Connect with us

News

NITDA boss urges regional cooperation to achieve digital sovereignty

Published

on

The Director-General of the National Information Technology Development Agency, Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi, has called on West African nations to deepen collaboration toward building shared digital infrastructure and governance frameworks that will foster economic integration and self-determination across the sub-region.

Abdullahi made the call on Monday at the second West African Digital Governance Forum (WADGov) held in Abuja, which brought together representatives from 15 West African countries, including Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo, and host country Nigeria.

The event was jointly organised by the United Nations University Operating Unit on Policy-Driven Electronic Governance, in collaboration with the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and supported by the German Development Agency.

The initiative, now in its second year, aims to foster dialogue among West African nations, promote shared standards, and create a roadmap for regional cooperation in digital governance.

Speaking in his keynote address, Abdullahi said Africa must move beyond mere technological adoption to designing inclusive, sustainable, and citizen-focused digital ecosystems.

He said, “We are grateful to host the second meeting of the West African Digital Governance Forum, a forum established to promote digital cooperation within African countries to develop policies, strategies, and frameworks that will help us build our own digital infrastructure. Because digital today is a lifestyle.

“Our citizens are online, therefore we need to make them online as well, as a government. To make them online is not something that will happen just by accident. We need to design it, we need to be intentional about it, and we need to collaborate in building that to make sure what we are building is sustainable.

“So to achieve that sustainability, it is beyond technology, because technology also is not our goal. Our goal is to use technology to deliver quality services to our citizens, to build trust, and to help our citizens get a delightful experience while consuming government services and other digital offerings in our country. And also, digital doesn’t have boundaries.

See also  Autonomy battle: Local Governments demand direct funds as states receive N7.43tn

“We see solutions built to solve local problems, but they have gone to the global stage. Therefore, as Africa also, as we build solutions, we should build in that mindset. And when it goes beyond boundaries, that means there is a need to have common standards, there is a need to have protocols, there is a need to have policies that will make sure we integrate.”

He stressed that Africa must build “digital bridges” that connect countries and allow seamless exchange of digital services, data, and innovation across borders.

“In Africa, we have many policies that promote cross-border trading, and our people move across borders. But when it comes to digital services, it is easier to consume services in Europe, the US, and other parts of the world than to consume services from our neighbours. Just take, for example, a typical bank transfer; if you are going to do it today, you have to route it through either Europe or the US.

“If you want to make a call, it routes through there. Internet traffic as well. So why can’t we build that digital collaboration within ourselves, so that we can easily exchange services with our neighbours, media, gather, and so on, without travelling all the way to other parts of the world?

“The only way we can achieve this is through collaboration platforms like this. How can we articulate our vision, our strategy together, how can we build infrastructure bridges, digital bridges that can help us to exchange digital services between our neighbours? So we thank the UNUEGov and UNDESA for creating this platform, and GIZ also and other development partners for convening this meeting to see how we can explore, how we can share experiences, how we can work together to build digital public infrastructure for our region.

See also  Tinubu clears 959 for national honours

“So I know many countries are doing a lot in silos, but when we collaborate, when we exchange ideas, when we share experiences, we can easily build systems that can easily integrate and interoperate within our region. So this platform can help us to strengthen and deepen policy implementations, to build standards and protocols that can flow across borders, as well as to build our digital self-determination.”

According to him, achieving that vision requires regional partnerships, common standards, and policies that encourage interoperability and integration among West African nations.

The NITDA boss underscored that digital sovereignty, owning and controlling Africa’s data, was essential to the continent’s future independence and economic resilience.

“Whoever controls your data controls your future,” he said. “The only way for us to control our economy and our destiny is to control our data and build our own digital infrastructure.”

He added that Nigeria is already implementing key initiatives to enhance digital literacy, expand connectivity, and develop homegrown digital skills.

Among these are the National Digital Literacy Framework, which integrates digital studies from kindergarten to tertiary level, and the Three Million Technical Talent programme, designed to make Nigeria a “global talent factory.”

He further highlighted ongoing infrastructure projects such as Project Bridge, which aims to connect all Nigerians through a national fibre optic network and local cloud infrastructure.

Also speaking at the event, Arpine Korekyan, Governance and Public Administration Officer at UN DESA, commended Africa’s progress in adopting digital technologies but cautioned that challenges such as affordability, infrastructure gaps, and policy fragmentation must be addressed.

See also  Slain husband’s family slams Tinubu’s pardon for Maryam Sanda

She observed that while Africa’s E-Government Development Index continues to improve, the continent still lags behind global averages in areas like online service delivery and citizen engagement.

“Digital transformation must remain human-centred, empowering people, enhancing participation, and leaving no one behind,” Korekyan said. “With strong political will and sustained investment, Africa can accelerate digital transformation and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.”

A GIZ representative, Eva Scholtes, described the West African Digital Governance Forum as a critical platform for building sustainable partnerships.

She said, “This transformation is unstoppable, but without good governance, it risks deepening inequalities. That’s why we’re committed to supporting this community of practitioners to ensure inclusive and sustainable transformation.”

The Director of UNU-EGOV, Prof. Delfina Soares, said the forum forms part of a broader Global Forum on Digital Governance Initiative, which links regional platforms across Africa and Asia to share knowledge and coordinate policy innovation.

“The question before us is not merely how to digitalise government, but how to govern digitalisation,” she said. “West Africa must ensure that technology serves people, builds trust, and promotes prosperity for all.”

The West African Digital Governance Forum was launched in 2023 as a regional platform for cooperation on digital governance, policy harmonisation, and knowledge sharing among West African states.

It is part of a wider United Nations initiative to promote policy-driven electronic governance and create regional frameworks for inclusive digital transformation.

This year’s meeting will focus on critical themes such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, data sovereignty, infrastructure development, and digital inclusion, key areas seen as essential to Africa’s long-term digital and economic resilience.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Tinubu clears 959 for national honours

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Govs budget N525bn for security as killings spread

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Slain husband’s family slams Tinubu’s pardon for Maryam Sanda

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Blackout looms as gas shortfall hits power stations

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Gombe’s 180-day justice deadline sparks debate over endless pre-trial detentions

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Group Demands Immediate Release Of Abba Kyari, Cites Presidential Pardons

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending