Connect with us

News

Opposition slams govt as states’ IGR soars by 50%

Published

on

The surge in subnational revenue has drawn mixed reactions from stakeholders nationwide, including labour union leaders and opposition parties, many of whom have criticised poor revenue management and the neglect of key projects at both federal and state levels.

This follows Monday’s release of Internally Generated Revenue data by the National Bureau of Statistics, showing that states’ combined revenue jumped by 50 per cent to N3.63tn in 2024, even as dependence on monthly disbursements from the Federation Accounts Allocation Committee persisted.

Twelve states recorded over 50 per cent revenue growth, while 24 states posted less than 50 per cent, underscoring the structural weakness of state economies and their reliance on FAAC allocations.

Labour leaders, opposition parties, and civil society groups who spoke to The PUNCH in separate interviews acknowledged the impressive growth in IGR but questioned its transparency and impact on citizens’ welfare.

Labour unions accused some state governments of failing to translate higher revenues into tangible development outcomes, alleging that workers’ welfare, infrastructure, and public services remain neglected despite record earnings. The Nigeria Labour Congress in several states described the growth as “paper gains”, arguing that it had not translated into improved salaries, pension settlements, or better healthcare services.

Opposition politicians also questioned the fiscal discipline of many governors, alleging that despite unprecedented inflows, budget performance and capital projects remained weak. They called on anti-graft agencies and auditors to investigate how states manage their revenues, insisting that citizens must see clear value for every naira generated.

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Ogun State said there was nothing on the ground to reflect the increased federal allocation to the state following fuel subsidy removal.

See also  No going back on reforms, Tinubu tells World Bank team

The party’s Publicity Secretary, Arc. Kayode Adebayo, told The PUNCH that while allocations to states had risen substantially, the Dapo Abiodun administration had “nothing significant to show”.

“Our roads are bad, and local governments, the tier closest to the people, have nothing to show. They can’t even clear drainages,” Adebayo said. “Local government autonomy exists only on paper. The governors are not in tune with President Bola Tinubu’s position on its implementation. Residents are not feeling the impact of these increased funds.”

Trade Union Congress Chairman, Comrade Akeem Lasisi, echoed similar sentiments, noting that many states had failed to make judicious use of the increased revenue.

“The general public is yet to feel the full impact. The government must prioritise workers’ welfare and projects that directly benefit residents, such as infrastructure, healthcare, and education,” he said.

In Sokoto, PDP Chairman Hon. Aliyu Goronyo accused Governor Ahmed Aliyu’s administration of mismanaging state revenue and abandoning legacy projects initiated by the previous government.

“Despite increased inflows, there’s no single legacy project to the government’s name,” Goronyo said. “Every project we started that had direct impact on people, from the Teaching Hospital to market developments, has been abandoned.”

He also alleged worsening insecurity and unemployment, claiming that over 2,000 health workers employed by the former administration had been dismissed. “Even after a year, many local government chairmen have no official vehicles,” he added.

Opposition parties and labour leaders in Benue State faulted Governor Hyacinth Alia’s performance despite “huge resources” accruing to the state.

PDP Chairman Hon. Ezekiel Adaji described the governor as “a total failure”, accusing him of prioritising political battles over governance. Labour Party Chairman Ibrahim Idoko also criticised the government, saying, “Payment of salaries and pensions is a basic duty, not an achievement.”

See also  AFUED set for 24/7 power as FG launches solar project

He added that ongoing road projects were not commensurate with the state’s revenue and accused the government of neglecting local contractors who could stimulate the economy.

In contrast, Plateau State NLC Chairman Eugene Mangji commended Governor Caleb Mutfwang for regular payment of workers’ salaries and implementation of the minimum wage.

He said, “As labour, our concern is prompt payment. The governor has met that expectation.” However, he declined to comment on budget utilisation, saying the NLC lacked oversight in that area.

The NLC in Kano praised Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf for prudent fiscal management. Chairman Kabiru Inuwa noted that “workers suffered under the previous administration, but this government has cleared arrears and paid N27bn of N48bn in gratuities.”

However, the SDP Chairman, Alhaji Ali Shettima, accused the government of “misplaced priorities”, saying it focused on flyovers rather than water supply and agriculture. “Only 15 per cent of residents have potable water,” he lamented.

Bayelsa TUC Chairman, Comrade Julius Laye, urged Governor Douye Diri to channel more funds into health and education despite progress in infrastructure.

He lauded the administration for constructing roads, acquiring aircraft, and paying gratuities but warned, “Hospitals are losing staff through retirements; without new recruitment, service delivery will suffer.”

In Zamfara, NLC Secretary Ahmed Abubakar said several ongoing projects suggested better governance, but APC spokesman Yusuf Idris alleged that development efforts were concentrated in Governor Dauda Lawal’s hometown, Gusau.

In Jigawa, NLC Chairman Sanusi Maigatari described IGR growth as encouraging but urged greater transparency. PDP Deputy Chairman Umar Danjani demanded an independent audit, saying, “We see rising figures but no visible impact.” Labour Party chieftain Ashiru Dalhatu also bemoaned poor infrastructure and unemployment.

See also  FULL LIST: FG lists federal hospitals where dialysis costs ₦12,000

The Bauchi TUC praised Governor Bala Mohammed’s administration for prudence and prompt payment of the N70,000 minimum wage.

State Chairman Sabiu Barau said, “Every local government has benefited from infrastructure upgrades. This is responsible governance.”

Despite overall growth, 24 states recorded less than 50 per cent IGR increase in 2024, raising concerns about fiscal dependence on FAAC.

FAAC data showed that the 36 states and the FCT collectively received N5.08tn from the Federation Account in 2024, well above their combined IGR of N3.63tn.

Among low performers were Adamawa, Anambra, Bauchi, Benue, Borno, Delta, Edo, Ekiti, FCT, Gombe, Imo, Kaduna, Katsina, Kogi, Kwara, Nasarawa, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo, Plateau, Sokoto, Yobe, and Zamfara. Some states, including Ondo, Ebonyi, and Yobe, even reported revenue declines.

In contrast, high performers such as Abia, Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Cross River, Enugu, Jigawa, Kano, Kebbi, Lagos, Osun, Rivers, and Taraba recorded growth of 50 per cent or more.

Lagos, Rivers, and the FCT remained Nigeria’s top revenue generators, accounting for more than 40 per cent of the national total.

Enugu State led percentage growth, rising by 433 per cent from N33.86bn to N180.50bn, followed by Bayelsa’s 222 per cent and Kano’s 100 per cent.

Fiscal analysts attributed Enugu’s rise to reforms in land administration and automation, while Bayelsa’s growth was driven by improved oil-related levies.

Despite such gains, experts warned that without stronger fiscal accountability, many states risk continuing a cycle of revenue growth without visible development.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  30 dead, 58 rescued in Niger boat mishap -NEMA

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  30 dead, 58 rescued in Niger boat mishap -NEMA

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Prepare for heavy rain, firm urges farmers

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  FULL LIST: FG lists federal hospitals where dialysis costs ₦12,000

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Prepare for heavy rain, firm urges farmers

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  30 dead, 58 rescued in Niger boat mishap -NEMA

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending