Connect with us

Business

Electricity tariff hike imminent as Gencos step up pressure

Published

on

Electricity generation companies have called on the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission to urgently review electricity tariffs following the Federal Government’s recent increase in the domestic base price of gas, warning that delays could worsen liquidity challenges and distortions across the power sector.

The Chief Executive Officer of the Association of Power Generation Companies, Joy Ogaji, said operators were less concerned about the increase in gas prices itself, but more worried about regulatory delays in adjusting tariffs to accommodate the new cost reality.

Ogaji, speaking in an interview with our correspondent on Monday, described gas as a “pass-through cost” that must be captured transparently in tariff computations.

She said, “Gas price, whether it is raised to $10, is not really our problem. Gas is a feedstock and a pass-through cost. So if the regulator in the power sector is comfortable with the increase, it is not a problem for us because whatever we are charged, we pass it down to consumers.

“All we want is for NERC to acknowledge the new base price and input it into tariff calculations. There is now a clear difference between what we used to pay and the new price, and that gap must be recognised.”

Despite the push for tariff adjustment, Ogaji stressed that the core challenge in the sector remained poor payment discipline rather than pricing. “For us, whether the price is high or low is not the issue. What matters is whether payments are made for what is supplied.

Even when the price was low, what percentage of invoices were settled? If you increase the price and payments are still not made, what difference does it make?” she queried.

She further called for the establishment of what she described as “bankable demand” in the electricity market, arguing that the absence of a clear and reliable payment structure continues to deter investment. “We need to define bankable demand in the market. Until we do that, we cannot determine whether investor confidence will improve or whether new investors can come in.

See also  Bulk fuel buyers dump middlemen for direct Dangote supply

“Nigeria has over 200 million people, but how many are actually paying for electricity? And even among those who are paying, do we have transparency to verify those payments? There is no transparency anywhere,” she added.

Ogaji warned that without structural reforms, including stronger political will and enforcement, the sector risks stagnation. “If we are not careful and do not change the dynamics, we will still be discussing the same issues in two years. The President needs to take decisive action, possibly declare a state of emergency in the sector and give clear marching orders on what must be achieved,” she said.

Also speaking, the Executive Director of PowerUp Nigeria, Adetayo Adegbenle, said the increase in gas prices would inevitably translate to higher electricity tariffs and rising subsidy obligations. “Since the price of gas, which is the major fuel for Gencos, has increased, it is expected that electricity tariffs will also increase,” he said.

Adegbenle added that regardless of whether tariffs are immediately adjusted, the financial implications would still manifest in higher invoices from generation companies. “Whether electricity tariffs are reviewed or not, it is bound to affect invoices from Gencos. What we need to understand, however, is what the government’s plan is to absorb the shock of these expected changes.

“Subsidies, or market shortfalls, are expected to increase since invoice values will increase. I have no idea yet, but this is the point. I hope the government will encourage full market deregulation and implement a fully contract-based electricity market. I had planned to make this a national discourse at some point, because we cannot continue to pretend that the electricity market is not optimal,” he explained.

See also  EU Provides N320.5B Credit Line to Boost Nigeria’s Agricultural Sector

He, however, questioned the Federal Government’s preparedness to absorb the fiscal impact of the changes. “We cannot continue to pretend that the electricity market is optimal. This situation also raises concerns about the sustainability of plans to raise bonds to offset debts owed to gas suppliers and Gencos. This is also another major argument against the bond being raised to pay off market exposure in terms of debt to gas suppliers and generating companies,” he added.

On his part, the President of the Nigeria Consumer Protection Network, Kunle Olubiyo, criticised the methodology behind the new gas pricing framework, describing it as inconsistent and lacking transparency. “The new base price is a bit confusing. The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority had, from July last year, approved $1.13 as transport cost. So how do you now arrive at a figure that does not reflect the full pricing model?” he asked.

Olubiyo noted that when previous base prices are combined with transportation costs, the effective gas price should already be above $3 per unit. “It was around $2.15 last year, and when you add the $1.13 transport cost, it should be about $3.63. So whatever figure is being quoted now does not reflect the true cost,” he said.

He added that Nigeria’s power sector currently enjoys one of the lowest gas pricing regimes due to domestic supply obligations, despite global market pressures. “Gas is a commodity, just like petrol. In the international market, buyers are willing to pay up to $12 due to geopolitical tensions, especially in the Middle East. So why would any producer prefer to sell to Gencos locally, where they are often asked to be patriotic and even sell on credit?” he queried.

Olubiyo, however, argued that tariff increases alone would not resolve the sector’s deep-rooted inefficiencies. “Even before privatisation, we warned that tariff increases are not a silver bullet. There are fundamental issues affecting efficiency across the value chain,” he said.

See also  Failure of Ajaokuta Steel caused by corruption, poor leadership — Economist Oyelaran-Oyeyinka

He pointed to widespread technical and commercial losses, particularly in metering and energy accounting, as major drivers of inflated costs. “There are significant leakages in how electricity is measured and billed. Many meters are obsolete and lack integrity. If we fix these issues and ensure accurate measurement, most of the claims by Gencos could drop by 40 to 50 per cent. What consumers are paying for today includes inefficiency and systemic leakages,” he added.

The Federal Government, through the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, last week reviewed the domestic base price of natural gas, a benchmark used in pricing gas supplied to power plants under the Domestic Gas Delivery Obligation framework.

The domestic gas pricing regime was originally designed to ensure an affordable and reliable gas supply to the power sector, with prices historically set below international market rates to support electricity generation. However, persistent payment shortfalls, mounting debts to gas suppliers, and rising global gas prices have triggered calls for a cost-reflective pricing model.

Industry data shows that gas accounts for over 70 per cent of Nigeria’s electricity generation mix, making it the single largest cost component in power production. Under the current structure, any increase in gas prices directly impacts the cost of generation, which is expected to be reflected in electricity tariffs unless subsidised by the government.

The latest price adjustment is aimed at incentivising gas producers to prioritise domestic supply, but warns that without corresponding reforms in tariff setting, payment assurance, and market transparency, the policy may further strain an already fragile electricity market.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Lagos bans petroleum tankers from transporting edible oil

Published

on

The Lagos State Government has banned the use of petroleum tankers in the transportation and distribution of edible oil as part of efforts to strengthen food safety, hygiene, and compliance standards across the sector.

The restriction forms part of a broader regulatory framework introduced through a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between the Lagos State Consumer Protection Agency (LASCOPA) and major stakeholders in the edible oil transportation chain.

The agreement involves the Marketers and Sellers of Edible Oil Association of Nigeria (MASEON), the Nigerian Association of Road Transport Owners (NARTO), and the Association of Edible Oil Tanker Drivers of Nigeria under the National Union of Edible Oil Tanker Drivers of Nigeria (ETD/NUEOTDN).

In a statement issued on Friday, LASCOPA said the move was aimed at stopping the use of tankers previously deployed for petroleum and hazardous substances in the transportation of edible oil.

The agency warned that the practice exposes consumers to serious health risks caused by possible contamination from chemical residues left in fuel tankers.

“The key objectives of the agreement include ensuring that tankers designated for edible oil transportation are used exclusively for that purpose; preventing the use of edible oil tankers for petroleum products and hazardous substances,” the statement read.

According to the agency, the MoU introduces a strict compliance framework mandating the exclusive use of food-grade certified tankers for edible oil transportation.

LASCOPA said the framework would also strengthen hygiene standards, improve traceability, and enhance operational monitoring within the edible oil distribution chain.

The agency added that stakeholders have committed to implementing tanker registration and identification systems, periodic inspections, random spot checks, laboratory testing of edible oil samples, and joint enforcement operations to ensure full compliance.

See also  Price of a bag of rice has crashed - Finance Minister, Wale Edun

It further stated that enforcement activities would be intensified under the Lagos State Consumer Protection Agency Law, 2025.

“Stakeholders are committed to tanker registration, identification systems, periodic inspections, random spot checks, laboratory testing of edible oil samples, and joint enforcement operations to ensure compliance,” the statement added.

LASCOPA also said it would step up monitoring activities and investigate consumer complaints as part of efforts to protect public health and improve consumer confidence in food transportation standards across Lagos State.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

NNPC urged to revive refineries after Dangote snub

Published

on

The National Publicity Secretary of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, Chinedu Ukadike, has tackled the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC) over its attempt to increase its stake in the Dangote Petroleum Refinery despite the poor state of government-owned refineries.

Ukadike stated this while reacting to comments by the President of the Dangote Group, Aliko Dangote, that the refinery rejected requests by the NNPC to increase its 7.25 per cent stake in the $20bn facility.

Dangote had disclosed this during an interview with the Chief Executive Officer of the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, Nicolai Tangen, monitored by our correspondents on Wednesday.

Reacting to the development, Ukadike questioned why the national oil company was seeking to invest more funds in the privately-owned refinery when the Port Harcourt, Warri, and Kaduna refineries under its control had remained largely inactive despite billions of dollars spent on rehabilitation.

“Why is NNPC trying to invest money in the Dangote refinery when it has three refineries that are not working? Why is NNPC not investing that money in those ones?” Ukadike asked.

He added, “The NNPC did not revive our refineries, but they want to look for where the refinery is already working to put money into it. Does that make sense?”

The IPMAN spokesman said Dangote had the right to reject the offer from the NNPC if he considered it unsuitable for his business interests.

“If Dangote refused to sell more stakes to NNPC, he must have his reasons. Dangote is a businessman. He doesn’t want issues, unnecessary crises, and nepotism. He knows what he wants, and I also think he has enough cash to fund his business,” he stated.

See also  Tax reforms: Why businesses must prioritise payroll, VAT

Ukadike further urged the national oil company to focus on reviving critical oil infrastructure across the country instead of pursuing additional ownership of the refinery. “The NNPC should repair the pipelines and revive the refineries instead of eyeing the Dangote refinery,” he said.

Dangote had stated during the interview that the NNPC was interested in acquiring more shares in the refinery after previously purchasing a 7.25 per cent stake for $1bn in 2021. According to him, the request was rejected because the company planned to list the refinery publicly and allow more Nigerians to own shares in the project.

“The other biggest risk is government inconsistencies in policies, and we are addressing that one because if you look at our refinery, the national oil company already owns 7.25 per cent, and they are trying to buy more. We are the ones that said no; we want to now spread it and have everybody be part of it,” Dangote said.

The NNPC had initially planned to acquire a 20 per cent stake in the refinery, but later reduced its ownership to 7.25 per cent after failing to pay the balance before the June 2024 deadline.

Dangote had explained this in 2024, saying, “The agreement was actually 20 per cent, which we had with NNPC, and they did not pay the balance of the money up until last year; then we gave them another extension up until June (2024), and they said that they would remain where they had already paid, which is 7.2 per cent. So NNPC owns only 7.2 per cent, not 20 per cent.”

See also  Naira gains, trades 1,365/$ at official FX market

However, a stakeholder in the petroleum sector who pleaded for anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter held that the interest of the nation is well served by NNPC having a 20 per cent stake in the Dangote refinery.

“I think Nigeria is better served by NNPC being a shareholder. If NNPC could have taken 20 per cent of that refinery, Nigeria as a country would be better served,” the stakeholder said.

According to him, the fact that the NNPC failed to get the 20 per cent take before does not mean it could not get it again. He said Dangote refused NNPC’s offer because he wants to remain in control.

“You know Dangote is planning to value his company at $50bn. I think he’s going to sell 10 per cent only, so he remains in control, making a lot of money for himself. Selling only 10 per cent means he has 90 per cent. If NNPC were there with 20 per cent, then NNPC would have two directors. These two directors would have some say,” he said.

The stakeholder added that such an important asset cannot exist in a country without the government’s involvement.

“You can’t have such a big asset in the country, and then the government or the government’s agent has no say in the decisions of that company. It can’t happen. It’s wrong. I’m not saying the government must have a say in all the big companies, but in a company that is so big that it can influence whether the sun rises or falls in that country, the government must have a say.

See also  FG to end fish importation

“The refinery is big. In any case, NNPC is also the supplier of last resort. It’s the national oil company. That has some meaning. I think that in the best interest of the country, if we all agree that Dangote is too big to fail, then it means that Nigerians as a people need to be inside the Dangote refinery to make sure it does not fail,” the operator said.

Meanwhile, a senior official of the NNPC said the NNPC is proud of its current stake in the Dangote refinery.

“The NNPC is proud and happy that we own a 7.2 per cent stake in Dangote. And whatever we own as a stake in Dangote as a national oil company is on behalf of the entire Nigeria. So, when the opportunity presents itself in the long term, yes.

“But right now, we are proud of the 7.2 per cent stake we own in the Dangote refinery. Apart from that, the quality and level of collaboration that is currently going on between NNPC and Dangote is in the interest of the entire Nigeria,” the official said, begging not to be mentioned because he was not authorised to speak on the matter.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

2027 poll spending may trigger inflation, MPC warns

Published

on

The Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria and Members of the Monetary Policy Committee have warned that rising political and election-related spending ahead of the 2027 general elections could undermine the country’s disinflation gains and trigger fresh inflationary pressures.

The warnings were contained in the personal statements of MPC members released by the apex bank and obtained by The PUNCH on Thursday. The MPC, at its 304th meeting held on February 23 and 24, 2026, reduced the Monetary Policy Rate by 50 basis points from 27 per cent to 26.5 per cent, while retaining other key monetary parameters.

CBN Governor, Olayemi Cardoso, had earlier warned in the MPC communiqué that election-related fiscal spending could threaten the inflation outlook despite the current moderation in prices.

According to the communiqué signed by Cardoso, “The outlook indicates that the current momentum of domestic disinflation will continue in the near term. This is premised on the lagged impact of previous monetary policy tightening, sustained stability in the foreign exchange market and improved food supply. However, increased fiscal releases including election-related spending could pose upside risk to the outlook.”

Also, in his personal statement, he noted “Growing fiscal pressures, from reduced government fiscal headroom and the approaching 2027 election cycle, warrant particular attention given the well-established link between pre-election fiscal expansion and inflation.”

CBN Deputy Governor for Economic Policy, Dr Muhammad Abdullahi, also highlighted election-related spending as a major risk to the inflation outlook. He said, “As political activities intensify ahead of the 2027 elections, increased fiscal injections and consumption spending could elevate demand-side inflation.”

See also  Price of a bag of rice has crashed - Finance Minister, Wale Edun

Abdullahi added that “the fiscal deficit has already increased significantly, and election-related spending is likely to exacerbate this trend in 2026 and early 2027.” According to him, stronger fiscal-monetary coordination would be needed to manage the liquidity impact of rising government spending.

Similarly, the CBN Deputy Governor for Operations, Emem Usoro, warned that the pre-election environment could worsen liquidity conditions and inflation expectations. Usoro stated, “Crucially, the pre-election environment increases the risk of liquidity surges, higher FX demand and a drift in inflation expectations.”

She added that the risks justified maintaining tight liquidity conditions despite the moderate rate cut. According to her, “These considerations support small, cautious adjustments and the retention of strong liquidity and prudential buffers.”

Also raising concerns was the newly appointed Deputy Governor, Lamido Yuguda, who said increased fiscal releases and election spending could disrupt the disinflation trend.

Yuguda, who was a former Director General of the Securities and Exchange Commission, noted, “The 75 per cent CRR on non-TSA public deposits remains critical, particularly given the potential for increased fiscal releases as implementation of Executive Order 9 advances.”

He further warned that, “Potential increases in fiscal spending associated with the electoral cycle could generate demand pressures and disrupt the disinflation trajectory.”

A member of the MPC, Dr Aloysius Ordu, warned that political spending tied to the elections could put pressure on foreign exchange demand and test the resilience of the economy. He said, “Domestically, rising political spending and FX demand pressures associated with the 2027 elections will test the resilience of the economy.”

See also  EU Provides N320.5B Credit Line to Boost Nigeria’s Agricultural Sector

Ordu added that although reforms such as Executive Order 9 were expected to improve fiscal transparency and strengthen reserves, high debt servicing costs and political-cycle spending remained major concerns for macroeconomic management.

Another MPC member, Bandele Amoo, also expressed concern over excess liquidity from fiscal injections and early political activities ahead of the elections. He said, “My primary concern is the persistence of excess liquidity from fiscal injections, which could undermine disinflation gains and exchange rate stability.”

Amoo further noted that “fiscal spending pressures linked to the 2026 budget cycle, and early political activities ahead of the 2027 elections may heighten risks.”

Another committee member, Professor Murtala Sagagi, said the main domestic risks to inflation included fiscal slippages and election-related spending. He said, “Upside risks to the inflation outlook warrant monitoring, particularly increased fiscal releases including election-related spending and any pass-through from global oil price volatility to domestic fuel prices.”

Sagagi added that “the primary domestic risks are fiscal slippage and the possibility of election-related spending which are medium-term in nature.” He urged stronger fiscal discipline and closer coordination between monetary and fiscal authorities.

The next meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee is scheduled to hold on Tuesday, May 19 and Wednesday, May 20, 2026. This would be about four days after the National Bureau of Statistics is expected to release the country’s Consumer Price Index report for April 2026 on May 15.

Nigeria’s inflation rate rose to 15.38 per cent in March 2026, marking a reversal in the recent easing trend, as increases in food, transport, and accommodation costs pushed prices higher. The PUNCH observed that this was the first time the headline inflation rate had increased since March 2025.

See also  Shell’s $5bn Bonga S’West project gets presidential support

In its Inflation Forecast report for April 2026, the Financial Market Dealers Association projected that Nigeria’s headline inflation would rise to 16.42 per cent year-on-year in April 2026, as sustained pressure from food prices, higher energy costs and elevated global commodity prices continue to shape the domestic price environment.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending