Connect with us

Business

Uber exit: Drivers brace for car loan defaults

Published

on

Drivers who obtained or deployed vehicles through financing arrangements to operate on Uber’s platform in Nigeria now face uncertainty after the ride-hailing company exited the country, the drivers’ association said on Thursday.

Uber Technologies Inc. discontinued its Nigerian operations on Wednesday, September 2, ending a 12-year presence in the country as it shifts investment towards markets where it believes it can create the most value.

Uber and Moove have a partnership under which vehicles financed by Moove for drivers were deployed for use on Uber’s platform. Uber is also one of Moove’s major investors.

The arrangement meant that drivers using Moove-financed vehicles for Uber’s UberGo service had previously been required to operate exclusively on the Uber platform.

Uber’s withdrawal from Nigeria therefore left affected drivers uncertain about the use of their vehicles and how they would continue earning from ride-hailing while meeting their financing obligations.

The Amalgamated Union of App-Based Transport Workers of Nigeria told The PUNCH that Uber’s departure would require drivers who depended on the platform to migrate to competing services, particularly Bolt and inDrive. “Now they have to migrate officially to Bolt and inDrive,” the union’s Public Relations Officer, Steven Iwindoye, stated.

The union also raised concerns about vehicles financed through mobility company Moove, asking what would happen to cars acquired or deployed specifically for Uber operations now that the platform had ceased operating in Nigeria.

However, the union said the migration would take place against the backdrop of existing financial pressures on drivers, who have repeatedly complained about the cost of fuel, vehicle maintenance and other operating expenses.

The union said many drivers were struggling to maintain their vehicles. “Look at the condition of our car; many of us don’t even have money to maintain, to take care of our car,” the executive stated.

The union also argued that ride-hailing companies could not sustain their businesses by focusing primarily on market dominance without ensuring adequate returns for the platforms and viable earnings for drivers. “What is the essence of you dominating the market when you are not making profit?” Iwindoye asked.

See also  States demand forensic audit of $8.8bn crude-for-loan deals

Drivers said they had repeatedly attempted to engage Uber on issues affecting them but received little attention from the company, while describing Bolt and inDrive as more receptive to discussions and interactive sessions with drivers and their representatives.

“Bolt, inDrive, sometimes they reach out to us; we do interactive sessions,” Iwindoye said, adding that attempts to establish similar engagement with Uber had yielded little response. But on the aspect of Uber, nothing, nothing,” he said.

For Bolt and inDrive, Uber’s departure presents an opportunity to attract some of the riders and drivers who previously used the platform. But the union warned that market dominance would not necessarily address the underlying economic challenges facing the industry.

The organisation said drivers were already facing difficulties maintaining their vehicles and argued that ride-hailing platforms needed to ensure that the economics of the sector worked for both operators and drivers.

 

 

Nigeria’s ride-hailing and mobility platforms market was valued at $450m in 2025 and is projected to reach $982m by 2032, representing a compound annual growth rate of 11.8 per cent, according to Ken Research.

The market’s size and projected growth contrast with Uber’s decision to withdraw, underscoring the increasingly selective approach global technology companies are taking to capital allocation.

An Uber spokesperson disclosed the withdrawal in an email to The PUNCH on Wednesday, saying that the withdrawal was specific to Nigeria and Uganda and would not affect its other African operations.

It reiterated its commitment to sub-Saharan Africa, where it said it continued to see “robust growth and long-term opportunity”.

Uber revealed it was shifting investment towards markets where it believed it could create the most value for drivers by providing earning opportunities at scale and enabling riders to travel seamlessly.

The company said its immediate priority was to support drivers, riders and employees affected by the withdrawal, adding that it had begun communicating with active drivers and would provide them with a token of appreciation during the transition.

The Nigerian withdrawal comes as Uber undergoes a major restructuring that will cut about 3,300 jobs, representing roughly 10 per cent of its global workforce.

See also  Nigeria risks returning to FATF grey list without deep reforms – Ngwu

Chief Executive Officer Dara Khosrowshahi said the restructuring was intended to make Uber simpler and faster, with the company reducing management layers and reorganising teams to operate more efficiently at its current scale.

The restructuring also reflects Uber’s focus on areas of future growth, including autonomous transportation and robotaxis, as the mobility industry prepares for the possibility of driverless vehicles altering the economics of conventional ride-hailing.

Before its exit, Uber had been less visible in its engagement with drivers than Bolt, its biggest rival. The company did not have a public relations officer in Nigeria, with its communications handled through a third-party PR firm, and also operated without a country manager.

It is unclear how many employees Uber had in Nigeria. Globally, the company has about 34,000 employees and operates in more than 70 countries, according to a recent filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Uber’s Nigerian exit follows a series of changes to its African operations. In January, the company withdrew from Tanzania following years of regulatory tensions involving fares, commissions and regulatory control.

The company also left Côte d’Ivoire in September 2025 after six years of operations. In South Africa, Uber discontinued UberX, its lower-cost service, on September 1, although it continues to operate other services in the country.

Nigeria had been an important part of Uber’s African expansion since the company entered Lagos in 2014 before expanding to Abuja in 2016.

 

 

The market has since developed into a broader mobility ecosystem involving ride-hailing platforms, drivers, fleet operators, vehicle-financing companies and businesses that use digital platforms to arrange transportation.

The union is also seeking a greater role in discussions over the future regulation of app-based transportation.

It stated that it was participating in policy discussions in Abuja involving transport commissioners, the Minister of Transportation, Vice-President Kashim Shettima, government agencies and other stakeholders.

See also  SAHCO seeks FG incentives as asset base rises

The organisation said it had presented its proposals to policymakers and believed that the resulting policies would apply across Nigeria’s transportation sector, including ride-hailing platforms.

Uber, however, rejected any suggestion that its Nigerian withdrawal was linked to a recent directive by the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria concerning e-hailing operations at Nigerian airports. The company said the decision followed its own review of business priorities and investment focus.

Economist reacts

In an interview with The PUNCH, Chief Executive Officer of Economic Associates, Dr Ayo Teriba, described Uber’s exit from Nigeria as a sector-specific regulatory issue that should not reflect on the country’s overall investment attractiveness.

Teriba criticised the government’s handling of Uber’s operations at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, arguing that restrictions and charges affecting its airport business could have contributed to its decision to leave.

“The airport or no airport issue definitely must be one of the factors. When they are in the country, but cannot do airport business, what other business will they be doing? We do not have to create a jungle-like situation and make life difficult for people,” he stressed.

The economist also questioned the impact of airport charges and the protection of designated taxi operators on Uber’s business model, saying, “And if Uber must be paying exorbitant parking fees at airports, what business will they have?”

Teriba, however, rejected suggestions that the exit represented a broader deterioration in Nigeria’s investment climate, stressing that the development remained specific to the transport sector. “This is sector-specific. And exceptions don’t prove the rule. This is exceptional,” he said.

He said authorities should investigate whether Uber’s exit could have been prevented and improve the operating environment for companies still active in the sector. “This is about those who manage that sector. The transport sector, in particular, the interface between air transport and road transport. We should not generalise it,” he cautioned.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

IMF advises Nigeria against restoring blanket petrol subsidy, read details

Published

on

The International Monetary Fund has advised Nigeria against restoring blanket petrol subsidy, urging the Federal Government to channel support towards vulnerable citizens as rising energy costs put pressure on households.

The Director of the IMF’s Fiscal Affairs Department, Rodrigo Valdés, gave the advice on Wednesday while responding to a question about calls for the return of petrol subsidy in Nigeria ahead of elections, during the IMF and World Bank Group annual meetings in Bangkok, Thailand.

Valdés acknowledged the political pressure governments face when fuel prices rise but said blanket subsidies were costly and that available resources would be better used to support people most affected by higher energy prices.

He said, “At the end of the day, it’s very tempting politically speaking because it’s not trivial the political effect of the price of oil, of fuels, of gasoline, of diesel.

“But you have to explain that this is a global shock, first. Second, that it’s very, very expensive for the country not to recognise that shock.

“And third, it’s much better to use some of that money that would you spend in the subsidies channeled towards more vulnerable people.”

He added that targeted support was preferable to a blanket subsidy, saying: “Yeah, gasoline could go up and perhaps bus fees may be subsidised in a way. That is a much better policy at the end of the day than just a blanket subsidy for everybody.”

He said governments should consider targeted assistance rather than keeping fuel prices artificially low for all consumers.

See also  Oil Price Hits $120 As OPEC+ Raises Output By 206,000 Bpd

The IMF has argued that broad-based fuel subsidies are expensive and often disproportionately benefit higher-income consumers, who tend to consume more fuel.

The advice comes as Nigeria faces renewed pressure over petrol prices following increases in global energy costs.

The Federal Government recently announced a 30-day petrol discount at Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited retail stations, with priority for public transport operators, to cushion the impact on consumers.

Finance Minister Taiwo Oyedele said NNPC retail would sell petrol at cost by foregoing its retail profit margin, describing the measure as temporary relief rather than a return to petrol subsidy.

The government has also proposed negotiating a ceiling of N1,350 per litre on petrol’s ex-gantry or landing cost, subject to monthly reviews.

Valdés said fuel subsidies could also worsen global energy pressures by preventing demand from adjusting when supplies were constrained.

“When you subsidise, you don’t allow, at the end of the day, demand to adjust.

“And reality is that we have less fuels in the world economy. That means that someone else has to adjust more, and the market produces a higher price for that,” he said.

The IMF also recommended targeted interventions to cushion the impact of higher fuel prices on transportation costs.

A division chief in the fund’s Fiscal Affairs Department, Davide Furceri, suggested that governments could redirect resources from blanket subsidies towards support for public transport users and other vulnerable groups.

He also suggested measures such as school feeding programmes, geographical targeting and assistance for vulnerable farmers.

Furceri acknowledged that some countries lacked household registries and digital payment systems needed to deliver targeted assistance effectively, but said governments could adopt alternative approaches while developing stronger systems.

See also  TCN refutes Kaduna Electric’s claim on Jos power supply

He recommended that support should be limited, targeted and temporary.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

African cocoa farmers face possible exclusion from EU market, group warns

Published

on

The Coffee Farmers Alliance Association of Africa has warned that up to 40 per cent of African smallholder cocoa farmers could be excluded from the European market because they cannot meet compliance requirements under the European Union Deforestation Regulation.

The Global President of COCEFAAA, Adeola Adegoke, raised the concern at the conclusion of the two-day Africa Cocoa and Coffee Conference held in Lagos, where stakeholders called for stronger African participation in shaping international trade policies affecting the continent’s cocoa and coffee industries.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, Adegoke expressed concern that the regulation could impose significant challenges on smallholder farmers, particularly those who lack the financial resources, technology and documentation systems required to meet its traceability standards.

He said, “Up to 40 per cent of African smallholder farmers could face exclusion from the European market if they are unable to comply with the requirements.

“The EUDR is designed to ensure that certain commodities entering the European Union market are not linked to deforestation. However, concerns have emerged over the cost and complexity of compliance, particularly for small-scale farmers who may struggle to provide the necessary information to demonstrate compliance,” he added.

Adegoke stressed the need for African cocoa-producing countries to strengthen their negotiating positions and improve traceability systems to protect farmers from potential disruptions to international trade.

He called for measures to ensure that smallholder farmers receive adequate technical and financial support to meet evolving market requirements without losing access to key export destinations.

See also  States demand forensic audit of $8.8bn crude-for-loan deals

Another major issue discussed at the conference was the emergence of cell-cultured cocoa technologies and their potential implications for traditional cocoa-producing communities.

Adegoke expressed concern that increased investment in alternative cocoa production technologies could affect demand for conventionally grown cocoa and create additional uncertainty for farmers whose livelihoods depend on the crop.

He urged African countries to assess the potential economic and social implications of these technologies while developing strategies to safeguard the interests of cocoa farmers and their communities.

The conference also highlighted the need for stronger cooperation among African cocoa- and coffee-producing countries to ensure that the continent has a greater voice in shaping international trade policies and standards.

Participants adopted the Lagos Declaration 2026, a shared statement of commitments aimed at improving farmers’ livelihoods, boosting productivity and expanding African ownership of the cocoa and coffee industries.

More than 200 delegates attended the conference, representing producing countries, governments, research institutions, development partners, commodity associations, private businesses, multilateral organisations and the media.

Speaking on the challenges facing the continent’s cocoa and coffee sectors, Adegoke said Africa had the expertise and solutions needed to transform the industries but lacked effective mechanisms to scale them across the continent.

“Africa is not short of solutions. We are short of mechanisms to scale them,” he said.

The Lagos Pact outlines three key positions that African cocoa- and coffee-producing countries intend to advance at continental and international negotiations.

These include reserving the terms “cocoa” and “coffee” for farmed products, advocating mandatory “Cell-Cultured Product” labelling at the Codex Alimentarius, and proposing a one per cent adaptation levy on revenues from cell-cultured products to support African smallholder farmers through the Common Fund for Commodities.

See also  NNPC, NUPRC, NMDPRA shut as PENGASSAN begins strike

The pact is expected to serve as Africa’s common position at the African Union Summit scheduled for February 2027.

The conference further highlighted Africa’s limited share of the value generated by its cocoa and coffee production, despite the continent’s significant contribution to global output.

According to figures presented by Adegoke, Africa produces about 75 per cent of the world’s cocoa and 12 per cent of its coffee but captures less than six per cent of the value of chocolate, while many farmers earn approximately $1.20 a day.

The Lagos Declaration 2026 commits participants to coordinated action in eight key areas: planning and coordination; unity and governance; farmers’ welfare; productivity; sustainability; traceability and product identity; value addition and finance; and people’s welfare.

Under the declaration, participants pledged to develop African strategic plans with clear responsibilities, timelines, and measurable outcomes. They also committed to strengthening farmers’ cooperatives, improving farmers’ incomes, investing in research and extension services, protecting forests and promoting climate resilience.

The declaration further calls for greater investment in local processing, stronger African brands and expanded access to markets under the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).

The commitments are intended to strengthen Africa’s position in global cocoa and coffee value chains, protect farmers’ livelihoods and ensure that a greater share of the value generated by these commodities remains on the continent.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

NNPC awaits reports on PH, Warri refineries’ revival

Published

on

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited is waiting for technical assessments from two Chinese firms on Port Harcourt and Warri refineries before proceeding with plans for additional investment agreements.

The NNPC’s Chief Corporate Communications Officer, Andy Odeh, disclosed this in an exclusive interview with our correspondent, following the company’s latest update on the proposed partnership.

The Chinese firms – Sanjiang Chemical Company Limited and Xinganchen (Fuzhou) Industrial Park Operation and Management Co. Limited – have conducted about three months of detailed on-site assessments alongside NNPC’s technical teams.

In its response to questions from The PUNCH, the company said the technical report was being finalised after the assessment, which is expected to establish the work and technology required to make the refineries commercially competitive.

“The prospective partners have carried out approximately three months of detailed on-site assessment with their senior engineers, working alongside NNPC teams. The technical report is being finalised. The assessment is intended to establish what work and technology are needed for competitive operations,“ Odeh said.

The NNPC said it was pursuing a technical equity partnership model to restore the facilities to sustainable operations, stressing that rehabilitation work alone would not guarantee success.

“As the Group Chief Executive Officer, Engr Bayo Ojulari, has explained, successful rehabilitation requires financing, competent engineering and construction, and strong operating capability.

“Completing repairs alone is not enough; the facilities must also be able to operate reliably and profitably,” he noted.

The company said the next steps would involve completing the assessment report, receiving a detailed proposal from the prospective partners and agreeing on the technical and commercial terms.

See also  Nigeria Secures $2Bn Shell Gas Investment in New Offshore Gas Project

“The next milestones are completion of the assessment report, a detailed partner proposal, and agreement on the technical and commercial terms. Definitive agreements, the necessary approvals and an investment decision would then provide the basis for a credible programme for completing work and restarting operations,” it stated.

However, the NNPC said it could not announce a restart date until the requirements had been settled.

“We cannot responsibly promise a restart date before these requirements are settled,” the company said, adding that the assessment was concrete progress but that Nigerians would ultimately judge the initiative by sustained production and reliable product supply.

“We cannot responsibly promise a restart date before these requirements are settled. The engineering assessment is concrete progress, but Nigerians will ultimately judge success by sustained production and reliable product supply. We will continue to communicate verified milestones as the process advances,“ Odeh stated.

The proposed partnership follows the memorandum of understanding signed by the NNPC and the two Chinese firms on 30 April, 2026. The agreement covers the completion of outstanding work, operation and maintenance of the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries, and the assessment of possible upgrades and expansion, including petrochemical opportunities.

The NNPC, however, clarified that the MoU was only a preliminary framework and not a final investment or operating agreement.

At a media parley on 29 September, Ojulari reaffirmed that the company would not proceed with further rehabilitation without a credible route to commercial viability.

The company said the proposed model was intended to bring in partners willing to invest and share responsibility for the refineries’ performance, rather than contractors whose involvement ends after payment for completed work.

See also  FG reopens fuel imports, Dangote reels from FX losses due to US-Iran war

“This is intended to protect public value and avoid repeating arrangements that did not deliver sustained results,” the NNPC stated.

It also clarified that work on the Kaduna refinery had not commenced under the partnership model, noting that the agreement with the Chinese firms covered only Port Harcourt and Warri.

On the impact of the proposed revival on petrol prices, the NNPC said more efficient domestic refining could strengthen supply, increase competition and reduce dependence on imported finished products.

“We understand why Nigerians are asking about our refineries as petrol prices put pressure on household budgets and businesses. Our priority is to restore reliable, commercially sustainable refining capacity while supporting practical relief for customers,“ Odeh noted.

Meanwhile, the NNPC said its retail petrol discount, introduced on 1 October, would continue until 31 October, 2026, as part of efforts to provide temporary relief to customers.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending