Connect with us

News

US expands travel restrictions, adds Nigeria to list of countries

Published

on

President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed a Proclamation further restricting entry to the United States for nationals from countries deemed high-risk due to “demonstrated, persistent, and severe deficiencies in screening, vetting, and information-sharing” that threaten U.S. national security and public safety.

Trump. US
File photo: USA flag

Among the 15 additional countries newly subject to partial restrictions is Nigeria.

The announcement comes directly from the White House website, in a fact sheet titled “President Donald J. Trump Further Restricts and Limits the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the Security of the United States”, issued December 16, 2025.

Trump had earlier on October 31 declared Nigeria as a ‘country of particular concern’ in response to allegations of a Christian genocide in the country.

The African Union chief said there was no genocide in Nigeria’s volatile north. And so did ECOWAS addressing the recent surge in terrorist attacks across the region, including Nigeria, while firmly rejecting claims that these acts constitute genocide. Over and over, Tinubu, days ago, again dismissed claims that there is a Christian genocide in the country, insisting that neither Christians nor Muslims are being targeted for killing.

This had prompted series of back and forth and meeting among US Congress and individuals and the Nigerian delegation who have met both in Nigeria and US since. On December 13, a US congressman, Riley Moore, said the US and Nigeria were close to reaching a strategic security agreement aimed at addressing terrorism and sectarian violence in Nigeria.

Days earlier, he stated that the US had concluded its fact-finding mission to Nigeria over alleged genocide and is expected to brief Trump before the end of the month.

However, the latest in the series of ban on Tuesday had the White House described the action as “strengthening national security through common sense restrictions based on data.”

The Proclamation continues full restrictions and entry limitations on nationals from the original 12 high-risk countries under Proclamation 10949: Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

See also  Presidential aide defends Tinubu’s Falcons rewards, cites BBNaija N150m prize money

It also adds full restrictions and entry limitations on five additional countries: Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, South Sudan, and Syria, along with individuals holding Palestinian-Authority-issued travel documents. Laos and Sierra Leone, previously subject to partial restrictions, now face full restrictions.

Nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Togo, and Venezuela remain under partial restrictions.

The Proclamation adds partial restrictions and entry limitations on 15 additional countries, including Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Dominica, Gabon, The Gambia, Malawi, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Tonga, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

The fact sheet notes that “exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories like athletes and diplomats, and individuals whose entry serves U.S. national interests” are included.

It also states that family-based immigrant visa carve-outs that carry “demonstrated fraud risks” have been narrowed, while case-by-case waivers remain possible.

In explaining the rationale, the White House fact sheet emphasizes that the Proclamation is necessary “to prevent the entry of foreign nationals about whom the United States lacks sufficient information to assess the risks they pose, garner cooperation from foreign governments, enforce our immigration laws, and advance other important foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism objectives.”

The fact sheet quotes Trump directly: “It is the President’s duty to take action to ensure that those seeking to enter our country will not harm the American people.”

It adds that, after consultations with cabinet officials and assessments based on Executive Order 14161, Proclamation 10949, and country-specific information, “President Trump has determined that the entry of nationals from additional countries must be restricted or limited to protect U.S. national security and public safety interests.”

The restrictions are country-specific “in order to encourage cooperation with the subject countries in recognition of each country’s unique circumstances,” the fact sheet says, highlighting challenges such as “widespread corruption, fraudulent or unreliable civil documents and criminal records, and nonexistent birth-registration systems—systemically preventing accurate vetting.”

See also  FG deploys military retirees to secure ungoverned spaces

Some countries, it notes, “refuse to share passport exemplars or law-enforcement data,” while others allow Citizenship-by-Investment schemes that conceal identity and bypass vetting requirements.

The fact sheet also cites “high visa-overstay rates and refusal to repatriate removable nationals” and the presence of “terrorist, criminal, and extremist activity” in several restricted countries.

The White House fact sheet frames the move as part of President Trump’s ongoing national security agenda: “President Trump is keeping his promise to restore travel restrictions on dangerous countries and to secure our borders.”

It references the Supreme Court’s prior ruling on similar restrictions, noting that the Court found the policy “is squarely within the scope of Presidential authority” and that it is “expressly premised on legitimate purposes”—specifically “preventing entry of nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to improve their practices.”

Finally, the fact sheet notes that Turkmenistan, which previously faced restrictions, has made progress in cooperation with the U.S., prompting the new Proclamation to lift the ban on its nonimmigrant visas while maintaining the suspension of entry for Turkmen nationals as immigrants.

From June 5 ban to national guard shooting

Two US National Guard soldiers were shot in November near the White House, officials said, and police said a suspect was detained in an extraordinary security drama likely to fuel controversy over President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown.

Reacting, Trump said that he would suspend migration from what the US leader called “third world countries”, a day after an Afghan national allegedly shot two National Guard soldiers in Washington, killing one.

His angry post, which also threatened to reverse “millions” of admissions granted under his predecessor, Joe Biden, marked a new escalation in the anti-migration stance of a second term that has been dominated by Trump’s mass deportation campaign.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration announced in the first week of December  that it would review the immigration status of all permanent residents, or “Green Card” holders, from Afghanistan and 18 other countries following the attack.

The review follows a June executive order from President Trump classifying 19 countries as “of Identified Concern.”

The order banned entry for nearly all nationals from 12 countries, including Afghanistan. The full list of these countries include: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

Barely two weeks after in June, Trump commenced plans to place a general visa ban on Nigerians.

According to a report by the Washington Post, an internal memo signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio outlined a proposal that could impose visa restrictions or entry bans on up to 36 additional nations.

These countries were expected to comply with newly established requirements from the U.S. State Department within a 60-day timeframe or face potential travel restrictions.

However, PUNCH Online reports that the timeframe elapsed in August 2025, and it was not until four months later that the new proclamation was issued.

What “Full” and “Partial” Restrictions Mean

  • Full bans/suspensions generally bar citizens of specified countries from entering the U.S. and block the issuance of most new immigrant and non-immigrant visas. Exceptions may still exist for lawful permanent residents, diplomats, or specific exempt categories.

  • Partial restrictions limit or suspend certain classes of visas (e.g., tourist, student, exchange), impose stricter vetting and shorter visa validity, and often require more rigorous screening before entry is permitted.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

‘If You’ve Removed Subsidy, Why Still Borrowing?’, Emir Sanusi II Queries Federal Govt’s Fiscal Strategy

Published

on

The 16th Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, has questioned the Federal Government’s continued reliance on borrowing despite the removal of petrol subsidy, warning that poor fiscal discipline could erode the gains of recent reforms.

Speaking in an interview with News Central TV on Friday, the former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) said while the removal of fuel subsidy and the liberalisation of the exchange rate were necessary, their timing and implementation remained problematic.

“If you’re not paying the subsidy and you’ve got the money, why are we still borrowing and borrowing? What are we borrowing for?

“I have always said the subsidy regime was unsustainable. We cannot continue supporting foreign refineries. We’re an oil-producing country. Keeping refineries open abroad while we’re not doing our own,” Emir Sanusi II said.

He, however, expressed optimism over Nigeria’s shift toward domestic refining, noting that the country has moved from being a major importer of petroleum products to an exporter.

“Today, we have a situation where we have our own domestic refinery. We’re not importing petroleum products. We’re even exporting to Europe, and this is very good for the economy,” he added.

Despite supporting the reforms, Sanusi II raised concerns about sequencing, arguing that policy execution without proper monetary tightening contributed to the naira’s sharp depreciation.

“Artificial exchange rates, especially when you’re printing money, cannot work. There was going to be a devaluation,” he said.

“For me, removing subsidy or liberalising exchange rates, these are good interventions. Were they done at the right time? Those are certain questions.”

See also  Presidential aide defends Tinubu’s Falcons rewards, cites BBNaija N150m prize money

He explained that implementing exchange rate liberalisation in a “loose monetary environment” worsened currency instability.

“If you decide to remove subsidy and liberalise exchange rates… before you have tightened money supply, the naira drops to a bottomless pit. That was a timing issue,” he said.

The monarch further challenged the government’s fiscal direction, questioning the rationale behind continued borrowing.

“We’ve removed the subsidy… what we should now see is fiscal consolidation. You cannot remove wastages and continue borrowing,” he said.

His remarks came amid concerns over Nigeria’s rising debt profile. Reports indicated that the Federal Government has increased its 2026 borrowing plan by ₦11.31 trillion, bringing the total to ₦29.20 trillion.

President Bola Tinubu also recently sought Senate’s approval for a fresh $516 million loan to fund the Sokoto–Badagry Superhighway project, further fuelling debate over the country’s fiscal direction.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

FG raises allowances, boosts welfare for civil servants

Published

on

The Federal Government of Nigeria has approved a sweeping increase in peculiar allowances and other welfare benefits for civil servants, in a move aimed at improving take-home pay and boosting morale across the public service.

The announcement was made on Friday by the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, during a press briefing in Abuja, where she outlined key reforms endorsed by the Federal Executive Council.

According to Walson-Jack, the review affects workers under both the Consolidated Public Service Salary Structure (CONPSS) and the Consolidated Research and Allied Institutions Salary Structure (CONRAISS), ensuring a broad-based impact across all cadres.

She said the revised peculiar allowances have been structured to reflect across all grade levels, resulting in a meaningful increase in earnings for both junior and senior officers.

In addition, the government approved an upward review of several key allowances, including duty tour allowance (DTA), estacode, and book allowance. Walson-Jack noted that virtually all allowances listed under the Public Service Rules have now been revised.

A major highlight of the reform is the approval of 100 percent Duty Tour Allowance for civil servants attending approved training programmes, regardless of whether travel is involved.

“Even if you are based in Abuja and attend training within Abuja, you are entitled to full DTA,” she said.

Beyond salary-related adjustments, the government also introduced a new exit benefit scheme for retiring civil servants under the Contributory Pension Scheme. The scheme provides 100 percent of a retiree’s total annual emoluments as an exit package, in addition to their pension, effective January 1, 2026.

See also  FG deploys military retirees to secure ungoverned spaces

Walson-Jack described the move as a step toward ensuring dignity in retirement, stressing that no public servant should leave service without adequate financial support.

The government also confirmed the operationalisation of the Employee Compensation Scheme, designed to provide financial protection for workers who suffer job-related injuries or death.

The reforms come amid growing calls from labour unions for improved welfare, as rising living costs continue to put pressure on workers. Analysts say the combined measures could significantly enhance financial stability for civil servants and improve overall productivity in the public sector.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Wiretapping: El-Rufai pleads not guilty, faces fresh charges

Published

on

The Federal Government, on Thursday, expanded the criminal case against former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, introducing fresh allegations bordering on interference with critical national infrastructure and unauthorised access to classified information.

The new counts are contained in a further amended five-count charge filed on April 13, 2026, before the Federal High Court in Abuja, replacing an earlier three-count charge instituted on February 16, 2026.

At his arraignment on Thursday before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, El-Rufai, however, pleaded not guilty to all counts after the court granted the prosecution’s request to substitute the initial charge.

The Department of State Services, through its counsel, Oluwole Aladedoye (SAN), told the court that the amended charge significantly revised the allegations against the former governor, urging the court to adopt the new processes.

Unlike the earlier charge, which focused mainly on alleged unlawful interception of communications, the fresh counts introduce a broader national security dimension.

In count one of the amended charge, the prosecution accused El-Rufai of “intentionally and unlawfully interfer[ing] with the communication” of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, describing the communication channel as part of Nigeria’s critical national information infrastructure.

The charge states that the alleged act contravenes provisions of the Designation and Protection of Critical National Information Infrastructure Order, 2024, and is punishable under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment Act, 2024.

In a separate and newly introduced count, the prosecution alleged that El-Rufai, “without authorisation, intentionally secured access to classified information” relating to Ribadu, including details of his arrest and detention order issued on February 12, 2026.

This count marks a shift from the earlier framing of the case, which was limited to claims of intercepted communications, to a more serious allegation involving breach of classified state information.

The amended charge also retains and restructures earlier allegations. Count four accuses the defendant of unlawfully intercepting the NSA’s communications, while count five alleges that he and others still at large used technical systems that compromised public safety and national security, thereby instilling fear among Nigerians.

See also  Tinubu, Fubara end foreign trips ahead of Ibas’ handover

Part of count four reads, “That you, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, adult, male, intentionally and without authorisation, intercepted the communications of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, as admitted by you on 13th February, 2026, while appearing as a guest on Arise TV Station’s Prime Time Programme in Abuja… and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 12(1) of the Cybercrimes Act.”

Count five further states, “That you… did use technical equipment or systems which compromised public safety, national security and instilling reasonable apprehension of insecurity among Nigerians… and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 131(2) of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003.”

The February charge had contained only three counts, focusing on alleged admission of unlawful interception, failure to report individuals involved, and actions capable of undermining public safety.

However, the amended charge introduces two additional counts and separates previously combined allegations into distinct offences, effectively broadening the scope of criminal liability.

Defence counsel, Oluwole Iyamu (SAN), confirmed receipt of the amended charge and did not oppose its substitution.

Following this, the court struck out the earlier charge and proceeded with the fresh arraignment.

After the plea was taken, the prosecution applied for an accelerated hearing, seeking three consecutive trial dates.

The defence objected, arguing that El-Rufai’s access to legal counsel could be affected due to his custody under the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission.

The defence also drew the court’s attention to a pending bail application filed on February 17, noting that an earlier missing affidavit had been located.

The DSS informed the court that it was not opposing the bail request.

In another application, the prosecution sought to shield the identities of two witnesses, requesting that their names be replaced with pseudonyms in court records, citing security concerns.

See also  US court slams $300,000 fine on Ashekun for defaming Mountain of Fire Ministries

The defence opposed the request, insisting that it violated the defendant’s constitutional right to know his accusers and that no concrete threat had been demonstrated.

Further arguments arose over access to proof of evidence, with the defence urging the court to compel disclosure to enable proper preparation for trial.

The prosecution opposed the application, describing it as procedurally misplaced.

The defence also filed a motion seeking to quash the amended charge, while the prosecution asked the court to dismiss it as lacking merit.

After listening to both sides, Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the matter to May 18, 19 and 20, 2026, for hearing.

Bail bid fails

The PUNCH gathered that the Kaduna State High Court refused El-Rufai’s bail application on the grounds that the seriousness of the allegations against him, as well as concerns over possible interference with investigations, outweighed the arguments advanced for his release.

The ruling was delivered on 21 April 2026 by Justice D.H. Khobo of the Kaduna Judicial Division in Charge No: KDH/KAD/ICPC/01/2026, filed by the Federal Republic of Nigeria through the ICPC.

El-Rufai had approached the court via a motion dated 25 March 2026, seeking bail “either on self-recognisance or upon such liberal terms as the court may deem fit.”

His application, brought under Sections 35(4) and 36(5) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and provisions of the Kaduna State ACJL 2017, argued that the offences were not capital in nature and, therefore, carried a presumption in favour of bail.

He further contended that he had strong community ties, fixed addresses, and substantial assets, which, according to him, eliminated any risk of flight.

El-Rufai also told the court he voluntarily returned from Egypt on 16 February 2026 to honour an EFCC invitation, and argued that the amended charge was “fundamentally defective” and “unintelligible.”

He also raised health concerns, claiming he required specialist medical attention.

See also  No safe haven for terrorists, bandits in 2026 — Guards Brigade

The ICPC opposed the application through a nine-paragraph counter-affidavit deposed to by Idris Abubakar, insisting that the offences were serious and “economically sabotaging.”

The anti-graft agency argued that the former governor posed a flight risk, adding that there was a likelihood he could interfere with witnesses and ongoing investigations involving other suspects.

It also alleged an incident at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, on 12 February 2026, where El-Rufai allegedly obstructed law enforcement officers.

The ICPC further dismissed his medical claims, stating that no supporting medical report was provided.

In his ruling, Justice Khobo held that the gravity of the nine-count charge, coupled with allegations of interference and obstruction, made bail inappropriate at this stage.

The court stated, “In the instant application, given the gravity of the nine-count charge against the defendant/applicant, the respondent’s credible apprehension regarding the interference with the ongoing investigations linked to other persons still at large… the interest of justice is best served by ensuring the applicant remains available for an accelerated trial.”

The judge also faulted the defence on health grounds, noting, “The applicant in my view has failed to provide sufficient medical evidence to justify the grant of bail on health grounds.”

Consequently, the court held, “Accordingly, the defendant/applicant’s application for bail pending trial fails and is hereby refused.”

Justice Khobo ordered that El-Rufai “shall remain in the custody of the respondent (ICPC) pending the commencement of the trial,” while directing that proceedings be conducted on an accelerated basis.

The court also fixed June 1, 2, 3 and 4, 2026, for day-to-day hearing, following what it described as a consensus between prosecution and defence counsel.

For now, the former governor remains in ICPC custody as the substantive trial awaits commencement.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending