Connect with us

Business

OPS reacts on CBN’s interest rates reduction

Published

on

The Monetary Policy Committee of the Central Bank of Nigeria has reduced the country’s benchmark interest rate to 27.00 per cent, the first cut in 2025 after three consecutive pauses, signaling a shift in policy towards supporting economic recovery.

While welcoming the move, members of the Organised Private Sector argued that the reduction remains marginal and insufficient to ease the credit squeeze on manufacturers and small businesses.

Announcing the decision at a press briefing on Tuesday in Abuja after the committee’s 302nd meeting, CBN Governor Olayemi Cardoso said all 12 members voted in favour of a 50-basis point cut from 27.5 per cent.

The committee also adjusted the Standing Facilities corridor to +250/-250 basis points, raised the Cash Reserve Requirement for commercial banks to 45 per cent while retaining merchant banks at 16 per cent, and introduced a 75 per cent CRR on non-TSA public sector deposits. The Liquidity Ratio was left unchanged at 30 per cent.

Cardoso explained that the decision was underpinned by “sustained disinflation recorded in the past five months, projections of declining inflation for the rest of 2025, and the need to support economic recovery efforts.”

The MPC noted that headline inflation slowed to 20.12 per cent in August from 21.88 per cent in July. Food inflation fell to 21.87 per cent from 22.74 per cent, while core inflation eased to 20.33 per cent from 21.33 per cent. On a month-to-month basis, inflation dropped sharply to 0.74 per cent in August compared with 1.99 per cent in July.

“This reduction is the first under my leadership and the first in five years,” Cardoso noted. The last time Nigeria cut its policy rate was in September 2020, when it dropped from 12.5 per cent to 11.5 per cent.

Across Africa, a similar trend is unfolding. Just last week, Ghana slashed its policy rate by 350 basis points to 21.5 per cent, while Kenya reduced its benchmark to 9.5 per cent in August. Nigeria’s cut, however, still leaves it with one of the highest rates on the continent.

The MPC also highlighted positive macroeconomic trends, particularly Nigeria’s second-quarter GDP growth of 4.23 per cent, up from 3.13 per cent in the first quarter.

The rebound was largely driven by the oil sector, which expanded by 20.46 per cent compared with just 1.87 per cent in the previous quarter.

See also  Tax: ‘Give reprieve to people with low income’

The committee commended the Federal Government for improved security in oil-producing regions, noting that sustained production growth would strengthen external reserves and stabilize the naira.

Foreign reserves rose to $43.05bn as of September 11, 2025, up from $40.51bn at the end of July, providing an import cover of 8.28 months. The current account balance also recorded a surplus of $5.28bn in Q2, up from $2.85bn in Q1.

Cardoso disclosed that 14 banks had already met the new recapitalisation requirements, with the sector remaining resilient and financial soundness indicators within prudential benchmarks.

Looking ahead, the MPC projected continued disinflation, supported by exchange rate stability, declining petrol prices, and the harvest season. The next MPC meeting is scheduled for November 24–25, 2025.

 

 

OPS reacts

While the rate cut was widely acknowledged as a step in the right direction, members of the Organised Private Sector argued that the reduction remains marginal and insufficient to ease the credit squeeze on manufacturers and small businesses.

Director-General of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN), Segun Ajayi-Kadir, described the cut as welcome but inadequate. “Virtually every time the MPC meets, what we anticipate is a reduction in rates. This is welcome, but it has not gotten us anywhere near our expectations. Manufacturers need to borrow at no more than five per cent for that borrowing to be supportive of production,” he said.

Ajayi-Kadir emphasised that no bank would lend at a rate below the MPR, meaning credit costs remain unaffordable. “It signals a rethinking by the CBN, but manufacturers still await a time when rates will be significantly lower,” he added.

Similarly, the Director-General of the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA), Adewale Oyerinde, warned that the cut’s impact might be undermined by other restrictive measures such as the high CRR. “If credit costs are lowered, businesses can access affordable financing, expand investments, and create jobs. But the persistently high CRR and liquidity restrictions risk limiting these outcomes,” Oyerinde said.

He pointed out that while inflation moderated in August, food inflation at 21.87 per cent continues to erode disposable incomes. “Macroeconomic stability must translate into tangible relief for Nigerians,” he added, urging the government to complement monetary policy with structural reforms.

The President of the Association of Small Business Owners of Nigeria, Dr Femi Egbesola, called the rate cut a “good start” but “insignificant” in the broader context. “Compared to other developing countries, ours still ranks among the highest. Access to finance remains the number one challenge of SMEs. A 0.5 reduction is insignificant compared to the pressure on the real sector,” he said.

See also  Gas firms supply 180bscf to power plants despite N2.7tn debt

Egbesola called for special credit windows at single-digit rates for small businesses, stressing that alternative funding sources beyond banks must also be explored.

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise echoed similar sentiments, commending the MPC’s move but stressing the need for complementary fiscal reforms.

Its Director, Dr Muda Yusuf, described the rate cut as “a welcome and timely intervention,” adding that the lower MPR combined with a reduced CRR should expand banks’ capacity to create credit and lower lending rates. This will support business expansion, stimulate output growth, and create jobs,” Yusuf said.

He, however, stressed that monetary easing alone is not enough. “Fiscal authorities must prioritise infrastructure to reduce production costs, strengthen the regulatory framework, and sustain fiscal consolidation to ensure macroeconomic stability and investor confidence,” he said.

Yusuf further urged the government to address insecurity, which continues to threaten private investment and rural productivity.

Observers agree that the CBN’s decision marks a significant shift in monetary policy, moving from stabilisation towards growth acceleration. Analysts note that while inflation remains elevated, the trend of disinflation provides room for cautious easing to support recovery.

For manufacturers, small businesses, and employers, the cut is a signal of intent but falls short of delivering immediate relief. The consensus across the OPS is that credit costs must drop significantly further, ideally into single digits, to unlock the full potential of Nigeria’s productive sectors.

As Yusuf summed it up: “If sustained and backed by fiscal and structural reforms, the new stance could stimulate growth, improve private sector performance, boost revenues, and moderate inflation sustainably in the medium to long term.”

On its part, the Nigeria Labour Congress described the CBN’s reduction of the Monetary Policy Rate from 27.50 per cent to 27 per cent as a step in the right direction, but cautioned that borrowing costs remain prohibitively high for businesses.

The Assistant Secretary-General of the NLC, Onyekachi Christopher, told The PUNCH that while it is encouraging that policymakers are considering rate reductions, the current level of 27 per cent remains very high.

See also  FG seeks 30-day credit window for airlines due to Jet fuel crisis

“As an organisation advocating for the welfare of workers, we hope to see manufacturers gain better access to financing, produce more goods, hire additional employees, and contribute more meaningfully to the economy,” Onyekachi said. “Easier access to bank loans would support these goals, creating long-term benefits for both businesses and workers.”

Professor of Economics and former Vice-Chancellor of Crescent University, Abeokuta, Sheriffdeen Tella, said while interest rate theory is more applicable in advanced economies, it remains relevant for Nigeria.

“The CBN likely felt it could reduce rates now that inflation is coming down. High interest rates increase borrowing costs, which in turn raise production costs for businesses. At current levels, borrowing is still unattractive because profits rarely exceed 20–30 per cent annually, making loans hard to justify. Although the reduction is a positive start, rates remain relatively high,” he said.

Former Zenith Bank Chief Economist Marcel Okeke said the rate cut signals the beginning of a loosening in the CBN’s tight monetary stance. “The Monetary Policy Rate is largely indicative. It signals to commercial banks that they may start easing their lending rates rather than keeping them high continuously. Essentially, it shows that the CBN is beginning to loosen its tight monetary stance,” he said.

Okeke noted that historically, high lending rates were driven by the CBN’s tight policy, which pushed the MPR to around 27.5 per cent. “This reduction is the start of reversing that trend. Even if banks only reduce rates by 1–2 per cent, it is symbolic but meaningful. In the next CBN meeting in November, further reductions could follow if inflation continues to decline,” the economist added.

He highlighted that inflation has fallen from almost 35 per cent in December 2024 to about 20.13 per cent in August 2025. “If it continues to fall to around 17–18 per cent, the CBN is likely to reduce the NPR further.

“Lower interest rates make loans more affordable, increasing access to credit and stimulating economic activity. However, the effect isn’t immediate; there is a time lag between policy implementation and visible impact. Further cuts will also depend on exchange rate stability and inflation trends,” Okeke said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Nigerian states’ revenues rise 93%, but education spending drops — World Bank

Published

on

The World Bank says Nigeria’s 36 states recorded a 93 per cent increase in revenues between 2023 and 2025 but education received a declining share of the sector’s expenditure.

The bank disclosed this in its latest Nigeria Development Update, which examined how increased public revenues have influenced spending priorities across the federation.

The report was made available to the News Agency of Nigeria by the World Bank in Washington D.C.

According to the report, states’ aggregate revenues rose by approximately 93 per cent in real terms, while expenditure increased by 92 per cent during the period.

The report attributed the improvement partly to exchange-rate reforms, petrol subsidy removal, stronger revenue administration and increased allocations from the federation account.

It said states also benefited from refunds, settlement of longstanding federal obligations, intervention funds, and stronger Value Added Tax collections.

However, education’s share of total state expenditure declined from 14.9 per cent in 2021 to 12.1 per cent in 2025, according to the report.

Health expenditure remained broadly stable at approximately seven per cent, while social protection’s share increased from 1.4 per cent to 4.4 per cent.

The bank said capital expenditure increased significantly, accounting for 61 per cent of state spending, compared with 46 per cent previously.

Transport infrastructure recorded the largest increase, alongside substantial spending on housing, agriculture and other economic investments.

The report quoted Mathew Verghis, the World Bank Country Director for Nigeria, as saying that increased revenues provided the opportunity to improve infrastructure, education, healthcare, and water services.

See also  NNPC, NUPRC, NMDPRA shut as PENGASSAN begins strike

He said greater spending efficiency, accountability and improved service delivery were essential to ensuring that additional public resources benefited Nigerians.

The bank acknowledged improvements in states’ fiscal reporting, transparency and internally generated revenue.

It, however, stressed that stronger investment in human capital was necessary to translate economic reforms into sustainable employment and improved living standards.

The report also projected average economic growth of 4.4 per cent between 2026 and 2028, subject to sustained reforms and improved service delivery.

It urged federal and state authorities to ensure that increased public revenues translated into tangible improvements in Nigerians’ welfare.

NAN

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Nigeria promotes investment without building production capacity – UNILAG don

Published

on

A professor of Comparative Political Economy at the University of Lagos, Adelaja Odukoya, has asserted that Nigeria’s economic policies promote investment without sufficiently strengthening domestic production.

Odukoya argued that the contradiction had weakened the country’s productive foundations, with policies encouraging investment and entrepreneurship while failing to create the technological capacity, productive employment and processing industries needed to drive sustainable development.

Odukoya spoke at the maiden edition of the Adeleke University Toyin Falola Annual Lecture, held on Thursday at the Performing Arts Theatre, Adeleke University, Ede.

The lecture had as its theme, “History, Power and Accumulation: Reimagining Africa in the Globally Disorderly Order.”

Odukoya identified several contradictions in the way the Nigerian state manages economic activity.

He said, “The state promotes investment without creating conditions for technological transfer. It encourages entrepreneurship without generating sufficient productive employment.

“It expands primary-product exports while leaving processing capacity undeveloped. It constructs infrastructure without establishing strong linkages with domestic production.”

According to him, the contradictions explain why increased economic activity and accumulation do not necessarily translate into development.

“Accumulation is not synonymous with development,” Odukoya stated.

He argued that genuine development should be measured by the expansion of productive, technological, institutional and human capabilities.

“A country could attract investment, export minerals and agricultural commodities and record economic activity while still failing to build the domestic industries and technological capabilities required for long-term development,” he said.

His argument was echoed by Prof Toyin Falola, who said Africa’s vast natural resources would continue to reinforce dependency unless governments developed the industrial, technological and institutional capacity to transform them into productive power.

See also  Oil cargoes meant for naira-for-crude deal supplied to Dangote – NNPC

Falola said Africa’s resource problem was not simply one of historical exploitation, but also the continent’s failure to convert its resource endowments into power.

“The issue, however, is not just to repeat the history of exploitation. It is more important to know how Africa turns its great resources into power,” Falola said.

He argued that Africa could not afford to remain a spectator as global economic and geopolitical arrangements continued to change, stressing that resource ownership without the capacity to add value would not guarantee influence.

Falola said the continent required a combination of knowledge, government policy and industrial capacity to change its economic position.

“There must be universities that generate new knowledge; there must be governments that translate this knowledge into policies; there must be industries that add value to the continent’s natural resources,” he said.

He added that Africa needed more than improved infrastructure and stronger economies if it wanted to exercise greater influence in the global system.

“The future of the continent will require more than just better infrastructure, improved economies, and more effective political institutions,” Falola said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Import waivers, insecurity end two-year agric trade surplus

Published

on

Import waivers meant to ease hunger and insecurity on farms have led to a deficit, ending a two-year run of surpluses, as Nigeria’s agricultural trade balance swung from a N740.27bn surplus in the first half of 2025 to a N56.13bn deficit in H1 2026, according to agriculture and trade experts.

Recent foreign trade data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed that agricultural exports fell by 33.28 per cent, or N985.14bn, to N1.98tn in H1 2026 from N2.96tn in H1 2025.

Agricultural imports fell by only 8.50 per cent, or N188.74bn, to N2.03tn from N2.22tn over the same period. The gap between the two movements produced a N796.40bn swing in the trade balance.

Nigeria recorded a N365.74bn deficit in H1 2023, when imports of N926.25bn far exceeded exports of N560.51bn. The balance then turned to a N194.92bn surplus in H1 2024 before it widened to N740.27bn in H1 2025.

In separate phone interviews with The PUNCH, Agribusiness experts, including the Chairman of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s Agricultural and Allied Group, Tunde Banjoko, explained that recent government policy led to the shift.

Banjoko said, “Some waivers were given for products like palm oil and rice, and the import tariffs were drastically reduced. It became more favourable for people to import than to patronise local producers.”

He said the waivers on food commodities hurt domestic producers, even though lower tariffs on tractors and manufacturing equipment helped them.

According to Banjoko, “The effect is that our imports will rise above our exports. Second, we will discourage local production. Thirdly, we will be reducing employment, because some factories will shut down if they are not able to compete.”

See also  Tax: ‘Give reprieve to people with low income’

Banjoko also said weak funding for processors compounds the problem. He said foreign direct investment flows mainly into the capital market rather than into production and processing, so local processors cannot scale.

He urged the Federal Government to speed up the Special Agro-Industrial Processing Zones programme. “We should speed up such projects where we can produce enough for our country and start exporting, not look for shortcuts by reducing prices,” Banjoko added.

Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, identified two major factors behind the deficit. He said the first was the Federal Government’s decision to allow some food imports to tackle runaway inflation.

Yusuf said, “The first is the decision of the government to allow for some food imports as a result of the challenges of food inflation, which at a point was getting almost completely out of hand.”

He added that insecurity worsened the supply gap and cut export capacity, stating, “Insecurity led many farmers to leave their farms. Many of them have ended up in IDP camps, and quite a number have completely abandoned farming.”

He added that farmers cannot export without output. Yusuf said, “You can only export when you have the output.”

Yusuf also said high input costs and falling produce prices have discouraged farming. He said, “Most of these inputs are imported, so the exchange rate situation has seriously affected the cost of inputs, and the prices of produce have gone down.”

He urged the Federal Government to cut the cost of fertiliser, agrochemicals, machinery and improved seedlings. He also called for a minimum guaranteed price for agricultural produce.

See also  Reps query foreign airlines’ N18.98bn debt, give FAAN two-week recovery deadline

Yusuf said, “The government can establish a threshold below which, if prices fall, it will give farmers some compensation. That is the way it is done in many other economies.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending