Connect with us

News

Big diplomatic overhaul: Tinubu’s 65 envoy picks brace for Senate storm

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu’s 65 ambassadorial nominees will face rigorous Senate grilling next week as part of their confirmation process.

Three notable opposition senators, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the screening would not be ‘business as usual,’ hinting at plans to put several of the nominees on the spot.

‘’Our current situation requires seasoned and knowledgeable men and women who can represent and defend Nigeria’s interests before the international community. Ambassadorial position is not all about political patronage or job for the boys and this is why we would ensure that those who would represent Nigeria at the foreign missions are patriotic individuals who have integrity,’’ a ranking senator noted.

Another lawmaker said the nominees would be properly grilled to ensure they are ‘’fit for purpose.’’

On Thursday, the Senate received the President’s request for the confirmation of the nominees, one of the administration’s largest diplomatic submissions yet.

The request, read during plenary by Senate President Godswill Akpabio, contained two lists: 34 career ambassadors and high commissioners and 31 non-career nominees.

The latest transmission came less than 24 hours after lawmakers began screening an initial set of three nominees earlier forwarded by the President.

Citing Section 171 (1), (2) and (4) of the 1999 Constitution, Tinubu urged the upper chamber to “consider and confirm expeditiously” 15 career ambassadors and 17 non-career ambassadors.

“I am pleased to present for confirmation the list of the 32 ambassadorial nominees for the positions of career ambassadors, non-career ambassadors and high commissioners,” the letter partly stated.

Notable career diplomats on the list include Ambassadors Sulu-Gambari Olatunji Ahmed (Kwara), Ahmed Mohammed Monguno (Borno) and  Maimuna Ibrahim (Adamawa).

Prominent non-career nominees include former Chief of Naval Staff and ex-Rivers State military administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd.)from Cross River; former presidential aide and ex-senator, Ita Enang (Akwa Ibom); and former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Abdulrahman Dambazau (retd.),  from Kano.

See also  Appeal court affirms retrieval of over 40 government vehicles from former Governor and defence minister Matawalle

Akpabio referred the list to the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs with a one-week deadline to conclude screenings and submit its report. ‘’The committee is to report back to us in one week,” he said.

On Wednesday, the Senate commenced the screening of Kayode Are (Ogun), Aminu Dalhatu (Jigawa) and Ayodele Oke (Oyo), who were earlier nominated by the President. The committee chairman, Senator Sani Bello, disclosed that Oke used the session to address and clear allegations previously levelled against him.

The report on the three nominees is expected to be presented to the full Senate in the coming days, even as lawmakers begin processing the newly transmitted list.

The staggered submissions appear to be part of the administration’s phased strategy to fill critical diplomatic positions ahead of an anticipated major shake-up in Nigeria’s foreign missions.

List of nominees

The career ambassadors are: Amb. Ezenwa Chukwuemeka (Abia); Maimuna Ibrahim (Adamawa); Monica Ogochukwu (Anambra); Ambassador Mohammed Mahmoud Lele (Bauchi); Endoni Sindo (Bayelsa); Ambassador Ahmed Mohammed Minguno (Borno); Jane Adams Okon Michael (Cross River); Clark Omeruo Alexandra (Delta); Chimma Geoffrey Davies (Ebonyi); Oduma Yvonne Ehinose (Edo); Wasa Segun Ige (Edo); Ambassador Adeyemi Adebayo Emmanuel (Ekiti); Ambassador Onaga Ogechukwu Kingsley (Enugu); Magaji Umar (Jigawa); Mohammed Saidu Dahiru (Kaduna); AbdulSalam Abus Zayat (Kano); Shehu Barde (Katsina); Aminu Nasiu (Katsina); Abubakar Musa Musa (Kebbi); Mohammed Idris (Kebbi); Bako Adamu Umar (Kogi); Sulu-Gambari Olatunji Ahmed (Kwara); Ramata Mohammed (Lagos); Shaga John Shama (Nasarawa); Salau Hamza Mohammed (Niger); Ibrahim Danlami (Niger); Adeola Ibrahim Mopelola (Ogun); Ruben Abimbola Samuel (Ondo); Akande Wahab Adekola (Osun); Adedokun Esther (Oyo); Gedagi Joseph John (Plateau); Luther Obomode Ayokalata (Rivers); Danladi Yakubu Yaku (Taraba); and Bello Dogondaji (Zamfara).

The non-career ambassadors include: Senator Grace Bent (Adamawa); Senator Ita Enang (Akwa Ibom); Nkechi Linda Okocha (Anambra); Mahmud Yakubu (Bauchi); Philip K. Ikurusi (Bayelsa); Paul Oga Adikwu (Benue); Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd.) (Cross River); Abasi Braimah (Edo); Erelu Angela Adebayo (Ekiti); Barr. Olumilua Oluwayimika Ayotunwa (Ekiti); Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi (Enugu); Chioma Ohakim (Imo); Lt. Gen. Abdulrahman Bello Dambazau (retd.) (Kano); Tasiu Musa Maigari (Katsina); Alhaji Abubakar Sanusi Aliyu (Kogi); Olufemi Pedro (Lagos); Barr. Mohammed Ubandoma Aliyu (Nasarawa); Senator Jimoh Ibrahim (Ondo); Ambassador Joseph Sola Iji (Ondo); Fani-Kayode (Osun); Professor O. Adewole (Osun); Florence Ajimobi (Oyo); Lola Akande (Oyo); Professor Nora Ladi Daduut (Plateau); Yakubu N. Gambo (Plateau); Chukwujinka Okocha (Rivers); Haruna Abubakar (Sokoto); Jerry Samuel Manwe (Taraba); and Adamu Garba Talba (Yobe).

See also  President Tinubu decorates Disu as acting IGP

However, a report claimed that Talba died about five months ago. The PUNCH could not verify this claim as of press time.

With the fresh batch of nominees, the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee faces a packed week of screenings aimed at clearing the backlog of ambassadorial postings critical to Nigeria’s representation abroad.

Two-year diplomatic vacuum

Tinubu’s delay in nominating ambassadors had sparked concern over Nigeria’s diplomatic presence. The nearly two-year wait was attributed partly to financial constraints.

Government officials said many embassies were in disrepair and required refurbishment before new envoys could resume.

The Federal Government earmarked N53bn in the 2024 budget to renovate 103 foreign missions, covering chanceries, staff quarters, ambassadors’ residences, office furniture and vehicles. Still, sources estimated that almost $1bn would be required to fully fund Nigeria’s 109 missions and clear accumulated arrears.

While the Presidency said the delay was meant to ensure the selection of the right candidates, critics argued that political wrangling and regional balancing were the real causes.

Experts warn that the prolonged diplomatic gaps weakened Nigeria’s influence in international forums, reduced its ability to protect citizens abroad and may have cost the country economic opportunities.

Security analysts also note that the absence of ambassadors could expose Nigeria to security threats that are better addressed through diplomatic channels.

The submission of 65 nominees is now seen as a crucial step toward restoring Nigeria’s diplomatic footprint worldwide.

Atiku slams Tinubu

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar criticised President Tinubu’s nomination of the immediate past chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, for an ambassadorial post.

See also  Tinubu to Amupitan: Make 2027 polls transparent, violence-free

Atiku said that if he were President of Nigeria, he would never nominate a past INEC chairman as an ambassador.

In a statement posted on his X handle on Thursday, he said he would not consider such a move, insisting it would send the wrong signals to the public and undermine trust in the electoral system.

“Let me state without ambiguity: under no circumstance would I, as President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, nominate the immediate past INEC Chairman for an ambassadorial position,” the former VP wrote.

Tinubu submitted Yakubu’s name as part of a list of 32 ambassadorial nominees to the Senate for confirmation on November 29.

However, Yakubu’s nomination has sparked debate, stemming from the fact that his tenure at INEC ended only a few weeks ago and that he presided over the 2023 general elections, which ushered in Tinubu as President.

According to Atiku, appointing the ex-INEC chairman to a diplomatic position would raise “serious concerns” and risk being interpreted as a reward for the conduct of one of Nigeria’s most disputed elections.

“It presents terrible optics for an administration already struggling with credibility. It sends the wrong message to the current @inecnigeria leadership; that partisan, compromised, or poorly executed elections may ultimately be rewarded.

“And most importantly, it is morally indefensible for an umpire at the centre of one of the most disputed elections in our history to become a beneficiary of its outcome,” he said.

Atiku further noted that such a nomination undermines efforts to strengthen Nigeria’s democracy and restore public trust in institutions.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

SEE FULL LIST: NJC recommends 28 candidates for judicial appointments

Published

on

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has recommended 28 candidates for appointment as judicial officers across six states, including 24 candidates for various State High Courts.

The recommendations cover the High Courts of Kano, Ebonyi, Edo, Adamawa and Ogun states, the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal and Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The Council announced the recommendations in a statement issued on Wednesday by its Deputy Director of Information, Kemi Babalola-Ogedengbe.

It said the decisions were taken at its 112th meeting held on November 3, 2026, under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun.

According to the Council, one candidate was recommended as Grand Kadi of the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, while another was recommended as Kadi of the Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal.

Two others were recommended as judges of the Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The appointment includes “24 High Court candidates and four candidates for the Sharia and Customary Courts of Appeal.”

The full list of the 28 recommended candidates is as follows:

PLATEAU STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (GRAND KADI)

1. Tijjani Jibrin Zololo

KANO STATE HIGH COURT

2. Nafisah Yusuf Hassan
3. Halima Yahuza Ahmad
4. Abdullahi Abdulsalam Bature
5. Musa Ibrahim Umar

EBONYI STATE HIGH COURT

6. Dickson Edmund Amaga

EDO STATE HIGH COURT

7. Benson Osagie Osawaru
8. Taiye Osayanmon Omoruyi
9. Dorothy Ibhade Adamaigbo
10. Festus Osagie Usiobaifo
11. Pius Idemudia Oiwoh
12. Majebi Samuel Amune
13. Emike Jessica Imuekemhe

See also  Senate reconvenes today as Electoral Act triggers uproar

ADAMAWA STATE HIGH COURT

14. Aminu Sa’ad
15. Ibrahim Ulenda Musa
16. Sadiq Giwa
17. Musa Bala Mijinyawa
18. Japhet Ibrahim
19. Aliyu Bakari
20. Yakubu Ahmadu

OGUN STATE HIGH COURT

21. Olakulehin Luqman Abiola Oke
22. Adebimpe Folusho Obienu
23. Fatimat Adeola Daudu
24. Rafiat Bolanle Kadiri
25. Oludotun Olaniyi Osho

ADAMAWA STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (KADI)

26. Abubakar Ishaku

ADAMAWA STATE CUSTOMARY COURT OF APPEAL

27. Elshama Gwama Dimas
28. David Benjamin Pembi

The NJC said all the recommended candidates were expected to be sworn in by their respective state governors without delay.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

JD Vance reveals Iran war cost Republicans midterm elections, read details

Published

on

United States Vice President JD Vance has blamed the Iran war for the Republican Party’s poor performance in the 2026 midterm elections, saying many supporters of President Donald Trump switched allegiance to Democrats over dissatisfaction with the conflict.

Vance said this in a post on his X handle on Wednesday, arguing that the party’s defeat was not primarily caused by poor voter turnout but by the defection of voters who supported the Trump-Vance ticket in 2024.

He said data analysis conducted by his team before the elections had shown that Republican supporters were turning out in significant numbers, despite opinion polls predicting a major Democratic victory.

“One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was ‘composition’—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win,” he said.

Vance explained that although turnout was encouraging in several states, a member of his data team had warned him that many Republican voters were angry and might not vote for the party.

“Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was nine points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024,” he said.

“But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.”

The Vice President acknowledged that the party might have failed to communicate its economic policies effectively, particularly on the cost of living and inflation.

However, he said the major reasons voters abandoned the Republicans were concerns about the war, economic hardship, America’s foreign policy priorities and its relationship with Israel.

See also  Fierce lobbying, tension as APC primaries begin

According to Vance, a pollster who accurately predicted the election outcome identified four major demands among former Republican supporters who switched to the Democrats.

The demands were to end the war, prioritise the cost of living and inflation, put America first and change the country’s relationship with Israel.

“The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night,” Vance stated.

He also defended television personality Rachel Campos-Duffy, saying her earlier call for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict had proved politically sound.

Vance warned against attempts by Republican establishment figures to attribute the party’s electoral setback to other issues, particularly immigration policy.

He said he was open to reviewing immigration enforcement strategies, including targeting businesses that employ undocumented workers, but rejected calls for amnesty.

“Anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you,” he said.

The Vice President challenged those who believed the war was worth the political cost to defend that position openly, noting that the defeat could cost Republicans control of the Senate for the next six years.

“If you’d like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next six years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay,” he said.

“Agree or disagree, that’s at least honest.”

Despite the setback, Vance expressed optimism about the country’s future, urging disappointed Republican supporters to channel their anger into rebuilding the party and electing candidates who share their political views.

“Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country,” he added.

See also  Tinubu has no plan to change Nigeria’s name, abolish Sharia law — Presidency 

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

UK to strengthen immigration enforcement with facial recognition

Published

on

The United Kingdom government plans to expand live facial recognition technology to strengthen immigration enforcement and identify individuals who have violated immigration rules.

The initiative, being developed by the Home Office, could see facial recognition cameras deployed at transport hubs and public events to help immigration officers identify people who have overstayed their visas, entered the country unlawfully or breached their immigration conditions.

According to policy documents published in October and sighted by PUNCH Online on Thursday, the proposed expansion could extend the technology’s use to general immigration enforcement, including civil immigration violations that do not necessarily involve criminal offences.

The development comes as Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood seeks to intensify immigration enforcement through increased funding, additional personnel and expanded deportation operations.

The Home Office said the technology would help officers identify individuals subject to removal proceedings and those attempting to re-enter the UK unlawfully.

The policy documents also suggest that facial recognition could reduce the need for repeated enforcement visits to residential properties and workplaces.

Authorities have already conducted three trials of the technology at Holyhead port in north Wales between November 2025 and February 2026. The trials focused on identifying individuals travelling from Ireland who were subject to deportation orders or wanted over immigration-related criminal offences.

The programme has now entered its formal delivery phase, with officials considering wider deployments at transport hubs and large public gatherings.

A Home Office spokesperson confirmed that further trials were being considered while the government examined the potential benefits and implications of the technology.

See also  Women protest in Abuja for reserved seats bill

U K Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said: “Facial recognition technology has been the biggest breakthrough for catching criminals since DNA matching, already helping police take thousands of dangerous criminals off our streets.

“The benefits are clear, but we must ensure that its use is fair, safe and proportionate.

“It is right we put in place clear laws to ensure that the use of this technology is watertight, so the public can have confidence that these tools, which are vital to our safety, are used responsibly too.”

However, the proposed expansion has raised concerns among civil liberties organisations and migrant rights advocates over privacy, surveillance and the possibility of inaccurate identification.

The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants described the development as a significant escalation of immigration enforcement powers, while the Open Rights Group questioned the transparency of the plans, public consent and the absence of comprehensive legislation governing facial recognition.

Critics have also warned that the technology could disproportionately affect people of colour because of concerns about identification accuracy.

Meanwhile, Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner William Webster has questioned whether existing regulatory arrangements are sufficient to oversee the expanding use of facial recognition across government agencies.

Under the proposed policy, individuals under 18 will not be included on facial recognition watchlists.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending