Connect with us

News

A tweet, a threat and reset

Published

on

The tweet missile seesawed through the spines of allied nations. And the warhead it carried sagged the bones of the powerful in the Nigerian government. Sleepless nights in the Presidency and diplomatic circles in Nigeria and beyond quickly followed the growling heavyweight cyber announcement. For Nigeria’s plenteous traducers, many of them from one block of a country so flummoxed, the tweet was sweet to retweet.

It was a long-overdue adrenaline shot that a group of anti-Bola Tinubu fellas needed to move their limbs in euphoric ballroom dance. They believe that something bad was going to happen to the country they so much despise. They surged into a continual cotillion, hoping that suddenly power would change hands, and a new Sheriff would occupy Aso Rock Villa. What jocosity! The conclusion of the matter, however, is that a banal bomb threat from a distance so long can wake up a sleeping giant.

Five thousand miles away in Washington, DC, US President Donald Trump’s cryptic and creepy words came as a warning shot on his Truth Tweeter handle. A Fox News video report on violence in Nigeria titillated the American President’s furious idiolect: “If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing’, to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities,” Trump wrote.

Wow! So, Yankees are coming ‘guns-a-blazing’ into Nigeria? And bombs will be dropped on a sovereign country that has no known beef with America? Well, that’s what Trump threatened. He promised to barge in with the US Marines to wipe off the terrorists who are killing Christians. “If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our cherished Christians!” As a patriotic Nigerian, a part of me agreed with the idea that focuses on wiping off the terrorists. These miscreants have put Nigeria through the hellhole for too long, and nobody is halting them as they hurt. The other part of me sensed ‘military occupation’, a disgusting and disguised form of colonisation that Nigeria broke its chains in 1960.

See also  Terrorism: Police tighten S’East security as Kanu knows fate today

The terror thugs that anger Trump anger Nigerians, too. They sneaked in from the Sahel and are snuffing lives indiscriminately out of every shade of humanity.  Families of the 37 worshippers at St Theresa Catholic Church in Madala, Niger State, are still mourning their loved ones bombed by Boko Haram on Christmas Day 2011. The Great Mosque of Kano got its own share of their mayhem from the same group in 2014 when 107 defenceless Muslim worshippers were killed. What about bomb blasts on soft target non-religious places in the Federal Capital Territory, such as the UN building, police headquarters, Nyanya motor park, THISDAY offices, where hundreds of Nigerians succumbed to the killing and cold hands of Islamic terrorists? These thugs, who are aided and abetted by Nigerians in powerful places and personalities with Brobdingnagian bags of stacked cash, are killing everybody.

This should also interest Trump. Many times and in times past, the loonies took their rampages even to the home of the then President, Mohammed Buhari, killing men and women; pillaging villages and hamlets; and sparing not their daggers and swords against the Muslims or Christians in the backyard of a retired general who was the sitting President. They are awkwardly audacious as the bandits carry out their mayhem with ease. On Buhari’s watch, many parts of the North became valleys of death. Despite the safety net provided by Buhari’s government to ‘repentant’ Boko Haram bandits and terrorists under Operation Safe Corridor, violence unleashed in the Northeast and Northwest intensified. The loonies are slaughtering everybody!

Just last month in Rome, President Bola Tinubu received Mr Massad Boulos, Senior Adviser to United States President Donald Trump on Arab and African Affairs. After the meeting, Boulos submitted this account: “People of all religions and of all tribes are dying, and it is very unfortunate, and we even know that Boko Haram and ISIS are killing more Muslims than Christians…. So, people are suffering from all sorts of backgrounds. This is not specifically targeted at one group or the other.” But who cares that the killers are killing not only Christians? Because they kill everybody, does that mean they should kill anybody? Must we fold our hands in timidity and allow these lunatics to keep killing because they kill Muslims too? Must any decent society accord free rein to this genocidal group of human beasts to murder the innocent at will? Have we lost our right to life and living because we don’t serve their god? That is what Trump is saying in many unspoken words. These killers are not Christians, Jews, traditional idol worshipers, or atheists. They are all Islamic terrorists. That is the point here.

See also  Insurgency: FG, Saudi Arabia sign five-year military pact

If the killings don’t anger Nigerian leaders enough, they anger Trump. And they anger Nigerians.  Deborah Yakubu was a 200-level Economics student at the Shehu Shagari College of Education in Sokoto. She had reportedly posted a message in a class WhatsApp study group asking her classmates to stop sharing religious content and focus on academics. This led to accusations of blasphemy. She was lynched in broad daylight, roasted in a bonfire, as Muslim elites defended her killers. These are the stories and ugly events that were brought to the attention of the most powerful man in the world, who happened to be the US President.

Nigerians aren’t looking for perfection in government. They just desire a commonsense approach from our leaders regarding issues affecting them. There is no shred of commonsense in the way governments from Olusegun Obasanjo till now have handled wanton and senseless killings of Nigerians by trifling terror errors called Boko Haram, Al Qaida, or ISIS. With billions of dollars sunk into that security terrain, the results are flat-out disgraceful.

Between 2016 and 2022, security spending exceeded $19.9bn. In 2023, $3.2bn was the commitment and N1.65tn in 2024. Despite large allocations, spending effectiveness has been hampered by corruption, poor management, and political factors.

Under Buhari, those guys were shipped into Nigeria with all expenses paid by Nigerians. Under the late President was an unsavoury uptick in terror activities. Under Buhari, security worsened. Tinubu, as President, is now groping around in the dark, trying to revive a dying economy and preside over an unsafe terrain now under the grips of horsemen from the Sahel. The Nigerian Government must live up to its responsibility enshrined in section 14 (2)(b) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, which states that the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.

See also  Retired Police Officer With Spinal Cord Injury Battles For Life On N47,000 Pension After Selling His Only House, No Support From Force

We thank Mr Trump for his love for Nigerian Christians. We have heard him. He has awakened a sleeping giant. Violence in Nigeria stems from complex socioeconomic factors rather than simple religious conflict. Clashes between farmers and herders are driven by resource scarcity and land competition, not religion alone. We will put our house in order. God has used Trump to wake up the Giant of Africa. But we decline the offer of a unilateral military strike on the terrorists’ terrain. We hope that the US will work with Nigeria to help clean up the evil debris that has built up over decades, as we build a stronger relationship between the two nations. Now, we hope that our President will fumigate our consulates around the world, especially Washington, DC, which has had no ambassadorial presence for the last two years. Diplomatic push toward the US must be in overdrive. We thank Mr Trump for the tweet and threat. We thank him for the reset that has woken up the sleeping giant.

#SMACKDOWN

X-@Folaojotweet

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  Terrorism: Police tighten S’East security as Kanu knows fate today

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  PenCom urges FG to raise police pension contribution to 20%

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  Tinubu revokes pardon for Sanda, 140 high-profile inmates

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  Tinubu revokes pardon for Sanda, 140 high-profile inmates

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  Insurgency: FG, Saudi Arabia sign five-year military pact

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  Armed Forces Day: Tinubu, govs celebrate soldiers, fallen heroes

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  Insurgency: FG, Saudi Arabia sign five-year military pact

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  India condemns drone strike on UAE

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending