Connect with us

News

#FreeNnamdiKanu: Protest wave hits Abuja, paralyses S’East states

Published

on

A coordinated wave of protests demanding the release of the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, swept through the Federal Capital Territory and several South-East states on Monday, disrupting commercial activities and grounding transportation.

Monday’s demonstration, convened by activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore, leader of the #RevolutionNow movement, also triggered heavy deployment of security personnel around key government facilities, including the Three Arms Zone, home to the Aso Rock Presidential Villa, the National Assembly, and the Supreme Court.

In Abuja, dozens of protesters were forcibly dispersed by security personnel who prevented the crowd from advancing toward the Villa. Access roads around the Three Arms Zone were also cordoned off, and federal civil servants were temporarily barred from entering key ministries for several hours. The diversions caused widespread traffic disruptions around the Federal Capital Territory.

At the Villa, armoured vehicles, soldiers, and personnel of multiple security agencies cordoned off the premises and major routes across the central business area.

The PUNCH observed that Yakubu Gowon Crescent, Asokoro, leading into the premises, was barricaded by Toyota Hilux vans as armoured personnel carriers were positioned at the entrance and exit. A security personnel told our correspondent that the increased deployment was to ward off protesters.

“It’s because of the protest. They gave us strict orders not to allow just anybody to enter today,” the official said.

At 6am on Monday, combined teams of soldiers, police officers, and operatives of the Department of State Services had taken up positions at strategic locations, sealing off access roads to the Three Arms Zone.

Stop-and-search operations were intensified, and movement around key government institutions was heavily restricted. Senior civil servants with official Villa tags were turned back at various entry points.

Those on foot were allowed to walk through the blockades while those driving were asked to reroute.

The lockdown led to severe gridlock for thousands of commuters from Nyanya, Karu, Mararaba, and Masaka who were delayed for hours on their way to work, reports say. Similar blockades were reported on the Dutse–Bwari axis and Airport Road, with advisories warning civil servants to seek alternative routes.

Security patrols were also intensified around Eagle Square, the Federal Secretariat, and the National Assembly complex, where anti-riot police and armoured personnel carriers were stationed to prevent possible convergence by protesters.

The protests were part of renewed calls for the Federal Government to comply with court orders directing Kanu’s release. The IPOB leader, arrested and extradited from Kenya in June 2021, remains in the custody of the DSS despite multiple rulings granting him bail.

Kanu’s supporters have consistently raised concerns about his deteriorating health, urging the government to free him to undergo medical treatment. The FG, however, maintained that Kanu faces serious charges bordering on treasonable felony and terrorism.

Sowore, who has remained vocal about human rights and government accountability, said the demonstration aimed to draw attention to what he called a “blatant disregard for the rule of law.”

In the days leading to the protest, Sowore used his social media handles to mobilise supporters, maintaining that peaceful assembly was a constitutional right.

He said the rally would be non-violent and urged the police to protect and not intimidate protesters.

However, security agencies had expressed concern that the protest could escalate into unrest around sensitive government zones.

Protesters, including Sowore and several activists, gathered at the Unity Fountain in Abuja early on Monday, chanting solidarity songs and carrying placards demanding Kanu’s release.

The police fired multiple rounds of tear gas canisters to disperse the crowd around the barricaded zones, a move that sparked tension.

See also  Genocide: Religious extremists plotting to divide Nigeria says FG

According to one of our correspondents, the protesters left Transcorp Hilton and adjoining streets in Maitama. They regrouped around the Utako axis of Abuja, prompting another round of dispersal by the police.

Police defend dispersal

The police has defended its enforcement of a court order restricting the #FreeNnamdiKanu protest from accessing key government areas in Abuja, insisting that its officers acted within the law and only used tear gas to disperse demonstrators.

Force Public Relations Officer, Benjamin Hundeyin, said this during an interview on Channels Television on Monday.

He explained that the decision followed a valid order from the Federal High Court obtained on Friday.

According to him, the order barred protesters from converging on or marching towards strategic areas, including the Aso Villa, Supreme Court, National Assembly, Eagles Square, and Shehu Shagari Way, among others.

“We got a court order specifically about this protest and restricting protests from certain areas like the Aso Villa, the Supreme Court, the National Assembly, Eagle Square, the Force Headquarters and Shagari Way. As a law enforcement agency, we are duty-bound to enforce that order,” Hundeyin said.

The spokesman explained that the Force acted after receiving intelligence indicating possible unrest if the protest reached those restricted zones, adding that the police were obliged to prevent a breakdown of law and order.

“We have records of past protests where things were destroyed. So, it is our duty to protect life and property. Whatever lawful steps we need to take to achieve that mandate are what we’ll take,” he added.

Hundeyin stressed that officers only used “minimal force” to disperse protesters who allegedly attempted to move towards the banned areas despite repeated warnings.

“We gave enough warning for these people to step back, but they were adamant. We used tear gas in line with our standard operating procedures. That was the least we could do. Nobody was harmed or injured,” he said.

The Force spokesman also denied reports that live ammunition was used during the protest, saying such claims were “false and misleading.”

“I can state categorically that no live ammunition was fired today. It’s easy for people who are not familiar with the sounds to mistake the firing of tear gas for live bullets, but I can say with authority that only tear gas was used,” he clarified.

He noted that the court order was not a secret document and that the protest organisers were directed to appear in court on Monday morning as part of the proceedings.

NSCDC condemns protest

The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps condemned an early morning protest at its headquarters in Abuja, calling it an anti-government demonstration disguised as a campaign for justice.

According to a statement by NSCDC spokesperson Afolabi Babawale, more than 50 individuals gathered at the entrance of the headquarters, chanting protest songs and demanding the release of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra.

Babawale described the protest as “totally condemnable,” stating, “The protesters invaded the entrance of the Corps National Headquarters chanting different protest songs.”

The spokesman noted that the Commandant-General of the NSCDC, Prof. Ahmed Audi, had previously issued directives to all state commands and formations, instructing them to intensify surveillance and bolster the protection of critical national assets in preparation for the protest.

The Corps had also deployed both undercover and uniformed operatives nationwide and in the Federal Capital Territory to prevent any potential unrest.

In his statement, Babawale reiterated the NSCDC’s primary responsibilities, which include safeguarding national assets, overseeing private security companies, managing disaster responses, and supporting food security by protecting farmers and their crops.

While acknowledging the public’s right to peaceful assembly, Babawale argued that such rights must be exercised lawfully.

See also  Rivers in turmoil: APC leaders intervene as Fubara faces fresh impeachment threat

“The corps reaffirm that as much as the civil populace reserves the right to meaningful gathering and freedom of association, the need to exercise caution and restraint is fundamental, especially where the court bars any reasonable citizen from such gathering,” he said.

The NSCDC called for collective action from all stakeholders, including government agencies, traditional leaders, and community organisations, to ensure the protection of national infrastructure.

Babawale concluded by warning that “culpable suspects arrested would face the full wrath of the law.” He stressed that the Corps would not tolerate any attempts to compromise national security.

Abia, Anambra, Enugu

Simultaneously, cities across the South-East, including Onitsha, Enugu, Aba, and Owerri, witnessed total lockdowns. Markets, schools, and banks remained shut, with residents observing a de facto sit-at-home.

The protest recorded a total compliance in Umuahia, the Abia state capital and Aba, its commercial hub, as markets, banks and private businesses were under lock and key.

One of our correspondents who monitored the situation observed that supporters of the Biafra Freedom Fighter were seen in the city centre in Umuahia singing freedom songs, urging the Federal government to release Kanu. Also, some prominent Igbo leaders joined the appeal for the release of Kanu through dialogue.

In separate interviews with The PUNCH, the President General of the Igbo Vanguard Group, James Uchegbuo, and the President General of the Igbo Ekene Global Development Union, Moses Onyegbule, called for Kanu’s release through peaceful and lawful means.

Uchegbuo emphasised that peace and reconciliation remain essential for rebuilding trust and fostering development across the South-East.

He maintained that the call for Kanu’s release was not a challenge to the nation’s authority but an appeal to uphold justice, equity, and national cohesion. Similarly, Onyegbule urged the FG to consider the broader implications of continued detention, noting that dialogue, understanding, and forgiveness were indispensable for national healing. He added that releasing Kanu would serve as a goodwill gesture, demonstrating the government’s commitment to unity and inclusion.

In Anambra state, residents reenacted the Monday sit-at-home in protest of Kanu’s continued detention. Although IPOB had long cancelled the Monday sit-at-home it introduced in 2021 across the South-East, residents remained indoors, mostly for fear of being attacked.

The Commissioner of Police, Ikioye Orutugu, commended people of Anambra State for their growing commitment to peace, unity, and progress while he further assures that adequate security arrangements have been emplaced to sustain the existing peace and to ensure that law-abiding citizens continue their legitimate activities without fear.

Orutugu reiterated that the Command will continue to adopt proactive measures, strengthen community policing strategies, and collaborate with critical stakeholders to maintain security, law, and order across the State.

One of our correspondents who traversed the major hubs across the state including Onitsha, Nnewi, Ekwulobia, Oba and some parts of Awka, observed that banks, offices, markets, motor parks, shops, schools and petrol stations, remained shut while major streets and roads were deserted.

It was observed that commercial activities were on hold as major markets auch as the Onitsha Main Market, Ochanja, Mgbuka Amazun, Electrical Market and Nkwo Nnewi were closed. Only a few roadside traders were seen displaying their wares at Nkpor as well as Eke-Awka market in Awka.

A resident of Okpoko, Onitsha, identified as Jude Uzor, who spoke to our correspondent, said, “The people intensified the sit-at-home today(Monday) in solidarity to the #ReleaseNnamdiKanuNow protest going on in Abuja over the Federal Government’s disobedience to the court judgment that ordered the release of IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu.

“We are happy with the protest, but we are used to staying indoors on Mondays, although in recent times, it seems to be subsiding, but today, it was a lockdown.”

See also  Babachir Lawal dumps ADC, makes great revelation about Atiku’s primary win

A market leader in one of the major markets in Onitsha who was spotted near the markets but requested anonymity said, “Due to the directive given by the governor that markets should be opening on Mondays, we started opening the markets, but today, we did not open in solidarity with the free Kanu protest.

“But as you can see, everywhere is deserted. For fear of being attacked by hoodlums, everyone has decided to stay indoors and wait for events to unfold. Even the traders did not come.”

Another pedestrian, John Okeke, said, “Only Nnamdi Kanu’s release is what the people are demanding; and people should support the protest because it could be anyone tomorrow. The governors of the region should just focus on using their good offices to lobby for the release of Kanu.”

Earlier in the day, police had beefed up security at Nkpor and Oyeagu, where lone protesters were seen marching on the streets and displaying placards.

Meanwhile, the Anambra State Police Command said it has conducted a security situational assessment following credible intelligence reports about a planned protest in some parts of the state.

In a statement on Monday, the Spokesman for the Anambra State Police Command, Tochukwu Ikenga, said the assessment revealed that residents had embraced dialogue and peaceful engagement as a means of addressing concerns.

The protests also held sway in Ebonyi State, where residents remained indoors. The PUNCH gathered that, although there were no protest marches, business activities were suspended as banks, schools, offices, eateries, shopping malls, and markets were all shut down.

It was further gathered that few commercial vehicles remained operational as motor parks were also shut down, with few commercial motorcyclists operating around the city centre.

Although armed security personnel were stationed in some strategic locations throughout the state to ensure a peaceful atmosphere, they soon dispersed when no protesters showed up.

When The PUNCH visited the metropolis, the roads were empty with almost all the shops closed. A few people were seen trekking to their destinations. Also banks, schools, markets, government offices, motor parks, and other private institutions were closed.

At the ever-busy Water Works Road section of the Ogoja Road and Afikpo Road, Gunning Street and Afikpo Street, there were no heavy vehicular traffic as the roads were deserted. Also, the Ezzama/Oshiri/Onicha/Okposi/Uburu road was deserted.

Meanwhile, Igbos in Ondo State joined the protest. Although protesters did not storm the streets, many of their shops were under lock and key. This included shops along Oyemekun Road, Adesida Road, Arakale Road, NEPA, Carl Street, Old Garage and other commercial areas in the capital, Akure, where Igbo traders cluster.

The only shops operating were all owned by folks from other parts of the country. One trader who simply identified herself as Nkechi said the Igbo traders sat at home as part of their solidarity for the IPOB leaders.

She said, “We refused to open shop today as a way of our own protest. If we can’t join them in Abuja, at least we can show our solidarity from here. They should release the man (Kanu)! It is unfair to keep him in detention for many years. Tinubu should be able to do that one for us.”

Our correspondent on the ground observed a heavy presence of security agents at the usual protest grounds in Akure metropolis.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Germany deports 137 Nigerians in five chartered flights

Published

on

Germany deported at least 137 Nigerian citizens in five documented chartered operations between February and June 2026, according to reports sighted by The PUNCH.

The documented arrivals comprised 27 Nigerians deported in February, 37 deported directly by Germany as part of a 50-person joint European Union operation in March, and 24, 23 and 26 Nigerians deported in April, May and June, respectively, according to figures contained in reports monitored by the DERS Team and Refugees4refugees.org.

The figures indicate an increase in the use of chartered flights to return Nigerians from Germany and other European countries, with several of the operations involving cooperation among European states.

On February 18, 2026, a batch of 27 Nigerians arrived at the Lagos Cargo Airport following a deportation operation from Germany.

According to Refugees4refugees.org, the flight was operated by World2fly and departed Stuttgart before arriving in Lagos shortly before 2 pm.

The report said the operation was primarily enforced by Germany, although one person, described as severely ill and mentally unfit, was transferred from Slovakia to join the 26 people deported from Germany.

It also identified Baden-Württemberg as a major participant in the operation and said Stuttgart had hosted both the December 2025 and February 2026 deportation operations to Nigeria.

The report further alleged that while some of those deported had serious health conditions, others had lived and worked in Germany for several years.

It cited the case of a single mother and her three children who were deported from the Sindelfingen district in Stuttgart despite reportedly having documentation relating to their residence status.

See also  Court threatens to revoke Sowore’s bail over absenteeism

According to the report, the family subsequently returned to Germany after intervention by a volunteer and confirmation from local foreign authorities that the deportation had been made in error.

Furthermore, the February deportation also coincided with Nigeria’s participation in preparations for the Voluntary National Review of the Global Compact for Migration ahead of the 2026 International Migration Review Forum in New York.

The DERS Team said that Nigerian government agencies did not send representatives to receive the deportees at the airport, adding that the returning Nigerians were subsequently transported away from the airport without adequate assistance.

On March 10, another 50 people were deported to Nigeria in a joint EU operation hosted by Germany in cooperation with Spain, Austria and Belgium.

Germany accounted directly for 37 of the deportations, according to the figures provided.

The operation was described as the largest single deportation involving Nigerians in the three years referenced in the report.

A further 24 Nigerians, including women and a minor, were deported on April 9 on a chartered flight from Frankfurt organised through Frontex and German authorities, according to the supplied data.

In May 2026, another batch of 23 deportees was returned to Nigeria, while 26 Nigerians arrived in Lagos on June 17 following another routine chartered deportation flight.

Taken together, the five documented batches amounted to 137 Nigerians returned to the country between February and June 2026.

The figures highlight the continued use of organised charter flights in the enforcement of migration decisions involving Nigerians in Europe.

Migration rights advocates have, however, continued to argue that deportation policies should be accompanied by adequate safeguards for vulnerable people and proper procedures to prevent wrongful removal.

See also  Dan Agbese was an institution in journalism - Tinubu

While migration is as old as time itself, identified underlying factors driving irregular migration include conflict, exploitation, climate-related pressures and economic inequality.

Migration is the permanent or temporary movement of people from one place to another, changing their home. It can happen within a country or across borders, shaping populations, cultures, and job markets.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Adeyemi demands media, lawyers’ presence before Reps probe on PFIPC scandal

Published

on

The House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee investigating the controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council is yet to decide where it will question the council’s self-appointed Director-General, Adeniyi Adeyemi, a source familiar with the committee’s proceedings has disclosed.

The development comes as Adeyemi insisted that his lawyers and journalists must be present before he submits to questioning by the House committee.

The committee, chaired by the lawmaker representing Kanke/Kanam/Pankshin Federal Constituency of Plateau State, Yusuf Gagdi, is probing how the PFIPC secured official office accommodation within the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of more than N1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act despite allegedly having no legal existence.

The investigation has attracted significant public attention following allegations that the council operated within government structures despite lacking legal recognition, raising concerns about possible lapses in public financial management and institutional oversight.

Adeyemi, who has been in police custody over the controversy surrounding the council, is expected to appear before the committee this week, following testimonies from several senior government officials.

However, as of Sunday, the venue for the much-anticipated session remained unsettled.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to discuss the committee’s proceedings with the media, confirmed the development in response to an inquiry by The PUNCH.

Asked whether the committee had chosen a venue for Adeyemi’s appearance, the source simply replied, “No decision yet.”

The development followed the committee’s hearings with key government officials, including the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack; the Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Tanimu Yakubu; the Director of Banking Services at the Central Bank of Nigeria, Hamisu Abdullahi; and representatives of the Inspector-General of Police.

The officials’ testimonies reportedly raised questions about how Adeyemi allegedly presented himself as the head of the PFIPC and secured recognition and access within government circles.

Adeyemi had, through his lawyers, indicated his willingness to appear before the committee publicly and respond to questions concerning the allegations.

However, Gagdi said the committee would determine the venue for the session at a later date.

Meanwhile, the Coalition of United Political Parties has rejected the findings of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on the PFIPC controversy, describing the investigation as inadequate and calling for a broader and transparent inquiry.

In an interview with our correspondent, CUPP spokesperson, Agu Bryan, said the ICPC’s report, which reportedly cleared the Presidency of wrongdoing while indicting Adeniyi Adeyemi, failed to answer critical questions about how an allegedly non-existent government agency was able to operate at such a high level.

“The ICPC probe of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council which exonerated the Presidency and indicted Adeniyi Adeyemi is nothing short of a charade,” Bryan said.

He argued that the report appeared to portray Adeyemi as having operated almost entirely alone, despite the scale of activities attributed to him.

See also  Babachir Lawal dumps ADC, makes great revelation about Atiku’s primary win

According to Bryan, such an operation could not have continued without assistance or enabling actions by officials within government institutions.

“As Nigerians, we know that someone could not have operated an alleged high-profile agency of such magnitude without enablers, either within the Presidency or across the government agencies involved,” he said.

Bryan called for a broader examination of the roles allegedly played by government institutions referenced in Adeyemi’s correspondence, including the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation.

He particularly cited the testimony of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, that her office failed to conduct due diligence on some of the documents associated with the controversial council.

The coalition also questioned how the PFIPC allegedly found its way into the national budget if, as reported by the ICPC, it had no legal foundation.

CUPP said the National Assembly and relevant government ministries owed Nigerians an explanation over how funds were appropriated to an organisation whose legal status had allegedly not been established.

“The National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, which appropriated funds to an agency that, according to the investigation, never existed as a creation of law, also owes Nigerians an explanation,” Bryan said.

He asked who within the Ministry of Budget and National Planning processed the budget line attributed to the PFIPC and what verification mechanisms were applied before public funds were appropriated.

CUPP also raised questions about the alleged recruitment of hundreds of staff and the extent to which Adeyemi was granted access to official government activities.

Bryan said the issues went beyond determining whether Adeyemi forged documents, arguing that investigators should establish how he allegedly gained access to government processes and institutions.

The controversy escalated after investigators reportedly established that a signature attributed to the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, was forged.

CUPP said the finding should prompt investigators to examine other official documents and correspondence allegedly used by Adeyemi.

“It is commendable that the House and the Police have established that the signature of the Chief of Staff to the President was allegedly forged. But that raises another critical question: how many other documents, official correspondences and signatures allegedly used by Adeyemi were also forged?” Bryan asked.

He said Nigerians deserved to know the full extent of the alleged deception and whether officials responsible for verifying the credentials of individuals dealing with public institutions failed in their duties.

The coalition further questioned how the PFIPC allegedly acquired sufficient official recognition to participate in government processes and appear in the national budget.

“How did a supposedly non-existent agency attain such a level of official recognition and attention that it found its way into the national budget?” he asked.

CUPP also called for Adeyemi to be given a fair opportunity to defend himself before the House committee, arguing that a transparent confrontation with the evidence could help determine whether other individuals or institutions were involved.

See also  2027 Presidency: Makinde, others to fight for PDP ticket

“Was Adeyemi given fair hearing thus far? Has he been given the privilege to appear before the Yusuf Gagdi-led Ad hoc Committee of the House of Representatives probing the matter to be interrogated and directly answer questions?” Bryan said.

He invoked the legal principle nemo judex in causa sua—that no person should be a judge in his own cause—in arguing that the investigation should be conducted independently and transparently.

Bryan said anything short of an open and impartial investigation would fail to satisfy public expectations.

He also criticised the ICPC’s handling of the matter and called for independent professional bodies to be considered if the Federal Government was genuinely interested in establishing the facts.

“If President Tinubu is determined to unravel the truth, independent organisations or bodies like the NBA, West African Bar Association or international or private investigators should be allowed to come in and take over the investigation,” Bryan said.

He accused federal security and anti-corruption agencies of lacking sufficient independence to investigate the controversy objectively, a claim the agencies have not accepted.

The House committee’s inquiry follows mounting concerns over how Adeyemi allegedly operated the PFIPC, secured government recognition and participated in official engagements despite questions over the organisation’s legal status.

The controversy has also drawn attention to the roles of several government institutions whose officials allegedly interacted with Adeyemi or processed documents connected to the council.

The committee is expected to hear directly from Adeyemi as it seeks to establish how the PFIPC was created, how it operated, who recognised it and whether public funds were allocated or expended in connection with its activities.

 

 

His appearance before the committee could therefore prove significant in determining whether the alleged scheme was the work of an individual or involved officials and institutions within government.

Adeyemi demands media

Adeyemi, through his lawyer, Ademola Oyedokun, had on Wednesday rejected the House committee’s decision to question him at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The committee subsequently attempted to question him on Thursday, but Adeyemi declined to respond to its questions, prompting the lawmakers to reschedule the interrogation for Monday.

However, a family source said Adeyemi had informed the committee that he would only submit to questioning if journalists and his legal representatives were allowed to be present.

“They eventually rescheduled to Monday and my brother told them that when they are coming, they should come with the media, otherwise he will not grant them audience.

“Initially, they agreed to come with the media, but later they said they would not be coming with any media. They said if he refuses to grant them audience, they will go ahead and conclude their investigation and it will be said that he was the one who failed to grant them audience,” the source said.

The development came a day after Adeyemi’s family raised concerns over an attempt by members of the House committee to question him in police custody without his lawyers present.

Adeyemi’s brother, Peter, alleged that the detained promoter declined to answer questions because his legal representatives were absent.

“The Reps committee came and wanted to interrogate him, but he refused. They are still there trying to make him talk without any of his lawyers being present. We are crying out loud so that the right thing would be done.

“He has stated that he wants to be quizzed the same way others who have accused him have spoken. It’s not that he is not willing to state his side of the story,” he said.

When contacted on whether the police were aware of the committee’s proposed visit and whether the lawmakers would be granted access to Adeyemi, the police spokesperson, Ani Ineidu, said visitors would be allowed provided they met the necessary requirements.

“Yes, if they have necessary documents. I’m not aware if they have relevant documents or authorisation, but if they fulfil the conditions, everybody who is under police custody has a right to visitors.

“So, in a case like this, if they have that right, they will be granted access,” Ineidu said.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, Oyedokun said his client welcomed the House investigation into the alleged establishment and operations of the PFIPC but opposed what he described as a closed-door interrogation.

“We have read that the committee intends to interview our client at an undisclosed date and place. We ask it, respectfully, to think again.

“Everyone else in this matter has been heard in public, and what has been said about our client was said in public. He should be allowed to answer in the same place it was said,” the lawyer stated.

The committee had on Tuesday announced that it would question Adeyemi at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The Chairman of the committee, Yusuf Gagdi, said the arrangement was necessary to avoid interfering with ongoing investigations by the Nigeria Police Force, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission.

Gagdi said the committee had invited Adeyemi but was informed by the police that he remained in custody pursuant to a court order.

He added that the National Assembly would not act in a manner that undermined the judiciary or violated the principle of separation of powers, stressing that lawmakers lacked the authority to override an existing court order directing Adeyemi’s detention.

 

 

The committee is investigating allegations surrounding the creation and operations of the PFIPC, including claims of impersonation, forgery, financial impropriety and the unlawful use of government facilities and official insignia.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

PHOTOS: Osun-Osogbo: Priestess defends 10-year-old Arugba, dismisses child abuse claims

Published

on

The Araba of Osogbo, Ifáyemí Elébuibón, has defended the tradition of selecting a young maiden as the Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, describing the role as a privilege rather than child abuse.

This is as a priestess and custodian of Osun Osogbo also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.


Osun-Osogbo: Priestess

Elébuibón spoke in a video interview posted on Sunday by Yoruba cultural content creator, Wàá Ṣeré, amid discussions surrounding the age and responsibilities of the 10-year-old Arugba, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi.

Arugba is the young maiden chosen to carry the sacred calabash during the annual Osun-Osogbo Festival procession to the Osun Sacred Grove.

Alimot, a member of the royal family of the Ataoja of Osogbo, was selected through traditional Ifa divination in March 2025.

She carried the sacred calabash for the first time during this year’s procession to the Osun Sacred Grove on Friday, after she was unable to do so during the 2025 festival because of her young age.


10-year-old Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi carries the sacred calabash at Osun Osogbo festival…Photo Credit: Dewunmi Lagos

Explaining the role and its benefit, Elébuibón said the Arugba served as a spiritual intermediary between the Osun deity and the people.

He added that the responsibility was not determined by biological age.

“You see those people saying all that? They lack understanding. They don’t know. Whoever says the Arugba is too young—this one is ten years old, but some started at five!

See also  Natasha’s appeal reveals court didn’t nullify suspension – Akpabio’s aide

“The role the Arugba plays is a role of spiritual maturity, not about physical age. What the Arugba does for the town and the community is what the white man calls a ‘medium’—an intermediary between the Orisa and the people,” he said.

Elébuibón said the young maiden could communicate the wishes of the deity to the people because of the spiritual significance attached to the position.

“As young as she is, provided she remains pure and undefiled by any man, she can wake up one morning and say, ‘Mother Osun said this and that, do this, do that, don’t do this.’”

He added that the Arugba’s spiritual development was not necessarily tied to her physical age.

“Very soon, she will mature spiritually far beyond her biological age because the Orisa themselves nourish and care for them. Her role is not about age; what she does is not about age.”


FILE: Ifayemi Elebuibon

A female priestess and culture custodian, in another video posted by culture content creator Olamide Oseyifunmii, also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.

According to her, the chosen maiden must be a virgin and is expected to observe certain taboos associated with the role.

“Whomever Ifa chooses becomes the Arugba. The Arugba must be a girl who remains untouched, pure, and a virgin. That is strictly what the Arugba must be,” she said.

She rejected the description of the practice as child abuse, saying the young girls selected for the role were traditionally protected and treated with care.

See also  First lady distributes 10,000 sanitary pad packs to Anambra schoolgirls

“Being selected as the Arugba carries taboos and honours; it is not what Westerners label as ‘child abuse’.”

The priestess said the Arugba was not expected to carry heavy loads apart from the sacred calabash during the annual procession.

She also explained the spiritual significance attached to the young maiden, saying devotees who bow before the Arugba were not worshipping the child but honouring the Osun deity believed to be represented through her.

“They were bowing to the divine spirit of Osun Ewuji inside her and upon her head,” she said.

The 2026 Osun-Osogbo Festival, which began on August 7, is being held at the Osun Sacred Grove in Osogbo, Osun State, and will run until August 19.

The annual festival, centred on the Osun deity, is one of Nigeria’s major traditional and cultural festivals and attracts worshippers, tourists and cultural enthusiasts from Nigeria and beyond.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending