Connect with us

News

2026 budget twist: MDAs inject N3.5tn new projects despite FG freeze

Published

on

There are at least N3.50tn new projects in the proposed 2026 budget, according to an analysis by The PUNCH.

This is despite earlier budget preparation guidelines that directed Ministries, Departments, and Agencies to carry over 70 per cent of their 2025 capital allocation into 2026 and avoid introducing new capital projects.

Figures collated from the 2026 Appropriation Bill show that new project entries amount to N844.49bn across MDAs, while the total rises to N3.50tn when Service Wide Votes are included.

Against the proposed capital budget of N23.21tn for 2026, the combined new project provision of N3.50tn represents 15.09 per cent of total capital expenditure.

The Service-Wide Votes component within the new project portfolio totals N2.66tn, reflecting the concentration of the largest single allocations outside conventional ministerial capital lines.

Earlier in December 2025, The PUNCH reported that the Federal Government ordered ministries, departments, and agencies to carry over 70 per cent of their 2025 capital budget into the 2026 fiscal year as the administration moves to prioritise the completion of existing projects and contain spending pressures in the face of weak revenues.

This directive is contained in the 2026 Abridged Budget Call Circular issued by the Federal Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning and circulated to all ministers, service chiefs, heads of agencies, and top government officials in Abuja.

According to the circular, “MDAs are to upload 70 per cent of their 2025 FGN Budget to continue in FY2026. All such rollover and uploads MUST be in line with the immediate needs of the country as well as the government’s development priorities that align with the policy direction of the new administration, which hinges on National Security, the Economy, Education, Health, Agriculture, Infrastructure, Power & Energy, as well as social safety nets, women & youth empowerment.”

It stated that ministries and agencies must continue with the allocations already approved in the 2025 budget rather than seeking fresh projects. The circular said all expenditure would be properly scrutinised to allow only essential spending and to ensure value for money

However, The PUNCH observed that no fewer than 82 MDAs have at least one fresh capital or programme item included in the budget.

Across these MDAs, the proposed budget contains over 400 new project lines, ranging from large multibillion-naira infrastructure and health investments to smaller constituency-level interventions such as boreholes, training schemes, and equipment supply.

Also, the review of the Service Wide Votes, with 18 new projects in the 2026 appropriation bill, shows that a significant share of the new project portfolio is tied to financing programmes, security-related provisions, liabilities, and central initiatives.

See also  Hundreds storm EFCC headquarters, demand El-Rufai prosecution

The largest single line item is the provision for 2024 outstanding contractors’ liabilities put at N1.70tn. This allocation alone accounts for about 48.55 per cent of the N3.50tn total new projects, including Service Wide Votes.

Also, the bill includes three N100bn provisions under Service Wide Votes for the Nigeria Development Finance Corporation, the Economic Transformation Finance Programme, and the Nigeria Growth Investment Fund, bringing the total for these three funding lines to N300bn.

The Service Wide Votes entries also include capitalisation of INFRACO of N20bn, a DSS special operations fund of N30bn, and N110.31bn for the Nigerian Air Force to meet outstanding obligations on six T-129 ATAK helicopters and three Mi-35 helicopters. Another large entry is presidential air fleet logistics and management, including operation of the National Forest Guard, put at N283.85bn.

There is also a recurrent related take-off grant line for new MDAs at N41.12bn and a capital take-off grant line for 12 new MDAs, most in health and education, at N19.50bn, alongside other service-wide provisions such as pension increases due to consequential adjustment and payment of gratuity to civil servants.

Within the MDA level items, the five MDAs with the highest value of new projects, based on the figures provided, are the Budget Office of the Federation, the Federal Ministry of Transport headquarters, the National Library of Nigeria, the National Blood Service Commission, and the Sokoto Rima River Basin Development Authority.

The Budget Office of the Federation has the largest MDA level new project provision at N375bn for a multilateral or bilateral tied loan line for the Power Sector Recovery Operation, additional financing. This single item is larger than the combined new project allocations of most other MDAs listed.

As a share of the N844.49bn MDA total, the Budget Office provision accounts for about 44.41 per cent. As a share of the total new projects, including Service Wide Votes, it accounts for about 10.71 per cent.

The Federal Ministry of Transport headquarters has N210.53bn in new projects, made up of N68.50bn for consultancy services for the Lekki Ijebu Ode Ore Kajola railway and coastal railway, Badagry Apapa Tin Can, and N142.03bn for the construction of six bus terminals and transportation facilities in the six geopolitical zones under national public transportation.

The ministry’s two entries together represent about 24.93 per cent of the N844.49bn MDA new project total and about 6.01 per cent of the N3.50tn total, including Service Wide Votes.

The National Library of Nigeria has a new project provision of N24bn for structural renovation and space upgrade of the National Library of Nigeria across the six geopolitical zones. This is the third largest MDA new project amount in the list and accounts for about 2.84 per cent of the total MDA new projects.

The National Blood Service Commission has N15bn in new projects for the construction and equipping of a national blood service centre and strategic national blood reserve in Abuja, valued at N10bn, and the reconstruction or rehabilitation of NBSC state offices valued at N5bn. The combined total represents about 1.78 per cent of the MDA new project total.

See also  US-Iran crisis: Nigerian crude oil nears $120

The Sokoto Rima River Basin Development Authority has N9.14bn in new projects. These include construction of solar mini grids in selected locations in the catchment area at N2bn, construction of all in one solar street lights as security lighting points at N1bn, construction of rural roads to selected rural communities at N3bn, and supply of water pumps for irrigation to Isa and Sabon Birni federal constituency at N140m.

Others include the supply of 3 inch solar powered water pumping machines to farmers in Kebbi State at N1bn, provision of small town water supply system with reticulation at N1bn, and provision of empowerment materials to support the livelihood of youths at N1bn. This portfolio accounts for about 1.08 per cent of the total MDA new projects.

Beyond the top five, the next tier of MDAs by size includes health and social sector institutions clustered around N5bn to N6.22bn per entity, as well as several teaching hospitals and medical centres.

The PUNCH further observed that N5.85bn in new projects is for vehicle purchases, led by N1.5bn for vehicles at FUT Iyin Ekiti, N600m at FUADSI, and N500m at JUTH.

Furnishing and office equipment account for N2.93bn, driven by N1.18bn for two medical complexes at NAUTH Nnewi, N435m at the Air Power Centre of Excellence, and N250m for a Pharmacy Council zonal office. Renovation and refurbishment total N29.88bn, dominated by the N24bn national library upgrade and N5bn for blood service offices.

Residential and staff accommodation projects reach N25.29bn, anchored by N16.48bn for Defence Headquarters facilities and N7bn for DSS housing.

The PUNCH further observed that this was not the first time the Federal Government had restricted the addition of new projects into the national budget.

In December 2024, The PUNCH reported that the Federal Government directed all Ministries, Departments, and Agencies to exclude new projects from their budget submissions for 2025 unless they can be linked to the completion of ongoing initiatives, according to the 2024 Federal Government Budget Call Circular.

See also  Edo Records Decline In Cultism Cases As Okpebholo Marks 1 Year In Office

The 2024 Budget Call Circular clearly states that no new projects will be admitted into the 2025 capital budget unless MDAs can demonstrate that sufficient resources have been allocated to complete ongoing projects.

The document read, “Again, the thrust of the FGN’s capital expenditure programme in 2025 will be the completion of as many cardinal ongoing projects as possible, rather than starting new projects. Thus, MDAs are hereby advised that new projects will not be admitted into the capital budget for 2025 unless adequate provision has been made for the completion/work programme of all ongoing projects.”

Also, MDAs have been instructed to carefully scrutinise and justify their proposed projects and programmes, ensuring that these align with the country’s immediate needs and the government’s key development priorities.

These priorities, as set out in the circular, include national security, economy, education, health, agriculture, infrastructure, power and energy, as well as social safety nets, with a focus on women and youth empowerment.

However, it appears that MDAs often flout this directive without any scrutiny from the Budget Office of the Federation or the National Assembly.

The National President of the Nigerian Economic Society, Professor Adeola Adenikinju, earlier argued that the late budget presentation prevents the National Assembly from carrying out proper scrutiny.

Adenikinju said, “The 2026 budget should have been in the National Assembly for consultation so that we can keep to this January 1st thing. That makes our fiscal system predictable.”

The economist said the rush to approve budgets “does not allow for proper analysis” and prevents ministries and departments from fully defending their plans. He warned that the practice was creating a disorganised fiscal environment.

A development economist and Chief Executive of CSA Advisory, Dr Aliyu Ilias, told The PUNCH that the Federal Government has “fiscal discipline problems.”

He insisted that government performance on fiscal and budget discipline “for now has not done well” and suggested that the lapses were deliberate. “I am sure I want to say that it is intentional because you could have seen that this is becoming an error,” he said.

Ilias said the problem also rested with the National Assembly, which he accused of failing in its oversight duty.

He said the legislature was tolerating inefficiencies, adding that “The National Assembly is also failing, failing in the sense that it is their own responsibility to make sure that those things do not really fly.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  PHOTOS: Shettima, Alia, others attend Akume’s son wedding in Benue

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  TikTok restricts late-night live access for Nigerian users

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  ‘If You’re Here Illegally, You’ll Be Deported’ – Kemi Badenoch Declares In Fresh UK Border Plan

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Edo Records Decline In Cultism Cases As Okpebholo Marks 1 Year In Office

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  ADC Reps caucus demands INEC chair removal

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  LG autonomy: Govs urged to support Tinubu

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending