Connect with us

News

Health workers’ strike grounds hospitals

Published

on

The ongoing strike by the Joint Health Sector Unions has entered the third month, crippling activities in government-owned hospitals across Nigeria, leaving patients stranded and forcing many to seek essential services outside public health facilities.

Now in its third month, the industrial action has grounded critical services, particularly in hospital pharmacies, laboratories, and other support departments, significantly disrupting healthcare delivery.

While the industrial action has severely disrupted federal health institutions, health workers in state-owned hospitals in Ekiti and Benue states have largely remained on duty, mitigating the impact on patients.

At the same time, resident doctors, nurses, and midwives in some state facilities, such as the Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi, have embarked on separate industrial actions, citing unpaid salaries, pension issues, and dilapidated infrastructure.

At the Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido Ekiti, medical doctors and nurses were seen at their posts; however, other health workers stayed away.

The Chairman of the Nigeria Union of Allied Health Professionals, Ekiti State Council, and the immediate past FETHI JOHESU Chairman, Ayodeji Ogunrinu, stated that the over two and a half months’ strike by the health workers was unfortunate.

Ogunrinu said, “It has deprived many, not just members of the communities, but also members of staff who ordinarily would have received medical services to save their lives. That is why I said it is very unfortunate.”

The JOHESU leader emphasised that the services of all workers in any health facility were important, adding that, “Even the cleaner, even a health assistant, they are all very important. I’m in Physiotherapy, so I know the roles they play.”

He lamented that FETHI now looked like a ghost town, without water, electricity, drugs, laboratories and other essential services, adding that it would be difficult for any person or medical officer to admit a patient.

Ogunrinu advised the Federal Government to implement the content of the 2018 circular from the Federal Ministry of Labour, which concerns the adjustment of the Consolidated Health Salary Scale for JOHESU members, the basis of the ongoing strike that began in late 2025.

Speaking on the strike, the JOHESU Acting Chairman at Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado Ekiti, Adewale Adeosun, said members at the facility were not on strike as a mark of honour for the Ekiti State Governor, Biodun Oyebanji.

Adeosun, addressing the impact of the JOHESU strike at federal health facilities on the state-owned tertiary health institution, said, “If you come to EKSUTH now, it is just like a market. Patients’ turnout has increased. All the other patients who were meant to go to the federal hospitals are now coming to EKSUTH.”

The EKSUTH JOHESU chairman said the Oyebanji administration in the state had done a lot for EKSUTH, and it would be unfair to join the strike.

The JOHESU State Chairman, Oluwafemi Ajoloko, expressed hope that the Federal Government would accede to members’ request for an upward adjustment of CONHESS within the next one or two weeks.

See also  Tinubu Asks Senate to Confirm New Service Chiefs

Ajoloko, who said that while health workers in federal institutions were on strike, those at state-owned hospitals and primary health centres had remained at work, noted that the industrial action had increased the workload of personnel at the state-owned facilities.

At the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife, The PUNCH observed obvious scaling down in activities, as some doctors, who preferred to remain anonymous as they were not authorised to comment on the matter, said no serious service was rendered since the commencement of the strike.

The doctors also revealed that the strike was having negative effects on the training of medical personnel, saying the patients slated for surgeries since early November 2025 had not been attended to.

Speaking on the effects of the industrial action on the hospital, the JOHESU chairman of the OAUTHC chapter, Abdullateef Adeyeni, said the facility had so far lost up to N1.5bn in internally generated revenue.

Adeyeni, speaking with one of our correspondents, also accused the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Prof Ai Pate, of being nonchalant regarding the demands of the union.

Apart from the loss of revenue, the labour leader said activities across the facility had been paralysed.

“Our Chief Medical Director was saying the hospital has lost a lot. He said the hospital has been losing a minimum of N500m per month. So, as a result of this strike, OAUTH has lost up to N1.5bn in three months.

“The most annoying part of it is that patients are suffering. The Federal Government has turned a deaf ear,” he said.

In Ondo State, The PUNCH observed that public hospitals experienced low patronage due to the ongoing strike.

A visit to the University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital, Akure, the state capital, revealed that the facility, which used to be a beehive of patients and their relatives, had significantly fewer patients following the strike.

Only doctors and consultants were seen working, while the offices of JOHESU staff, as well as the laboratory, pharmacy, and registry, were locked.

It was also gathered that many patients had switched to private hospitals for treatment after failing to receive satisfactory services at the government facility.

A patient, Mrs Remilekun Ayebo, said she had been patronising a private hospital for treatment and only visited the government hospital to consult her doctor.

Meanwhile, Dr Olufunmilayo Dada of the National Association of Resident Doctors at the Federal Medical Centre, Owo, said the strike had not significantly affected the services being rendered by the doctors at the hospital.

“The strike is indeed ongoing, but we are not being affected in our services. We are doing what we are supposed to do,” Dada stated.

See also  Alleged killing of Christians: Onanuga warns Senator Cruz as US lawmakers move to sanction Nigerian politicians

The chairman of the state chapter of the Nigerian Medical Association, Dr Olumuyiwa Alonge, confirmed that the industrial action by health workers affected the smooth operation of doctors’ services.

“Every health worker has a role at every stage of medical work. For instance, now, the laboratory workers are not working, which means one has to take blood samples elsewhere for examination. The same applies to pharmacists. Everybody’s role is important in the hospital.

“Though we are working, it is not as smooth as it used to be when everyone was at work,” Alonge added.

A visit to the University of Benin Teaching Hospital on Saturday showed that services were nearly paralysed.

The hospital was observed operating at minimum capacity, with pharmacies and laboratories closed.

A staff member, who requested anonymity, said, “Nothing is working.”

An officer of the Medical and Health Workers Union of Nigeria, UBTH chapel, Abdulazeez, expressed displeasure over the slow pace of government response.

He said the strike aimed to highlight the plight of JOHESU members, not to punish patients.

“As of today, we have not seen any sign that the strike will end. The President set up a committee headed by Governor Hope Uzodimma of Imo State to look into the matter. They were supposed to meet with the Nigeria Labour Congress and report back to the President.

“Last week, the President was in Turkey, and there has been no meeting between the NLC and the government. The NLC and the TUC got involved in December. Both bodies are also part of the negotiations.

“There were also different committees set up at different levels, but the one set up by the Federal Government supersedes everyone. Unfortunately, no meeting has taken place recently.

“The strike has affected hospital operations and patients, but it is not our intention to make them suffer. We have been addressing this issue for 12 years,” he said.

At Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, a visit on Friday showed the fee-paying pharmacy was shut, and the laboratory section was largely non-operational, with many patients seen purchasing drugs from private pharmacies due to the disruption.

A hospital staff member, speaking on condition of anonymity, explained that services had been drastically reduced since the strike began.

“Before the strike, the pharmacy operated 24 hours daily, including weekends. But now, they only open in the morning and close by 4 pm, and they don’t come at all on weekends,” the staff member said.

A relative of a patient lamented that the strike prevented him from donating blood for his cousin.

“I wanted to donate blood for my cousin who was admitted here, but when I got to the laboratory, there were no staff members to bleed me or screen the blood. I had no choice but to go outside to buy blood,” he said.

See also  FG spends N75bn on arms amid worsening insecurity

Similar disruptions were observed at Alimosho General Hospital, where the pharmacy rendered only skeletal services.

The chairman of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital Association of Resident Doctors, Dr Gbolahan Adenuga, said much of the workload was now handled by local staff and interns in the absence of JOHESU members.

“Due to the strike, the workload is now being handled by local staff and interns.

“Of course, there are glitches and delays because of the strike. What 10 people were supposed to do, two people are now doing,” Adenuga added.

However, the JOHESU Benue State chapter chairman, Benjamin Ioryem, said the union was not on strike in the state.

Speaking to our correspondent over the weekend, Ioryem said while there were nine challenges in the state, eight were internal, and the remaining one, concerning the state government, was already receiving attention.

“In Benue State, we are not on strike because some of our challenges are with hospital management. Out of the nine issues, eight are internal, such as salary shortfalls, claims, and promotions, which management has resolved to address.

“The only serious issue with the government is 18 months of salary arrears for medical doctors and nurses, which is before the governor. We have reached an agreement with management and government, so in Benue, we are not on strike.”

However, health care in the state has been partially grounded due to ongoing strikes by nurses, midwives, and resident doctors at the State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi.

The state chairman of the National Association of Nurses and Midwives, Mr Tahav Kershio, said members had been on strike for close to 10 weeks over issues such as removal from the contributory pension scheme, manpower shortages, delayed promotions, dilapidated structures, denial of leave grants, and salary arrears.

Similarly, the Association of Resident Doctors at the State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi, had been on strike since November 1, 2025, due to unpaid salary arrears, pension deductions without remittance, and poor infrastructure, according to the chairman, Dr Pededoo Kawen.

When contacted, the Commissioner for Health, Dr Paul Ogwuche, said the government was already attending to some of the issues raised by the unions.

“As I speak now, I can tell you authoritatively that the affected unions will suspend the strike at any moment.

“We have been engaging them, and the major issue, which is the 18 months of increments owed by the government, has been addressed.

“We are about to sign an agreement so that they can return to work and provide maximum health care delivery,” he said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  UK contractor details luxury property, unpaid bills during Diezani trial

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  FG spends N75bn on arms amid worsening insecurity

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  LASU professor reveals how to stabilize governance in Nigeria

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Alleged killing of Christians: Onanuga warns Senator Cruz as US lawmakers move to sanction Nigerian politicians

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Tinubu Asks Senate to Confirm New Service Chiefs

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  FG spends N75bn on arms amid worsening insecurity

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending