Connect with us

Business

Airlines groaning under multiple taxation – Okonkwo

Published

on

Amidst ongoing developments in Nigerian aviation, United Nigeria Airlines Chairman/CEO and Airline Operators of Nigeria spokesperson, Obiora Okonkwo, has provided insights into sector policies, infrastructure gaps, and the significant impact of multiple taxation on local operators, in this interview with OLASUNKANMI AKINLOTAN, which also covered industry realities and prospects for regional development.

What distinguishes your airline on the newly launched Accra route, and what is your plan to ensure long-term viability in this competitive market?

Passengers can only buy tickets from airlines that are available. We have not been available in the market, so we could not have competed. Now, we are in the market; our first strategy is promotion, letting people know that we are here with an exceptional service to offer. Our CRJ-900 for that route is a beautiful aircraft. The aircraft is superb; the configuration is great, the interior is marvellous, it is very suitable for this kind of operational flight, and it has a passenger capacity of 90. So, if we have an adequate and a reasonable number of passengers to fly there, that aircraft will be dedicated to that route. We also have the ERJ-145 to compete. Pretty much, we are offering the passengers not just an apple-for-apple comparison but something bigger and better than an apple. That is one way to tell you that we are ready and we are prepared. In terms of the saturation of the market, at least from available data, out of the whole region of West Africa, traffic from Nigeria to Accra is more than all the other regional flights. I mean the whole traffic from Nigeria to other regions. 50 per cent of the traffic is between Nigeria and Accra. So, it is still a place to compete. In other words, we have to be as reasonable and fair as possible with our pricing and costing. Above all that, we will do more than the passengers’ expectations. Every passenger will want to have a convenient schedule and then, with that convenient schedule, will want to get there on time. If you look at our records at United Nigeria, our on-time departure is almost 98 per cent, if not more. There is no record that is better than that. Those things we have developed out of our experiences in the domestic market, we will take them to the regional level.

See also  Nigeria Secures $2Bn Shell Gas Investment in New Offshore Gas Project

Given the heavy burden of charges, including an $80 FAAN fee, a $20 NCAA security levy, and a separate 5% ticket sales tax, which are pricing many passengers out of air travel, how can you possibly sustain your new Ghana route amidst such high costs and intense competition?

This should be the industry’s concern. This should be a national concern because it is not to the government’s credit that Nigerian airlines that start operations in the region would close shop shortly after. All the airlines that operate primarily are private companies, and they can only operate on a route if it is sustainable. The maximum you can fly is three to six months, unless you have some support. Nigeria has a reputation for taxing more than any other country, and that is not good for aviation. It is not good for the passengers. Every passenger taking off from Nigeria to Ghana is already paying $100, and then returning from Ghana to Nigeria is $60. If you have to go that route from Abuja to Ghana, you buy a ticket for as much as N300,000, and when you factor in tax and fuel, you would find out that the ticket yields zero profit for the operator. Such things are killing us and suffocating us. If the taxes are so high and Nigerian operators cannot remain competitive on that route, these other carriers coming in, whatever ticket you pay for, represent a capital flight from Nigeria. It is a capital flight because those foreign airlines, even if you buy their ticket in Nigeria, have to convert that money and send it back to their own country. There is no obligation that they must leave the money here. Imagine if Nigerian airlines were competitive and not suffocated by all those charges. For instance, if they had access to single-digit loans, they could acquire more aircraft, and the business could be taken away from the international carriers.

In such a case, the companies that would be closing shop would not be Nigerian companies; it would be all those carriers who have been exploiting these routes.

See also  Minority caucus, House clash over tax law probe

Despite the current administration’s efforts to develop the aviation sector, airlines still face significant hurdles like high taxes and an inability to secure single-digit loans. What is the concrete impact of these financial burdens on your operations?

When we talk about single-digit loans, we are bearing in mind that aviation is a worldwide industry and the competition can be very high. In Nigeria, we are competing in the same market with other large carriers and legacy carriers such as British Airways, American Airlines, Lufthansa, and Qatar, just to name a few. In their countries, they have loans at two to three per cent, not even through a special window loan. Compared with our market, we have to take loans in Naira and convert them into forex at the existing commercial rate, which is already over 30 per cent. It is a spillover effect.

One way or another, all these things are factored into our costing. When all these things are done, our ticket is the major product. For instance, a trader, businessperson, or manufacturer who has a product has to factor in everything that went into the product before arriving at the cost. The components must be able to cover the cost before a tiny margin is added. Automatically, if somebody in another country is getting interest loans at five per cent and we are getting it at 35 per cent, my ticket cost is already 30 per cent more than it should be in that country. However, if you do not price accordingly, you will deprive yourself of other benefits. When you fail to do that, you find yourself at a level where you cannot make enough margin to grow, expand, and strengthen your business. Businesses must be able to remain sustainable. It must be viable to attract financing because airlines are capital intensive. The business owners can only scale up with huge finances. These finances are mostly available with the banks or other financial institutions. For them to do business with an operator, the operator’s books must be very attractive to show a good business plan. We are asking the government to treat aviation as an essential business. It should not be seen as a business of one individual because where there is strong aviation, it is a catalyst; it is an enabler to other economic growth. If you do not make it available for people to fly from Abuja to Lagos comfortably, it will affect their business. The point we are trying to make to the Nigerian government, the policymakers and even the general public is that, for instance, there are incentives attached to agriculture. Yes, feeding is good, but it is just as essential as aviation. There is no government economy that will grow if focused only on the lower-income elements. For any nation to grow, they have to put in place a policy that is good enough to build the middle class and even the upper class. I do not think that any country can achieve all its economic growth from tax. You cannot tax yourself, you cannot tax your country, and you cannot tax your citizens to greatness. I strongly believe that tax is necessary, but it has to be a tax that will enable other things to grow. We still have certain things that have been considered in this new review for the aviation industry that are a killer. It will erode all the good intentions this government has for this industry.

See also  Kwankwaso joins ADC, sparks Obi alliance talk

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Oil nears $110 as Trump threatens strike in Iran

Published

on

Oil prices rose to $109.3 on Sunday amid the unending tension in the Middle East, data by Oilprice.com has shown.

This was as the United States President, Donald Trump, warned Iran that the “clock is ticking” after talks to bring the war to an end continued to stall.

From about $107 a barrel last week, oil prices continue to go higher, impacting the cost of refined petroleum products at the pump.

Recall that Trump had last week rejected the proposal by Iran to end the crisis and reopen the all-important Strait of Hormuz. Iran has remained in control of the strait since the war started in February, making oil transportation impossible.

On Sunday, Trump warned Iran to act fast or lose everything. “They better get moving FAST, or there won’t be anything left of them. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE!” he wrote on his Truth Social platform.

The BBC reports that the message came as the president was due to speak with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday.

Trump warned earlier that the ceasefire agreed with Iran was on “massive life support” after rejecting Tehran’s demands to end the war.

Trump had labelled the Iranian response to US proposals “totally unacceptable”.

An Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, insisted the response was “responsible” and “generous”.

According to Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency, it includes an immediate end to the war on all fronts, a reference to the continued Israeli attacks against Iran-supported Hezbollah in Lebanon, a halt to the US naval blockade of Iranian ports, and guarantees of no further attacks on Iran.

See also  Nigeria secures $18.2bn oil investments, 28 field plans

It also reportedly includes a demand for compensation for war damage and an emphasis on Iranian sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump said Chinese President Xi Jinping had agreed Tehran must reopen the Strait of Hormuz, though China gave no indication it would weigh in.

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi stated that the Strait of Hormuz remains open to commercial traffic, but ships must cooperate with the Iranian Navy and the authorities while navigating the region.

About 30 Chinese vessels transited the strait on Wednesday.

Continue Reading

Business

Lagos bans petroleum tankers from transporting edible oil

Published

on

The Lagos State Government has banned the use of petroleum tankers in the transportation and distribution of edible oil as part of efforts to strengthen food safety, hygiene, and compliance standards across the sector.

The restriction forms part of a broader regulatory framework introduced through a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between the Lagos State Consumer Protection Agency (LASCOPA) and major stakeholders in the edible oil transportation chain.

The agreement involves the Marketers and Sellers of Edible Oil Association of Nigeria (MASEON), the Nigerian Association of Road Transport Owners (NARTO), and the Association of Edible Oil Tanker Drivers of Nigeria under the National Union of Edible Oil Tanker Drivers of Nigeria (ETD/NUEOTDN).

In a statement issued on Friday, LASCOPA said the move was aimed at stopping the use of tankers previously deployed for petroleum and hazardous substances in the transportation of edible oil.

The agency warned that the practice exposes consumers to serious health risks caused by possible contamination from chemical residues left in fuel tankers.

“The key objectives of the agreement include ensuring that tankers designated for edible oil transportation are used exclusively for that purpose; preventing the use of edible oil tankers for petroleum products and hazardous substances,” the statement read.

According to the agency, the MoU introduces a strict compliance framework mandating the exclusive use of food-grade certified tankers for edible oil transportation.

LASCOPA said the framework would also strengthen hygiene standards, improve traceability, and enhance operational monitoring within the edible oil distribution chain.

The agency added that stakeholders have committed to implementing tanker registration and identification systems, periodic inspections, random spot checks, laboratory testing of edible oil samples, and joint enforcement operations to ensure full compliance.

See also  UK bans over 100 jobs from foreign recruitment to curb migration

It further stated that enforcement activities would be intensified under the Lagos State Consumer Protection Agency Law, 2025.

“Stakeholders are committed to tanker registration, identification systems, periodic inspections, random spot checks, laboratory testing of edible oil samples, and joint enforcement operations to ensure compliance,” the statement added.

LASCOPA also said it would step up monitoring activities and investigate consumer complaints as part of efforts to protect public health and improve consumer confidence in food transportation standards across Lagos State.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

NNPC urged to revive refineries after Dangote snub

Published

on

The National Publicity Secretary of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, Chinedu Ukadike, has tackled the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC) over its attempt to increase its stake in the Dangote Petroleum Refinery despite the poor state of government-owned refineries.

Ukadike stated this while reacting to comments by the President of the Dangote Group, Aliko Dangote, that the refinery rejected requests by the NNPC to increase its 7.25 per cent stake in the $20bn facility.

Dangote had disclosed this during an interview with the Chief Executive Officer of the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, Nicolai Tangen, monitored by our correspondents on Wednesday.

Reacting to the development, Ukadike questioned why the national oil company was seeking to invest more funds in the privately-owned refinery when the Port Harcourt, Warri, and Kaduna refineries under its control had remained largely inactive despite billions of dollars spent on rehabilitation.

“Why is NNPC trying to invest money in the Dangote refinery when it has three refineries that are not working? Why is NNPC not investing that money in those ones?” Ukadike asked.

He added, “The NNPC did not revive our refineries, but they want to look for where the refinery is already working to put money into it. Does that make sense?”

The IPMAN spokesman said Dangote had the right to reject the offer from the NNPC if he considered it unsuitable for his business interests.

“If Dangote refused to sell more stakes to NNPC, he must have his reasons. Dangote is a businessman. He doesn’t want issues, unnecessary crises, and nepotism. He knows what he wants, and I also think he has enough cash to fund his business,” he stated.

See also  Constituency meeting: Lagos lawmaker empowers residents

Ukadike further urged the national oil company to focus on reviving critical oil infrastructure across the country instead of pursuing additional ownership of the refinery. “The NNPC should repair the pipelines and revive the refineries instead of eyeing the Dangote refinery,” he said.

Dangote had stated during the interview that the NNPC was interested in acquiring more shares in the refinery after previously purchasing a 7.25 per cent stake for $1bn in 2021. According to him, the request was rejected because the company planned to list the refinery publicly and allow more Nigerians to own shares in the project.

“The other biggest risk is government inconsistencies in policies, and we are addressing that one because if you look at our refinery, the national oil company already owns 7.25 per cent, and they are trying to buy more. We are the ones that said no; we want to now spread it and have everybody be part of it,” Dangote said.

The NNPC had initially planned to acquire a 20 per cent stake in the refinery, but later reduced its ownership to 7.25 per cent after failing to pay the balance before the June 2024 deadline.

Dangote had explained this in 2024, saying, “The agreement was actually 20 per cent, which we had with NNPC, and they did not pay the balance of the money up until last year; then we gave them another extension up until June (2024), and they said that they would remain where they had already paid, which is 7.2 per cent. So NNPC owns only 7.2 per cent, not 20 per cent.”

See also  FULL TEXT - Tinubu’s 65th Independence Day address to Nigerians

However, a stakeholder in the petroleum sector who pleaded for anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter held that the interest of the nation is well served by NNPC having a 20 per cent stake in the Dangote refinery.

“I think Nigeria is better served by NNPC being a shareholder. If NNPC could have taken 20 per cent of that refinery, Nigeria as a country would be better served,” the stakeholder said.

According to him, the fact that the NNPC failed to get the 20 per cent take before does not mean it could not get it again. He said Dangote refused NNPC’s offer because he wants to remain in control.

“You know Dangote is planning to value his company at $50bn. I think he’s going to sell 10 per cent only, so he remains in control, making a lot of money for himself. Selling only 10 per cent means he has 90 per cent. If NNPC were there with 20 per cent, then NNPC would have two directors. These two directors would have some say,” he said.

The stakeholder added that such an important asset cannot exist in a country without the government’s involvement.

“You can’t have such a big asset in the country, and then the government or the government’s agent has no say in the decisions of that company. It can’t happen. It’s wrong. I’m not saying the government must have a say in all the big companies, but in a company that is so big that it can influence whether the sun rises or falls in that country, the government must have a say.

See also  Opposition leaders urge N’Assembly to begin fresh electoral act amendment

“The refinery is big. In any case, NNPC is also the supplier of last resort. It’s the national oil company. That has some meaning. I think that in the best interest of the country, if we all agree that Dangote is too big to fail, then it means that Nigerians as a people need to be inside the Dangote refinery to make sure it does not fail,” the operator said.

Meanwhile, a senior official of the NNPC said the NNPC is proud of its current stake in the Dangote refinery.

“The NNPC is proud and happy that we own a 7.2 per cent stake in Dangote. And whatever we own as a stake in Dangote as a national oil company is on behalf of the entire Nigeria. So, when the opportunity presents itself in the long term, yes.

“But right now, we are proud of the 7.2 per cent stake we own in the Dangote refinery. Apart from that, the quality and level of collaboration that is currently going on between NNPC and Dangote is in the interest of the entire Nigeria,” the official said, begging not to be mentioned because he was not authorised to speak on the matter.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending