Connect with us

News

Sunday Igboho defends action on Insecurity as ACF, NEF warn of anarchy

Published

on

The Arewa Consultative Forum and the Northern Elders Forum have warned that Nigeria risks sliding into anarchy if the Federal Government fails to rein in Yoruba Nation agitator, Sunday Adeyemo, popularly known as Sunday Igboho, over his reported ultimatum to Fulani leaders in Oyo State following the abduction of a pregnant woman and her relatives.

The groups, alongside several Fulani associations, accused Igboho of ethnic profiling and cautioned that attempts to hold an entire ethnic group responsible for the actions of suspected criminals could inflame tensions, provoke reprisals and undermine national unity.

Igboho, on Monday, defended his move, adding that his advocacy for effective security of the South-West was not targeted at any ethnic nationality but rather against criminal elements, who are perpetrating abduction, killings, banditry, and other vices.

The warnings and Igboho reaction came as the Oyo State police command and the Oorelope Local Government chairman dismissed reports that the abducted woman, Mrs Kuburat Omowumi, her son and other relatives had regained their freedom, insisting that they remained in captivity and that rescue efforts were ongoing.

The controversy followed a viral video in which Igboho reportedly issued a two-hour ultimatum to Fulani leaders in the Igboho community, Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State, demanding the release of the abducted victims.

In the video, Igboho accused unnamed Fulani men of engaging in kidnappings in the area, alleging that the victims were being held in a forest location within the community.

The National Publicity Secretary of the Arewa Consultative Forum, Prof Tukur Muhammad-Baba, on Sunday, described the ultimatum given to the ethnic group as unconstitutional, dangerous and capable of worsening the country’s security challenges.

According to him, the Federal Government, security agencies, traditional rulers and religious leaders must act quickly to prevent the situation from escalating.

“It is, therefore, the duty of the state, security agencies and community leaders, religious clergy, etc., to call him to order and to make it clear that ethnic profiling is a many-sided sword, a recipe for anarchy and an aberration in the modern world,” Muhammad-Baba told The PUNCH.

The ACF spokesman argued that the ultimatum unfairly portrayed all Fulani people as accomplices in crimes allegedly committed by a few individuals.

“The ultimatum is condemnable as it presumes the specific kidnappers represent the whole Fulani group without exception,” he said.

Muhammad-Baba noted that there was no evidence establishing the ethnic identity of the abductors, stressing that kidnapping had evolved into a criminal enterprise involving people from diverse ethnic and religious backgrounds.

“It is not clear how he has concluded that the kidnappers are of the Fulani ethnic group, when we know that the criminal enterprise that kidnapping has evolved into involves all manner of people irrespective of social identities—ethnicity, religion, gender, etc.

“Wholesale association of kidnapping with all Fulani ethnic people is clearly counterintuitive. Plainly, it is counterproductive to assume Fulani people in this location and everywhere else should be held responsible for the activities of criminal elements from among them.”

He further argued that attributing criminality to an ethnic group amounted to self-deception.

“It is a trite fact that criminality has no tribe and to assume otherwise is to engage in collective illusory self-deception,” he added.

Questioning the legality of Igboho’s actions, Muhammad-Baba maintained that neither the activist nor his associates had constitutional powers to issue such directives.

“Obviously, the directive is unconstitutional. Mr Igboho and his group are not state law enforcement agents and cannot operate outside the law of the land,” he stated.

See also  Nigeria receives $187.3m as United States reviews aid conditions

He warned that allowing non-state actors to assume security responsibilities could encourage retaliatory actions in other parts of the country.

“Their activities pose a threat to national security, and if they remain unrestrained, there is a risk of copycat backlash from others and our slide into catastrophic anarchy and atavism.”

The professor, however, blamed the rise of ethnic champions and self-help security measures on the inability of the government to adequately secure lives and property.

“It is a sign of failure and abdication of the responsibility of government to protect the lives and property of citizens, that enable kidnappers and other criminals to operate. The same failure also encourages local non-state actors and champions of provincialism to seek to fill the gap left by the state,” he said.

“Characters like Sunday Igboho can be seen as products of bad governance, corruption, impunity and criminal neglect by government.”

The Northern Elders Forum echoed similar concerns. Its spokesperson, Prof Abubakar Jiddere, condemned the abduction, but insisted that no ethnic group should be profiled because of the actions of criminals.

“The question is, who told them it is the Fulani people who carried out the kidnapping? That is the ethnic profiling we are against. That is the problem. We are overheating the political atmosphere,” he said.

“Already, Nigeria is facing serious challenges. When we make statements, we are supposed to do so with maturity and put the safety, peace and unity of the country first rather than ethnic sentiments.”

Jiddere argued that Fulani communities were among the worst victims of banditry and kidnapping.

“Many people do not know that Fulani people suffer more than any ethnic group as a result of banditry, kidnapping and cattle rustling. If you go to Zamfara, Sokoto, Katsina and Kebbi, you will discover that thousands of Fulani families have been displaced and forced to relocate,” he said.

He also warned against stereotyping. “Many people you see in the bush put on Fulani dressing. No Fulani man will wear his traditional ceremonial dress and go into the bush to kidnap people. We should be careful about stereotyping entire ethnic groups.”

Jiddere stressed that every Nigerian enjoyed equal rights under the Constitution.

“A Christian has the same rights as a Muslim in Nigeria. A Yoruba person has the same rights as a Hausa or Fulani person. Nobody has a birthright that is superior to another person’s in this country,” he stated.

“If a child is kidnapped in Oyo State, should a Fulani man in Sokoto be held responsible? A child is a child, and every Nigerian should feel concerned when any Nigerian suffers.”

The Coalition of Northern Groups also faulted the alleged threats against Fulani residents.

Its National Coordinator, Jamilu Charanchi, said while the kidnapping deserved condemnation, fighting crime should not involve threats or collective blame.

“While we condemn the kidnapping and support all lawful efforts to secure the victim’s release and bring the perpetrators to justice, addressing crime must not involve issuing threats, ultimatums, or assigning collective blame to an entire ethnic community,” he said.

“Criminal responsibility is individual, and law-abiding Fulani residents should not be held accountable for the actions of criminal elements. Sustainable security can only be achieved through intelligence-driven policing, due process and respect for the constitutional rights of all Nigerians.”

See also  El-Rufai sparks controversy after airport ‘arrest’ drama

The coalition, in another statement on Monday, also expressed concern over reports and viral videos allegedly showing operatives of the Ondo State Security Network Agency, popularly known as Amotekun, profiling, publicly parading and threatening women identified as Hausa and Fulani residents who were engaged in lawful business activities in Ondo State.

The group argued that while insecurity remains a major challenge across the country, criminality should not be linked to ethnic identity.

According to the coalition, different regions of Nigeria had experienced varying forms of crime, including terrorism, banditry and kidnapping in the North; separatist violence and organised criminal activities in the South-East; cybercrime, armed robbery and cultism in the South-West; and oil theft and piracy in the Niger Delta.

The CNG maintained that these security challenges are products of criminal networks rather than ethnic identities and warned against stigmatising entire communities because of the actions of a few individuals.

“We categorically reject the dangerous practice of collective punishment and ethnic stereotyping. No Nigerian should become a suspect merely because of his or her ethnicity, appearance or place of origin,” Charanchi said.

He described as unacceptable reports that women conducting legitimate businesses in Ondo State were allegedly paraded or humiliated because of their ethnic background.

The group urged security agencies to focus on intelligence gathering, investigation and prosecution of criminal suspects rather than resorting to ethnic profiling.

It further called on the Ondo State Government to investigate the conduct of Amotekun personnel featured in the circulated videos and sanction any officers found culpable of misconduct.

In Oyo State, the CNG called on security agencies to ensure the protection of all residents, including Fulani communities, while intensifying efforts to apprehend those responsible for the reported kidnapping incident that sparked tensions in Igboho.

Similarly, the National President of Kautal Fulaku Fulbe, Dr Muhammad Hussaini, condemned the remarks attributed to Igboho, describing them as divisive and detrimental to national unity.

“He is not advocating for peace. Rather, he is one of those whose actions and comments continually threaten the peaceful coexistence and unity of the country,” Hussaini said.

“There is no situation in any of the 19 northern states where an entire tribe would be asked to leave a community because of the actions of a few individuals. Such an approach is unfair and unfortunate.”

The Kulen Allah Cattle Rearers Association of Nigeria also joined the criticism.

Its President, Khalil Muhammad Bello, said no individual had the authority to issue eviction orders to fellow citizens.

“We strongly condemn the statement attributed to Sunday Igboho, especially the part where an ultimatum was issued to a group of citizens, as it is capable of creating tension and misunderstanding in society.

“The Nigerian Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to reside and carry out lawful activities in any part of the country without intimidation, harassment or being forced to leave by any individual or group.”

Bello urged influential figures to avoid inflammatory statements capable of undermining peaceful coexistence.

“Farmers and pastoralists have lived together for many years and depend on one another for survival and economic activities, and anything that threatens that relationship is not in the interest of national peace and development,” he added.

Meanwhile, the pan-Yoruba socio-political organisation, Afenifere, expressed concern over the worsening security situation in Oke-Ogun and renewed calls for state police.

Its National Publicity Secretary, Jare Ajayi, described the abductions and killings in the area as disturbing and unacceptable.

See also  Egypt releases prominent journalist from custody

“As we in Afenifere and others have repeatedly demanded, kidnapping for whatever reason and terrorisation of our people must stop. It is a very sad thing indeed that these heinous crimes are occurring right on our own soil,” he said.

“The government and security agencies should buckle up to put an end to the evil act and ensure that those in bondage presently are freed without further delay.”

Ajayi urged authorities to fast-track the creation of state police.

“This must be fast-tracked and made to go down to the community level. Enough avoidable bloodshed has been shed. The banditry we are experiencing must come to an end forthwith,” he said.

Reacting on Monday, Igboho, in a statement issued by his spokesperson, Olayomi Koiki, contended that Nigerians, irrespective of religious, political and ethnic divides, should collaborate with the government and relevant security agencies to rid the nation of criminality.

Reacting to the statement of a Fulani socio-cultural group, the Concerned Fulani People of Nigeria, Igboho described the development as “baseless, misplaced priority and distortion of facts over insecurity ravaging some communities in Yorubaland.”

The PUNCH reports that the group, in a statement by its Convener, Ibrahim Barkindo Chubado, called on President Bola Tinubu and the Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, to caution Igboho over what it described as inflammatory remarks directed at Fulani communities in Oyo over the alleged abduction of a woman and her children.

Reacting, Igboho said, “It is obvious that since my agitation for improved security in South-West and other parts of the country, I have never declared war against any ethnic group but have consistently voiced my position against criminal elements responsible for kidnapping, vicious killings, rape and violent attacks across Yoruba communities.

“The call by this faceless CFPN is myopic, uninformed and ridiculous. Our concern and primary focus have always been the protection of innocent lives and the preservation of peace, security and justice.

“We will never advocate hatred against any ethnic group. Our position has always been very clear: criminals should be identified, arrested and prosecuted by the law enforcement agencies regardless of their ethnic, religious and political inclinations because crime has no colour or race.

“It is absolutely wrong and misleading to portray our reaction to security breaches in South-West as ethnic profiling when the rights to life, freedom, and economic livelihoods of our people are being threatened by mindless hoodlums who are obsessed with gruesome killings and kidnapping of innocent people in rural communities.”

Igboho commended the Inspector General of Police, Tunji Disu, the Director-General of the Department of State Service and heads of other security agencies for their sustained onslaught against criminals in the South-West and other parts of the nation.

“While we would not hesitate to collaborate with security agencies to strengthen peace and safety of our communities in the South-West, the collective task of ensuring a secure environment in our society should not be left to the government and stakeholders in the security sector,” the statement explained.

It, however, added that those calling on the government to caution Igboho should instead support stronger security measures aimed at dismantling criminal networks and ensuring justice for victims of kidnapping and other violent crimes.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

State Police Update: National Assembly collates reports from 30 state assemblies

Published

on

The National Assembly has commenced collation of reports from state Houses of Assembly on the proposed establishment of state police, with the Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, saying the constitutional requirement for the reform had been met.

Bamidele disclosed this on Thursday while delivering a lecture to participants of Senior Executive Course 48 at the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies, Kuru, Plateau State.

He said at least 30 state legislatures had approved the State Police Constitution Alteration Bill, 2026, surpassing the constitutional requirement of two-thirds of the 36 State Houses of Assembly.

According to him, the National Assembly will collate the reports, consider the positions of the state legislatures and pass a resolution by a simple majority in both chambers before transmitting the bill to President Bola Tinubu for assent.

The Senate Leader, who is also Vice Chairman of the Senate Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, said the National Assembly intended to complete the remaining legislative processes by December 2026.

He said, “We are pleased to inform our constituents across the federation that state police has moved from rhetoric to reality. We have already received formal reports from the state Houses of Assembly and, as of today, no fewer than 30 states have approved the State Police Constitution Alteration Bill, 2026.

“By the provision of Section 9(2) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which requires the concurrence of not less than two-thirds of all state Houses of Assembly, the constitutional requirement for the alteration has been duly met. This is a historic milestone in our collective quest to re-engineer our security architecture and make it more responsive, more local, and more effective.

See also  VIDEO: Russia strikes Ukraine with Oreshnik ballistic missile, one of its most advanced weapons

“What happens next is procedural, but critical. The National Assembly is now constitutionally obligated to consider the reports transmitted by the state Houses of Assembly, collate those reports, and pass a resolution by simple majority of members in both chambers. Once this resolution is passed, the Alteration Bill will be transmitted to the President and Commander-in-Chief for assent.

“We have set a clear timeline for ourselves. We intend to conclude all these legislative stages — consideration of reports, passage of resolution, and transmission for presidential assent — on or before December 2026,” the Senate Leader emphasised.

The proposed state police system is part of wider efforts to decentralise Nigeria’s security architecture amid persistent killings, kidnappings and other violent crimes across the country.

Under the existing policing structure, the Nigeria Police Force operates primarily as a centrally administered institution.

Proponents of state police argue that allowing states to establish their own police services would improve local intelligence gathering, response times and accountability.

However, concerns have been raised about the potential abuse of state police by governors and other political office holders, particularly against political opponents.

Bamidele said the proposed reform would operate within constitutional safeguards, oversight mechanisms and human rights protections.

He described the development as a significant breakthrough after more than 15 years of unsuccessful attempts to establish state police through constitutional reform.

“What this means is that state police is no longer a campaign promise or a subject of endless debate. It is now a constitutional reality. It means that the security of lives, private property and public assets occupies a prime place in the legislative agenda of the 10th National Assembly,” he said.

Bamidele said the proposed system would enable states to develop policing structures better suited to their local conditions.

See also  El-Rufai sparks controversy after airport ‘arrest’ drama

He added that the reform was not intended to weaken the Federal Government but to strengthen Nigeria’s federal system by making security more responsive to local communities.

According to him, the objective was not to create state armies but state-led, community-anchored policing arrangements operating under clearly defined constitutional and operational standards.

The Ekiti lawmaker also credited the leadership of the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, with supporting the reform, assuring Nigerians that the National Assembly would see the process through.

He said the National Assembly, under the leadership of Akpabio, “remains committed to delivering on the establishment of state police. We will not falter until every Nigerian, whether in Kuru, in Iyin-Ekiti, in Gusau or in Yenagoa, can sleep with both eyes closed.”

Beyond state police, Bamidele said the 10th National Assembly had prioritised legislation intended to address citizens’ welfare, economic development and institutional reforms.

He argued that the performance of the legislature should be assessed by the practical effects of its laws and interventions rather than the number of bills passed.

Bamidele listed the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) Act, 2024; the Minimum Wage (Amendment) Act, 2024; the four Tax Reform Acts of 2025; and the National Social Investment Programme Act among the measures passed by the current Assembly.

The Senate Leader also cited the Electoral Act, 2026, the Cybercrimes (Amendment) Act, the Investments and Securities Act, 2025, the Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act, 2024, and the Regional Development Commissions Acts.

He said the laws reflected a deliberate effort to use legislation to anticipate emerging challenges, strengthen public institutions and improve governance.

See also  PHOTOS: Atiku, Patience Jonathan, Osinbajo, David Mark, Others Storm The Wedding Of Rotimi Amaechi’s Son In Abuja

Bamidele said the impact of proactive lawmaking extended to national security, economic transformation, public financial management, electoral credibility, education, healthcare, technological innovation, environmental sustainability and relations among the different tiers of government.

On the relationship between the National Assembly and NIPSS, he called for stronger institutional collaboration to improve legislative foresight and policy development.

He maintained that the passage of laws alone was insufficient to guarantee good governance, stressing the need for effective implementation, funding and monitoring.

The senator said good laws must be relevant to citizens’ needs and capable of producing measurable improvements in their lives.

He, thus, observed that good governance “requires good laws. But good laws alone do not guarantee good governance.

“We require laws that are relevant, evidence-based, implementable, adequately funded, properly administered, effectively monitored, periodically reviewed and ultimately measured by their impact on citizens,” Bamidele stated.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

FG pumps N5tn into military operations, read details

Published

on

The Federal Government has disbursed N5.15tn in special intervention funds to the Nigerian military and related security agencies between November 2023 and September 2026, amid persistent insecurity, including terrorism, banditry, kidnapping and other violent crimes across the country.

An analysis by The PUNCH of documents from the Federation Account Allocation Committee, obtained on Thursday, revealed that the government received N5.65tn into a dedicated special intervention account over the period, out of which N5.15tn had been disbursed, representing 91.15 per cent of the total funds.

The records showed that the intervention was financed through allocations from the Federation Account and other government revenue sources, including non-oil revenue and funds transferred from a FAAC withholding account.

The document, titled ‘Ledger of Special Intervention Programme for Nigerian Military September, 2026”, was prepared by the Federation Account Department of the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation and formed part of the records presented to the Technical Sub-Committee of FAAC at its meeting in Abuja on October 14, 2026.

According to the ledger, the N5.15tn was released through 30 payment transactions between November 8, 2023, and September 23, 2026, while the total receipts were recorded across 33 funding transactions.

The disbursements were separate from the regular annual budgetary allocations to the Ministry of Defence and other security institutions, indicating the scale of additional financial resources channelled towards security operations.

However, the records did not provide a breakdown of the specific military operations, equipment purchases, personnel costs or security projects financed with the money.

A breakdown of the transactions showed that the intervention programme commenced with a N100bn transfer on October 19, 2023, described as the September 2023 allocation.

The first payment of N100bn was made to the military on November 8, 2023, while another N100bn was received on November 20, 2023, and subsequently disbursed on December 20.

By the end of December 2023, the account had received N300bn and disbursed N300bn, leaving no outstanding balance.

The funding arrangement continued throughout 2024, with regular transfers of N100bn and corresponding payments to military and paramilitary agencies.

Between January and December 2024, the account received N1.2tn and disbursed the same amount, bringing cumulative receipts and payments to N1.5tn.

See also  Trump’s statement opportunity to end killings in Nigeria — Northern CAN

The transactions were largely recorded as monthly allocations under the special intervention programme, although the payment dates did not always correspond with the months for which the funds were allocated.

For instance, the January 2024 allocation was transferred on February 27, while the corresponding payment was made on March 1.

Similarly, the ledger showed that the programme entered a second phase in July 2024, beginning with a N100bn transfer on July 27.

The second phase continued into 2025, with the government maintaining the N100bn monthly funding pattern.

During the first nine months of 2025, the account received N900bn and disbursed N900bn, bringing cumulative payments to N2.4tn by September 1, 2025.

An analysis of the transactions, therefore, showed that N2.4tn was disbursed between November 2023 and September 2025, before the government significantly increased the scale of the intervention in 2026.

The records indicated that the funding arrangement changed considerably in 2026, with individual transfers rising from the previous N100bn monthly pattern to between N200bn and N500bn.

On March 18, 2026, the government transferred N200bn from the FAAC Withheld Account, described in the ledger as savings for March 2026.

The amount was followed by a N100bn payment to security agencies on March 16, although the payment preceded the recorded transfer by two days.

Another N250bn was transferred from non-oil revenue on May 18, 2026, while N130bn was paid to security agencies from the FAAC Withheld Account on May 25.

The ledger also recorded a N120bn payment to the Consolidated Pool Account II TSA on June 3, 2026.

This particular transaction differed from the other payments because it was not expressly described as a transfer to military or paramilitary agencies.

On June 16, 2026, the government transferred N400bn from non-oil revenue for May, which was reversed the same day.

The reversal was followed by a fresh transfer of N500bn from non-oil revenue, indicating that the earlier transaction was cancelled and replaced.

The same day, N500bn was paid to military and paramilitary agencies, marking one of the largest individual disbursements recorded under the programme.

See also  “Pride Is in His Blood!” — Actor Kola Olaiya Fires Back at Actor Pete Edochie Over Nollywood Seniority

Another N500bn was transferred from non-oil revenue on July 15, followed by a corresponding payment to military and paramilitary agencies on July 22.

The pattern continued in August, when N500bn was transferred on August 19 and paid out on the same date.

On September 16, another N500bn was transferred from non-oil revenue, while the corresponding payment was recorded on September 23.

The final entry in the ledger showed a further N500bn transfer from non-oil revenue on October 14, 2026, described as the September 2026 allocation.

Although the ledger was titled September 2026, the inclusion of the October 14 transaction indicated that its financial position incorporated the latest transfer recorded at the FAAC technical meeting.

The figures showed that the intervention account received N3.25tn in 2026 up to October 14, compared with N1.2tn throughout 2024.

This represented an increase of about 170.83 per cent over the entire amount received in 2024, despite the 2026 records covering only part of the year.

Payments recorded in 2026 amounted to N2.75tn, compared with N1.2tn in 2024, representing an increase of approximately 129.17 per cent.

The N2.75tn disbursed in 2026 also accounted for 53.40 per cent of the N5.15tn paid out under the programme since its commencement.

The analysis further showed that the government disbursed more under the special intervention programme in 2026 than the combined N2.4tn released between November 2023 and September 2025.

It also revealed that the programme had an outstanding balance of N500bn as of October 14, 2026, representing 8.85 per cent of the total N5.65tn received.

The balance arose after the latest N500bn transfer was recorded without a corresponding payment in the ledger.

Consequently, the outstanding amount represented funds available in the intervention account rather than money already disbursed to security agencies.

Despite the significant increase in funding, the country continues to grapple with security challenges across several regions.

In the North-East, the military has continued operations against Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province, while banditry and mass kidnappings remain major security concerns in parts of the North-West and North-Central regions.

Communities in several states have also experienced attacks by armed groups, resulting in deaths, displacement and disruption of farming and other economic activities.

See also  VIDEO: Russia strikes Ukraine with Oreshnik ballistic missile, one of its most advanced weapons

The security challenges have placed pressure on government finances, as authorities continue to allocate substantial resources to military operations, intelligence gathering, logistics and the protection of vulnerable communities.

FG reviews strategy

Ina related development, the Federal Government has begun a review of the 2019 National Security Strategy to develop a new framework that addresses emerging threats, including terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, cybercrime, food insecurity and climate change.

The National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, disclosed this on Thursday during the inauguration of a committee to review the existing strategy and formulate the National Security Strategy 2026.

Ribadu, who was represented by Major General Sarkin Bello (retd.), said Nigeria’s security environment had changed significantly since the last review in 2019, requiring a comprehensive reassessment of the country’s security priorities.

“Our national security landscape is undergoing rapid and profound transformations. Since the last review of our strategy in 2019, the domestic, regional and global security environments have changed dramatically, with intensity,” he said.

He noted that the country was confronted with multiple security challenges that required a broader strategic response.

“As you are aware, these problems range from terrorism, banditry and kidnapping to sophisticated cyber threats, misinformation, economic problems, food insecurity and environmental challenges, among others,” Ribadu said.

He said the new strategy would serve as a framework for coordinating national security, resilience and sustainable development, adding that it must reflect current realities while anticipating future threats.

Also, the Deputy Chairman of the committee, Major General Evi Onumajuru (retd.), said the changing nature of security threats made a strategic realignment imperative.

He said traditional security challenges, including terrorism, insurgency and banditry, had become intertwined with non-kinetic threats such as cybercrime, economic vulnerabilities, food insecurity and climate change.

He added that the strategy must integrate the priorities of the Renewed Hope Agenda by linking economic prosperity and good governance with human security and national defence.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

10 things to know about applying for 2027 SAN rank

Published

on

The Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee has invited applications for the 2027 award of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria, with private legal practitioners required to pay a non-refundable processing fee of N5m and government-employed lawyers N2.5m.

The committee said the application portal would open on November 1, 2026, directing all candidates to complete the application process online and comply with its document submission requirements and deadlines.

PUNCH Online had reported Wednesday that Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee invited applications for the 2027 conferment of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria.

Here are 10 things prospective applicants need to know about the exercise.

1. Applications open on November 11

The LPPC said its application portal would open to the public at 12am on November 1, 2026.

Applications are to be processed through its official portal, www.lppconline.com.

2. Private legal practitioners will pay N5m

The committee fixed the non-refundable processing fee for private legal practitioners at N5m.

3. Government-employed lawyers will pay N2.5m

Legal practitioners employed by the government are required to pay a non-refundable fee of N2.5m.

4. Payment must be made into designated bank accounts

Applicants are required to pay directly into either of the committee’s designated accounts:

– Zenith Bank: 1014103141

– Guaranty Trust Bank: 0213662834

5. Proof of payment must be uploaded

Candidates must upload evidence of payment to the online portal for verification.

According to the notice, the LPPC Secretariat will send a confirmation email after verification, allowing applicants to continue with the process.

See also  VIDEO: Russia strikes Ukraine with Oreshnik ballistic missile, one of its most advanced weapons

6. All supporting documents must be uploaded online

Applicants seeking the rank through advocacy or academia must upload clear and legible scanned copies of all mandatory and supporting documents through the portal.

7. Academic applicants have additional requirements

Candidates applying through the academic category must submit seven physical photocopies each of their curriculum vitae and impact statement, in addition to the required flash drives.

8. Every applicant must submit five flash drives

The committee directed all applicants to provide five flash drives containing copies of their completed application forms downloaded from the portal and all mandatory and supporting documents uploaded during the application process.

9. Online applications close on January 31, 2027

The deadline for completing online applications is midnight on January 31, 2027. Applicants are advised to complete their submissions before the deadline to avoid technical or procedural complications.

10. Flash drives must arrive by February 1, 2027

The five flash drives must be delivered to the LPPC Secretariat before 4pm on February 1, 2027.

The committee warned that applications that do not comply with its guidelines or are submitted after the prescribed deadlines will be rejected and treated as non-submissions.

The notice was signed by the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court of Nigeria and Secretary of the LPPC, Kabir Eniola Akanbi.

Applicants seeking clarification may contact the secretariat through lppcsecretariat@courts.gov.ng.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending