Connect with us

News

A tweet, a threat and reset

Published

on

The tweet missile seesawed through the spines of allied nations. And the warhead it carried sagged the bones of the powerful in the Nigerian government. Sleepless nights in the Presidency and diplomatic circles in Nigeria and beyond quickly followed the growling heavyweight cyber announcement. For Nigeria’s plenteous traducers, many of them from one block of a country so flummoxed, the tweet was sweet to retweet.

It was a long-overdue adrenaline shot that a group of anti-Bola Tinubu fellas needed to move their limbs in euphoric ballroom dance. They believe that something bad was going to happen to the country they so much despise. They surged into a continual cotillion, hoping that suddenly power would change hands, and a new Sheriff would occupy Aso Rock Villa. What jocosity! The conclusion of the matter, however, is that a banal bomb threat from a distance so long can wake up a sleeping giant.

Five thousand miles away in Washington, DC, US President Donald Trump’s cryptic and creepy words came as a warning shot on his Truth Tweeter handle. A Fox News video report on violence in Nigeria titillated the American President’s furious idiolect: “If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing’, to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities,” Trump wrote.

Wow! So, Yankees are coming ‘guns-a-blazing’ into Nigeria? And bombs will be dropped on a sovereign country that has no known beef with America? Well, that’s what Trump threatened. He promised to barge in with the US Marines to wipe off the terrorists who are killing Christians. “If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our cherished Christians!” As a patriotic Nigerian, a part of me agreed with the idea that focuses on wiping off the terrorists. These miscreants have put Nigeria through the hellhole for too long, and nobody is halting them as they hurt. The other part of me sensed ‘military occupation’, a disgusting and disguised form of colonisation that Nigeria broke its chains in 1960.

See also  Tinubu hails EFCC as FBI commends Nigeria over sextortion crackdown

The terror thugs that anger Trump anger Nigerians, too. They sneaked in from the Sahel and are snuffing lives indiscriminately out of every shade of humanity.  Families of the 37 worshippers at St Theresa Catholic Church in Madala, Niger State, are still mourning their loved ones bombed by Boko Haram on Christmas Day 2011. The Great Mosque of Kano got its own share of their mayhem from the same group in 2014 when 107 defenceless Muslim worshippers were killed. What about bomb blasts on soft target non-religious places in the Federal Capital Territory, such as the UN building, police headquarters, Nyanya motor park, THISDAY offices, where hundreds of Nigerians succumbed to the killing and cold hands of Islamic terrorists? These thugs, who are aided and abetted by Nigerians in powerful places and personalities with Brobdingnagian bags of stacked cash, are killing everybody.

This should also interest Trump. Many times and in times past, the loonies took their rampages even to the home of the then President, Mohammed Buhari, killing men and women; pillaging villages and hamlets; and sparing not their daggers and swords against the Muslims or Christians in the backyard of a retired general who was the sitting President. They are awkwardly audacious as the bandits carry out their mayhem with ease. On Buhari’s watch, many parts of the North became valleys of death. Despite the safety net provided by Buhari’s government to ‘repentant’ Boko Haram bandits and terrorists under Operation Safe Corridor, violence unleashed in the Northeast and Northwest intensified. The loonies are slaughtering everybody!

Just last month in Rome, President Bola Tinubu received Mr Massad Boulos, Senior Adviser to United States President Donald Trump on Arab and African Affairs. After the meeting, Boulos submitted this account: “People of all religions and of all tribes are dying, and it is very unfortunate, and we even know that Boko Haram and ISIS are killing more Muslims than Christians…. So, people are suffering from all sorts of backgrounds. This is not specifically targeted at one group or the other.” But who cares that the killers are killing not only Christians? Because they kill everybody, does that mean they should kill anybody? Must we fold our hands in timidity and allow these lunatics to keep killing because they kill Muslims too? Must any decent society accord free rein to this genocidal group of human beasts to murder the innocent at will? Have we lost our right to life and living because we don’t serve their god? That is what Trump is saying in many unspoken words. These killers are not Christians, Jews, traditional idol worshipers, or atheists. They are all Islamic terrorists. That is the point here.

See also  NIN – SIM policy erased 59.7m phone lines — NCC

If the killings don’t anger Nigerian leaders enough, they anger Trump. And they anger Nigerians.  Deborah Yakubu was a 200-level Economics student at the Shehu Shagari College of Education in Sokoto. She had reportedly posted a message in a class WhatsApp study group asking her classmates to stop sharing religious content and focus on academics. This led to accusations of blasphemy. She was lynched in broad daylight, roasted in a bonfire, as Muslim elites defended her killers. These are the stories and ugly events that were brought to the attention of the most powerful man in the world, who happened to be the US President.

Nigerians aren’t looking for perfection in government. They just desire a commonsense approach from our leaders regarding issues affecting them. There is no shred of commonsense in the way governments from Olusegun Obasanjo till now have handled wanton and senseless killings of Nigerians by trifling terror errors called Boko Haram, Al Qaida, or ISIS. With billions of dollars sunk into that security terrain, the results are flat-out disgraceful.

Between 2016 and 2022, security spending exceeded $19.9bn. In 2023, $3.2bn was the commitment and N1.65tn in 2024. Despite large allocations, spending effectiveness has been hampered by corruption, poor management, and political factors.

Under Buhari, those guys were shipped into Nigeria with all expenses paid by Nigerians. Under the late President was an unsavoury uptick in terror activities. Under Buhari, security worsened. Tinubu, as President, is now groping around in the dark, trying to revive a dying economy and preside over an unsafe terrain now under the grips of horsemen from the Sahel. The Nigerian Government must live up to its responsibility enshrined in section 14 (2)(b) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, which states that the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.

See also  US court upholds Trump administration’s $100,000 visa fee for tech workers

We thank Mr Trump for his love for Nigerian Christians. We have heard him. He has awakened a sleeping giant. Violence in Nigeria stems from complex socioeconomic factors rather than simple religious conflict. Clashes between farmers and herders are driven by resource scarcity and land competition, not religion alone. We will put our house in order. God has used Trump to wake up the Giant of Africa. But we decline the offer of a unilateral military strike on the terrorists’ terrain. We hope that the US will work with Nigeria to help clean up the evil debris that has built up over decades, as we build a stronger relationship between the two nations. Now, we hope that our President will fumigate our consulates around the world, especially Washington, DC, which has had no ambassadorial presence for the last two years. Diplomatic push toward the US must be in overdrive. We thank Mr Trump for the tweet and threat. We thank him for the reset that has woken up the sleeping giant.

#SMACKDOWN

X-@Folaojotweet

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

SEE FULL LIST: NJC recommends 28 candidates for judicial appointments

Published

on

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has recommended 28 candidates for appointment as judicial officers across six states, including 24 candidates for various State High Courts.

The recommendations cover the High Courts of Kano, Ebonyi, Edo, Adamawa and Ogun states, the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal and Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The Council announced the recommendations in a statement issued on Wednesday by its Deputy Director of Information, Kemi Babalola-Ogedengbe.

It said the decisions were taken at its 112th meeting held on November 3, 2026, under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun.

According to the Council, one candidate was recommended as Grand Kadi of the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, while another was recommended as Kadi of the Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal.

Two others were recommended as judges of the Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The appointment includes “24 High Court candidates and four candidates for the Sharia and Customary Courts of Appeal.”

The full list of the 28 recommended candidates is as follows:

PLATEAU STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (GRAND KADI)

1. Tijjani Jibrin Zololo

KANO STATE HIGH COURT

2. Nafisah Yusuf Hassan
3. Halima Yahuza Ahmad
4. Abdullahi Abdulsalam Bature
5. Musa Ibrahim Umar

EBONYI STATE HIGH COURT

6. Dickson Edmund Amaga

EDO STATE HIGH COURT

7. Benson Osagie Osawaru
8. Taiye Osayanmon Omoruyi
9. Dorothy Ibhade Adamaigbo
10. Festus Osagie Usiobaifo
11. Pius Idemudia Oiwoh
12. Majebi Samuel Amune
13. Emike Jessica Imuekemhe

See also  US court upholds Trump administration’s $100,000 visa fee for tech workers

ADAMAWA STATE HIGH COURT

14. Aminu Sa’ad
15. Ibrahim Ulenda Musa
16. Sadiq Giwa
17. Musa Bala Mijinyawa
18. Japhet Ibrahim
19. Aliyu Bakari
20. Yakubu Ahmadu

OGUN STATE HIGH COURT

21. Olakulehin Luqman Abiola Oke
22. Adebimpe Folusho Obienu
23. Fatimat Adeola Daudu
24. Rafiat Bolanle Kadiri
25. Oludotun Olaniyi Osho

ADAMAWA STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (KADI)

26. Abubakar Ishaku

ADAMAWA STATE CUSTOMARY COURT OF APPEAL

27. Elshama Gwama Dimas
28. David Benjamin Pembi

The NJC said all the recommended candidates were expected to be sworn in by their respective state governors without delay.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

JD Vance reveals Iran war cost Republicans midterm elections, read details

Published

on

United States Vice President JD Vance has blamed the Iran war for the Republican Party’s poor performance in the 2026 midterm elections, saying many supporters of President Donald Trump switched allegiance to Democrats over dissatisfaction with the conflict.

Vance said this in a post on his X handle on Wednesday, arguing that the party’s defeat was not primarily caused by poor voter turnout but by the defection of voters who supported the Trump-Vance ticket in 2024.

He said data analysis conducted by his team before the elections had shown that Republican supporters were turning out in significant numbers, despite opinion polls predicting a major Democratic victory.

“One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was ‘composition’—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win,” he said.

Vance explained that although turnout was encouraging in several states, a member of his data team had warned him that many Republican voters were angry and might not vote for the party.

“Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was nine points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024,” he said.

“But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.”

The Vice President acknowledged that the party might have failed to communicate its economic policies effectively, particularly on the cost of living and inflation.

However, he said the major reasons voters abandoned the Republicans were concerns about the war, economic hardship, America’s foreign policy priorities and its relationship with Israel.

See also  US court upholds Trump administration’s $100,000 visa fee for tech workers

According to Vance, a pollster who accurately predicted the election outcome identified four major demands among former Republican supporters who switched to the Democrats.

The demands were to end the war, prioritise the cost of living and inflation, put America first and change the country’s relationship with Israel.

“The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night,” Vance stated.

He also defended television personality Rachel Campos-Duffy, saying her earlier call for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict had proved politically sound.

Vance warned against attempts by Republican establishment figures to attribute the party’s electoral setback to other issues, particularly immigration policy.

He said he was open to reviewing immigration enforcement strategies, including targeting businesses that employ undocumented workers, but rejected calls for amnesty.

“Anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you,” he said.

The Vice President challenged those who believed the war was worth the political cost to defend that position openly, noting that the defeat could cost Republicans control of the Senate for the next six years.

“If you’d like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next six years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay,” he said.

“Agree or disagree, that’s at least honest.”

Despite the setback, Vance expressed optimism about the country’s future, urging disappointed Republican supporters to channel their anger into rebuilding the party and electing candidates who share their political views.

“Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country,” he added.

See also  “Muslim Will One Day Become US President” — Nigerian Islamic Cleric, Sheikh Gumi Predicts

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

UK to strengthen immigration enforcement with facial recognition

Published

on

The United Kingdom government plans to expand live facial recognition technology to strengthen immigration enforcement and identify individuals who have violated immigration rules.

The initiative, being developed by the Home Office, could see facial recognition cameras deployed at transport hubs and public events to help immigration officers identify people who have overstayed their visas, entered the country unlawfully or breached their immigration conditions.

According to policy documents published in October and sighted by PUNCH Online on Thursday, the proposed expansion could extend the technology’s use to general immigration enforcement, including civil immigration violations that do not necessarily involve criminal offences.

The development comes as Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood seeks to intensify immigration enforcement through increased funding, additional personnel and expanded deportation operations.

The Home Office said the technology would help officers identify individuals subject to removal proceedings and those attempting to re-enter the UK unlawfully.

The policy documents also suggest that facial recognition could reduce the need for repeated enforcement visits to residential properties and workplaces.

Authorities have already conducted three trials of the technology at Holyhead port in north Wales between November 2025 and February 2026. The trials focused on identifying individuals travelling from Ireland who were subject to deportation orders or wanted over immigration-related criminal offences.

The programme has now entered its formal delivery phase, with officials considering wider deployments at transport hubs and large public gatherings.

A Home Office spokesperson confirmed that further trials were being considered while the government examined the potential benefits and implications of the technology.

See also  Senate to discuss Trump’s invasion threat with executive

U K Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said: “Facial recognition technology has been the biggest breakthrough for catching criminals since DNA matching, already helping police take thousands of dangerous criminals off our streets.

“The benefits are clear, but we must ensure that its use is fair, safe and proportionate.

“It is right we put in place clear laws to ensure that the use of this technology is watertight, so the public can have confidence that these tools, which are vital to our safety, are used responsibly too.”

However, the proposed expansion has raised concerns among civil liberties organisations and migrant rights advocates over privacy, surveillance and the possibility of inaccurate identification.

The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants described the development as a significant escalation of immigration enforcement powers, while the Open Rights Group questioned the transparency of the plans, public consent and the absence of comprehensive legislation governing facial recognition.

Critics have also warned that the technology could disproportionately affect people of colour because of concerns about identification accuracy.

Meanwhile, Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner William Webster has questioned whether existing regulatory arrangements are sufficient to oversee the expanding use of facial recognition across government agencies.

Under the proposed policy, individuals under 18 will not be included on facial recognition watchlists.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending