Connect with us

News

A tweet, a threat and reset

Published

on

The tweet missile seesawed through the spines of allied nations. And the warhead it carried sagged the bones of the powerful in the Nigerian government. Sleepless nights in the Presidency and diplomatic circles in Nigeria and beyond quickly followed the growling heavyweight cyber announcement. For Nigeria’s plenteous traducers, many of them from one block of a country so flummoxed, the tweet was sweet to retweet.

It was a long-overdue adrenaline shot that a group of anti-Bola Tinubu fellas needed to move their limbs in euphoric ballroom dance. They believe that something bad was going to happen to the country they so much despise. They surged into a continual cotillion, hoping that suddenly power would change hands, and a new Sheriff would occupy Aso Rock Villa. What jocosity! The conclusion of the matter, however, is that a banal bomb threat from a distance so long can wake up a sleeping giant.

Five thousand miles away in Washington, DC, US President Donald Trump’s cryptic and creepy words came as a warning shot on his Truth Tweeter handle. A Fox News video report on violence in Nigeria titillated the American President’s furious idiolect: “If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing’, to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities,” Trump wrote.

Wow! So, Yankees are coming ‘guns-a-blazing’ into Nigeria? And bombs will be dropped on a sovereign country that has no known beef with America? Well, that’s what Trump threatened. He promised to barge in with the US Marines to wipe off the terrorists who are killing Christians. “If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our cherished Christians!” As a patriotic Nigerian, a part of me agreed with the idea that focuses on wiping off the terrorists. These miscreants have put Nigeria through the hellhole for too long, and nobody is halting them as they hurt. The other part of me sensed ‘military occupation’, a disgusting and disguised form of colonisation that Nigeria broke its chains in 1960.

See also  Oyo school attack: Senate, Yoruba leaders demand action as distress videos emerge

The terror thugs that anger Trump anger Nigerians, too. They sneaked in from the Sahel and are snuffing lives indiscriminately out of every shade of humanity.  Families of the 37 worshippers at St Theresa Catholic Church in Madala, Niger State, are still mourning their loved ones bombed by Boko Haram on Christmas Day 2011. The Great Mosque of Kano got its own share of their mayhem from the same group in 2014 when 107 defenceless Muslim worshippers were killed. What about bomb blasts on soft target non-religious places in the Federal Capital Territory, such as the UN building, police headquarters, Nyanya motor park, THISDAY offices, where hundreds of Nigerians succumbed to the killing and cold hands of Islamic terrorists? These thugs, who are aided and abetted by Nigerians in powerful places and personalities with Brobdingnagian bags of stacked cash, are killing everybody.

This should also interest Trump. Many times and in times past, the loonies took their rampages even to the home of the then President, Mohammed Buhari, killing men and women; pillaging villages and hamlets; and sparing not their daggers and swords against the Muslims or Christians in the backyard of a retired general who was the sitting President. They are awkwardly audacious as the bandits carry out their mayhem with ease. On Buhari’s watch, many parts of the North became valleys of death. Despite the safety net provided by Buhari’s government to ‘repentant’ Boko Haram bandits and terrorists under Operation Safe Corridor, violence unleashed in the Northeast and Northwest intensified. The loonies are slaughtering everybody!

Just last month in Rome, President Bola Tinubu received Mr Massad Boulos, Senior Adviser to United States President Donald Trump on Arab and African Affairs. After the meeting, Boulos submitted this account: “People of all religions and of all tribes are dying, and it is very unfortunate, and we even know that Boko Haram and ISIS are killing more Muslims than Christians…. So, people are suffering from all sorts of backgrounds. This is not specifically targeted at one group or the other.” But who cares that the killers are killing not only Christians? Because they kill everybody, does that mean they should kill anybody? Must we fold our hands in timidity and allow these lunatics to keep killing because they kill Muslims too? Must any decent society accord free rein to this genocidal group of human beasts to murder the innocent at will? Have we lost our right to life and living because we don’t serve their god? That is what Trump is saying in many unspoken words. These killers are not Christians, Jews, traditional idol worshipers, or atheists. They are all Islamic terrorists. That is the point here.

See also  Kanu Fails To Open Defence Again, Court Adjourns Until Monday

If the killings don’t anger Nigerian leaders enough, they anger Trump. And they anger Nigerians.  Deborah Yakubu was a 200-level Economics student at the Shehu Shagari College of Education in Sokoto. She had reportedly posted a message in a class WhatsApp study group asking her classmates to stop sharing religious content and focus on academics. This led to accusations of blasphemy. She was lynched in broad daylight, roasted in a bonfire, as Muslim elites defended her killers. These are the stories and ugly events that were brought to the attention of the most powerful man in the world, who happened to be the US President.

Nigerians aren’t looking for perfection in government. They just desire a commonsense approach from our leaders regarding issues affecting them. There is no shred of commonsense in the way governments from Olusegun Obasanjo till now have handled wanton and senseless killings of Nigerians by trifling terror errors called Boko Haram, Al Qaida, or ISIS. With billions of dollars sunk into that security terrain, the results are flat-out disgraceful.

Between 2016 and 2022, security spending exceeded $19.9bn. In 2023, $3.2bn was the commitment and N1.65tn in 2024. Despite large allocations, spending effectiveness has been hampered by corruption, poor management, and political factors.

Under Buhari, those guys were shipped into Nigeria with all expenses paid by Nigerians. Under the late President was an unsavoury uptick in terror activities. Under Buhari, security worsened. Tinubu, as President, is now groping around in the dark, trying to revive a dying economy and preside over an unsafe terrain now under the grips of horsemen from the Sahel. The Nigerian Government must live up to its responsibility enshrined in section 14 (2)(b) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, which states that the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.

See also  Senate approves Tinubu’s request to deploy troops in Benin

We thank Mr Trump for his love for Nigerian Christians. We have heard him. He has awakened a sleeping giant. Violence in Nigeria stems from complex socioeconomic factors rather than simple religious conflict. Clashes between farmers and herders are driven by resource scarcity and land competition, not religion alone. We will put our house in order. God has used Trump to wake up the Giant of Africa. But we decline the offer of a unilateral military strike on the terrorists’ terrain. We hope that the US will work with Nigeria to help clean up the evil debris that has built up over decades, as we build a stronger relationship between the two nations. Now, we hope that our President will fumigate our consulates around the world, especially Washington, DC, which has had no ambassadorial presence for the last two years. Diplomatic push toward the US must be in overdrive. We thank Mr Trump for the tweet and threat. We thank him for the reset that has woken up the sleeping giant.

#SMACKDOWN

X-@Folaojotweet

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Guinea-Bissau’s Prime Minister Collapses, Hospitalised

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Investigation uncovers Col who plotted Tinubu’s ouster

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  PHOTOS: Iranians around the world celebrate the killing of Iran's Ayatollah Khomenei in joint US–Israel airstrikes

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Kanu Fails To Open Defence Again, Court Adjourns Until Monday

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Guinea-Bissau’s Prime Minister Collapses, Hospitalised

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Investigation uncovers Col who plotted Tinubu’s ouster

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending