Connect with us

Business

FG seeks 30-day credit window for airlines due to Jet fuel crisis

Published

on

To tackle Nigeria’s worsening jet fuel shortage and price surge, the Federal Government has asked marketers to grant airline operators a 30-day credit window and sell aviation fuel directly to them.

The development is sequel to a series of high-level engagements convened by the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, following an earlier meeting called by the Minister of Aviation and Airspace Management on April 22-23, 2026.

The session brought together representatives from the Ministries of Aviation and Petroleum Resources, as well as major aviation agencies, including the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria, Nigerian Airspace Management Agency, Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority, airline operators, and aviation fuel marketers.

According to a copy of the executive summary of the meeting obtained by one of our correspondents in Abuja on Monday, the stakeholders called for urgent regulatory intervention to stabilise prices, urging the authority to engage relevant bodies to review pricing components linked to international benchmarks.

“To ensure price stability, NMDPRA should engage DPRP to adjust the premium on Platts and the cost variation element that was recently increased by the refinery,” the document stated.

At the end of the deliberations, the stakeholders agreed on a new indicative pricing band based on prevailing global oil market dynamics and domestic cost considerations. “The indicative end-user price should range between N1,760 – N1,988 per litre in Lagos and N1,809 – N2,037 per litre in Abuja,” the document stated.

It added that the pricing benchmarks were derived from Platts average prices recorded between April 17 and 23, 2026, warning that prices could climb even higher outside that window.

“Products purchased outside this window may be higher due to high volatility in current prices precipitated by the U.S.-Iran war and varying operational costs by operators,” the summary noted.

In addition, the committee advised regulatory agencies to streamline airport operations by reducing the number of airside fuel distributors to only those with verifiable infrastructure and capacity.

“NMDPRA is to work with FAAN and NCAA to validate airside distributors with infrastructure to trim the number of operators based on agreed criteria,” it added.

The issue of mounting debt between airline operators and fuel marketers also featured prominently during the discussions. To resolve this, the Ministry of Aviation was tasked with facilitating a consultative meeting between both parties.

“The Ministry of Aviation should facilitate a consultative meeting between oil marketers and airline operators to resolve outstanding debts,” the communiqué said.

As part of measures to ease financial pressure on airlines, marketers were encouraged to introduce more flexible payment terms. “Marketers should consider a 30-day credit window for airlines to pay up for supplies made,” it stated.

The committee further recommended the inclusion of Aviation Turbine Kerosene under the Federal Government’s naira-for-crude initiative, which was designed to reduce dependence on foreign exchange and stabilise the cost of petroleum products.

Industry crisis

Nigeria’s aviation industry continues to struggle with high and inconsistent Jet A1 fuel costs, significantly impacting airlines’ operating expenses. Over the past two years, domestic airlines have repeatedly raised concerns over surging fuel prices, which at different periods exceeded N1,000 per litre, forcing operators to increase ticket fares and, in some cases, scale down operations.

The latest price projections underscore the continued vulnerability of the sector to global oil market fluctuations, particularly amid geopolitical tensions such as the ongoing U.S.-Iran conflict, which has contributed to rising crude oil prices.

Industry stakeholders say the success of the newly proposed measures—especially direct sales, pricing adjustments, and inclusion in the naira-for-crude policy—will be critical to stabilising aviation fuel supply, controlling costs, and sustaining airline operations across the country.

See also  Access Holdings appoints Innocent Ike new GMD/CEO

The aviation fuel crisis adds to the challenge facing the sector, including a mounting debt of more than N9bn owed by domestic airlines to ground handling companies, which have threatened to withdraw their services from Tuesday (today), raising fears of widespread flight disruptions.

The looming standoff, triggered by a seven-day ultimatum issued by the Aviation Ground Handlers Association of Nigeria, could cripple both domestic and international operations if unresolved.

The affected companies include Skyway Handling Company of Nigeria Plc, Nigerian Aviation Handling Company Plc, Butake Handling Company, Precision Handling Company Limited, and Swissport Handling Company.

N7m fuel cost

Meanwhile, Nigerian airlines said they are now spending over N7m to fuel a single domestic flight, as the sharp increase in aviation fuel prices raises fresh concerns over the viability of their operations.

Airlines in separate interviews with The PUNCH held that they are increasingly strained by the spike in costs, with fears mounting that the situation could soon force capacity cuts or broader disruptions if no urgent intervention is made.

Ibom Air, one of the country’s domestic carriers, stated the scale of the crisis, disclosing that it now spends about N7.6m to fuel a single flight, more than triple what it paid just months ago.

The airline, in a statement, described the development as unprecedented and warned that the financial burden is becoming unsustainable for domestic operators.

“The fuel price situation is an unprecedented crisis for Nigeria’s domestic airlines. At Ibom Air, the cost of fueling our aircraft has more than tripled between January and today. From an average of N2.1m per flight in January, as of today, the 27th of April, we are paying approximately N7.6m to fuel every flight.”

The airline noted that the spike represents a sharp escalation in operating costs in just a matter of weeks, placing additional strain on already stretched airline finances.

“This is a more than 350 per cent increase since the beginning of March, a space of just seven weeks! And our aircraft are some of the most fuel-efficient in the domestic market.

“At this point, domestic airlines are baffled at why the price of aviation fuel in Nigeria has ballooned to this level, way above the rest of the world, while the fuel marketers obtain 95 per cent or more of their aviation fuel from Dangote Refinery.”

Ibom Air further explained that despite the rising costs, airlines have been unable to significantly increase fares due to stiff competition and broader economic realities.

“The situation is exacerbated by the fact that a combination of competitive pressures and patriotism has prevented a commensurate increase in our fares, meaning that we and our fellow domestic airlines have had to absorb the immense operating losses resulting from this situation,” it stated.

The airline said it had initially hoped the surge in fuel prices would be temporary, but the situation has persisted longer than anticipated.

“We chose to do this believing that the crisis would pass in a week or two, but it has persisted now for nearly two months, continuously increasing, with no reprieve in sight as of today. ‘’While we continue to do everything we can to maintain normal operations, it is clear to us that the current conditions are unsustainable.

“We note that, worldwide, where fuel price increases are nowhere near what we are facing in Nigeria, airlines are reducing flights to manage the situation. We, too, will have to take whatever ameliorating actions we can in the days ahead, including reducing our capacity if necessary, to be able to continue to provide services to our customers and our country.”

See also  Banks make N209bn from account maintenance fees in three months

The Akwa Ibom-based airline warned that if the current trend continued, it could threaten the operation of airlines across the country.

“We also note that, if this situation persists much longer, airlines will not be able to continue operating just to pay for fuel and nothing else. We call on the fuel marketers to seriously reconsider the pricing of aviation fuel to make the airline business model continue to work in Nigeria,” the statement added.

Corroborating the development, the spokesperson for United Nigeria Airlines, Chibuike Uloka, said operators across the industry are facing similar cost pressures, as all airlines source fuel from the same market.

“We all purchase from the same market and source. It’s not cheaper for operator A or B; most airlines spend more than even because the Airbus A320 aircraft consumes more fuel due to its size and capacity, with a minimum of 5,000 litres per uplift.

“ So, some operators who operate Airbus or Boeing with more fuel consumption spend double the figure.”

Refinery’s profit surges

The $20bn Dangote Petroleum Refinery is currently enjoying a surge in profit margins from jet fuel production, even as Nigerian airlines warn they may be forced to halt operations over rising aviation fuel costs, a new report by Reuters revealed on Monday.

Findings showed that the refinery, regarded as Africa’s largest with a capacity of 650,000 barrels per day, is capitalising on strong international demand and premium pricing in Europe to rake in record returns on jet fuel exports.

However, this windfall comes at a time when domestic carriers are grappling with soaring fuel prices, raising concerns about the sustainability of flight operations in Nigeria.

The report read, “The Dangote refinery is benefiting from record margins for producing jet fuel that it is mostly selling abroad, while the domestic airlines it also supplies have threatened to stop flying because of the surge in fuel prices.

‘’The refinery, the largest on the continent, was built to turn Africa’s biggest oil-producing ‌country into a net exporter of refined products, end Nigeria’s reliance on fuel imports, and shield its economy from global energy shocks.”

The Airline Operators of Nigeria said the cost of aviation fuel, also known as Jet A1, has climbed to about N3,300 per litre when logistics and storage are factored in, almost three times the levels recorded in February.

The development has pushed airlines to the brink, with operators warning that continued increases could trigger widespread disruption in the aviation sector.

A statement by AON noted, “The current price regime for Jet A1 is unsustainable. At over N3,000 per litre, airlines are operating under extreme financial pressure, and there is a real risk of service disruptions if urgent interventions are not implemented.”

Data from Nigeria’s downstream regulator showed that the refinery’s ex-depot price stood at about N1,879 per litre, broadly in line with imported fuel landing at roughly N1,900 per litre in Lagos.

Despite this parity, industry players said additional costs across the supply chain significantly inflate the final price paid by airlines.

The pricing dynamics have been further complicated by Nigeria’s fully deregulated fuel market, where prices are determined by global trends without government subsidies, unlike in many other African countries.

The structure allows the Dangote refinery to align its pricing with international markets, particularly at a time when global jet fuel demand has surged due to geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

See also  Voltage disturbance hits Gombe substation, triggered partial grid collapse — NISO 

The ongoing crisis has disrupted energy supplies worldwide, forcing airlines across continents to increase ticket prices, introduce fuel surcharges, and, in some cases, ground aircraft.

But for Dangote, the situation has translated into a lucrative opportunity.

According to industry expert Alan Gelder of Wood Mackenzie, refining margins for jet fuel in Europe are around $15 per barrel. He estimated that Dangote’s margins are more than double that figure, driven by the refinery’s scale, efficiency, and strategic positioning.

“European refiners are making about $15 per barrel, but Dangote is likely earning significantly higher margins, more than double, because of its configuration and access advantages,” Gelder said.

The refinery is said to be producing about 24 million litres of jet fuel daily, with the bulk exported to Europe, where buyers are willing to pay a premium ahead of the peak summer travel season.

Shipping data indicated that European imports of Nigerian jet fuel rose to between 78,000 and 96,000 barrels per day in April, the highest levels on record.

Dangote Group Vice President, Devakumar Edwin, confirmed the export trend, noting that a significant portion of the refinery’s output is directed to international markets.

He said, “We are producing about 24 million litres of jet fuel daily, and a large share of that is exported to Europe. However, we are also meeting the bulk of domestic demand, which is estimated at about 2.1 million litres per day.”

Despite the strong earnings, Edwin disclosed that the refinery relies heavily on imported crude oil, sourcing supplies from the United States, Brazil, and other African countries.

This, analysts said, limits the refinery’s profit potential, as reliance on imported feedstock introduces additional freight costs.

The situation is linked to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited’s existing crude-for-loan arrangements, which tie up a substantial portion of the country’s daily oil production.

Estimates suggest that about 400,000 barrels per day of Nigeria’s crude output is committed to servicing these obligations, leaving limited volumes available for domestic refining.

Experts noted that if the refinery had consistent access to local crude, its margins could be even higher due to reduced logistics costs.

Though the Federal Government has stepped in to avert a looming aviation crisis, approving measures to ease the burden on airlines, including debt relief and negotiations aimed at lowering fuel prices, stakeholders insist that a more sustainable solution lies in improving crude supply to local refineries and addressing inefficiencies in the downstream distribution chain.

They also warned that the benefits of having a mega refinery in Nigeria may not automatically translate to lower fuel prices.

“Building a large refinery does not automatically mean cheaper fuel,” Gelder added. “Prices will still reflect global market realities, especially in a deregulated environment.”

Dangote refinery was conceived as a game-changer for Nigeria’s energy sector, aimed at ending fuel imports, boosting exports, and insulating the economy from external shocks.

The company is now planning a public listing and an expansion of its refining capacity to 1.4 million barrels per day, a move that could position it as the largest refinery globally by the end of the decade.

Its growing profit margins from jet fuel exports highlight a stark contrast between global opportunity and domestic strain in Nigeria’s aviation sector.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Abia begins relocation of transport operators to new terminal

Published

on

The Abia State Government has commenced the enforcement of its new centralised transport system in Umuahia, with the phased relocation of transport operators to the Nnenna Otti Bus Terminal, Umuahia.

The Commissioner for Information, Okey Kanu, made this known at Government House, Umuahia, on Tuesday while briefing newsmen on the outcome of this week’s State Executive Council (EXCO) meeting presided over by Governor Alex Otti.

The commissioner disclosed that, in order to ensure compliance by transport operators, the state government took time to hold a series of meetings with transport stakeholders, during which their concerns were addressed.

Kanu added that, following the steps taken by the government, full operations had commenced at the terminal, with informal transport operators and unions already moved to the facility, despite the normal resistance that accompanies change.

“There appears to be some push backs among some of the operators and this is as a result of the fact that people are not easily giving in to change.

“What is happening is that all the parks in the state have been moved to the bus terminal.

“The Honourable Commissioner for Transport and his team have been holding a series of meetings with all the operators. They had one yesterday. And a few of their anxieties will be addressed very soon. Enforcement also will commence today to bring all the operators into the terminal.

“The first phase of operations involves the operations of the Abia Green Shuttle buses. The second phase involves informal transport operators, while the third phase will involve the formal transport operators,” Kanu stated.

See also  Yuletide: Dangote assures Nigerians of stable fuel supply

Answering questions from newsmen, the Commissioner for Transport, Dr Chimezie Ukaegbu, said the state government had not taken away anybody’s means of livelihood but had instead introduced a more organised system to sanitise the transport sector and improve it.

He revealed that transport unions and operators were told to bring four of their workers each to the terminal, where they would be properly identified with reflective tags and carried along.

He further noted that the terminal operates a transparent system that allocates loading opportunities on a first-come, first-served basis irrespective of union affiliations, insisting that about 80 to 90 per cent of operators had embraced the initiative. He added that continuous engagements were being held with those yet to fully comply with the government’s transport policy.

He equally noted that the government provided a drivers’ lodge, fully air-conditioned and furnished with seats, while passengers sit in a conducive air-conditioned environment, adding, “what else will you need as a transporter or even as a passenger? I think everything good about transportation is embedded in that Nnenna Otti Bus Terminal,” Ukaegbu stated.

Contributing, the Special Adviser to the Governor on Media and Publicity, Mr Ferdinand Ekeoma, said that the centralisation of transport operations would reduce urban congestion, indiscriminate loading bays, expenses incurred by transport operators on their loading bays, and security challenges associated with the influx of unregulated transport operators, thereby enabling transport operators to make more gains.

He added that, over the years, “we have seen transport operators extort people, by coming up with this organised system, we are solving our problems,” Ekeoma stated.

See also  FG to invest N12bn in digital research projects — Minister

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Court orders Virgin Atlantic to pay N13m for missed flight

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited to pay Mrs. Joy Ezetah the sum of $5,906.50 in damages after it failed to allow her board a scheduled Lagos-London flight, an incident that disrupted her onward trip to Canada and caused her financial loss.

Justice Ibrahim Kala in the judgement delivered on Monday, held that the airline was liable for the losses suffered by the claimant after she was denied boarding at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport on 6 April 2024.

The claimant had asked the court for N100m in general damages, arguing that she bought a business-class ticket through Air Canada for a four-leg trip from Lagos to Toronto and back, but was stopped from boarding the Virgin Atlantic flight “without justification.”

She told the court that she arrived early, completed check-in, and was issued a boarding pass for the Lagos-London leg.

According to her, airline officials later prevented her from boarding, stating they could not connect her ticket to her Air Canada connecting flight from London to Toronto.

Ezetah stated that the airline owed her a duty of care and should have resolved the issue with Air Canada or made other arrangements instead of denying her boarding.

She further maintained that when she later contacted Air Canada, the airline confirmed that her ticket was valid and that she was expected on the connecting flight.

Virgin Atlantic, however, denied liability. It said it was “not the issuing carrier” and insisted that the ticket had been purchased directly from Air Canada under a codeshare arrangement.

See also  Customs seize N4.3bn drugs in Tin Can

The airline also argued that an error code in the reservation system prevented it from issuing a boarding pass for the connecting flight and that it acted professionally by advising the passenger to contact the ticket issuer.

It further contended that the claimant’s inability to complete online check-in before arriving at the airport showed that there was already a problem with the ticket.

After reviewing the evidence, submissions and legal authorities cited by both sides, Justice Kala held that the claimant’s case had merit.

The court awarded $5,906.50 in damages against Virgin Atlantic and ordered that the sum be paid using the prevailing exchange rate published by the Central Bank of Nigeria. Based on the highest official rate of N1,365.50 to a dollar, the award translates to about N8.07m.

Justice Kala also ordered the airline to pay 10 per cent interest per annum on the judgment sum until full liquidation of the debt.

Additionally, the court awarded N5m as costs against Virgin Atlantic, noting that the claimant had been forced to approach the court to enforce her rights.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

States kick as Senate moves to amend Electricity Act; read details

Published

on

A fresh battle over the control of Nigeria’s electricity sector is brewing, as state electricity regulators have accused the National Assembly of attempting to claw back powers already devolved to states under the Constitution and the Electricity Act 2023.

In a strongly worded memorandum submitted to the Senate Committee on Power and obtained by our correspondent on Tuesday, electricity regulatory commissions and bureaus from 16 states warned that the proposed Electricity Act (Amendment) Bill 2026 could reverse one of the most significant reforms in Nigeria’s power sector.

The regulators argued that the amendment bill, rather than strengthening the electricity market, seeks to restore extensive federal oversight over matters they insist have constitutionally become the responsibility of states.

The concerns were contained in a letter dated May 26, 2026, addressed to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Power and signed on behalf of the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions and Bureaus.

Signatories to the document included the chairmen and chief executives of electricity regulators in Abia, Anambra, Bayelsa, Edo, Ekiti, Enugu, Gombe, Imo, Kogi, Lagos, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo and Plateau states.

The regulators said they had taken advantage of the Electricity Act 2023 to begin building sub-national electricity markets and had already engaged investors based on the framework created by the law.

They noted that they had earlier met with the Senate committee and were subsequently requested to consolidate their concerns into a single memorandum for the consideration of lawmakers, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission and other stakeholders.

The letter stated, “We represent State Regulatory Commissions/Bureaus that have taken advantage of the Electricity Act 2023 to commence the development of our sub-national electricity markets and sectors.

We are grateful for the audience you granted us to raise concerns on the ongoing consideration of the proposed Amendment Bill 2026 to the Electricity Act 2023.

“As agreed during our discussion, we have collated and consolidated the comments into one document which is hereby attached for the consideration of the Senate and House Committees on Power, NERC and other stakeholders.”

The state electricity regulators said they had identified 17 contentious provisions in the proposed amendments to the Electricity Act that they believed could undermine the constitutional powers already granted to states in the electricity sector.

According to the regulators, the areas of disagreement include the authorisation of State Houses of Assembly to legislate on electricity matters, the supremacy of state laws within state electricity markets, and provisions seeking to retain federal control over all activities connected to the national grid.

Other disputed clauses relate to restrictions on states’ participation in the wholesale electricity market, matters concerning the Nigerian Wholesale Electricity Market, the authority of states over independent transmission and distribution networks, and the establishment and administration of the Power Consumers Assistance Fund.

The regulators also raised concerns over the proposed expansion of the powers of the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency, the structure and decisions of the Forum of Electricity Regulators, and the provision granting the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission final administrative appellate jurisdiction on certain issues arising within the forum.

See also  Ramaphosa slams xenophobic violence, vows illegal immigrants arrest

They further opposed provisions designating electricity generation, transmission, distribution and supply as essential services, as well as clauses dealing with government-owned enterprises as licensees and obligations to host communities.

Additional areas of contention include the regulation of intra-state electricity matters that may have implications for the national grid, the imposition of timelines and phased conditions for states transitioning into independent electricity markets, and proposed federal oversight on consumer protection, anti-trust measures and tariff design within state electricity jurisdictions.

The regulators argued that the disputed provisions require further consultation to ensure that the decentralisation objectives of the Electricity Act are not weakened by subsequent amendments.

“A review of the Bill suggests that the general intention is to reverse the devolution of legislative, governance and regulatory powers over electricity matters that occur solely within the respective states to the state governments, in favour of a reconsolidation of powers at the federal level, with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission retaining full supervisory powers over the market. Effectively, it appears that the intention of the Bill is that Nigeria should continue with the same regime that, for 20 years, has not led to any significant increase in power availability or per capita consumption for Nigerians, despite ever-increasing (and unsustainable) federal debt.”

At the centre of the dispute is the interpretation of the constitutional amendments that allowed states to legislate on electricity matters within their territories. The regulators argued that the proposed amendment bill wrongly assumes that state legislatures derive their powers from the National Assembly rather than directly from the Constitution.

According to them, any attempt by the National Assembly to grant, restrict or redefine those powers through ordinary legislation would amount to a constitutional violation.

The memorandum stated, “Section 2 of the Bill aims to amend Section 2(2)(a)-(e) of the Principal Act. By that section, the National Assembly reserves to itself the power to delegate legislative powers to States’ Houses of Assembly, suggesting that the Bill (or the Principal Act) is the source of the powers of a state to make laws on its electricity markets.

“This provision is based on a shocking miscomprehension of Nigerian constitutional law—it proceeds from the wrong assumption that the NASS, by ordinary legislation and not constitutional amendment, can confer (or restrict) the legislative power of states.

“The constitutional division of powers is fundamental to federalism, ensuring a balance between national unity and state autonomy. There is no legal framework for the NASS to ‘empower’ state governments to make law by ordinary legislation, as the language of the Bill attempts to do.

“The constitutional division of powers is fundamental to federalism, ensuring a balance between national unity and state autonomy. There is no legal framework for the NASS to ‘empower’ state governments to make law by ordinary legislation, as the language of the Bill attempts to do. Consequently, Section 2 of the Bill, seeking to amend Section 2 of the Act, is not consistent with the Constitution.”

See also  DisCos blame low generation as grid collapses third time

The regulators described as “a shocking miscomprehension of Nigerian constitutional law” the provisions of the bill that appear to suggest that the National Assembly is the source of states’ authority over electricity matters.

They warned that the proposed law could undermine the principle of federalism by weakening state autonomy. Beyond constitutional concerns, the regulators said the bill could create uncertainty in the electricity market and discourage investors who had already committed resources based on the existing legal framework.

“The clear intention behind the new drafting is to reconsolidate in the Federal Government matters solely within the state electricity markets which had been devolved to the states,” the memorandum stated.

“This will defeat the key objectives of the Electricity Act and the various states’ electricity laws, even before the regime introduced by them has taken any root. It will introduce avoidable disruption in the industry as significant investment decisions have already been taken based on the Electricity Act 2023, and these investments are now put at risk by this proposed amendment.”

The state regulators specifically faulted provisions relating to federal oversight of activities connected to the national grid, restrictions on state authority over wholesale electricity transactions, the proposed expansion of NERC’s powers and changes affecting mini-grids and independent distribution systems.

They argued that allowing NERC to retain overriding authority over electricity activities merely because they have some connection to the national grid would effectively render state powers meaningless.

The memorandum stated, “What is required, in order to attain the full benefits of the decentralisation of the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry that is the theme of the Fifth Alteration and provided for in the Principal Act, is proper coordination on transmission matters between NERC and state regulators, and not top-down federal legislation.”

The regulators also rejected provisions that would permit NERC to exercise final administrative appellate jurisdiction over disputes involving state electricity regulators. According to them, NERC and the SERCs are on equal standing within their respective constitutional spheres of authority.

“NERC and the SERCs are on equal standing within their respective constitutional spheres of authority,” the memorandum said. “The National Assembly cannot arrogate to NERC quasi-judicial authority over SERCs, especially where the dispute might be on a matter over which NERC has no authority.”

They further argued that the Constitution already vests judicial powers in the courts and that such responsibilities cannot be transferred to a regulatory agency. The proposed establishment of a Forum of Electricity Regulators also drew criticism.

Although the regulators acknowledged the importance of coordination among electricity regulators, they argued that participation in such arrangements should be voluntary rather than imposed through federal legislation.

See also  OPS reacts on CBN's interest rates reduction

“The better approach would be a Memorandum of Understanding or similar instrument jointly negotiated by all relevant regulatory bodies in which the principles of coordination and harmonisation will be agreed,” they said.

The state regulators equally opposed provisions declaring generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity as essential services covering both federal and state electricity markets.

According to them, such provisions could inadvertently expand NERC’s jurisdiction into areas already devolved to states, including tariff regulation. “The provision is invidious, regressive and should be expunged,” the memorandum stated.

The regulators also faulted proposals empowering NERC to determine contributions to the Power Consumers Assistance Fund from electricity consumers. They argued that since electricity tariffs and retail supply have become matters for state regulation, decisions relating to subsidies and customer contributions should similarly reside with state authorities.

Other contentious areas identified by the regulators included host community obligations, the role of the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency, licensing arrangements involving government-owned electricity enterprises and timelines for states transitioning into independent electricity markets.

The dispute highlights the growing tension between the Federal Government and states over the future structure of Nigeria’s electricity industry. The Electricity Act 2023 was enacted following the Fifth Alteration to the 1999 Constitution, which removed electricity from the Exclusive Legislative List and empowered states to generate, transmit and distribute electricity within their territories.

Since then, several states have enacted electricity laws and established regulatory agencies to oversee emerging sub-national electricity markets. Lagos, Enugu, Ekiti, Ondo, Edo and other states have already commenced varying stages of implementation of their electricity reform programmes.

Energy experts have repeatedly described the decentralisation of the sector as a major opportunity to attract investment, improve efficiency and expand access to electricity. However, the latest amendment proposals appear to have reopened the debate over how regulatory powers should be shared between Abuja and the states.

As the National Assembly continues deliberations on the amendment bill, the position adopted by lawmakers could shape the future direction of Nigeria’s electricity reforms and determine whether the country deepens its experiment with decentralisation or returns to a more centralised regulatory model.

The Electricity Act 2023 was designed to operationalise the constitutional amendments that empowered states to participate directly in electricity generation, transmission and distribution within their boundaries. Since its enactment, several states have passed their own electricity laws and established regulatory commissions.

The proposed Electricity Act (Amendment) Bill 2026 seeks to amend several provisions of the principal legislation. However, state regulators contend that some of the proposed changes amount to an attempt to reverse the gains of decentralisation and restore broad federal control over the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending