooding shuts Lagos airport temporary terminal

Published

on

There was chaos at the temporary terminal of the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, on Sunday after heavy rainfall caused severe flooding at the facility.

The departure hall, boarding gates, airline temporary offices, and other sections of the makeshift terminal were submerged. The situation forced the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria to shut the terminal abruptly, as airlines operating from the facility could no longer process passengers.

As a result of the flooding, airlines, including Air France-KLM, Ethiopian Airlines, and Fly Gabon, were relocated from the terminal. According to officials, the terminal’s powerhouse was also flooded, forcing the authorities to switch off electricity.

Consequently, all airlines operating from the facility were moved to Terminal Two of the MMIA. FAAN officials alleged that the flooding was caused by blocked drainage channels, which they attributed to the Chinese company currently reconstructing the old international terminal.The incident came just months after FAAN shut the old MMIA terminal for a major reconstruction project estimated to cost more than N600bn. A few months ago, a fire also broke out at the old terminal, damaging parts of the facility.

Sources said the ongoing reconstruction of the old terminal by the Chinese contractor has caused several disruptions at the airport.

Reacting to Sunday’s flooding, FAAN spokesperson Henry Agbebire confirmed the incident, attributing it to the ongoing construction work at the airport.

According to Agbebire, the construction temporarily affected the drainage system, resulting in flooding. He said, “It was the construction works that affected the drainage. And for operational reasons, we have moved airlines operating from that terminal to Terminal 2, and the development has not really affected their operations.

See also  Lawyer petitions Chief of Air Staff over personnel’s invasion of disputed Abuja property

“There were no cancellations at all. We have taken immediate action to fix that problem to the extent that it doesn’t happen again. You can rest assured of that.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending