Connect with us

News

Benin: ECOWAS fears coup surge, Senate okays Nigerian troops deployment

Published

on

The Senate on Tuesday approved President Bola Tinubu’s request to deploy Nigerian troops to the Republic of Benin as part of a rapid regional peace mission aimed at restoring democratic order after an attempted coup in the neighbouring country.

The Senate’s approval comes as the Economic Community of West African States expressed worry over the security and political challenges eroding democracy in the sub-region during the 55th Session of the Mediation and Security Council at the ministerial level in Abuja on Tuesday.

Benin Republic was thrust into turmoil on Sunday after soldiers operating under the Military Committee for Refoundation seized the state-owned television station in Cotonou and announced the removal of President Patrice Talon.

The mutineers, led by Lt. Col. Pascal Tigri, claimed to have deposed the government, raising urgent security alarms across the sub-region.

Loyalist forces, however, regained control after a brief standoff, aided by the rapid mobilisation of Nigerian troops.

The Presidency described the intervention as proof of President Tinubu’s resolve to safeguard constitutional order in West Africa and prevent another democratic collapse within the ECOWAS region.

The Senate granted Tinubu’s request following the consideration of the President’s letter in the Committee of the Whole, after Senate President Godswill Akpabio read the communication during plenary.

In the letter, Tinubu—who also chairs ECOWAS—urged lawmakers to endorse the deployment to “help restore governance” in Benin, where a faction of soldiers had attempted to topple President Patrice Talon.

But the chamber erupted into a rare open disagreement among senior lawmakers shortly after the Senate assented to the request.

Deputy Senate President and First Deputy Speaker of the ECOWAS Parliament, Senator Jibrin Barau, opened the floor with effusive praise for the President’s swift intervention.

He declared, “Democracy is the best form of government. All ECOWAS members are proud of what the president did. Mr President is a true democrat and showed leadership. We will support and stand by him.”

His remarks, however, immediately drew objections from former Bayelsa State governor, Senator Seriake Dickson, who insisted the matter ought to be debated openly.

“I actually felt there is a need for lawmakers to debate this action,” Dickson protested.

Akpabio promptly shut down the suggestion, insisting the Senate had already given its consent.

“We have given the president consent. Every person was in agreement. All the senators are aware and wouldn’t have given consent if otherwise,” he ruled.

He added that the Senate’s position was unanimous, stressing that Tinubu acted in the interest of national and regional security.

“Whatever the president has done, the Senate is in total agreement. That means he is also protecting the borders of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The president is not going to war.”

See also  ECOWAS, Islamic Scholars Unite Against Terrorism In West Africa

Former Edo State governor, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, backed Akpabio’s position and reinforced the argument that the matter had been concluded.

“Mr President, we unanimously consented to it, including Senator Dickson. It is not up for debate. He has acted well and in good faith. The Senate has endorsed and sealed it. Therefore, it cannot be opened.”

Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele also weighed in, providing the legal justification for the Senate’s action.

“The standing order says that in the event of a threat or national security, Mr President can intervene and seek the consent of the Senate within seven days,” he explained.

He thanked senators for acting swiftly. “We believe democracy should not be endangered in Africa.”

Dickson later clarified that he did not oppose the approval but insisted ECOWAS must also address governance deficits that often trigger coups.

“Mr President has done the right thing because democratic institutions are collapsing around us. But it has to be done the right way,” he said.

Dickson added, “We must also warn the leaders of the nations around us to stem the tide and run good governance and popular government in accordance with the constitution they run.”

Senator Jimoh Ibrahim described Nigeria’s intervention as consistent with its long-standing leadership role on the continent.

“Peace is not the opposite of war and war is not the opposite of war… Nigeria is also in line to intervene to save democracy among its close neighbours,” he argued.

He added, “I think this action is quite commendable. President Tinubu is a liberal and democrat.”

Akpabio later expanded the historical context, recalling Nigeria’s roles in Liberia and South Africa.

“Nigeria went into Liberia when it was late. That was why we lost so many soldiers. But we are glad peace was eventually restored. In South Africa, we supported the end of apartheid and brought a lot of South Africans to Nigeria to support our brothers and sisters in Africa.

“But the swiftness of this action is why the Senate gave its consent. I think it is commendable,” he noted.

Addressing the 55th Session of the Mediation and Security Council at the Ministerial level in Abuja on Tuesday, the President of the ECOWAS Commission, Dr Omar Touray, warned about escalating political instability and security threats across the region.

Addressing ministers, diplomats and senior officials, Touray painted a picture of West Africa’s political climate, citing recent developments as evidence of a deteriorating environment.

The commission’s president described ECOWAS as facing an average of high risk across its member states.

“Events of the last few weeks have shown the imperative of serious introspection on the future of our democracy and the urgent need to invest in the security of our community.

See also  Nigeria not facing Christian genocide, says NOA boss

“As you would have seen in the memoranda before you, the country-by-country analyses of our member states show different risk levels across our community, from high to medium, with an average of high risk for our community, thereby demanding immediate and concerted action.

“The risk factors are: the persistence of military interventions (Guinea-Bissau and the Republic of Benin just days ago) and non-compliance with transition norms in Guinea, as we face a military leader turning into a civilian leader;

“Growing erosion of electoral inclusivity across multiple states; expanding influence of terrorists and armed groups and criminal networks threatening regional stability; and increasing geopolitical pressures affecting member states’ diplomacy and cohesion,” he explained.

Among the most concerning developments, he emphasised that “Elections have become a major trigger of instability in our community.”

Several ECOWAS states, such as Guinea, Benin, The Gambia and Cape Verde, are headed into elections in the coming months, raising concerns about electoral tensions and constitutional violations.

Touray also cited recent attempted coups and ongoing negotiations with the Alliance of Sahel States, stressing the urgent need for a united regional response to terrorism and cross-border criminal networks.

Declaring the situation unprecedented, Touray warned, “Faced with this situation, Excellencies, it is safe to declare that our community is in a state of emergency.”

He urged that sessions of the Mediation and Security Council be convened more frequently over the next year, insisting that ECOWAS must “pool our resources to confront the threats of terrorism and banditry, which operate without respect for territorial boundaries.”

He outlined key priorities requiring constant ministerial oversight, including managing the crisis in Guinea-Bissau, ensuring peaceful transitions, addressing growing political exclusion and protecting regional unity amid external pressures.

The ECOWAS commission president also highlighted worsening humanitarian conditions across West Africa, referencing recent UNHCR data. He noted that “as of October 2025, approximately 7.6 million individuals are forcibly displaced across the region,” including over 6.5 million internally displaced persons.

Still referring to the data, the largest displaced populations are found in Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Niger and Mali, while countries such as Niger, Mali, Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire and Togo host the highest numbers of asylum seekers.

Touray stressed, “We must therefore take decisions and actions that will reverse this trend.”

Despite the daunting challenges, Touray pledged ECOWAS’s continued commitment to the region’s citizens.

“Let me assure our community citizens that we will not rest on our oars. We will continue to work harder to promote a peaceful, stable and stronger region for the overall benefit of community citizens,” he noted.

See also  Electoral Act: Opposition pushes back as e-transmission faces firestorm

He called on member states to uphold constitutional norms and maintain unity: “Let us all remain committed to preserving regional unity, advancing peace and upholding the community’s constitutional convergence principles.”

He praised President Bola Tinubu for his prompt military response in the Benin Republic following the failed coup attempt.

Concluding his address, he welcomed new ministerial representatives attending for the first time.

“May I extend a warm welcome to the new Ministers of Defence of Nigeria, Rtd. General Christopher Musa, and Foreign Affairs of Cabo Verde, José Luis Livramento, who are joining today for the first time,” he concluded.

In his remarks, Sierra Leone’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and Chair of the Council of Ministers, Timothy Kabba, urged West African leaders to take decisive action to protect democratic governance in the region amid recent political instability.

Kabba highlighted the fragility of democracy in West Africa, pointing to recent political crises in Guinea-Bissau and Benin.

“The recent coup in Guinea-Bissau and the attempted coup in the Benin Republic are sobering reminders of the fragility of our democratic gains,” Kabba said.

He detailed Sierra Leone’s diplomatic efforts, noting that he and a high-level delegation visited Guinea-Bissau on December 1, 2025, to engage with the military leadership and political stakeholders.

“His Excellency’s engagement helped ease tensions and opened the door for continued dialogue under ECOWAS’s guidance.

“These actions reflect our collective position. ECOWAS cannot and will not accept this development. They undermine everything our community stands for, and they threaten the peace and security of our citizens,” he explained.

The minister stressed the urgent need for practical outcomes from the summit.

“The discussions we have today must move beyond just reaffirming principles. They must generate decisions that offer real hope and strengthen the credibility of our institutions.

“Our people no longer have patience for commitments that remain unpaid. They expect us to confront these challenges with seriousness, unity and purpose,” Kabba said.

The meeting of the Mediation and Security Council precedes the gathering of ECOWAS Heads of State and Government, who are expected to deliberate on the Council’s recommendations amid mounting pressure to restore stability in a deeply troubled region.

West Africa is facing escalating political instability and security challenges, with several ECOWAS member states experiencing coups, attempted coups and fragile political transitions.

Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso remain under military rule, while Guinea-Bissau recently joined this group following a military intervention. On Sunday, an attempted coup in the Benin Republic was foiled, further highlighting the fragility of democratic governance across the region

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Nigeria not facing Christian genocide, says NOA boss

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Airlines reject fresh $11.50 NIS fee

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  ECOWAS, Islamic Scholars Unite Against Terrorism In West Africa

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Jimoh Ibrahim urges Nigerians to support Tinubu’s economic, security reforms

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Buhari was an angel in human flesh - Bisi Akande

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Jimoh Ibrahim urges Nigerians to support Tinubu’s economic, security reforms

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending