Connect with us

News

Wike ends LG tours, Assembly alleges plot to stall Fubara’s impeachment in Rivers

Published

on

Lawmakers of the Rivers State House of Assembly have alleged that they uncovered a plot by certain individuals linked to the executive arm of the state government to obtain a court order preventing the legislature from performing its functions.

This comes as the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, ended his tour of the 23 local government areas of the state.

A statement issued in Port Harcourt on Sunday by the Chairman of the House Committee on Information, Petitions and Complaints, Dr Enemi George, said the alleged plot involved securing an ex parte order from a Rivers State High Court operating outside Port Harcourt, the state capital.

Last Thursday, the lawmakers, led by the Speaker, Martins Amaewhule, formally commenced impeachment proceedings against the state governor, Siminalayi Fubara, and his deputy, Prof. Ngozi Odu.

The Majority Leader, Major Jack, presented a notice signed by 26 lawmakers, outlining multiple allegations of gross misconduct against the governor.

The allegations include extra-budgetary spending of over N800bn without legislative approval, withholding funds allocated to the Assembly Service Commission, demolition of the Assembly complex, and defiance of Supreme Court rulings on legislative autonomy.

A separate notice was also read against the deputy governor for allegedly conniving in unconstitutional expenditures.

Amaewhule announced that the notices would be served on the governor and his deputy within seven days, in line with the Constitution.

The development marks a renewed escalation of the protracted political crisis in Rivers State, stemming from the fallout between Governor Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, now the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.

Previous impeachment attempts in 2023 and 2025 were halted by presidential interventions, before a state of emergency was declared by President Bola Tinubu last March.

However, the House said in Sunday’s statement to journalists that the alleged attempt to halt the impeachment proceedings was dead on arrival, as it amounted to an effort to subvert the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

The lawmakers described the alleged plot as illegal, saying it violated Sections 272(3) and 188(10) of the Constitution, as well as existing judicial decisions of the Court of Appeal.

George said that instead of running from pillar to post, the office holders served with notices of allegations of gross misconduct should respond accordingly.

He said, “The Rivers State House of Assembly has received information of plots by certain persons to utilise some Rivers State High Courts, especially those outside the Port Harcourt Judicial Division, to issue ex parte orders to illegally stop the Rivers State House of Assembly from performing its constitutional duties.

“These persons are fully aware of the provisions of Section 272(3) of the Constitution, which states that, ‘subject to the provisions of Section 251 and other provisions of the Constitution, the Federal High Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine the question as to whether the term of office of a member of the House of Assembly of a state, governor or deputy governor has ceased or become vacant.’

See also  Trump’s threat: We’re monitoring situation in Nigeria – Russia

“Also, Section 188(10) states that ‘no proceedings or determination of the panel or of the House of Assembly or any matter relating to such proceedings or determination shall be entertained or questioned in any court.’

“These persons are also fully aware of judicial pronouncements on this matter, especially recent decisions of the Court of Appeal involving similar ex parte orders by Rivers State High Courts contrary to Section 272(3) of the Constitution. A word is enough for the wise.”

The Assembly called on those behind the alleged move to exercise restraint and refrain from actions inimical to the Constitution.

The lawmakers added, “Therefore, with the leave of the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, I call on those concerned to exercise restraint and refrain from acts inimical to the Constitution and the rule of law.

“All that is required is for the office holders who have already been duly served with the notices of allegations of gross misconduct to respond to them item by item, rather than deploy subterranean moves to subvert the law or use proxies to malign members and the Rivers State House of Assembly in the media.

“We remain committed to the Constitution and the rule of law, and may God bless our dear Rivers State and Nigeria.”

Meanwhile, Governor Fubara has returned to Port Harcourt after a recent trip abroad.

Unconfirmed reports claimed that the governor travelled to France to meet with the President over the impeachment move, though the reports were not confirmed by official state sources.

On Sunday, the governor attended a church service to mark the 2026 Armed Forces Remembrance Day at St Cyprian’s Anglican Church, Port Harcourt.

Also in attendance were his deputy, Prof. Ngozi Odu, and other senior government officials.

The service marked the first public appearance of Governor Fubara and his deputy since fresh impeachment proceedings were initiated against them by the Rivers State House of Assembly last Thursday.

The latest move by the lawmakers is the third impeachment attempt against the governor in less than three years.

Despite the renewed political tension in the state, Governor Fubara and members of his administration have remained silent on the allegations of gross misconduct levelled against them by the Assembly.

Wike asserts grip

Following the development, accusations surfaced that Wike was the mastermind behind the impeachment move, recalling comments he made during his recent tour of local government areas in the state, where he described the governor as a “mistake” he planned to correct in 2027 — remarks later echoed by the Speaker.

See also  Why I won’t assess Tinubu’s govt now – Soyinka

“Siminalayi Fubara is a mistake; Rivers State has never had it this bad,” Amaewhule had said, also faulting the governor and his deputy for allegedly failing to submit the 2026 budget to the Assembly.

Meanwhile, Wike said political power was earned through strength and strategic interests, insisting that Obio/Akpor Local Government Area remained a decisive force in Rivers State politics.

Wike spoke during a thank-you visit to Obio/Akpor Local Government Area on Sunday, where he addressed party leaders, traditional rulers, women and youths from the council.

The minister concluded his tour of the 23 local government areas of the state with the Obio/Akpor visit to appreciate residents for their support in the 2023 elections and to canvass continued backing for President Bola Tinubu ahead of the 2027 polls.

Addressing the gathering, Wike stressed that politics should not be driven by sentiment. He said, “There is no sentiment; there is no emotion. Politics is about interest — the interest of your people.

“Power is not dashed; we struggle for it. After all, if Donald Trump does not have power, would he go to Venezuela to pick a president? He would not. Because he has power, that is why he could go to Venezuela, whether it is wrong or right.

“So, for the people of Obio/Akpor, we have the power to dictate who becomes governor. Those commenting from the sidelines should ask themselves if their local government, which produced only 5,000 votes, can challenge a local government that produced 40 per cent of the votes. Let us see how that will work.

“We will use our strength to punish them. Nobody has become governor in this state without Obio/Akpor making a pronouncement. Nobody has become a senator of Rivers East without Obio/Akpor making a decision.

“So, if you like abusing us, after abusing us, come and look for the votes, and we will punish you with the votes.”

The former Rivers governor dismissed calls for his removal from office, saying such decisions rest solely with the President.

“So, don’t bother about people who say, ‘Sack him.’ If my appointor believes that I can no longer offer anything, he has the right, not you. But I am very proud that the people of Obio/Akpor are proud, that Rivers people are proud, and we can tell Nigerians that we have not disappointed them as far as the FCT is concerned.

“I said it yesterday in Port Harcourt: if you’re not doing well, nobody will talk about you. But because we’re doing well, they will talk about us,” he said.

See also  Oil output slumps as Nigeria, Libya, Venezuela drag OPEC+ targets

Earlier, the Chairman of Obio/Akpor Local Government Council, Gift Worlu, praised Wike’s political career and influence, describing him as a major asset to the council, the state and the country.

Worlu also commended Wike’s performance across various public offices, noting his roles as council chairman, chief of staff, governor and minister.

He added, “You asked the PDP to account for the support Rivers State has given the party since 1999. Till now, nobody has answered.

“When it comes to who should be President of Nigeria in 2027, we know where to go. When it comes to who should be the governor of Rivers State, we don’t know where to go, but we know where not to go.

“We will not go the way of ingratitude, disappointment or disloyalty.”

Also speaking, the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Martins Amaewhule, reaffirmed the legislature’s support for Wike and President Tinubu.

He said, “On behalf of the RSHA, we want to once again reassure you of our prayers and support as you continue to support Mr President. Your Excellency, we are proud of you.

“Don’t bother about your detractors. The real people of Nigeria know your worth. They know you are helping Mr President to deliver on the Renewed Hope Agenda.”

Presidency to intervene

Speculation over a fresh intervention by President Bola Tinubu in the Rivers political crisis deepened on Friday after the 26 lawmakers initiated impeachment proceedings against Governor Fubara and his deputy.

Amid rising tension, sources close to the Presidency told The PUNCH that President Tinubu was planning to intervene and had invited both Wike and Fubara for a meeting.

On Sunday evening, Wike departed the Port Harcourt International Airport for Abuja, dispelling rumours of a planned trip to Dubai to meet the President for another intervention session.

He arrived at the airport at about 4:30 pm and proceeded to the VIP lounge in the company of friends and loyalists.

Efforts to reach Wike’s media aide, Lere Olayinka, for confirmation of a meeting with the President were unsuccessful. However, a source close to the minister said Wike had returned to Abuja to receive President Tinubu, who is currently abroad, upon his arrival at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport.

“He returned to Abuja today. He has to receive the President when he arrives, as usual. Whether there will be a meeting — and specifically one on Rivers State — I cannot confirm at this time.

“Outside his official duties and meetings with the President as minister, I am not aware of any other meeting,” the source said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FG raises allowances, boosts welfare for civil servants

Published

on

The Federal Government of Nigeria has approved a sweeping increase in peculiar allowances and other welfare benefits for civil servants, in a move aimed at improving take-home pay and boosting morale across the public service.

The announcement was made on Friday by the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, during a press briefing in Abuja, where she outlined key reforms endorsed by the Federal Executive Council.

According to Walson-Jack, the review affects workers under both the Consolidated Public Service Salary Structure (CONPSS) and the Consolidated Research and Allied Institutions Salary Structure (CONRAISS), ensuring a broad-based impact across all cadres.

She said the revised peculiar allowances have been structured to reflect across all grade levels, resulting in a meaningful increase in earnings for both junior and senior officers.

In addition, the government approved an upward review of several key allowances, including duty tour allowance (DTA), estacode, and book allowance. Walson-Jack noted that virtually all allowances listed under the Public Service Rules have now been revised.

A major highlight of the reform is the approval of 100 percent Duty Tour Allowance for civil servants attending approved training programmes, regardless of whether travel is involved.

“Even if you are based in Abuja and attend training within Abuja, you are entitled to full DTA,” she said.

Beyond salary-related adjustments, the government also introduced a new exit benefit scheme for retiring civil servants under the Contributory Pension Scheme. The scheme provides 100 percent of a retiree’s total annual emoluments as an exit package, in addition to their pension, effective January 1, 2026.

See also  UK to bar eligible visitors without ETA from February 25

Walson-Jack described the move as a step toward ensuring dignity in retirement, stressing that no public servant should leave service without adequate financial support.

The government also confirmed the operationalisation of the Employee Compensation Scheme, designed to provide financial protection for workers who suffer job-related injuries or death.

The reforms come amid growing calls from labour unions for improved welfare, as rising living costs continue to put pressure on workers. Analysts say the combined measures could significantly enhance financial stability for civil servants and improve overall productivity in the public sector.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Wiretapping: El-Rufai pleads not guilty, faces fresh charges

Published

on

The Federal Government, on Thursday, expanded the criminal case against former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, introducing fresh allegations bordering on interference with critical national infrastructure and unauthorised access to classified information.

The new counts are contained in a further amended five-count charge filed on April 13, 2026, before the Federal High Court in Abuja, replacing an earlier three-count charge instituted on February 16, 2026.

At his arraignment on Thursday before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, El-Rufai, however, pleaded not guilty to all counts after the court granted the prosecution’s request to substitute the initial charge.

The Department of State Services, through its counsel, Oluwole Aladedoye (SAN), told the court that the amended charge significantly revised the allegations against the former governor, urging the court to adopt the new processes.

Unlike the earlier charge, which focused mainly on alleged unlawful interception of communications, the fresh counts introduce a broader national security dimension.

In count one of the amended charge, the prosecution accused El-Rufai of “intentionally and unlawfully interfer[ing] with the communication” of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, describing the communication channel as part of Nigeria’s critical national information infrastructure.

The charge states that the alleged act contravenes provisions of the Designation and Protection of Critical National Information Infrastructure Order, 2024, and is punishable under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment Act, 2024.

In a separate and newly introduced count, the prosecution alleged that El-Rufai, “without authorisation, intentionally secured access to classified information” relating to Ribadu, including details of his arrest and detention order issued on February 12, 2026.

This count marks a shift from the earlier framing of the case, which was limited to claims of intercepted communications, to a more serious allegation involving breach of classified state information.

The amended charge also retains and restructures earlier allegations. Count four accuses the defendant of unlawfully intercepting the NSA’s communications, while count five alleges that he and others still at large used technical systems that compromised public safety and national security, thereby instilling fear among Nigerians.

See also  FG tightens border control due to fresh Ebola Outbreak

Part of count four reads, “That you, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, adult, male, intentionally and without authorisation, intercepted the communications of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, as admitted by you on 13th February, 2026, while appearing as a guest on Arise TV Station’s Prime Time Programme in Abuja… and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 12(1) of the Cybercrimes Act.”

Count five further states, “That you… did use technical equipment or systems which compromised public safety, national security and instilling reasonable apprehension of insecurity among Nigerians… and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 131(2) of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003.”

The February charge had contained only three counts, focusing on alleged admission of unlawful interception, failure to report individuals involved, and actions capable of undermining public safety.

However, the amended charge introduces two additional counts and separates previously combined allegations into distinct offences, effectively broadening the scope of criminal liability.

Defence counsel, Oluwole Iyamu (SAN), confirmed receipt of the amended charge and did not oppose its substitution.

Following this, the court struck out the earlier charge and proceeded with the fresh arraignment.

After the plea was taken, the prosecution applied for an accelerated hearing, seeking three consecutive trial dates.

The defence objected, arguing that El-Rufai’s access to legal counsel could be affected due to his custody under the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission.

The defence also drew the court’s attention to a pending bail application filed on February 17, noting that an earlier missing affidavit had been located.

The DSS informed the court that it was not opposing the bail request.

In another application, the prosecution sought to shield the identities of two witnesses, requesting that their names be replaced with pseudonyms in court records, citing security concerns.

See also  Groups Kick As Islamic Council Says No Christian Genocide In Nigeria

The defence opposed the request, insisting that it violated the defendant’s constitutional right to know his accusers and that no concrete threat had been demonstrated.

Further arguments arose over access to proof of evidence, with the defence urging the court to compel disclosure to enable proper preparation for trial.

The prosecution opposed the application, describing it as procedurally misplaced.

The defence also filed a motion seeking to quash the amended charge, while the prosecution asked the court to dismiss it as lacking merit.

After listening to both sides, Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the matter to May 18, 19 and 20, 2026, for hearing.

Bail bid fails

The PUNCH gathered that the Kaduna State High Court refused El-Rufai’s bail application on the grounds that the seriousness of the allegations against him, as well as concerns over possible interference with investigations, outweighed the arguments advanced for his release.

The ruling was delivered on 21 April 2026 by Justice D.H. Khobo of the Kaduna Judicial Division in Charge No: KDH/KAD/ICPC/01/2026, filed by the Federal Republic of Nigeria through the ICPC.

El-Rufai had approached the court via a motion dated 25 March 2026, seeking bail “either on self-recognisance or upon such liberal terms as the court may deem fit.”

His application, brought under Sections 35(4) and 36(5) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and provisions of the Kaduna State ACJL 2017, argued that the offences were not capital in nature and, therefore, carried a presumption in favour of bail.

He further contended that he had strong community ties, fixed addresses, and substantial assets, which, according to him, eliminated any risk of flight.

El-Rufai also told the court he voluntarily returned from Egypt on 16 February 2026 to honour an EFCC invitation, and argued that the amended charge was “fundamentally defective” and “unintelligible.”

He also raised health concerns, claiming he required specialist medical attention.

See also  Nnamdi Kanu acted like Awolowo by disengaging lawyers — Consultant

The ICPC opposed the application through a nine-paragraph counter-affidavit deposed to by Idris Abubakar, insisting that the offences were serious and “economically sabotaging.”

The anti-graft agency argued that the former governor posed a flight risk, adding that there was a likelihood he could interfere with witnesses and ongoing investigations involving other suspects.

It also alleged an incident at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, on 12 February 2026, where El-Rufai allegedly obstructed law enforcement officers.

The ICPC further dismissed his medical claims, stating that no supporting medical report was provided.

In his ruling, Justice Khobo held that the gravity of the nine-count charge, coupled with allegations of interference and obstruction, made bail inappropriate at this stage.

The court stated, “In the instant application, given the gravity of the nine-count charge against the defendant/applicant, the respondent’s credible apprehension regarding the interference with the ongoing investigations linked to other persons still at large… the interest of justice is best served by ensuring the applicant remains available for an accelerated trial.”

The judge also faulted the defence on health grounds, noting, “The applicant in my view has failed to provide sufficient medical evidence to justify the grant of bail on health grounds.”

Consequently, the court held, “Accordingly, the defendant/applicant’s application for bail pending trial fails and is hereby refused.”

Justice Khobo ordered that El-Rufai “shall remain in the custody of the respondent (ICPC) pending the commencement of the trial,” while directing that proceedings be conducted on an accelerated basis.

The court also fixed June 1, 2, 3 and 4, 2026, for day-to-day hearing, following what it described as a consensus between prosecution and defence counsel.

For now, the former governor remains in ICPC custody as the substantive trial awaits commencement.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Why El-Rufai’s Bail Application Was Denied

Published

on

A Kaduna State High Court has denied bail to former governor of the state, Nasir El-Rufai, in an ongoing trial over alleged financial misconduct.

Delivering a ruling on Tuesday, Justice Darius Khobo held that it was in the interest of justice for the defendant to remain in custody to ensure his availability for trial.

El-Rufai was arraigned by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on a nine-count charge bordering on the alleged conferment of benefits under false pretences and dishonest disposal of loan funds.

He pleaded not guilty to all charges.

According to the court, the bail application was supported by a 24-paragraph affidavit, in which the former governor argued that the offences were non-capital.

He also cited his status as a former governor, his strong community ties, and his voluntary return to Nigeria from Egypt.

El-Rufai further claimed that he had underlying health conditions requiring specialist care.

The anti-corruption agency opposed the bail request, filing a counter-affidavit.

The ICPC argued that the offences were “economically sabotaging” and raised concerns about possible interference with witnesses and ongoing investigations.

It also described the defendant as a “flight risk with the means to evade trial due to his high standing in society.” The commission added that no medical evidence was provided to support claims of ill health.

In his ruling, Justice Khobo said the bail application relied heavily on El-Rufai’s status, describing it as “a double-edged sword.”

He noted that concerns raised by the ICPC about interference with investigations were significant.

See also  Nnamdi Kanu acted like Awolowo by disengaging lawyers — Consultant

According to the certified true copy (CTC) of the ruling delivered on April 21, obtained by The Cable, the judge held that the prosecution made “weighty depositions” justifying the refusal of bail, adding that the defence failed to counter them with further evidence.

The judge said, “It is, however, noteworthy here that in spite of these weighty depositions in the Prosecution/Respondent’s counter affidavit, which sought to controvert the depositions in the Applicant’s supporting affidavit, the Applicant never deemed it fit to file a further and better affidavit to further controvert the said weighty depositions in the Prosecution/Respondent’s counter affidavit.

“In the instant case, therefore, failure to file a further affidavit by the applicant to further controvert the above-outlined weighty depositions in the Respondent’s counter affidavit leaves the said weighty depositions in the counter affidavit unchallenged and deemed to be admitted as being correct, and I so hold.

“The law is trite: if in an application for bail pending trial there is good reason to believe or strongly suspect that the accused will jump bail, thereby making himself unavailable to stand his trial, and/or will interfere with the witnesses, thereby constituting an obstacle in the way of justice, the Court will be acting within its undoubted discretion to refuse bail.

“In the instant application, the applicant alluded to facts that he has health conditions requiring specialist monitoring, but the applicant did not attach any medical evidence to substantiate his claim of ill-health.

“The law is settled that where an application for bail seeks to lay claim to ill-health, credible evidence in that branch of medicine ought to be made available before the court by the Applicant.

See also  US places $10m reward for information on Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei, others

“Accordingly, the Defendant/Applicant’s application for bail pending trial fails and is hereby REFUSED.

“The Defendant/Applicant shall remain in the custody of the Respondent (ICPC) pending the commencement of the trial.

“The Respondent/Prosecution is hereby ordered to ensure the trial of the Defendant commences expeditiously and shall be given an accelerated hearing by this Court on a day-to-day basis where practicable.”

Afterwards, the prosecutor and el-Rufai’s counsel agreed that the trial should commence the first week of June.

The case was then adjourned to June 1, 2, 3, and 4, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending