Connect with us

Politics

APC plans appearance as US Congress debates ‘Christian genocide’ today

Published

on

The United States chapter of the All Progressives Congress has requested to testify today (Thursday) before the United States House Subcommittee on Africa as American lawmakers prepare to review former President Donald Trump’s redesignation of Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” over alleged religious persecution.

In a letter forwarded to the Subcommittee Chairman, Chris Smith, the APC USA said it was prepared to lead a high-level delegation to provide what it described as firsthand intelligence and verifiable data on Nigeria’s security landscape.

The APC USA Chairman, Prof Tai Balofin, disclosed this in a statement added available to journalists in Abuja.

Balofin said that while the party supports religious freedom for all Nigerians, global discourse on the matter often fails to reflect the full complexity of the nation’s insecurity challenges.

He said the delegation was ready to appear before Congress at short notice.

“The narrative that is sometimes presented abroad risks oversimplifying a complex security crisis driven by banditry, resource conflicts, climate stress, and transnational crime, not solely by religious persecution. We owe it to the American people and to millions of Nigerians to ensure Congress hears the complete picture before conclusions are drawn.”

Balofin said the group’s planned testimony would highlight what it considers notable security gains under President Bola  Tinubu.

He added, “These include progress in degrading terrorist networks, improvements in community-based early-warning systems, and initiatives that promote interfaith harmony. Recent reductions in attacks across several hotspots have been documented by both Nigerian authorities and independent international monitors.”

The APC USA also plans to present proposals for stronger U.S.–Nigeria cooperation on security, intelligence sharing and humanitarian support, arguing that such collaboration is vital for protecting all religious groups without undermining diplomatic relations.

He said, “Chairman Chris Smith has been a consistent champion for human rights and religious liberty worldwide. We respectfully ask him to grant APC USA—the official voice of Nigeria’s democratically elected government in the United States—the opportunity to contribute to a fair, accurate, and solution-oriented discussion.”

See also  Tinubu playing games, can’t fix Nigeria without dismantling 1999 constitution – PDP’s Adetokunbo

The development comes hours after Nigeria faulted the United States for excluding it from a UN event hosted by American rapper Nicki Minaj on alleged killings of Nigerians from a particular faith group.

Nigeria’s chargé d’affaires to the UN, Syndoph Endoni, condemned the exclusion, saying deciding Nigeria’s case without Nigerian representation amounted to “shaving our head in our absence.”

The event, held at the UN headquarters in New York with the backing of the U.S. Mission, was organised amid renewed U.S. allegations of Christian persecution in Nigeria — accusations Nigeria has repeatedly denied.

Endoni said, “It is important to ensure the country concerned in the ongoing allegations of genocide against Christians is present, aware and has a voice in the matter. This is because you should not make important decisions or take action on something that involves a country without their presence or consent.”

He expressed disappointment that while a few countries and even a Nigerian pastor were invited, officials of the Nigerian government were deliberately left out.

According to him, U.S. officials later explained that the event was “private” and that the organisers demanded no Nigerian government representatives be invited due to fears of “reprisals” against participants.

Endoni warned that such unilateral actions could escalate tensions, adding that both countries could more effectively address insecurity by working together and ensuring inclusive engagement.

The Nigerian envoy said Abuja would continue to engage Washington over killings by extremist groups and collaborate on efforts to protect lives and property nationwide.

The PUNCH had earlier reported that the US House of Representatives Subcommittee on Africa will on Thursday, November 20, 2025, examine President Donald Trump’s recent redesignation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern.

See also  Ekiti, Osun Polls Test For 2027 Elections – INEC Chair Amupitan Tells Staff

The CPC designation, if ratified by the Senate, would allow the US to impose sanctions on Nigerian officials found complicit in religious persecution and limit certain forms of bilateral assistance.

It also signals to the international community that religious freedom in Nigeria remains under serious threat.

The hearing, scheduled for 11:00 am in Room 2172 of the Rayburn House Office Building and available via live webcast, will be chaired by Representative Chris Smith (R-NJ).

It will feature two panels of witnesses, including senior US State Department officials and Nigerian religious leaders.

The invite to the members of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, sighted by

The PUNCH, read, “You are respectfully requested to attend an open hearing of the Committee on Foreign Affairs to be held by the Subcommittee on Africa at 11:00 a.m. in Room 2172 of the Rayburn House Office Building.”

According to the invite, panelists will include Senior Bureau Official of the Bureau of African Affairs, Jonathan Pratt, and Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Jacob McGee.

The second panel will feature the Director of the Center for Religious Freedom, Ms Nina Shea; Bishop Wilfred Anagbe of Makurdi Catholic Diocese in Nigeria; and Ms Oge Onubogu of the Center for Strategic & International Studies.

The congressional hearing is expected to review not only the scope of religious persecution in Nigeria but also potential policy responses, including targeted sanctions, humanitarian assistance, and collaboration with Nigerian authorities to prevent further violence.

On October 31, 2025, President Trump designated Nigeria a Country of Particular Concern for religious freedom violations. The move has sparked debate over rising attacks on Christians in Nigeria and the possibility of US intervention.

See also  Obi denies seeking Bwala’s support for 2023 campaign

In designating Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern,” Trump cited alleged severe violations of religious freedom, particularly the persecution of Christians.

He claimed that Christianity is facing an existential threat in Nigeria, with thousands of Christians being killed by radical Islamists.

Trump warned that the US would take action, including potential military intervention, if Nigeria did not address the issue.

The US President also threatened to halt all aid and assistance to Nigeria should President Bola Tinubu’s administration fail to end the alleged persecution and killing of Christians.

“If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the USA will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now-disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.

“I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our cherished Christians,” he said on November 1, 2025.

President Bola Tinubu, however, described the claim as a misrepresentation of Nigeria’s religious reality.

Reacting through a statement on his official X handle, Tinubu said the claim failed to reflect the country’s constitutional commitment to religious liberty.

Nigeria stands firmly as a democracy governed by constitutional guarantees of religious liberty. The characterisation of Nigeria as religiously intolerant does not reflect our national reality.

“Religious freedom and tolerance have been a core tenet of our collective identity and shall always remain so. Nigeria opposes religious persecution and does not encourage it,” the President said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Oshiomhole dismisses Peter Obi’s threat ahead of 2027, says public anger drove 2023 votes

Published

on

The Senator representing Edo North, Adams Oshiomhole, has dismissed suggestions that Labour Party’s Peter Obi poses a major political threat to the All Progressives Congress ahead of the 2027 general election.

He argued that Obi’s performance in the 2023 presidential election was driven by public anger over the economic policies of the late former President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration.

The former Edo State Governor stated this on Monday during an appearance on TVC News’ Beyond The Headlines.

Responding to a question on whether the APC was underestimating Obi’s political influence, particularly after his victory in Lagos and strong showing in the South-East during the 2023 election, Oshiomhole said the former Anambra State governor emerged from an “unusual situation” rather than personal political strength.

“No, not at all, not at all. Obi was produced by an unusual situation when a ruling party decided to destroy itself, making anybody running on its platform almost unelectable. It was that confusion that produced those votes,”Oshiomhole said.

The former Nigeria Labour Congress President blamed the cash crunch caused by the naira redesign policy and the fuel scarcity that preceded the 2023 election for the widespread voter dissatisfaction that, according to him, benefited Obi.

According to Oshiomhole, Nigerians were frustrated after being unable to access their money despite having funds in their bank accounts.

“People had money in the bank but couldn’t access it. They queued all night at ATM machines just to withdraw ₦10,000, and after a week, even the ATMs were dry,” he said.

He added that many Nigerians also had to pay high charges to Point of Sale operators to obtain cash during the period.

See also  Council of State approves appointment of Prof. Amupitan as INEC Chairman

“Someone asked why people would queue all night to withdraw ₦5,000, then queue again for fuel, and still expect them to queue on election day to vote for the same government. That anger was what produced Obi,” he said.

Oshiomhole argued that voters had already become disillusioned with the Peoples Democratic Party before the APC government introduced policies that worsened economic hardship on the eve of the election.

He also recalled conversations with constituents who blamed the government for the hardship caused by the cash shortage.

“A woman in my village told me, ‘You said I should keep my money in the bank, but when I went to collect it, they said there was no money. At the POS, they deducted ₦2,000 from ₦5,000. How do I survive?’”

The senator maintained that the policies responsible for the hardship were not part of the APC’s political agenda.

“I told her what Buhari was doing at that time was not APC policy. It was that anger that influenced the outcome of the election,” he said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Politics

Appeal Court reverses order deregistering ADC, four others

Published

on

The Court of Appeal in Abuja, on Tuesday, nullified the judgment of the Federal High Court ordering the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and four other political parties.

In a unanimous judgment delivered by a three-member panel of justices led by Justice Abba Mohammed, the appellate court held that the June 15 judgment of the Federal High Court was a nullity, having been delivered without jurisdiction.

The appellate court held that the trial court wrongly assumed jurisdiction and made the order on an incompetent suit filed by a non-juristic entity.

It held that there was no valid suit that could have warranted the consequential order directing INEC to deregister the affected political parties.

The appellate court further held that the trial court failed to properly evaluate the evidence before it, noting that proof showing the parties had won various elective seats in previous elections was ignored.

It also held that the lower court acted in defiance of an order directing it to stay proceedings pending the determination of an interlocutory appeal.

The appellate court consequently held that the Federal High Court ought to have dismissed the substantive suit for want of jurisdiction and merit.

It allowed the separate appeals filed by the political parties, restored their registration, and awarded costs against the National Forum of Former Legislators, which instituted the suit.

The affected parties are the African Democratic Congress, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance, Accord Party and Zenith Labour Party.

The appellate court declared that all the affected political parties remain duly registered.

See also  Tinubu playing games, can’t fix Nigeria without dismantling 1999 constitution – PDP’s Adetokunbo

The appellate court had, on June 16, stayed the execution of the trial court’s judgment pending the determination of the appeals.

In its decision, the panel faulted the conduct of Justice Peter Lifu for proceeding with the case, despite an earlier order made on May 22 directing him to stay proceedings pending the outcome of the appeal.

The appellate court noted that although Justice Lifu’s attention had been drawn to the stay order, he proceeded to deliver judgment.

It described the action as “a form of judicial impertinence,” adding that the Supreme Court had previously held that a judge who acts in such a manner “is unfit for the bench, as the conduct amounts to judicial rascality.”

The PUNCH reports that Justice Lifu had ordered INEC to deregister the five political parties after holding that they failed to satisfy the constitutional requirements for their continued existence.

He also restrained INEC from recognising the parties, accepting candidates sponsored by them or giving effect to their activities ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The judgment followed a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, instituted by the National Forum of Former Legislators.

The plaintiff had asked the court to determine whether INEC was constitutionally bound under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the Electoral Act 2022 and its regulations, to deregister political parties that failed to meet prescribed electoral performance thresholds.

The forum argued that the affected parties failed to secure at least 25 per cent of votes in a state during a presidential election, or win at least one elective seat at the national, state or local government levels as required by law.

See also  Natasha resumes Senate duties after suspension

It further contended that the parties’ poor performance in the 2023 general election and subsequent by-elections rendered their continued registration unconstitutional and detrimental to the integrity of the electoral process.

The Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), who was joined as a defendant in the suit, supported the plaintiffs’ case, arguing that retaining the affected political parties was inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution and undermined the country’s electoral integrity.

Dissatisfied with the Federal High Court judgment, the affected political parties and INEC filed separate appeals, urging the Court of Appeal to set it aside.

The appellate court upheld the appeals and vacated the judgment in its entirety.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Politics

Obi, Kwankwaso ticket sparks fresh NNPP-NDC showdown

Published

on

The New Nigeria People’s Party has raised concerns over an alleged attempt by former leaders to collapse its structure in support of a Peter Obi-Rabiu Kwankwaso presidential ticket in the Nigeria Democratic Congress ahead of the 2027 general election.

In a swift reaction, the NDC leadership denied the allegation, saying the opposition was delusional for coming up with such an allegation.

The fresh war of words comes days after the NNPP denied reports of a secret pact to align with the NDC for an Obi-Kwankwaso joint ticket, insisting it only nominated a placeholder presidential candidate to meet electoral timelines while keeping its options open for future political alliances.

Two months ago, the immediate past National Chairman of the NNPP, Bala Yusuf, had denied the speculation that he was working with the Kwankwasiyya Movement to collapse and align the presidential and vice presidential slots for the O-K ticket in solidarity with his principal, Kwankwaso.

The former NNPP chair clarified in an interview held on the sidelines of the party’s 11th National Executive Committee meeting in Abuja.

In the past six months, the party has lost Kwankwaso and former National Publicity Secretary, Ladipo Johnson, to the Nigeria Democratic Congress.

The NNPP also lost its only elected governor, Abba Yusuf of Kano State, alongside his political appointees, to the ruling All Progressives Congress.

The immediate past national chairman, however, insisted that the party had not entered into any agreement with Kwankwaso or any other political party despite growing speculation that the NNPP could align with the NDC following Kwankwaso’s recent defection to the coalition platform.

See also  Anambra Decides: Soludo gains massive lead, wins 19 out of 21 LGAs

The new national chairman of the NNPP, Major Agbo, however, claimed that Yusuf lied.

In an exclusive interview with The PUNCH, Agbo identified and accused the Yusuf-led leadership of masterminding the move to advance what he described as the “O-K arrangement with the NDC.

Agbo said, “He lied. You don’t need a seer to tell you that was what they wanted to do if the status quo had remained the way it was before we came in. They would have eventually collapsed the entire structure into their principal’s arrangement. That’s the level of greed that is in them.

“But let’s not dissipate energy into discussing that because they are gone. We are done with them. For us, the primary responsibility of every political party is to field candidates for election.

“The way our laws are structured, you do not only need to field candidates, but you also have to win. If you don’t win, you get cancelled as a political party.”

On why the party fielded a placeholder instead of a notable candidate,  the national chairman explained that the move was made solely to comply with electoral timelines after running short of time to identify stronger contenders.

“I have explained repeatedly that our decision to field a placeholder is not because we are rushing into an alliance or any form of understanding with anybody.

“But within the period that the window is available, you just have to do something, even if you have to return to it later to make one or two changes.

See also  Ekiti, Osun Polls Test For 2027 Elections – INEC Chair Amupitan Tells Staff

“But at least the most important thing is that something has to happen as long as the window for that thing is open.

“So we did that because it’s a normal thing that every other political party does. However, that is not to say that we intend to work with the ruling party or this idea of Obi-Kwankwaso.

“This party has resolved never, under any circumstance, to have anything to do with Kwankwaso, Buba Galadima and any of his jokers. It’s not possible.

“But that is not to say that we are foreclosing any chances of having any form of alliance. No party is an island. We believe in the more, the better. That has always been the position of the NNPP since it was registered in 2002,” he added.

Going down memory lane, Agbo said that, checking through all the election cycles before now, it would be observed that NNPP didn’t present candidates.

“I think in 2007 or so, we didn’t present any. In 2003, we presented Kalu Idika Kalu,” he stated.

The NNPP, however, said it remained open to political alliances ahead of the 2027 general election, stressing that it had not ruled out working with any presidential candidate whose vision aligned with the party’s manifesto and constitution.

The party added that once the window for substitution opens, it will replace the placeholder with a more formidable candidate if one emerges.

Responding, the NDC Deputy National Publicity Secretary, Abdulmumin Abdulsalam, dismissed the allegation of collusion, stressing that the Seriake Dickson-led leadership had no pact with the NNPP and was not seeking any political arrangement with it.

See also  Owed contractors threaten APC convention protest, see why

He said, “We have no pact with the NNPP or any party, especially in the local political landscape of Kano State. The NDC is a moving train and the momentum we have at the moment is enough for us.

“We don’t need any pact. If there is a need for such, it is the other party saying they are not going into any collaboration that should be begging us for a partnership to be able to survive beyond 2027. They need it to avoid going into extinction.

“The NNPP that you just mentioned is not different from an old shirt or cloth you once put on. You are bound to discard it as you get older. So you no longer look up to it to wear it again because it’s an old cloth.

“As far as we are concerned, His Excellency Senator Rabiu Kwankwaso and his teeming supporters in Kano are no longer in the party. The NNPP is his former party. It is now an old cloth which he cannot go back to wear,” he said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending