Connect with us

Business

NNPCL spends N17.5tn securing fuel pipelines, others in 12 months

Published

on

The Federation has racked up a staggering N17.5tn as debt owed to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited for pipeline protection and energy security operations the oil giant undertook on behalf of the nation in the financial year ended 2024.

This came as analysts demanded a forensic audit of the N17.5tn spending, and expressed concern over the pipeline protection and energy-security costs, citing persistent leakages, low crude production, and systemic opacity in the national oil company.

Findings showed that out of the total amount, N7.13tn was spent as energy-security costs to keep petrol prices stable whenever the gap between the exchange rate and the ex-coastal price of refined petrol widened. This is according to NNPC’s 2024 consolidated financial statements, analysed by our correspondent on Thursday.

The costs also showed that a significant portion of the expenditure went into safeguarding Nigeria’s critical oil and gas infrastructure. This included pipeline surveillance, repairs, prevention of crude oil theft, and security operations aimed at ensuring an uninterrupted energy supply across the country.

Recall that on Monday, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited declared a profit after tax of N5.4tn for the financial year ended 2024, marking one of its strongest performances since its transition into a limited liability company. The Group Chief Executive Officer of NNPCL, Bayo Ojulari, announced the financial results during a press briefing in Abuja.

The latest figures represent a sharp improvement from the 2023 financial year, when the company posted a Profit After Tax of N3.297tn. The 2024 profit reflects a 64 per cent year-on-year increase, signalling the impact of higher production volumes, cost-cutting measures, and enhanced operational efficiency across its assets.

In the document, NNPC disclosed that N8.67tn of the total amount was spent directly as under-recovery on refined petroleum products, highlighting the immense financial burden of maintaining operations under regulated fuel prices.

Under Section 64(m) of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021, any cost incurred by NNPC Limited (Group) as the “supplier of last resort” for energy-security purposes is to be borne by the Federation. In line with this provision, the Federal Government directed that NNPC Ltd must not sell Premium Motor Spirit above a fixed, regulated price. However, the actual import cost of PMS is often significantly higher than this regulated pump price.

This gap between the true landing cost of PMS and the approved selling price gives rise to under-recovery. The under-recovery amount is applied to reduce the Group’s cost of sales, while the corresponding balance is either netted off against liabilities owed to the Federation or recorded as a receivable from the Federation.

See also  Naira slips to 1,456.72 per dollar

The report read, “In line with Section 64/M) of the Petroleum Industry Act 2021, the cost incurred by NNPC Limited (Group) as the energy supplier of last resort for energy security reasons, and all associated costs shall be on the account of the Federation. The government instructed that NNPC Limited cannot sell its Premium Motor Spirit above a certain regulated price.

“However, the cost of importing this PMS is usually much higher than the regulated price. The under recovery is essentially the difference between the actual landing cost of the product and the regulated price. This balance is used to reduce the cost of sales of the Group. The corresponding entry is either used to reduce the liability due to the Federation or used as a receivable from the Federation.”

A breakdown showed that the year opened with an under-recovery balance of N6.25tn, up from N2.06tn in 2023. After deducting an exchange-rate difference of N40.95bn, the opening balance stood at N6.21tn.

It added that energy-security costs rose sharply to N7.13tn in 2024, compared to N4.843tn in 2023. As of December 31, the total amount owed under energy-security expenses had climbed to N8.67tn, up from N6.25tn the previous year, representing an increase of N2.42tn, or roughly 38.7 per cent.

Another N8.84tn was recorded under “Other Receivables from Federation,” covering advances to the Federal Government and additional security costs incurred in protecting oil and gas assets.

These payments were made under an approval framework between the government and NNPC, allowing the company to shoulder costs upfront and recover them later from the Federation.

“Other receivables from federation relate to advance payment to federation and the security costs incurred in protecting the oil and have assets. This is under the framework of approval between the group and the government of Nigeria to incur security costs and charge the same to the federation,” the report read.

The disclosure underscores growing pressure on NNPC’s balance sheet, as the company continues to operate with the expectation of reimbursement from the government.

It also raises a question about President Bola Tinubu’s May 29, 2023 announcement that “fuel subsidy is gone,” a statement that was expected to mark a decisive end to decades of costly subsidy spending but which now appears at odds with emerging figures showing continued government support for petrol pricing.

The 2024 debt nearly doubled the N9.36tn recorded in 2023, reflecting mounting strain on NNPC’s cash flow and the increasing financial challenge of maintaining national energy security while meeting the government’s fuel price regulations.

See also  Confiscated undeclared cash at airports hits $2.2m – Report

However, the document offered no indication of whether the Federal Government has refunded any part of the amount or outlined a plan to offset the mounting bill, leaving the repayment timeline unclear. The figures underscore the mounting financial pressure on Nigeria’s national oil company amid an environment of regulated fuel prices, exchange-rate volatility, and rising operational costs.

As Nigeria grapples with energy infrastructure security and under-recovery of fuel costs, stakeholders insist that a transparent and timely reimbursement framework is critical to avoid passing the financial burden onto NNPC, and ultimately, the Nigerian public.

Meanwhile, the NNPC report shows that throughput charges rose to N145.7bn in 2024, representing commissions paid to private depot owners for handling petroleum products at terminals. It added that marketing and distribution expenses cover the cost of transporting petroleum products to water-fed depots within and outside the country.

Commenting on the report, Proshare, a leading Nigerian financial information and investment research platform, described the 2024 financial results as “strong and commercially encouraging,” highlighting significant revenue growth across multiple segments.

In its commentary on the financial statements, Proshare noted, “NNPC delivered robust top-line and operating performance in FY 2024, with total revenue rising by 87.89 per cent, from N23.99tn in FY 2023 to N45.08tn in 2024.

This growth was broad-based but primarily driven by crude oil sales, which more than doubled to N29.21tn, reflecting higher national production, stabilised export volumes, and more efficient trading operations.”

The analyst platform also pointed to substantial gains from other revenue streams. “Revenue from petroleum products increased by 35.39 per cent, while natural gas and power surged 125.66 per cent, and services climbed 110.88 per cent,” Proshare said. “Power revenues alone jumped from N94m in FY 2023 to N9.42bn in FY 2024, demonstrating deeper involvement in the gas-to-power value chain.”

On profitability, Proshare observed that NNPC’s net income rose by 64.20 per cent, with EBITDA nearly doubling, improved operational efficiency, and commercial discipline. However, it cautioned, “The quality of earnings warrants careful oversight given the substantial rise in finance costs and the narrowing of gross profit margins. The growing leverage ratio underscores the importance of prudent cash-flow and liability management, particularly in light of an increasing debt-to-equity ratio and expanding inventories and receivables.”

Looking ahead, Proshare highlighted both opportunities and challenges for the national oil company. “NNPC sits at a pivotal point in its transformation under the Petroleum Industry Act. Higher national output, evolving into a more commercially-driven entity, and the emergence of new domestic refining capacity offer significant upside potential. However, sustaining this growth will require disciplined execution, tighter working-capital management, and careful navigation of the increasingly complex Nigerian and global energy markets,” the platform added.

See also  NNPC eyes $60bn investment, targets 600tcf in new master plan

Experts react

Commenting, energy economists and analysts raised concerns over the disclosure by NNPC that it spent N17.5tn on pipeline protection, security, and other energy-security related costs in 2024, describing the expenditure as “outrageous”, demanding a full-scale forensic audit.

The Chief Executive Officer of Petroleumprice.ng, Jeremiah Olatide, said the figures contained in the company’s 2024 financials reinforced long-standing fears of deep-rooted leakages and opacity in the national oil company.

According to him, the scale of expenditure is indefensible given the country’s daily production realities. “N17.5tn spent on pipeline security and energy-security costs in a single year is outrageous and should be probed,” Olatide said. “This reaffirms the leakages in NNPCL because one of the main causes of oil theft is internal corruption and conspiracy with oil thieves.”

He argued that despite claims of improved crude output, Nigeria’s production still averages around 1.4–1.5 million barrels per day, far below its potential of 2.5–3 million barrels per day.

“How do you justify such a humongous expense when production remains depressed?” he queried. “Declaring N17.5tn for pipeline protection and subsidy-linked costs is unacceptable. A thorough, transparent, and independent audit must be carried out.”

Olatide noted that persistent losses from theft, vandalism, and operational sabotage point to systemic collusion, insisting that the financial disclosures should trigger scrutiny by regulators and the National Assembly.

In a separate reaction, public finance analyst and co-founder of Dairy Hills, Kelvin Emmanuel, said the NNPCL’s disclosures validate long-standing allegations that crude oil is routinely allocated to armed groups under the guise of pipeline surveillance contracts.

Writing on X on Wednesday, Emmanuel said he had repeatedly warned that the government was effectively compensating militants with crude barrels, rather than cash contracts, to keep pipelines secure.

“For months I have been saying that the government is giving crude oil daily to militants for pipeline protection,” he wrote. “Now that NNPC’s financial statement shows that N7.1tn was disbursed in 2024 from supposed subsidy savings for pipeline security contracts, I am sure the 78,000 to 110,000 barrels per day is now confirmed.”

He said the figures underscore the urgent need for open contracting, third-party verification of security-related payments, and an overhaul of the opaque pipeline protection architecture that has remained unchanged for more than a decade.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

WHY DO WE VALUE FOREIGN PRODUCTS MORE THAN OUR OWN? THE MINDSET HOLDING AFRICA BACK

Published

on

Africa is rich in natural resources, creativity, culture, and entrepreneurial talent. Yet one uncomfortable question continues to deserve our attention: **Why do we sometimes trust products made abroad more than products made by our own people?**

Consider this scenario: a Nigerian entrepreneur produces shoes, clothing, cosmetics, food, or household products locally. Some consumers immediately question the quality. But when a similar product carries a foreign label, those same consumers may suddenly see it as more fashionable, prestigious, or desirable.

Is the foreign product necessarily better, or have we developed a mindset that automatically associates foreign with quality and local with inferiority?

## The Psychology of Foreign Products

In many African markets, foreign brands are associated with prestige, social status, and international recognition. For some consumers, owning imported products is not merely about functionality; it is also about how those products make them appear in the eyes of others.

This creates a difficult environment for local entrepreneurs. They must compete not only on price and quality but sometimes also against perceptions that are deeply rooted in consumer behaviour.

However, it would be unfair to claim that all foreign products are better or that all locally made products meet acceptable standards. Consumers have legitimate reasons to demand durability, safety, reliability, attractive packaging, and value for money.

The real challenge is to ensure that local manufacturers can compete on a fair playing field.

## How This Mindset Can Affect African Economies

When locally produced goods struggle to attract consumers, businesses may find it harder to expand, invest in modern equipment, hire workers, and develop new products.

See also  Agency presents new regulatory laws to boost electricity

Strong local industries can create employment, develop technical skills, support farmers and suppliers, and keep more economic activity within a country. Countries that successfully build globally competitive industries generally combine investment, innovation, infrastructure, quality control, and consumer confidence.

Africa cannot build a stronger manufacturing base through slogans alone. It requires practical action from governments, businesses, financial institutions, and consumers.

## Local Manufacturers Must Also Take Responsibility

Supporting African businesses should not mean accepting poor-quality products simply because they are locally made.

Manufacturers must take responsibility for improving their standards, customer service, packaging, product safety, and innovation. Governments must tackle barriers such as unreliable electricity, expensive financing, inadequate infrastructure, and unfair competition.

Consumers, meanwhile, should judge products by their actual quality and value rather than automatically dismissing them because of their country of origin.

**Patriotism should encourage excellence, not protect mediocrity.**

## Can Africa Change This Mindset?

The answer begins with education, investment, accountability, and a willingness to give good local products a fair chance.

African entrepreneurs need opportunities to prove themselves. Consumers need reliable products they can trust. Governments need policies that make local production more competitive.

The goal should not be to reject everything foreign. International trade brings technology, ideas, competition, and useful products. The goal should be to build African industries strong enough to compete with the best in the world.

## The Big Question for Our Readers

Why do some consumers proudly display foreign brands but hesitate to support products made in their own countries?

Is it a genuine concern about quality, a desire for social status, a lack of trust in local manufacturers, or a combination of these factors?

See also  Aig-Imoukhuede: Building Africa’s public sector brain trust

**Newsbreak365 wants to hear your opinion.**

Would you choose a quality Nigerian-made product over an imported alternative if both offered similar quality and value for money?

Join the discussion in the comments. Your perspective matters.

*Newsbreak365 — Real News. Real People. Real Issues.*

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

AFRICA, WAKE UP! WHY SHOULD A CONTINENT WITH SO MUCH LAND STILL STRUGGLE TO FEED ITS PEOPLE?

Published

on

Africa, we must confront an uncomfortable question: **How can a continent with enormous agricultural potential continue to depend on food imports while millions of its people search for jobs and farmers struggle to make a living?**

We cannot talk about economic independence while neglecting the very industry that puts food on our tables.

From Nigeria to Ghana, Kenya to Uganda, agriculture has the potential to create jobs, build businesses, empower young people, and strengthen local economies. Yet this potential cannot be fully realised without investment, modern technology, reliable infrastructure, and policies that support farmers.

FARMING IS NOT A SIGN OF FAILURE. DEPENDING TOO HEAVILY ON OTHERS FOR ESSENTIAL FOOD CAN BECOME A NATIONAL RISK.

Imagine what Africa could achieve if more young people entered commercial farming, local industries processed more homegrown produce, and farmers had access to affordable financing, irrigation, modern equipment, and profitable markets.

The answer is not simply to tell Africans to return to the farms. Governments must make agriculture productive and profitable. Investors must support food production. Communities must respect farmers, and young people must be given the tools to build successful agricultural businesses.

A STRONGER AFRICA BEGINS WITH THE ABILITY TO FEED ITS PEOPLE.

The continent has opportunities worth developing. The real challenge is turning agricultural potential into practical results.

LET’S TALK!

If African countries invested seriously in agriculture, would it create more jobs, reduce dependence on imported food, and help make food more affordable?

Drop your opinion in the comments. Is Africa neglecting one of its greatest economic opportunities, or are deeper problems holding agriculture back?

See also  Confiscated undeclared cash at airports hits $2.2m – Report

Share this post and follow **Newsbreak365** for more thought-provoking discussions about Africa’s future.

#Newsbreak365 #Africa #Agriculture #FoodSecurity #AfricanDevelopment #SupportFarmers #EconomicDevelopment

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Nigerian, Indonesian firms sign $10m business deals

Published

on

Nigerian and Indonesian companies have signed business agreements worth a combined $10m to strengthen trade and economic cooperation between the two countries.

The Indonesian Ambassador to Nigeria, Bambang Suharto, disclosed this on Thursday during a memorandum of understanding signing ceremony involving Nigerian investors and their Indonesian counterparts at the 2026 Trade Expo Indonesia.

The agreements were among a broader collection of business commitments at the expo, where 55 memoranda of understanding involving Indonesian companies and international business partners were signed.

The participating countries included Nigeria, Australia, Canada, Chile, Germany, Hungary, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates and Vietnam.

The event had present ambassadors, diplomatic representatives, international buyers and business partners.

The occasion was highly praised as one of the significant moments of the 2026 Trade Expo Indonesia which kickstarted and was declared opened on Wednesday.

Suharto speaking to Journalists described the agreements involving Nigerian and Indonesian companies as a historic development, expressing optimism that the partnerships would expand bilateral business relations and deliver economic benefits to both countries.

“Today we are witnessing a very historical moment for this year. We have two companies who are having signing ceremony, the MOU, a business contract with their counterpart in Indonesia. So, the amount reached in total 10 million USD or 5 million USD each,” the ambassador said.

He explained that the agreements covered the dental equipment and pharmaceutical sectors, describing them as important areas with significant implications for public welfare.

The ambassador urged Indonesian businesses to look beyond commercial trading and explore investment opportunities in Nigeria, noting that some Indonesian companies already operating in the country had demonstrated the benefits of long-term business engagement.

See also  Labour rejects N100,000 minimum wage proposal; see the amount NLC proposed

“I mentioned that there are now some Indonesian companies operating in Nigeria. So, they are a good example. For so many years, they have been doing business in Nigeria, creating job opportunities for the locals and also absorb the local resources that can be produced in their factory and bring, of course, for the benefit of Nigeria as well,” he said.

Suharto encouraged Nigerian companies to invest in Indonesia, highlighting the countries’ large populations, available human resources and investment potential.

“We have 280 million people and Nigeria has 230 million people. In both countries, we have a demographic bonus. So, we have also attractive manpower, which is good for investment,” he said.

He added that Indonesia remained open to Nigerian businesses seeking opportunities in its market.

One of the Nigerian investors who signed an agreement, Ralph-Michael Simon-Michael of Irad Investment Limited, said his company had partnered with Indonesian firm PT Winn Appliance to introduce domestic gas appliances into the Nigerian market.

Simon-Michael, whose company is headquartered in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, said the partnership was aimed at making the products accessible to ordinary Nigerians through established distribution channels.

“So, we’re based in Port Harcourt, our headquarters. So, we’re an oil and gas servicing company. We’ve come to Indonesia to partner with a company called Win Appliances. So, we’re going to be bringing gas, domestic appliances into Nigeria,” he said.

He explained that the products would be targeted at everyday consumers and distributed nationwide through established retail outlets and cash-and-carry distributors.

“The appliances that we’re bringing are for domestic use, for the everyday consumer. So, the everyday man can essentially afford these appliances that we’re bringing in,” he said.

See also  Drivers, cooks, traders can own refinery shares, says Dangote

Simon-Michael named Shoprite, Next cash-and-carry distributors among other outlets, through which he said the products would be distributed across Nigeria.

He said the company’s long-term plan was to establish a factory in Indonesia, and expand its operations into other African countries.

The investment agreements also formed part of broader efforts to deepen trade relations between Nigeria and Indonesia, according to Sheye Oyetade, Executive Director of Invest Nigeria, who said the Nigerian delegation was working to translate existing cooperation agreements into practical business opportunities.

Oyetade said the delegation’s participation was linked to the memorandum of understanding between Invest Nigeria and the Developing Eight (D-8) countries, a grouping of countries that includes Nigeria and Indonesia.

“We actually came to service our Memorandum of Understanding with D8 to make sure that trade is actually seamless between Nigeria and Indonesia,” he said.

He added that economic reforms in Nigeria had created opportunities for cross-border trade and investment, while the country’s growing population offered businesses access to a large consumer market.

“The signing of the MOU is key, simply because, whether you like it or not, Africa is becoming the major darling of the world in terms of the market,” Oyetade said.

He projected that Nigeria’s population would rise to about 400 million by 2050, arguing that the expansion would increase its importance as a destination for investment and consumer goods.

“So, where the people are, there the market is. So, that’s exactly what we are doing here today,” he said.

The agreements are expected to strengthen commercial links between businesses in both countries, with participants expressing hope that the partnerships would encourage further investment, job creation and the exchange of products and expertise.

See also  Confiscated undeclared cash at airports hits $2.2m – Report

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending