Connect with us

News

CDS eyes foreign partnership to crush insurgency

Published

on

Nigeria’s newly appointed Service Chiefs on Wednesday pledged to overhaul the nation’s security architecture through strategic foreign partnerships, local arms production, inter-agency collaboration, and improved personnel welfare.

They made the pledge on Wednesday during their screening exercise by the Senate and House of Representatives.

The screening, which held simultaneously at both chambers of the National Assembly, was marked by rigorous questioning, closed-door sessions, and commitments by the officers to reposition the armed forces for modern warfare and sustained internal security.

Appearing before members of the Senate and House Committees on Defence, Army, Navy and Air Force, Chief of Defence Staff, Lt. Gen. Olufemi Oluyede, said his years of exposure to national security issues had prepared him for the complex task of defending Nigeria.

“My exposure to national security issues and the responsibilities of senior military leadership has prepared me for this assignment,” Oluyede said.

“I will work to bring positive change to our military economy and optimise our operational design and tactics. This is a period for unity, strong bilateral and multilateral partnerships, and fairness across all services.”

The Defence Chief also called for the establishment of a local military-industrial complex to reduce Nigeria’s dependence on foreign arms procurement.

“We can’t keep buying equipment from outside; it’s extremely expensive. Nigeria must develop its capacity to produce the tools needed to prosecute wars and tackle insecurity,” he said, adding that he would prioritise the welfare of personnel and their families while strengthening collaboration with the legislature to secure adequate funding.

Oluyede, who emphasised the need for intelligence-led operations and restructuring of the police to handle internal duties, also warned against new threats such as cyber warfare and misinformation.

See also  See what caused Abuja-Kaduna train derailment

He told lawmakers: “This role is challenging and all-consuming. We will focus on local solutions while strengthening international partnerships to eliminate insurgency and restore peace nationwide.”

The Chief of Army Staff, Maj. Gen. Waidi Shuaibu, pledged to inject fresh energy into military operations, improve intelligence gathering and strengthen manpower.

“Under my command we were able to rescue 15 Chibok girls from terrorist enclaves and neutralise a number of terrorist commanders,” Shuaibu recalled. “I am determined to bring renewed rigour into our training and ensure our troops are prepared for the roles ahead.”

Senator Isah Jubrin (Kogi East) vouched for Shuaibu’s competence, describing him as “humble and serious-minded,” and said, “I believe he has what it takes to move Nigeria out of the challenges the country is experiencing today.”

The Chief of Naval Staff, Rear Admiral Idi Abas, promised to deploy modern technology, including drones, to enhance maritime surveillance and curb piracy, oil theft, and kidnapping.

“With the appointments and experiences I have had, I understand what it takes to move the Navy forward,” Abas said. “Some patrols waste resources due to terrain challenges. Drones will make our monitoring more effective.”

He also backed the deradicalisation of repentant insurgents but urged greater sensitivity to the feelings of victims’ families.

For the Chief of Air Staff, Air Vice Marshal Kennedy Aneke, innovation and discipline would define his leadership.

He vowed to “fight smartly, professionally, aggressively, and offensively” to defeat terrorism and insurgency.

“We have men and women risking their lives every night. These assets are giving value for money,” he said, assuring that the Super Tucano aircraft procured from the United States were fully operational and deployed in the North-East and North-West.

See also  LASG Addresses Makoko Demolition Concerns, Unveils $2m Redevelopment Initiative

“Every decision I make will be guided by the singular purpose of safeguarding our nation and preserving peace,” Aneke said.

Earlier while declaring the Senate screening open, President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, said the screening  was a constitutional duty to ensure that only competent and patriotic officers were entrusted with safeguarding national security.

“Today’s exercise is in keeping with our constitutional duty to provide oversight and ensure that only the most competent, patriotic, and disciplined officers are entrusted with the task of safeguarding our national security and territorial integrity,” Akpabio stated.

He later told reporters that the Senate had grilled the nominees thoroughly during the closed session.

“They have answered all questions in the course of the interactions. Let me also thank the President for the selection of the nominees who have been so approved and confirmed by this chamber. On the whole, we believe this will renew the hope of Nigerians in respect of restoring security to our nation,” he said.

In the House, Chairman of the Defence Committee, Babajimi Benson, described the screening as a constitutional process designed to ensure transparency and accountability.

“This process is not merely ceremonial. It is a critical mechanism for ensuring accountability, transparency and public confidence in our national security institutions,” Benson said. “Approach this engagement with openness and clarity. Present practical ideas that will contribute to national peace and stability.”

Meanwhile, President Tinubu will today decorate the new Service Chiefs at the Council Chamber of the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

Presidency officials confirmed that the event would hold at 1:00 p.m., following their confirmation by both chambers of the National Assembly.

See also  Nigerian Senate approves 10-year passport ban for Nigerians convicted abroad

Tinubu had on Monday met the officers in a closed-door session at the Villa, where he charged them to take decisive action against insurgents and bandits in the North.

Last Friday, the President announced a sweeping reshuffle in the military hierarchy “in furtherance of efforts to strengthen the national security architecture.”

The statement by his Special Adviser on Media and Public Communication, Sunday Dare, expressed appreciation to the outgoing service chiefs and charged their successors to justify the confidence reposed in them through professionalism and unity.

The reshuffle came days after online reports alleging a coup plot, which the Defence Headquarters dismissed as “baseless” and “intended to cause unnecessary tension.”

Director of Defence Information, Brig. Gen. Tukur Gusau, clarified that the reported arrests of 16 officers were “issues of indiscipline,” not an attempted coup, and that the cancellation of the October 1 military parade was “purely administrative.”

With legislative confirmation concluded, all eyes are now on the new military high command as they assume their posts—tasked with the herculean mission of restoring peace and stability to a nation wearied by years of insurgency, banditry, and rising insecurity.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  "Political intimidation," Malami slams EFCC over armed raid on residence

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  Nigerian Senate approves 10-year passport ban for Nigerians convicted abroad

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  See what caused Abuja-Kaduna train derailment

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  PHOTOS: FCT police rescue 23 abducted foreigners, arrest 14 transnational kidnappers in Nasarawa

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  Ogun bondsmen scheme frees over 8,000 defendants, reduces prison crowding

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  US to revoke passports of parents owing child support

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  PHOTOS: FCT police rescue 23 abducted foreigners, arrest 14 transnational kidnappers in Nasarawa

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  Protest rocks NBA conference over imprisoned lawmaker

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending