Connect with us

Politics

Power rotation debate heats up as North reviews Tinubu’s scorecard

Published

on

The long-simmering debate over Nigeria’s power rotation arrangement flared up again on Tuesday as northern political leaders, technocrats, traditional rulers, and civil society actors converged on Kaduna to assess President Bola Tinubu’s performance two years into his tenure.

The high-powered meeting, convened by the Sir Ahmadu Bello Memorial Foundation and held at the historic Arewa House, brought together some of the most influential voices from across the 19 northern states and the Federal Capital Territory.

The two-day event, themed “Assessing Electoral Promises: Fostering Government-Citizen Engagement for National Unity,” underscored both the region’s weight in national politics and the urgency of the questions being asked about Nigeria’s future under Tinubu.

Top dignitaries in attendance included the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume; the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu; the Chief of Defence Staff, Gen Christopher Musa; and other service chiefs — all northerners appointed by Tinubu.

Representing the President, Akume assured the gathering that Tinubu’s “Renewed Hope Agenda” was already delivering results.

North should wait

In what appeared to be a warning to northern politicians already preparing for 2027, Akume reminded the gathering that by the principle of rotation, the North’s turn would not come until 2031.

“In 1999, northern patriots like Solomon Lar, Adamu Ciroma, Abubakar Rimi, and Jerry Gana agreed that power rotation is key to peace and national cohesion. Based on that unwritten understanding, the North will be eligible again in 2031,” he declared.

He urged patience, saying, “Let us be patient. Nigeria will not cease to exist before 2031. When it’s our turn, the nation will know.”

Afenifere, MBF react

The Middle Belt Forum expressed agreement with Akume on the issue of power rotation in Nigeria.

In an interview with The PUNCH in Jos on Tuesday, the National President of the Middle Belt Forum, Bitrus Pogu, said as long as the country practices rotation, which is a gentleman’s agreement rather than a constitutional provision, Akume’s statement that the North should wait until 2031 for the presidency holds water.

Pogu emphasised that the agreement on rotation was initially made by the PDP, not the APC, but believes it’s essential to respect such arrangements for peaceful transition and coexistence in a plural society like Nigeria.

“Yes, a southerner is in the presidential seat at the moment, and another southerner could contest for the seat; then the North should be patient till 2031,” Pogu stated.

However, Pogu lamented that Nigeria’s current situation is “unfortunate” due to the country’s inability to transcend ethnic and regional divisions.

“We are still at an archaic arrangement where anybody who comes in tries to satisfy his people to the maximum at the expense of others,” he noted, highlighting the need for a more inclusive and nationalistic approach to leadership.

While the Middle Belt Forum acknowledges the current power rotation arrangement, Pogu believes that Nigeria’s divisions are a legacy of British colonial rule and that a radical shift in approach is needed to foster national unity.

“It will take some radical person coming on board to be able to dismantle this thing so that Nigerians from anywhere, given his pedigree, can become president,” he said, expressing hope for a more united and inclusive Nigeria in the future.

The pan-Yoruba socio-political organisation, Afenifere, threw its weight behind Akume.

Speaking with The PUNCH on Tuesday, the Organising Secretary of the group, Kole Omololu, said, “We commend the SGF’s firm and principled articulation of the necessity to uphold the unwritten but nationally recognised convention of power rotation.

“It is our conviction, and evidently his as well, that for the sake of equity and cohesion, the Presidency must remain in the South until 2031.

“This position, rooted in historical precedent and political decorum, is a stabilising message that Nigerians of goodwill should embrace. The call for restraint by Northern politicians who are prematurely eyeing the 2027 contest is both prudent and patriotic.

“Akume’s clarification that the Renewed Hope Agenda is not an empty slogan but a structured governance blueprint deserves commendation.

“His emphasis on transparency, rule of law, and participation as guiding principles reflects the kind of clarity and accountability that must characterise public service.

“It is incumbent upon every region, particularly those who overwhelmingly supported the present administration, to assess government performance not by sentiment, but through data, delivery and strategic impact.”

He added, “We note the ongoing projects listed, including the rehabilitation of the Kaduna refinery, the expansion of gas pipelines, and railway lines connecting economic corridors. These are significant undertakings which, if completed with sincerity and competence, can catalyse regional development and foster national integration. While economic reforms have no doubt caused hardship, the long-term benefits, as outlined, must be communicated with honesty, not propaganda.

“Afenifere appreciates the composure and statesmanship displayed by Akume. At a time of deepening socio-political anxieties, his intervention is both reassuring and necessary.

“We call on other senior public figures to emulate such candour, and for all Nigerians to prioritise national interest above sectional ambition.”

LP, NNPP speak

The National Publicity Secretary of the New Nigeria People’s Party, Ladipo Johnson, warned against barring northern candidates from contesting the 2027 presidential election.

Johnson said if President Tinubu could disrupt the delicate religious and ethnocentric political balance the country has been practising before 2023, nobody should grandstand with the rhetoric of fielding only a Southern candidate.

He said, “We had developed a culture where we felt two things were sacrosanct, which were Muslim-Christian or Christian-Muslim tickets, and the rotation from North to South.

“However, you will see that at the last election, the issue of a mixed ticket to keep some form of balance in the country was jettisoned.

“Today, we have a Muslim-Muslim ticket in governance, and the country hasn’t collapsed. So why would anyone think the country would collapse or go bad if the northern candidate wins in 2027?

“There must not be a restriction because when there was none regarding religious balance, why should there be a restriction regarding where the person comes from?”

The Deputy National Chairman of the Labour Party, Dr Ayo Olorunfemi, also shared his sentiment.

According to him, what Nigeria should be more concerned about is the competence and intellectual ability of the candidates, not the region.

He said, “We have opened our doors for anybody who wants to contest, whether you are from the South or the West. It’s not all about zoning, but getting the right leader for Nigeria.

“So if the person is coming from the North or South, he is welcome. As far as we are concerned, there is no hard and fast rule about this. It’s about the people of Nigeria and our economy. It’s about security, health, technology, and a country we can truly call our own in terms of culture and values.

“Labour Party is determined to help Nigerians by bringing somebody, regardless of where he is coming from, who jas the capacity to turn this nation around.”

Babachir slams Akume

A former SGF, Babachir Lawal, said it would be foolhardy of the APC and ministers in Tinubu’s cabinet to ask the North to wait for 2031 before fielding a candidate for election.

Lawal said it would amount to mockery, knowing that Tinubu and the ruling party were the ones who broke the unwritten agreement on power rotation in the country when they introduced a Muslim-Muslim ticket into the political equation.

He queried, “Are competent people found only in the South? Is that what Akume and Tinubu are saying? Let me know if there is a document somewhere that says it is the turn of Southerners again.

“I don’t think it is written anywhere that you can’t truncate the tenure of a bad president just because he is from the South. If the APC fields a Southern candidate, that is their choice, not our own.

“We shouldn’t be talking about the APC. These are people who have no standard at all.

“How can somebody who fielded a Muslim-Muslim ticket, when the standard has not always been the same faith ticket, suddenly turn around and start demanding that a standard must be followed?

‘When he broke the implied understanding, why didn’t he say that before? Even in the military, it has always been Muslim-Christian or Christian-Muslim. Why is he now saying it’s the turn of the South? Even the Southerners are not comfortable with his government.

“I once told you in an interview that Tinubu and his people have opened Pandora’s box. Now, they can’t hold anybody to any standard. They can’t have their cake and eat it.”

APGA, PDP react

The All Progressives Grand Alliance threw its weight behind the call for the South to produce Nigeria’s President in 2027.

Speaking exclusively with The PUNCH, the National Publicity Secretary of APGA, Ejimofor Opara, said the party would prioritise the South when it was time to pick its presidential flagbearer.

He said, “It is the turn of the South to produce the president in 2027. We will certainly promote a southern candidate,” adding that “More importantly, the progressives will surely work together come 2027.”

He, however, made it clear that the party would have nothing to do with the ADC-led coalition being championed by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar.

“APGA is not part of any coalition of spent politicians. Their mission is unpatriotic. It is nothing about the people. Thus, we don’t consider them to be progressives by their very ideals,” he added.

But the Peoples Democratic Party maintained that Nigerians would ultimately decide Tinubu’s fate at the ballot box.

PDP spokesman, Debo Ologunagba, said: “By 2027, Nigerians will vote them out because they have failed—failed woefully. So, they won’t be there till 2031.”

With voices for and against a southern presidency growing louder, the Kaduna parley has set the stage for what promises to be an intense build-up to the 2027 elections — one that could redefine Nigeria’s delicate balance of power.

Kwankwaso under fire

A former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress, Yekini Nabena, faulted recent remarks by Kwankwaso concerning national development and project allocation.

In a statement released on Tuesday, Nabena dismissed Kwankwaso’s claims, insisting that no ethnic, religious, or regional sentiment could undermine the legitimacy of a Southern presidency.

He stressed that the South’s completing eight years in power was non-negotiable.

Kwankwaso, who contested the 2023 presidential election under the New Nigeria People’s Party, had accused the Federal Government of disproportionately favouring the South in project distribution, citing poor road infrastructure in the North and a concentration of development in the South.

However, the Presidency refuted his claims by releasing a list of projects, which showed that President Bola Tinubu’s administration had allocated more funds to northern projects than those in the South.

Also responding to Kwankwaso, Nabena alleged that “the former governor’s real intention was to incite the northerners against the current administration and the re-election of a southerner in 2027 to complete eight years of a Southern presidency in the seat of power.”

The APC chieftain said such incitement for “a political business or negotiation, like some politicians did in 2019 and 2023, could no longer work because the people now know the real intention.

“The Kano voters now know who is using them for political business, and even the political gladiators now understand the tactics of political merchants.

“Is the North inferior or superior to the South after eight years of the North in the helm of affairs of Nigeria?

“Why is Senator Kwankwaso still complaining of underdevelopment in the North when the region has just completed its eight years?

“One will also wonder which of the northern money or resources was used to develop the South? Is it the gold, rice, or groundnut pyramid?

“As a politician, we all understand what the former governor is up to. He is working hard to incite the North against the Southern presidency, but that has failed woefully because the South must complete the eight years in the presidency for fairness and equity.”

The former APC spokesperson firmly stated that Kwankwaso lacked both the ability and influence to intimidate the South ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“You cannot intimidate the South or anybody with Kano votes any longer because, as politicians, we all know the game and what you are up to.

“The era of playing religious or ethnic cards is becoming far unfashionable,” Nabena warned.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

APC slams Obi over borrowing criticism, defends Tinubu’s policies

Published

on

The All Progressives Congress in Lagos State has defended the borrowing policy of President Bola Tinubu’s administration, insisting it is strategic and aimed at funding critical infrastructure, not reckless as alleged by Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi.

Nigeria’s rising debt profile has remained a recurring issue in national discourse. Tinubu’s administration has defended its borrowing as necessary for infrastructure expansion and economic reforms, citing global practices.

However, critics, including opposition figures, argue that mounting debt without visible improvements in living standards worsens Nigeria’s economic challenges.

The APC Spokesman, Mr Seye Oladejo, in a statement titled “Peter Obi’s Borrowing Hypocrisy: Physician, Heal Thyself” on Thursday berated the 2023 Labour Party’s Presidential Candidate’s criticism of Tinubu’s borrowings.

The News Agency of Nigeria reports that the former Anambra governor had called on accountants to confront Tinubu-Federal Government over what he called “reckless borrowings”.

Oladejo advised Obi to play to his strengths in politics, “as topics bordering on finance, economy, development, and social policy remain his enduring handicap.”

According to him, borrowing under the present administration is strategic, tied to projects and funding of productive sectors.

“First, borrowing is not inherently reckless. What matters is purpose and prudence.

“Under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, borrowing is strategic, tied to critical infrastructure, energy, transportation, and productive sectors.

“This is the globally accepted practice-even the most advanced economies borrow to fund growth. Second, Peter Obi has no moral authority to lecture anyone about prudence.

“Nigerians remember that as governor, he left behind unpaid pensions, collapsing infrastructure, and poor human capital indices,” Oladejo said.

He said that Obi had consistently displayed extravagant tendencies, adding that it was a contradiction that he was going about giving sermons on prudent management of resources.

“For someone who flew around the world in private jets during his campaign while sermonising about cutting costs, the contradictions are glaring,” he said.

According to him, unlike Obi’s motivational-speech politics, Tinubu is taking bold, necessary steps to reset the economy.

“Subsidy removal, currency reforms, and targeted borrowing are difficult but inevitable measures to secure Nigeria’s future. This is leadership in action – not empty moralising,” he added

He urged Obi to refrain from commenting on serious matters of finance and governance,” he is out of depth and out of place”.

Oladejo said that Tinubu was building Nigeria’s future, while Obi was busy building sound bites. One is a reformer, the other a motivational speaker. Nigerians know the difference,” he said.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

INEC recognises David Mark-led ADC leadership

Published

on

The Independent National Electoral Commission on Wednesday officially recognised the David Mark-led leadership of the African Democratic Congress.

This development followed a period of internal restructuring within the party, which culminated in the emergence of new national officers aimed at repositioning the ADC ahead of future electoral contests.

Alongside Mark, other principal officers now officially acknowledged by INEC include Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary, Dr. Ibrahim Mani as National Treasurer, Akibu Dalhatu as National Financial Secretary, and Professor Oserheimen Aigberaodion Osunbor as National Legal Adviser.

With this formal endorsement, the ADC leadership is expected to commence a nationwide reconciliation and mobilisation effort, as the party seeks to strengthen its presence across the country ahead of the 2027 general elections.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

INEC chairman – Early political campaigns threaten democracy

Published

on

The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Professor Mahmood Yakubu, has raised concerns over the growing trend of premature political campaigns across the country, describing it as a direct violation of Nigeria’s electoral laws and a threat to democratic governance.

Speaking at a one-day roundtable on the challenges of early political campaigns, held at the Electoral Institute in Abuja on Wednesday, Yakubu highlighted what he described as a “disturbing trend” of political campaigning ahead of scheduled timelines, especially in relation to upcoming off-cycle governorship elections, the Federal Capital Territory Area Council elections, and the 2027 general election.

He referenced Section 94(1) of the Electoral Act 2022, which clearly prohibits the commencement of campaigns earlier than 150 days before polling day, and requires all campaign activities to end 24 hours before voting begins.

However, he lamented that political actors often disregard this provision. “Political parties, candidates and their supporters seem to be perpetually in election mood even when the Electoral Commission is yet to release the Timetable and Schedule of Activities for elections.

“Around the country, we have seen outdoor advertising, media campaigns and even rallies promoting various political parties and candidates,” the INEC Chairman noted.

Yakubu warned that these premature activities severely compromise the commission’s ability to enforce campaign finance limits.

“These actions and activities undermine the commission’s ability to track campaign finance limits as politicians, prospective candidates and third-party agents expend large amounts of money that cannot be effectively monitored before the official commencement of campaigns,” he said.

He noted that while Nigerians expect INEC, as the regulator of political parties, to act, the Commission’s powers are constrained by gaps in the legal framework. “The major challenge for the commission is the law itself,” he noted.

Although Section 94(2) of the Electoral Act 2022 imposes a maximum fine of N500,000 for campaigning within 24 hours of an election, Professor Yakubu pointed out that “there is no sanction whatsoever concerning breaches for campaigns earlier than 150 days to an election.

“Here lies the challenge for the commission in dealing with the early campaign.”

He acknowledged that early campaigning is not a new issue, but said the failure of regulatory bodies to address it within existing legal constraints necessitated deeper reflection.

“The seeming inability of the commission and other regulatory agencies to deal with the menace within the ambit of the existing electoral legal framework calls for deep reflection,” Yakubu said.

“With the National Assembly currently reviewing our electoral laws,” Yakubu said, “the commission has also invited the leadership of both the Senate and House of Representatives Committees on Electoral Matters.

“I am confident that they will give due consideration to actionable recommendations by experts.”

He also acknowledged the participation of regulatory agencies, including the National Broadcasting Commission, the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria, and the Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria, expressing optimism that the discussions would yield practical solutions.

The INEC chairman’s remarks came amid rising political activity nationwide, despite the 2027 general election still being more than a year away. Across the country, politicians have been hosting large gatherings, commissioning constituency projects, and holding “empowerment” events—many of which observers say are disguised campaign efforts.

Nigeria operates on a four-year electoral cycle, during which elected officials serve for a renewable term of four years. As general elections are constitutionally mandated to be held every four years, political activities tend to intensify well in advance. In recent election cycles, the build-up has started earlier with each cycle, often turning governance into secondary business as politicians begin to focus more on elections than service delivery.

Historically, early campaigns have also led to increased political tension and division. During the build-up to the 2023 general elections, similar concerns were raised as political rhetoric dominated the national conversation months before INEC officially flagged off campaign activities. Many of those early activities went unchecked due to a lack of punitive measures within the legal framework.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending