Connect with us

News

Concerns mount over 25% paternity fraud report

Published

on

Fresh concerns have trailed the release of the 2025 Annual DNA Testing Report by a testing centre in Lagos, which revealed that Nigeria’s paternity exclusion rate currently stands at 25 per cent.

This means one in every four men tested is not the biological father of the child in question.

The report, released during the week by Smart DNA, also showed that firstborn children were the most affected in paternity disputes, with firstborn sons accounting for 64 per cent of negative results.

Across the country, the revelations have continued to fuel public debate, with many men stating that they would subject their children to DNA tests to confirm their paternity and erase doubts raised by the report.

A Lagos-based tech entrepreneur, Samuel Adegbite, stated that he was considering conducting a DNA test for his children.

In an interview, he said, “I had never actually given serious consideration to conducting a DNA test on my children, but with this recent news, and the types of things I am hearing these days, it is something I will do soon.

“I actually trust my wife and I even feel bad thinking about it. But, it’s just something I need to do for my peace of mind. I believe every man has a nagging feeling that ‘what if’, and I just want to be sure of the paternity of my children once and for all.”

An accounts manager at a public relations and advertising firm, Emeka Njoku, said he would take his children for DNA tests when he could afford it.

He stated that though his wife had never given him any reason not to trust her, he was worried because two of his children had certain character traits that were not shared by him or his wife.

He said, “Two of my children are extroverts and are very expressive. Meanwhile, my wife and I are quiet and reserved people. Many people actually comment innocently that they are not like us at all. Meanwhile, my first child is practically my carbon copy, and behaves exactly like me. It never really meant anything to me, but in recent times, even before the release of the report you’re referencing, I had been giving it serious thought. I have made up my mind that once I am financially buoyant, I will take my three children for tests.”

However, a fashion designer and father of three, Alabi James, said he had no reason to doubt his children’s paternity.

“It’s not about anything else but the fact that I trusted my wife from day one. Besides, I can clearly see my family traits in my children. For these reasons and more, I have never bothered to think otherwise,” he said.

James added that suspicion would only arose from broken trust.

“Tolerance and endurance are qualities this generation has neglected. Be satisfied with whatever your partner can afford,” he said.

Corroborating James stance, another father, who identified himself as Mr. Odunusi, stated that it had never crossed his mind to get a DNA test for his children, citing the striking resemblance he shared with them.

See also  Senate approves Tinubu’s N1.15tn domestic loan to fill 2025 budget gap

Another man, Emmanuel Ajayi, described the trend as “scary,” stressing the emotional toll it could have on unsuspecting fathers.

He said, “How can a man live with children he believes are his, only to later find out they are not? Although I trust my wife would never do such a thing, I might consider it myself if I have enough money—just for the sake of it.”

For Chibueze Uzor, a father of four, the test is necessary but not urgent.

“We all know women cannot be trusted. I will do the DNA test but not now,” he said.

Asked if he had doubts about the paternity of his children, he responded, “At all. But I will do it to clear all forms of doubt.”

‘Resemblance may be deceptive’

A genetic and molecular expert with Easy Genetics, which partners Alpha Bio Labs in the United Kingdom and Universal Forensics in the United States, Dede Gilbert, explained the science and realities behind paternity testing.

He said, “Everyone has 23 pairs of chromosomes. 22 are autosomes while the last pair is the sex chromosome, which determines a person’s gender.

“During DNA testing, all 23 pairs are analysed, and we also calculate the combined paternity index to make sure the result is accurate.

“There is maternity and paternity testing, and what we call avuncular testing, which is used to establish sibling relationships.”

He further clarified how testing works.

“If it’s a paternity test, we take a sample from the alleged father and the child. For a maternity test, we use the mother’s sample. When the father is not available for a paternity test, his sibling, preferably a male, can be tested.”

On the cost, he noted that prices depended on the laboratory handling the analysis and could vary between N400,000 and N1m.

Responding to why physical resemblance can be misleading, the expert said, “It is very possible to look like someone who isn’t your biological parent. I have seen people who look like me or even my friends. That is called phenotype. Every little child, at some point, looks like everybody. It’s as they grow older that physical traits become more distinct. If your child resembles you, it will be obvious, but once you have reasons to doubt, a test is the surest way to know.”

On the rise in reported negative paternity results, he stressed that the statistics were often misunderstood.

“People who come for DNA tests are not a random sample of society; they usually have strong suspicions already.

“For example, if a couple is living peacefully and the man notices inconsistencies—say his wife claims to be at a conference but is seen elsewhere—that could trigger the need for a test. Others seek testing for immigration purposes, since proof of biological relationship is required when relocating with a child. Some do it because of legal disputes. So, these statistics are not a true reflection of the entire population. In statistics, we regard such a group as a ‘skewed population,’ and you cannot use their results to judge the whole.”

In a similar vein, a DNA consultant, Ayodele Adeniyi, explained that while the demand for the test was rising, DNA testing was not a routine medical requirement.

See also  Igboho Apologises To Alaafin Over Comment At Ooni’s Palace

He said, “Two to three out of 10 cases we have handled came back showing the man is not the father, but this is not a direct representation of the population. Many people who come to us already have suspicions, such as catching a wife cheating or following rumours. The tests are carried out in the United States, and take about two weeks.”

A nurse with Surge Healthcare in Abuja, Happiness Ogenyi, urged families to conduct DNA tests if they had the resources.

She said, “In about one out of every 10 tests we’ve conducted, the man turns out not to be the child’s father. If there are doubts, especially where trust issues exist, that’s where a DNA test becomes necessary. But if you trust your wife, I don’t think there’s any cause for alarm. And if you can afford it, there’s nothing wrong with doing it for all your children.”

She advised families to conduct DNA tests not only for paternity issues but also for health and immigration purposes.

She noted that a test currently costs about N290,000, with results available within four weeks.

Unreliable traditional DNA

An activist and Ifa adherent, Efunsetan Ifagbemi, maintained that long before scientific DNA testing became popular in Nigeria, many communities relied on traditional methods to determine the paternity of children.

According to her, in some riverine areas, a ritual sometimes referred to as “traditional DNA” is still carried out.

She noted that one of the most well-known practices involves throwing a child into a river or placing them on water.

“Community elders believe that the water, seen as a sacred force, will ‘accept’ a child whose lineage is legitimate and ‘reject’ one whose paternity is questionable. In many cases, the child is expected to float briefly or be safely carried by the water, while sinking or struggling is taken as a sign of illegitimacy.

“Although it might be shocking to outsiders, these practices are rooted in cultural beliefs about ancestry, purity, and the spiritual role of natural elements in safeguarding truth. In some communities, rivers are considered deities, and water is regarded as an impartial judge. For families, such rituals offer a way to resolve disputes without going by way of modern science,” she said.

A bank worker and traditionalist, who opted to remain anonymous, also stated that in certain Igbo communities, elders relied on divination oracles, where a spiritualist would consult the gods to determine if a child belongs to a man.

However, these practices are not without risks.

The water ritual has been criticised for endangering children’s lives, and in many areas, it has been abandoned.

Some human rights advocates have argued that such practices amount to child abuse, while health experts note that cultural methods cannot provide reliable evidence compared to scientific DNA testing.

Celebrities caught in paternity fraud controversies

Paternity fraud has become a recurrent trend in the entertainment industry where DNA scandals have made headlines.

The most recent and emotionally charged case involved the late singer, Ilerioluwa Aloba, popularly known as Mohbad, whose sudden death in September 2023 remains shrouded in controversy.

See also  FG issues compliance directive to MDAs on equipment leasing procedures

The paternity of his son, Liam, became a subject of heated debate after Mohbad’s father, Joseph Aloba, openly demanded a DNA test to establish whether the boy was truly his grandson.

Mohbad’s saga is only the latest in a long list of celebrity DNA controversies.

Afrobeats superstar, Davido, for instance, has repeatedly found himself entangled in paternity disputes.

Over the years, several women have claimed he fathered their children, leading to public confrontations and DNA tests.

One of the most prominent cases involved Ayotomide Labinjo, who alleged she had a daughter, Aanuoluwapo, for the singer after a relationship in 2013.

She claimed that Davido cut off communication after she announced her pregnancy.

Labinjo further alleged that when a test was arranged by Davido’s father, the result—stating Davido was not the biological father—was manipulated, insisting it was only a blood test and not a DNA analysis.

Davido’s family, however, denied the allegation.

His brother, Adewale Adeleke, insisted the test was properly conducted in the presence of all parties and was conclusive.

Despite the negative result, in an X post on March 17, 2017, Davido said the family offered financial assistance to the mother out of pity.

“Upon finding out the test results were negative Out of pity we still give dem money,” he wrote.

Another celebrity whose personal life was dramatically altered by a DNA revelation is On-Air Personality, Chinedu Emmanuel, popularly known as Nedu Wazobia.

In 2021, the comedian and broadcaster found himself at the centre of a messy public dispute with his estranged wife.

Also, Afrobeat master, Femi Kuti, publicly confirmed that a DNA test taken in 2006 had revealed that two of his children were not biologically his.

Explaining the reason he had taken the test, he said, ““It happened eight years ago. One of my girlfriends was talking on the phone with one of her lovers and I entered the room, took the phone and discovered she was talking to a lover.

“And there was already a rumour in the Shrine that one of my children does not look like me and my sister advised me to address the issue. For security reasons and for the sake of the family, I took all my children for a DNA test and I found out that two were not my children,” he said.

However, in an interview with Saturday Beats, the singer noted that he had already discussed what happened to him and could not advise anyone on whether they should do a DNA test or not.

He said, “Some people even want to accept children that are not theirs and I have no business with that. If anyone wants to do DNA, they should and if anyone does not want to do DNA, they should not do. The moment you have had a child, you are mature enough to decide whether you want to do DNA or not.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Igboho Apologises To Alaafin Over Comment At Ooni’s Palace

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  FG issues compliance directive to MDAs on equipment leasing procedures

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  US sanctions eight Nigerians over links to Boko Haram, cybercrime

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Outdated, embarrassing, group knocks NCAA over ban on airplane mode

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Outdated, embarrassing, group knocks NCAA over ban on airplane mode

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Sanwo-Olu won’t leave uncompleted projects – LASG

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending