Connect with us

Business

Vehicle imports slide 10% on weak consumer spending

Published

on

The automobile market is facing one of its most difficult periods in recent years, as data from the National Bureau of Statistics show that passenger car importation has continued to decline sharply, reflecting a broader collapse in consumer purchasing power and business activity across the transport sector.

According to the National Bureau of Statistics’ foreign trade data, passenger motor car imports in the first six months of 2025 stood at N479.26bn, a 9.69 per cent drop from the N530.67bn recorded in the same period of 2024. The downward trend is consistent with the previous year’s figures, when the total import value fell from N1.47tn in 2023 to N1.26tn in 2024, representing a 14.29 per cent decline.

A quarterly breakdown of the data showed that in Q1 2025, the country imported passenger vehicles worth N224.58bn, while Q2 2025 recorded N254.67bn. By contrast, Q1 2024 saw imports valued at N238.73bn, and Q2 2024 stood at N291.93bn, underscoring the consistent slowdown in vehicle importation since 2023.

Dealers and analysts told The PUNCH in phone interviews that the trend is not a surprise, given the persistent foreign exchange challenges, high import duties, and the low purchasing power of Nigerians, which have combined to make car ownership increasingly unaffordable for both households and businesses.

Dealers hit hard

A vehicle sales expert, Cletus Aregbesola, said the high cost of the dollar and steep customs tariffs remain the biggest reasons for the continued fall in car imports.

“You cannot separate Nigeria from the global market. Even though the dollar has stabilised, it is still high. So by the time you bring in a car, you already know how much you will pay your OEMs, and that reflects on the final price,” Aregbesola said.

He noted that import duties have become unbearable for dealers. “Custom duty is so high for both ‘Tokunbo’ (fairly used) and new cars. You’re paying between 75 and almost 100 per cent on the car. The tariff used to be lower for Tokunbo cars, but now both categories are almost the same,” he explained.

Aregbesola noted that this has forced many potential buyers to postpone new purchases and focus instead on maintaining their existing vehicles. “People are no longer buying new cars. They prefer to maintain what they have. It doesn’t make sense to sell your car at N3m only to buy a new one at N12m,” the car expert added.

He added that the surge in fuel costs has further discouraged ownership. “Fuelling is also a major factor. With the price of petrol rising, people now ask themselves if they can sustain the cars they own. Most families are not thinking about cars now; they’re focused on feeding, rent, and school fees.”

See also  FG urged to expand grazing reserves nationwide

Worse, the decline in car importation has hit the profitability of auto businesses, leading to layoffs and restructuring. Aregbesola revealed that “many auto companies that used to sell 2,000 or 3,000 units annually are now struggling to sell 500. Corporate fleet purchases, which used to support bulk sales, are now rare. When those orders don’t come, the businesses struggle.”

He said that, to survive, dealers have begun embracing Chinese car brands, which are relatively cheaper compared to European or American vehicles.

“The market is now pro-Chinese vehicles. Just three years ago, there were very few on Nigerian roads, but today that’s what companies and even some government agencies can afford. Some go for N30m to N40m, while equivalent European models cost over N100m,” he noted.

He added that the focus on cheaper brands has helped businesses “cushion the impact” of falling demand, though profits remain thin.

Many car dealers have diversified into after-sales and maintenance services to stay afloat, given that more Nigerians are choosing to repair rather than replace their cars. “We now emphasise after-sales. That’s where most of the income comes from,” Aregbesola maintained.

Some companies have also reduced their workforce. “You can’t run away from it. You have to reshuffle staff, reduce your load, and become leaner to survive,” he said.

Meanwhile, the President of the Importers Association of Nigeria, Kingsley Chikezie, after a failed attempt to contact the car import group of his association, corroborated the challenges faced by car importers. While the IMAN president noted that he is “not involved in the importation of cars”, he confirmed that “there are a lot of issues in car importation in Nigeria.”

Chikezie said, “The income per capita in Nigeria is so small that somebody cannot save up N6m to N10m to go and buy a Corolla car.”

FX, tariffs choke demand

Economist and former President of the Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria, Prof Segun Ajibola, said the continued decline in car imports reflects the harsh realities of the economy.

“There is a decline in the value of our local currency, which has jacked up the landing costs of imported goods. Since there is a limit to the purchasing power of end users, most car users now rely more on repairs and refurbishing old cars instead of buying new ones,” he said.

Ajibola noted that the import data likely does not include the large number of Tokunbo cars that enter the country through unofficial channels. “We are all aware that there is large-scale smuggling of Tokunbo cars into Nigeria. Those who evade customs duties can sell at cheaper prices, which further distorts the market,” he explained.

See also  Elon Musk Reacts as Nigeria Makes Top 10 List of Countries Contributing to Global GDP

He observed that corporate institutions have also cut back on new vehicle purchases. “Many companies that used to buy new cars for staff or management now settle for Tokunbo vehicles. Maintenance and refurbishment businesses are booming because people are trying to stay in motion without buying new cars.”

Despite government initiatives like the Renewed Hope Automobile Credit Fund and the Nigeria Consumer Credit Corporation, stakeholders say access to affordable credit remains a major problem.

Ajibola said, “If they afford people a credit line to buy cars, can they pay back? Why will I take an N50m or N100m loan in Nigeria today just to buy a car? I would rather look for a Tokunbo that costs N10m or N20m. So affordability is still a big issue.”

He added that the nature of vehicles as “movable assets” also discourages lenders. “A car can disappear, have an accident, or lose value fast. So there’s a limit to how far banks and credit institutions can go,” he said.

He argued that Nigeria must develop its own local automobile industry to reduce reliance on imports. India has its own brands. Korea has its own mix. “Why should Nigeria, after 65 years of independence, still depend on foreign countries for cars?” the economist queried.

Local production

While the Federal Government has made moves to stimulate local production through credit schemes and assembly plant incentives, stakeholders say progress remains slow.

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, in a policy brief on Nigeria’s 2025 second-quarter Gross Domestic Product report, listed motor vehicle assembly among the “challenged and recessionary sectors”.

According to CPPE Director Muda Yusuf, “The motor vehicle assembly sector reversed Q1 gains to contract by 1.5 per cent, reflecting import pressure and weak demand. Sustained policy support, including government procurement of locally assembled vehicles, is essential for revival.”

An earlier commentary made available to The PUNCH by the Executive Director of the Motorcycle Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, Lambert Ekewuba, confirmed that local production was below the optimal level.

Ekewuba had called for the Federal Government to partner with the Original Equipment Manufacturers to accomplish a successful component deletion programme, which would pave the way for a lucrative local auto manufacturing sector.

He said, “Nigerian motorcycle manufacturers are not OEMs. That is, we don’t have the original manufacturing equipment. We are not the owners of the motorcycles. You must convince the owners to establish their technology here in Nigeria.”

Meanwhile, CPPE director Yusuf explained that only stable policies can address the challenges facing the sector, ranging from smuggling to high energy costs. “Without consistent government patronage and stable policies, these assembly plants will continue to struggle,” he warned.

See also  Nigeria emerges major crude supplier to Senegal refinery

The Federal Government, through the National Automotive Design and Development Council and CrediCorp, launched initiatives to ease vehicle ownership and stimulate local production. The PUNCH reported in 2024 that both agencies unveiled an N20bn consumer credit fund to help Nigerians purchase locally assembled vehicles.

The initiative, announced during a signing ceremony with nine local manufacturers, including Innoson, Nord, CIG GAC, PAN, Mikano, Jets, NEV, and DAG, was intended to reduce import dependency and support local assemblers.

By March 2025, CrediCorp expanded the scheme to a N100bn credit initiative aimed at making vehicle ownership more accessible. The PUNCH reported the CrediCorp Chief Executive Officer, Uzoma Nwagba, said, “Our goal is to expand access to consumer credit for Nigerians to improve their quality of life. This includes financing for vehicles, mobility, solar panels, and home improvements.”

The impact of these programmes is yet to be felt in the market. The PUNCH discovered that most Nigerians are unable to meet the repayment conditions, even if they are available. Thus, the market remains dry.

Dealers and economists agree that the decline in car imports is not only a reflection of weak demand but also a sign of deeper structural challenges in Nigeria’s economy, high inflation, rising taxes, and limited credit access.

Aregbesola said the government must rethink its import and tariff policies if it wants to revive the sector. “The tariff on vehicles needs to come down. Even local assemblers are not benefiting because the cost of setting up an assembly plant is still high,” he said.

He also urged the government to strengthen local production through consistent incentives and power supply. “If the government buys locally assembled vehicles for official use, it will create the demand that keeps factories alive.”

Ajibola, however, cautioned that no short-term measure will fix the situation without addressing purchasing power. “Until the income level of Nigerians improves, no credit scheme or tariff reduction will make car ownership easier. People simply cannot afford it,” he said.

With the average new vehicle now costing between N40m and N100m, and used cars between N10m and N25m, the dream of car ownership is fast slipping beyond the reach of most Nigerians.

As the data show, the sector’s contraction is not just a statistical trend; it represents the growing economic strain facing households and the fading shine of a once vibrant automobile trade.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Abia begins relocation of transport operators to new terminal

Published

on

The Abia State Government has commenced the enforcement of its new centralised transport system in Umuahia, with the phased relocation of transport operators to the Nnenna Otti Bus Terminal, Umuahia.

The Commissioner for Information, Okey Kanu, made this known at Government House, Umuahia, on Tuesday while briefing newsmen on the outcome of this week’s State Executive Council (EXCO) meeting presided over by Governor Alex Otti.

The commissioner disclosed that, in order to ensure compliance by transport operators, the state government took time to hold a series of meetings with transport stakeholders, during which their concerns were addressed.

Kanu added that, following the steps taken by the government, full operations had commenced at the terminal, with informal transport operators and unions already moved to the facility, despite the normal resistance that accompanies change.

“There appears to be some push backs among some of the operators and this is as a result of the fact that people are not easily giving in to change.

“What is happening is that all the parks in the state have been moved to the bus terminal.

“The Honourable Commissioner for Transport and his team have been holding a series of meetings with all the operators. They had one yesterday. And a few of their anxieties will be addressed very soon. Enforcement also will commence today to bring all the operators into the terminal.

“The first phase of operations involves the operations of the Abia Green Shuttle buses. The second phase involves informal transport operators, while the third phase will involve the formal transport operators,” Kanu stated.

See also  FG urged to expand grazing reserves nationwide

Answering questions from newsmen, the Commissioner for Transport, Dr Chimezie Ukaegbu, said the state government had not taken away anybody’s means of livelihood but had instead introduced a more organised system to sanitise the transport sector and improve it.

He revealed that transport unions and operators were told to bring four of their workers each to the terminal, where they would be properly identified with reflective tags and carried along.

He further noted that the terminal operates a transparent system that allocates loading opportunities on a first-come, first-served basis irrespective of union affiliations, insisting that about 80 to 90 per cent of operators had embraced the initiative. He added that continuous engagements were being held with those yet to fully comply with the government’s transport policy.

He equally noted that the government provided a drivers’ lodge, fully air-conditioned and furnished with seats, while passengers sit in a conducive air-conditioned environment, adding, “what else will you need as a transporter or even as a passenger? I think everything good about transportation is embedded in that Nnenna Otti Bus Terminal,” Ukaegbu stated.

Contributing, the Special Adviser to the Governor on Media and Publicity, Mr Ferdinand Ekeoma, said that the centralisation of transport operations would reduce urban congestion, indiscriminate loading bays, expenses incurred by transport operators on their loading bays, and security challenges associated with the influx of unregulated transport operators, thereby enabling transport operators to make more gains.

He added that, over the years, “we have seen transport operators extort people, by coming up with this organised system, we are solving our problems,” Ekeoma stated.

See also  FG targets 1m hectares of soybean cultivation

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Court orders Virgin Atlantic to pay N13m for missed flight

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited to pay Mrs. Joy Ezetah the sum of $5,906.50 in damages after it failed to allow her board a scheduled Lagos-London flight, an incident that disrupted her onward trip to Canada and caused her financial loss.

Justice Ibrahim Kala in the judgement delivered on Monday, held that the airline was liable for the losses suffered by the claimant after she was denied boarding at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport on 6 April 2024.

The claimant had asked the court for N100m in general damages, arguing that she bought a business-class ticket through Air Canada for a four-leg trip from Lagos to Toronto and back, but was stopped from boarding the Virgin Atlantic flight “without justification.”

She told the court that she arrived early, completed check-in, and was issued a boarding pass for the Lagos-London leg.

According to her, airline officials later prevented her from boarding, stating they could not connect her ticket to her Air Canada connecting flight from London to Toronto.

Ezetah stated that the airline owed her a duty of care and should have resolved the issue with Air Canada or made other arrangements instead of denying her boarding.

She further maintained that when she later contacted Air Canada, the airline confirmed that her ticket was valid and that she was expected on the connecting flight.

Virgin Atlantic, however, denied liability. It said it was “not the issuing carrier” and insisted that the ticket had been purchased directly from Air Canada under a codeshare arrangement.

See also  Electricity Power subsidy hits N418bn, losses exceed N300bn

The airline also argued that an error code in the reservation system prevented it from issuing a boarding pass for the connecting flight and that it acted professionally by advising the passenger to contact the ticket issuer.

It further contended that the claimant’s inability to complete online check-in before arriving at the airport showed that there was already a problem with the ticket.

After reviewing the evidence, submissions and legal authorities cited by both sides, Justice Kala held that the claimant’s case had merit.

The court awarded $5,906.50 in damages against Virgin Atlantic and ordered that the sum be paid using the prevailing exchange rate published by the Central Bank of Nigeria. Based on the highest official rate of N1,365.50 to a dollar, the award translates to about N8.07m.

Justice Kala also ordered the airline to pay 10 per cent interest per annum on the judgment sum until full liquidation of the debt.

Additionally, the court awarded N5m as costs against Virgin Atlantic, noting that the claimant had been forced to approach the court to enforce her rights.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

States kick as Senate moves to amend Electricity Act; read details

Published

on

A fresh battle over the control of Nigeria’s electricity sector is brewing, as state electricity regulators have accused the National Assembly of attempting to claw back powers already devolved to states under the Constitution and the Electricity Act 2023.

In a strongly worded memorandum submitted to the Senate Committee on Power and obtained by our correspondent on Tuesday, electricity regulatory commissions and bureaus from 16 states warned that the proposed Electricity Act (Amendment) Bill 2026 could reverse one of the most significant reforms in Nigeria’s power sector.

The regulators argued that the amendment bill, rather than strengthening the electricity market, seeks to restore extensive federal oversight over matters they insist have constitutionally become the responsibility of states.

The concerns were contained in a letter dated May 26, 2026, addressed to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Power and signed on behalf of the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions and Bureaus.

Signatories to the document included the chairmen and chief executives of electricity regulators in Abia, Anambra, Bayelsa, Edo, Ekiti, Enugu, Gombe, Imo, Kogi, Lagos, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo and Plateau states.

The regulators said they had taken advantage of the Electricity Act 2023 to begin building sub-national electricity markets and had already engaged investors based on the framework created by the law.

They noted that they had earlier met with the Senate committee and were subsequently requested to consolidate their concerns into a single memorandum for the consideration of lawmakers, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission and other stakeholders.

The letter stated, “We represent State Regulatory Commissions/Bureaus that have taken advantage of the Electricity Act 2023 to commence the development of our sub-national electricity markets and sectors.

We are grateful for the audience you granted us to raise concerns on the ongoing consideration of the proposed Amendment Bill 2026 to the Electricity Act 2023.

“As agreed during our discussion, we have collated and consolidated the comments into one document which is hereby attached for the consideration of the Senate and House Committees on Power, NERC and other stakeholders.”

The state electricity regulators said they had identified 17 contentious provisions in the proposed amendments to the Electricity Act that they believed could undermine the constitutional powers already granted to states in the electricity sector.

According to the regulators, the areas of disagreement include the authorisation of State Houses of Assembly to legislate on electricity matters, the supremacy of state laws within state electricity markets, and provisions seeking to retain federal control over all activities connected to the national grid.

Other disputed clauses relate to restrictions on states’ participation in the wholesale electricity market, matters concerning the Nigerian Wholesale Electricity Market, the authority of states over independent transmission and distribution networks, and the establishment and administration of the Power Consumers Assistance Fund.

The regulators also raised concerns over the proposed expansion of the powers of the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency, the structure and decisions of the Forum of Electricity Regulators, and the provision granting the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission final administrative appellate jurisdiction on certain issues arising within the forum.

See also  Nigeria emerges major crude supplier to Senegal refinery

They further opposed provisions designating electricity generation, transmission, distribution and supply as essential services, as well as clauses dealing with government-owned enterprises as licensees and obligations to host communities.

Additional areas of contention include the regulation of intra-state electricity matters that may have implications for the national grid, the imposition of timelines and phased conditions for states transitioning into independent electricity markets, and proposed federal oversight on consumer protection, anti-trust measures and tariff design within state electricity jurisdictions.

The regulators argued that the disputed provisions require further consultation to ensure that the decentralisation objectives of the Electricity Act are not weakened by subsequent amendments.

“A review of the Bill suggests that the general intention is to reverse the devolution of legislative, governance and regulatory powers over electricity matters that occur solely within the respective states to the state governments, in favour of a reconsolidation of powers at the federal level, with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission retaining full supervisory powers over the market. Effectively, it appears that the intention of the Bill is that Nigeria should continue with the same regime that, for 20 years, has not led to any significant increase in power availability or per capita consumption for Nigerians, despite ever-increasing (and unsustainable) federal debt.”

At the centre of the dispute is the interpretation of the constitutional amendments that allowed states to legislate on electricity matters within their territories. The regulators argued that the proposed amendment bill wrongly assumes that state legislatures derive their powers from the National Assembly rather than directly from the Constitution.

According to them, any attempt by the National Assembly to grant, restrict or redefine those powers through ordinary legislation would amount to a constitutional violation.

The memorandum stated, “Section 2 of the Bill aims to amend Section 2(2)(a)-(e) of the Principal Act. By that section, the National Assembly reserves to itself the power to delegate legislative powers to States’ Houses of Assembly, suggesting that the Bill (or the Principal Act) is the source of the powers of a state to make laws on its electricity markets.

“This provision is based on a shocking miscomprehension of Nigerian constitutional law—it proceeds from the wrong assumption that the NASS, by ordinary legislation and not constitutional amendment, can confer (or restrict) the legislative power of states.

“The constitutional division of powers is fundamental to federalism, ensuring a balance between national unity and state autonomy. There is no legal framework for the NASS to ‘empower’ state governments to make law by ordinary legislation, as the language of the Bill attempts to do.

“The constitutional division of powers is fundamental to federalism, ensuring a balance between national unity and state autonomy. There is no legal framework for the NASS to ‘empower’ state governments to make law by ordinary legislation, as the language of the Bill attempts to do. Consequently, Section 2 of the Bill, seeking to amend Section 2 of the Act, is not consistent with the Constitution.”

See also  Crude supply to domestic refineries hit 67.6m barrels – FG

The regulators described as “a shocking miscomprehension of Nigerian constitutional law” the provisions of the bill that appear to suggest that the National Assembly is the source of states’ authority over electricity matters.

They warned that the proposed law could undermine the principle of federalism by weakening state autonomy. Beyond constitutional concerns, the regulators said the bill could create uncertainty in the electricity market and discourage investors who had already committed resources based on the existing legal framework.

“The clear intention behind the new drafting is to reconsolidate in the Federal Government matters solely within the state electricity markets which had been devolved to the states,” the memorandum stated.

“This will defeat the key objectives of the Electricity Act and the various states’ electricity laws, even before the regime introduced by them has taken any root. It will introduce avoidable disruption in the industry as significant investment decisions have already been taken based on the Electricity Act 2023, and these investments are now put at risk by this proposed amendment.”

The state regulators specifically faulted provisions relating to federal oversight of activities connected to the national grid, restrictions on state authority over wholesale electricity transactions, the proposed expansion of NERC’s powers and changes affecting mini-grids and independent distribution systems.

They argued that allowing NERC to retain overriding authority over electricity activities merely because they have some connection to the national grid would effectively render state powers meaningless.

The memorandum stated, “What is required, in order to attain the full benefits of the decentralisation of the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry that is the theme of the Fifth Alteration and provided for in the Principal Act, is proper coordination on transmission matters between NERC and state regulators, and not top-down federal legislation.”

The regulators also rejected provisions that would permit NERC to exercise final administrative appellate jurisdiction over disputes involving state electricity regulators. According to them, NERC and the SERCs are on equal standing within their respective constitutional spheres of authority.

“NERC and the SERCs are on equal standing within their respective constitutional spheres of authority,” the memorandum said. “The National Assembly cannot arrogate to NERC quasi-judicial authority over SERCs, especially where the dispute might be on a matter over which NERC has no authority.”

They further argued that the Constitution already vests judicial powers in the courts and that such responsibilities cannot be transferred to a regulatory agency. The proposed establishment of a Forum of Electricity Regulators also drew criticism.

Although the regulators acknowledged the importance of coordination among electricity regulators, they argued that participation in such arrangements should be voluntary rather than imposed through federal legislation.

See also  FG scraps revenue collection deductions, pledges fiscal transparency

“The better approach would be a Memorandum of Understanding or similar instrument jointly negotiated by all relevant regulatory bodies in which the principles of coordination and harmonisation will be agreed,” they said.

The state regulators equally opposed provisions declaring generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity as essential services covering both federal and state electricity markets.

According to them, such provisions could inadvertently expand NERC’s jurisdiction into areas already devolved to states, including tariff regulation. “The provision is invidious, regressive and should be expunged,” the memorandum stated.

The regulators also faulted proposals empowering NERC to determine contributions to the Power Consumers Assistance Fund from electricity consumers. They argued that since electricity tariffs and retail supply have become matters for state regulation, decisions relating to subsidies and customer contributions should similarly reside with state authorities.

Other contentious areas identified by the regulators included host community obligations, the role of the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency, licensing arrangements involving government-owned electricity enterprises and timelines for states transitioning into independent electricity markets.

The dispute highlights the growing tension between the Federal Government and states over the future structure of Nigeria’s electricity industry. The Electricity Act 2023 was enacted following the Fifth Alteration to the 1999 Constitution, which removed electricity from the Exclusive Legislative List and empowered states to generate, transmit and distribute electricity within their territories.

Since then, several states have enacted electricity laws and established regulatory agencies to oversee emerging sub-national electricity markets. Lagos, Enugu, Ekiti, Ondo, Edo and other states have already commenced varying stages of implementation of their electricity reform programmes.

Energy experts have repeatedly described the decentralisation of the sector as a major opportunity to attract investment, improve efficiency and expand access to electricity. However, the latest amendment proposals appear to have reopened the debate over how regulatory powers should be shared between Abuja and the states.

As the National Assembly continues deliberations on the amendment bill, the position adopted by lawmakers could shape the future direction of Nigeria’s electricity reforms and determine whether the country deepens its experiment with decentralisation or returns to a more centralised regulatory model.

The Electricity Act 2023 was designed to operationalise the constitutional amendments that empowered states to participate directly in electricity generation, transmission and distribution within their boundaries. Since its enactment, several states have passed their own electricity laws and established regulatory commissions.

The proposed Electricity Act (Amendment) Bill 2026 seeks to amend several provisions of the principal legislation. However, state regulators contend that some of the proposed changes amount to an attempt to reverse the gains of decentralisation and restore broad federal control over the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending