A customer of Kuda Microfinance Bank, Abdulrahman Ekundayo, has dragged the bank before the Federal High Court in Lagos over alleged unlawful freezing of its Multibusiness Global Enterprise corporate account.
When the matter came up on Tuesday for hearing, counsel to the applicant, Olalekan Ogunbunmi, informed the court that all court processes had been served on the bank and that the respondent was aware of the day’s proceedings.
However, Justice Ambrose Lewis-Allagoa, after reviewing the court file, noted that there was no proof of service before the court.
“There is no evidence of service in the court record,” the judge observed.
The court consequently ordered that a hearing notice be issued and properly served on the bank, and adjourned the matter to March 24, 2026, for report of service.
The applicant, in the suit marked FHC/L/CS/2230/2025 and filed by its lawyer, Olalekan Ogunbunmi, accused the bank of violating its fundamental rights by placing restrictions on its account without a court order.
According to the originating application, the action was brought pursuant to Sections 34, 35, 36, 41, 43 and 46 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as well as the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules, 2009.
In the suit, the applicant urged the court to declare “that the unlawful freezing of the applicant’s account by the respondent without court order or lawful excuse is illegal, wrongful, unconstitutional and a violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights.”
The applicant also asked the court to order Kuda Microfinance Bank to immediately unfreeze its account.
He prayed, “An order directing and mandating the respondent to unfreeze the corporate account of the applicant, maintained with Kuda Microfinance Bank Limited with account number 3001195269.”
The applicant further asked the court to compel the bank to release various sums allegedly placed under lien, including: “N4,444,540 held on July 5, 2025, till date;” “N502,100 held on July 8, 2025, till date;” and“N2,896,680 held on July 15, 2025, till date.”
The applicant also sought “an order directing the respondent to release all funds held under lien on the applicant’s corporate account.”
Explaining the grounds for the suit, the applicant stated that, “the applicant is a law-abiding citizen and did not commit any offence known to law.”
It added, “The respondent has no lawful excuse for any threat of arrest, humiliation or detention against the applicant. The only ‘offence’ of the applicant was that it engaged in legitimate transactions with proof of evidence.”
The applicant further maintained that “the restriction placed on the account without a court order was unlawful and unjustified, as the applicant has not committed any offence to warrant such treatment.”
punch.ng
FOLLOW US ON:
