Connect with us

News

FG pushes states to establish power firms as blackouts persist

Published

on

Apparently overwhelmed by the country’s power woes, the Federal Government is pushing this challenge to the 36 states, asking them to take over power generation, transmission, and distribution.

The Federal Government said this was the only solution to the power crisis in the country.

The Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, said this in Lagos on Tuesday at the Nigeria Energy Leadership Summit.

Despite a series of efforts to make power available to Nigerians, the power sector seems to have defied all solutions by successive governments to sanitise the industry.

Speaking at the conference, Adelabu said the Federal Government was aware that power centralisation could never work for Nigeria, and that was why President Bola Tinubu’s administration signed the Electricity Act in 2023.

“On legislation, the enactment of the Electricity Act 2023 remains a major milestone. Sincerely, it is the pathfinder.

It provides a robust governance and regulatory framework for the Nigerian electricity supply industry.

The Act devolves regulatory powers to the states, enables subnational markets, promotes competition, and empowers private participation across the value chain.

“The impact of this legislation includes decentralisation and liberalisation. A country as big as Nigeria, with almost a million square kilometres of landmass, over 200 million people, millions of businesses, thousands of institutions (health and educational institutions), 36 states plus the Federal Capital Territory, and 774 local governments—centralisation cannot work for us.

The responsibility of providing stable electricity can never be left in the hands of the Federal Government.

“At the centre, you cannot, from Abuja, guarantee stable power across the country. So this is one thing that the Act has achieved—decentralisation. That has now allowed all the states or the subnationals to play in all segments of the power sector value chain—generation, transmission, distribution, and even service industries supporting the power sector,” he stated.

Presently, Adelabu said the Federal Government was pursuing a comprehensive agenda to reposition the power sector for sustainability, efficiency, and growth.

“This approach spans critical pillars, which include legislation, policy reforms, infrastructure development, energy transition, asset expansion, local content, and capacity development. each designed to address structural challenges, unlock private capital, and enhance service delivery across the electricity value chain, to achieve functional, reliable, affordable electricity throughout Nigeria to power our households, our businesses, our offices, our institutions, and our industries, thereby improving the economic prosperity of our people,” he noted.

The minister maintained that the private sector must get involved if the nation is serious about having a reliable power sector.

“The investment required can never be made available by the government. There are too many competing sectors—education, health, defence, works, aviation, and so on. They all compete for the limited funds from the Federal Government. So, given the level of investment required in this sector, we need private capital infusion, both local and foreign. The developed nations have done their bit, and they are still supporting us, but it can never be enough if private sector investors are not involved. That’s one advantage of this legislation, and I believe the states and private sector investors are up to the task.

See also  Greece set to approve controversial 13-hour workday reform

“The Act devolves regulatory powers to the states, enables supply chain markets, promotes competition, and empowers private participation across the value chain. This represents a clear shift towards a liberalised and investment-friendly electricity market,” he stressed.

15 states get regulatory autonomy

Since the passage of the Electricity Act, Adelabu said 15 states have received regulatory autonomy and established subnational electricity markets, with one, Enugu, fully operationalised through the Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission.

“I believe other states will follow suit in operationalising the autonomy granted, with full collaboration of the national regulator. We are working actively with these states to ensure strong alignment between the wholesale market and the retail market.

“In this regard, we believe the active involvement of the state governments, particularly in the off-grid segment, is critical, given the series of roundtable engagements held with governors by the Rural Electrification Agency, as well as ongoing efforts to closely track the distribution companies’ performances within their respective jurisdictions. The Managing Director of REA, Abba Aliyu, has held meetings with almost 20 states regarding the national electrification programme across the country, and this is an opportunity and a platform for the subnationals to leverage and start to activate the autonomy they have been granted,” Adelabu emphasised.

He charged the states to raise the bar.

“The states must raise the bar. I know Lagos State said it is ready to lead the pack. Let that not end on our lips. We must take the necessary steps to achieve this. They say that cows don’t make milk; we milk the cows. You need to take steps to ensure you activate this autonomy. We must take that step to milk the cow and make it up.

“Beyond that, we need to start engaging local and foreign investors at the state level. We have the autonomy. There are lots of investors interested in establishing generation outfits in your states. It could be thermal, small hydro, solar, or a wind farm to generate power in your states. It guarantees the energy security of your state. A lot of our states are bigger than some West African countries, and they’re running as countries. Who says we cannot run our states the way these people run their countries?

“We have the autonomy; we have the platform legally now. So, I believe we need to take the right step and get more involved, especially when it comes to the rural areas, the unserved communities, the underserved communities, and the semi-urban areas. You can start from that, not just providing electricity to households or lighting up households with solar systems and all that. You can do that, but it must include productive use of equipment that can boost the prosperity of your people at the rural level.

See also  El-Rufai: DSS detains five over airport incident, N1bn suit hangs

“There is a rural economy with huge potential, not just in agriculture alone. There are some small-scale enterprises in the local environment that can be boosted by supplying reliable electricity,” he added.

States told to challenge DisCos, TCN

The minister charged state governors to start challenging power distribution companies and the Transmission Company of Nigeria.

“You need to start challenging the TCN when it comes to grid supply. The transmission company has been broken into two, now the Transmission Service Provider and the Nigerian Independent System Operator. Challenge them: ‘Take light to my state, drop light for me,’ then you take up the decision from there.

“Now you need to get closer to the DisCos. You have to drive the DisCos. You have to track their performance. You have to monitor their performance because the provision of electricity is an electoral promise of every state governor. Challenge DisCos, get closer to them, and monitor their performance. NERC or the Ministry of Power cannot effectively track these DisCos from Abuja. You are closer to them. Challenge them, and they will provide power for your people,” Adelabu said.

States are ready – Enugu commission

Speaking with our correspondent at the conference, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission, Chijioke Okonkwo, said states are ready to provide a stable power supply to residents.

Okonkwo maintained that the minister was right when he said states had to take over power generation, transmission, and distribution, saying, “That is the way to go.”

He said Enugu took the lead by establishing its regulatory commission.

He invited investors to come and build mini-grids in Enugu, saying the state and its policies are investor-friendly.

The Governor of Lagos State, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, who was represented at the event by the Commissioner for Energy and Mineral Resources, Biodun Ogunleye, also invited investors to the state.

See also  PHOTOS & VIDEO: Police Authorities Hold Guard Of Honour For Late IGP, Solomon Arase

Sanwo-Olu said the state was ready to collaborate with anyone or organisation willing to invest in the state’s electricity market.

The Governor of Katsina State, Dikko Radda, represented by his deputy, Faruk Lawal-Jobe, also disclosed the state’s readiness to invest in the power sector, collaborate with investors, and light up the state.

Speaking on power commercialisation, Adelabu noted that the government was deepening this to strengthen revenue, liquidity, and investor confidence.

According to him, through tariff policy reforms that enable cost-reflective tariffs for select consumers, supply reliability has improved while reducing energy costs for industries.

Industry revenue, he added, had increased by 70 per cent to N1.7tn in 2024 compared with the previous year, and revenue is expected to exceed N2tn in 2025.

At the Nigeria Energy Conference, Adelabu told stakeholders, investors, financiers, and innovators that Nigeria’s power sector remains open and ready for business more than ever before.

“We recognise that achieving the scale of investment required to transform the sector demands greater private sector participation across the entire value chain, particularly in the transmission segment. A useful reference is South Africa’s ambitious $25bn transmission grid expansion initiative, which seeks private developers to deliver 14,000 kilometres of new power lines and connect over 59 gigawatts of new capacity within the next 14 years. This is remarkable when compared with Nigeria’s Presidential Power Initiative (the Siemens project) valued at $2.3bn,” he said.

The minister regretted that Nigeria currently has over 10GW of stranded generation capacity—energy that could power industries, create jobs, and even support electricity exports to neighbouring countries through the regional power pool.

“We are therefore open to strategic partnerships to mobilise the necessary investments and unlock this potential. Our market fundamentals are improving, our policy environment is clear, and the national leadership is committed to creating the enabling conditions for long-term investment and innovation,” he submitted.

Since the Electricity Act was signed in 2023, 21 states have yet to set up their electricity markets. The 15 that have autonomy have not invested in the value chains as they look up to investors.

Adelabu’s charge might be a wake-up call to states to recognise the enormity of the power they now possess under the current legislation. If the states heed his call and invest in the value chains, experts believe this will disrupt the sector, boost power accessibility, reduce reliance on the national grid.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  PHOTOS & VIDEO: Police Authorities Hold Guard Of Honour For Late IGP, Solomon Arase

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Many feared killed in Oyo gas explosion

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Nigeria's domestic debt service hits N1.7trn Q2 2025

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Airlines cancel dozens of Caribbean flights after U.S. attacks on Venezuela

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Nigeria seeks $2bn China loan for new ‘super grid’ — Adelabu

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Many feared killed in Oyo gas explosion

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending