Connect with us

News

States intensify action as 232 die, 121,000 displaced due to flood disaster

Published

on

Several states, including Kaduna, Nasarawa, Bauchi and Jigawa, have intensified campaigns to avert flood crisis.

According to figures obtained by The PUNCH from the National Emergency Management Agency on Monday, no fewer than 232 persons have lost their lives, while 121,224 others have been displaced following floods that swept through parts of the country as of September 20, The PUNCH reports.

The 2025 flood dashboard shows that at least 339,658 people also recorded some form of losses, with 681 sustaining various degrees of injuries.

Deaths were recorded in seven states, with Niger State accounting for 163 fatalities, Adamawa 59, Taraba five, Yobe two, Borno, Gombe, and Jigawa one each, bringing the nationwide death toll to 232. The floods also resulted in 115 cases of missing persons across the country.

The disaster also left 42,301 houses damaged and destroyed about 48,447 hectares of cultivated farmlands.

The most impacted states include Lagos, where 57,951 people were affected, 3,680 displaced and 3,244 houses damaged; Adamawa, with 57,890 affected, 23,077 displaced, 438 injured, 59 killed, and more than 9,000 farmlands destroyed; and Akwa-Ibom, where 46,233 persons were affected, 40,140 displaced, with over 17,000 homes and farmlands damaged.

Other states severely hit are Imo, which recorded 29,242 affected, 15,607 displaced, 81 injured, and hundreds of homes and farms destroyed; Taraba, with 26,722 affected, 3,080 displaced, 88 injured, and five killed; Rivers, with 22,345 affected and 9,645 displaced; Delta, with 14,057 affected and 3,325 displaced; Abia, where 11,907 were affected, 4,896 displaced, and 21 injured; and Edo, with 10,608 affected and 2,439 displaced.

Also affected are Borno, which had 8,164 people impacted, 2,436 displaced, three injured, and one death; Kaduna, with 7,334 affected and 662 displaced; Niger, where 6,041 were affected, 1,860 displaced, 11 injured, and 163 deaths; Bayelsa, with 5,868 affected; Cross River, which reported 5,646 affected and 5,518 displaced; Yobe, where 4,256 were affected, 486 displaced, and two killed; Sokoto, with 4,278 affected and 1,287 displaced; Gombe, where 4,098 were affected, 865 displaced, 12 injured, and one death; and Ondo, which reported 3,735 affected and 363 displaced.

See also  176 Illegal Estates In Lagos Exposed, Govt Gives Ultimatum

The floods further impacted Jigawa, with 3,650 affected, 293 displaced, and one death; Kogi, where 2,825 were affected; Kwara, which recorded 2,663 affected and extensive farmland losses; Anambra, with 925 affected and 816 displaced; Nasarawa, where 749 persons were affected and all displaced; Kano, which recorded 1,446 affected; and the Federal Capital Territory (Abuja), where 1,025 people were affected and 117 houses damaged.

NEMA identified food, shelter, health services, water and sanitation, and livelihood support as the most urgent needs of victims.

In the aftermath of the floods, NEMA identified several obstacles hampering response efforts. Resource shortage was the most pressing challenge, accounting for 68 per cent of reported difficulties.

This was followed by the inaccessibility of flooded communities (17 per cent), which made it difficult for rescue teams and relief materials to reach victims. Security risks (six per cent) in some locations also slowed operations, while community resistance (seven per cent) further complicated humanitarian access and aid delivery.

Gombe households displaced

The Gombe State Emergency Management Agency said the floods had displaced hundreds of households and claimed several lives since the start of the rainy season.

The Executive Secretary of SEMA, Gombe, Haruna Abdullahi, confirmed that no fewer than 986 households have been affected so far, while 15 lives have been lost to flood-related incidents.

“The situation is worrying. From the beginning of this rainy season till date, we have recorded 15 deaths, and close to 1,000 households have been displaced across different communities,” Abdullahi said.

He explained that one of the most recent incidents occurred at Jurara in Kwami Local Government Area, where about 96 people were displaced and currently being hosted by members of the community.

See also  Burkina Faso grounds Nigerian military aircraft over airspace violation

“So, also at Jalingon Kamu in Kaltungo Local Government Area, about 102 persons were dislocated and are now managing with their neighbours,” he added.

Abdullahi added that a tragic canoe accident compounded the situation in Funakaye Local Government Area.

“A canoe capsized in a village near Bage, leading to the death of five people, while only two survived,” he said.

The SEMA boss, however, assured that the agency was working with local authorities and humanitarian partners to provide relief to victims, even as he urged residents in flood-prone areas to take precautionary measures during the peak of the rainy season.

In Sokoto, findings from a joint assessment conducted by SEMA and NEMA showed that the torrential downpours on September 4 and 9 ravaged 61 communities in Rabah Local Government Area, destroying about 2,200 houses and displacing more than 5,300 households.

With flooding already affecting over 5,000 households and killing at least two people in Sokoto alone in the past fortnight, humanitarian groups and community leaders are calling for urgent interventions to protect lives, provide relief to displaced families, and invest in long-term flood and water transport safety measures.

Kano houses, farmlands

Many houses were destroyed during the recent flood disaster, which ravaged a number of local government areas of Kano State within the last two weeks.

The Executive Secretary of the Kano SEMA, Alhaji Isyaku Kubarachi, said, “As you know, the rainy season is coming to an end, but the problem is that whenever it rains, the rain is always accompanied by strong windstorms, thereby causing a lot of havoc to many houses by uprooting the roofing of the affected houses.

See also  New year crash: Over speeding driver kills 6, injures two on Lagos-Ibadan expressway (PHOTOS)

“We have several such houses and we even recorded fatalities, but I cannot give you the exact number of persons affected or houses destroyed because we’re still working on it,” he said.

Kunarachi said when they finished compilation of the affected persons and houses, they would forward the comprehensive report to the state government.

In neigbouring Bauchi, an official of the State Emergency Management Agency, Adamu Nayola, noted that the state government had spent about N500m as an intervention fund to help victims rebuild houses affected by floods across the state.

Kaduna flood camp

A two-day torrential rainfall also wreaked havoc across Zaria and parts of Kaduna metropolis, displacing at least 970 residents, including hundreds of children, and destroying no fewer than 270 homes, The PUNCH learnt.

The downpour, which began on September 11, lasted until the early hours of September 12 and left a trail of destruction in multiple communities in Zaria, as well as the densely populated Kigo Road Extension in Kaduna North Local Government Area.

These formed the highest figures for those displaced in Kaduna in the last two weeks.

Meanwhile, the Kaduna State Government has announced the temporary closure of the Bashama flood camp in Tudun Wada, Kaduna South Local Government Area, following what officials described as a significant improvement in the flood situation that displaced dozens of families in recent weeks.

According to the Kaduna State Emergency Management Agency, the camp accommodated 42 households comprising 239 residents, including pregnant women, persons with disabilities, and children, who were forced out of their homes when floodwaters submerged parts of the community.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Burkina Faso grounds Nigerian military aircraft over airspace violation

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Bayelsa assembly confirms Peter Akpe as deputy gov

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  See why Ooni of Ife praised Zulum

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  New year crash: Over speeding driver kills 6, injures two on Lagos-Ibadan expressway (PHOTOS)

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Burkina Faso grounds Nigerian military aircraft over airspace violation

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  PHOTOS: UK police launches an investigation after mass train stabb!ng that left 10 people injured

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending