Connect with us

Business

Electricity tariff hike imminent as Gencos step up pressure

Published

on

Electricity generation companies have called on the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission to urgently review electricity tariffs following the Federal Government’s recent increase in the domestic base price of gas, warning that delays could worsen liquidity challenges and distortions across the power sector.

The Chief Executive Officer of the Association of Power Generation Companies, Joy Ogaji, said operators were less concerned about the increase in gas prices itself, but more worried about regulatory delays in adjusting tariffs to accommodate the new cost reality.

Ogaji, speaking in an interview with our correspondent on Monday, described gas as a “pass-through cost” that must be captured transparently in tariff computations.

She said, “Gas price, whether it is raised to $10, is not really our problem. Gas is a feedstock and a pass-through cost. So if the regulator in the power sector is comfortable with the increase, it is not a problem for us because whatever we are charged, we pass it down to consumers.

“All we want is for NERC to acknowledge the new base price and input it into tariff calculations. There is now a clear difference between what we used to pay and the new price, and that gap must be recognised.”

Despite the push for tariff adjustment, Ogaji stressed that the core challenge in the sector remained poor payment discipline rather than pricing. “For us, whether the price is high or low is not the issue. What matters is whether payments are made for what is supplied.

Even when the price was low, what percentage of invoices were settled? If you increase the price and payments are still not made, what difference does it make?” she queried.

She further called for the establishment of what she described as “bankable demand” in the electricity market, arguing that the absence of a clear and reliable payment structure continues to deter investment. “We need to define bankable demand in the market. Until we do that, we cannot determine whether investor confidence will improve or whether new investors can come in.

See also  Trump threatens to end cooking oil purchases from China

“Nigeria has over 200 million people, but how many are actually paying for electricity? And even among those who are paying, do we have transparency to verify those payments? There is no transparency anywhere,” she added.

Ogaji warned that without structural reforms, including stronger political will and enforcement, the sector risks stagnation. “If we are not careful and do not change the dynamics, we will still be discussing the same issues in two years. The President needs to take decisive action, possibly declare a state of emergency in the sector and give clear marching orders on what must be achieved,” she said.

Also speaking, the Executive Director of PowerUp Nigeria, Adetayo Adegbenle, said the increase in gas prices would inevitably translate to higher electricity tariffs and rising subsidy obligations. “Since the price of gas, which is the major fuel for Gencos, has increased, it is expected that electricity tariffs will also increase,” he said.

Adegbenle added that regardless of whether tariffs are immediately adjusted, the financial implications would still manifest in higher invoices from generation companies. “Whether electricity tariffs are reviewed or not, it is bound to affect invoices from Gencos. What we need to understand, however, is what the government’s plan is to absorb the shock of these expected changes.

“Subsidies, or market shortfalls, are expected to increase since invoice values will increase. I have no idea yet, but this is the point. I hope the government will encourage full market deregulation and implement a fully contract-based electricity market. I had planned to make this a national discourse at some point, because we cannot continue to pretend that the electricity market is not optimal,” he explained.

See also  High borrowing costs threaten banks’ credit expansion - CBN

He, however, questioned the Federal Government’s preparedness to absorb the fiscal impact of the changes. “We cannot continue to pretend that the electricity market is optimal. This situation also raises concerns about the sustainability of plans to raise bonds to offset debts owed to gas suppliers and Gencos. This is also another major argument against the bond being raised to pay off market exposure in terms of debt to gas suppliers and generating companies,” he added.

On his part, the President of the Nigeria Consumer Protection Network, Kunle Olubiyo, criticised the methodology behind the new gas pricing framework, describing it as inconsistent and lacking transparency. “The new base price is a bit confusing. The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority had, from July last year, approved $1.13 as transport cost. So how do you now arrive at a figure that does not reflect the full pricing model?” he asked.

Olubiyo noted that when previous base prices are combined with transportation costs, the effective gas price should already be above $3 per unit. “It was around $2.15 last year, and when you add the $1.13 transport cost, it should be about $3.63. So whatever figure is being quoted now does not reflect the true cost,” he said.

He added that Nigeria’s power sector currently enjoys one of the lowest gas pricing regimes due to domestic supply obligations, despite global market pressures. “Gas is a commodity, just like petrol. In the international market, buyers are willing to pay up to $12 due to geopolitical tensions, especially in the Middle East. So why would any producer prefer to sell to Gencos locally, where they are often asked to be patriotic and even sell on credit?” he queried.

Olubiyo, however, argued that tariff increases alone would not resolve the sector’s deep-rooted inefficiencies. “Even before privatisation, we warned that tariff increases are not a silver bullet. There are fundamental issues affecting efficiency across the value chain,” he said.

See also  Airlines face disruptions as fuel costs soar

He pointed to widespread technical and commercial losses, particularly in metering and energy accounting, as major drivers of inflated costs. “There are significant leakages in how electricity is measured and billed. Many meters are obsolete and lack integrity. If we fix these issues and ensure accurate measurement, most of the claims by Gencos could drop by 40 to 50 per cent. What consumers are paying for today includes inefficiency and systemic leakages,” he added.

The Federal Government, through the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, last week reviewed the domestic base price of natural gas, a benchmark used in pricing gas supplied to power plants under the Domestic Gas Delivery Obligation framework.

The domestic gas pricing regime was originally designed to ensure an affordable and reliable gas supply to the power sector, with prices historically set below international market rates to support electricity generation. However, persistent payment shortfalls, mounting debts to gas suppliers, and rising global gas prices have triggered calls for a cost-reflective pricing model.

Industry data shows that gas accounts for over 70 per cent of Nigeria’s electricity generation mix, making it the single largest cost component in power production. Under the current structure, any increase in gas prices directly impacts the cost of generation, which is expected to be reflected in electricity tariffs unless subsidised by the government.

The latest price adjustment is aimed at incentivising gas producers to prioritise domestic supply, but warns that without corresponding reforms in tariff setting, payment assurance, and market transparency, the policy may further strain an already fragile electricity market.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

US Government Warns American Business Executives About Investing In Nigeria

Published

on

A United States Department of State report has warned American business executives in Nigeria.

The department warned that insecurity, corruption, port inefficiencies, and regulatory uncertainty could significantly hinder investment in Nigeria.

It was reports that the department gave the warning in its 2026 Investment Climate Statements on Nigeria.

The report explained that those challenges continue to weigh on the country’s business environment despite signs of macroeconomic stability.

The department said the country’s investment landscape has been shaped by the outcomes of “painful but necessary” structural reforms introduced by the President Bola Tinubu administration.

The report said the removal of fuel subsidies and liberalisation of the foreign exchange market initially triggered significant economic volatility, although early 2026 indicators suggested some stabilisation.

However, it warned that security concerns, administrative bottlenecks and the social consequences of economic reforms remain significant considerations for foreign investors.

“The security environment is a primary variable which gives pause to potential investors,” the report said.

It noted that although attacks on oil infrastructure in the Niger Delta have decreased, oil theft and illegal bunkering persist.

In the North, the expansion of terrorist and ‘bandit’ groups continues to degrade the climate for agribusiness and mining,” the document added.

The report also raised concerns about how regulators treat foreign business executives in disputes, citing the detention of Tigran Gambaryan, a US citizen and Binance executive, for nearly eight months in 2024.

“Furthermore, the use of coercive exit bans and detentions, highlighted by the high-profile nearly eight-month detention in 2024 of U.S. citizen Binance employee Tigran Gambaryan, serves as a cautionary note for foreign executives regarding the risks of aggressive regulatory friction,” it said.

See also  Trump threatens to end cooking oil purchases from China

The report said such cases could shape perceptions of Nigeria as a destination for foreign investment.

The department identified inefficiencies at Nigerian seaports as another major challenge for businesses, particularly those dependent on imports and exports.

“Port inefficiency remains a significant ‘hidden tax’ on investment,” the report said.

It noted that the Lekki Deep Seaport handled $9.6 billion in trade in 2025 and operated at 50 per cent capacity, helping to ease pressure on older facilities.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Nigerian states’ revenues rise 93%, but education spending drops — World Bank

Published

on

The World Bank says Nigeria’s 36 states recorded a 93 per cent increase in revenues between 2023 and 2025 but education received a declining share of the sector’s expenditure.

The bank disclosed this in its latest Nigeria Development Update, which examined how increased public revenues have influenced spending priorities across the federation.

The report was made available to the News Agency of Nigeria by the World Bank in Washington D.C.

According to the report, states’ aggregate revenues rose by approximately 93 per cent in real terms, while expenditure increased by 92 per cent during the period.

The report attributed the improvement partly to exchange-rate reforms, petrol subsidy removal, stronger revenue administration and increased allocations from the federation account.

It said states also benefited from refunds, settlement of longstanding federal obligations, intervention funds, and stronger Value Added Tax collections.

However, education’s share of total state expenditure declined from 14.9 per cent in 2021 to 12.1 per cent in 2025, according to the report.

Health expenditure remained broadly stable at approximately seven per cent, while social protection’s share increased from 1.4 per cent to 4.4 per cent.

The bank said capital expenditure increased significantly, accounting for 61 per cent of state spending, compared with 46 per cent previously.

Transport infrastructure recorded the largest increase, alongside substantial spending on housing, agriculture and other economic investments.

The report quoted Mathew Verghis, the World Bank Country Director for Nigeria, as saying that increased revenues provided the opportunity to improve infrastructure, education, healthcare, and water services.

See also  Flutterwave expands open banking with Mono acquisition

He said greater spending efficiency, accountability and improved service delivery were essential to ensuring that additional public resources benefited Nigerians.

The bank acknowledged improvements in states’ fiscal reporting, transparency and internally generated revenue.

It, however, stressed that stronger investment in human capital was necessary to translate economic reforms into sustainable employment and improved living standards.

The report also projected average economic growth of 4.4 per cent between 2026 and 2028, subject to sustained reforms and improved service delivery.

It urged federal and state authorities to ensure that increased public revenues translated into tangible improvements in Nigerians’ welfare.

NAN

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Nigeria promotes investment without building production capacity – UNILAG don

Published

on

A professor of Comparative Political Economy at the University of Lagos, Adelaja Odukoya, has asserted that Nigeria’s economic policies promote investment without sufficiently strengthening domestic production.

Odukoya argued that the contradiction had weakened the country’s productive foundations, with policies encouraging investment and entrepreneurship while failing to create the technological capacity, productive employment and processing industries needed to drive sustainable development.

Odukoya spoke at the maiden edition of the Adeleke University Toyin Falola Annual Lecture, held on Thursday at the Performing Arts Theatre, Adeleke University, Ede.

The lecture had as its theme, “History, Power and Accumulation: Reimagining Africa in the Globally Disorderly Order.”

Odukoya identified several contradictions in the way the Nigerian state manages economic activity.

He said, “The state promotes investment without creating conditions for technological transfer. It encourages entrepreneurship without generating sufficient productive employment.

“It expands primary-product exports while leaving processing capacity undeveloped. It constructs infrastructure without establishing strong linkages with domestic production.”

According to him, the contradictions explain why increased economic activity and accumulation do not necessarily translate into development.

“Accumulation is not synonymous with development,” Odukoya stated.

He argued that genuine development should be measured by the expansion of productive, technological, institutional and human capabilities.

“A country could attract investment, export minerals and agricultural commodities and record economic activity while still failing to build the domestic industries and technological capabilities required for long-term development,” he said.

His argument was echoed by Prof Toyin Falola, who said Africa’s vast natural resources would continue to reinforce dependency unless governments developed the industrial, technological and institutional capacity to transform them into productive power.

See also  Investing in women’s health not optional, says FG

Falola said Africa’s resource problem was not simply one of historical exploitation, but also the continent’s failure to convert its resource endowments into power.

“The issue, however, is not just to repeat the history of exploitation. It is more important to know how Africa turns its great resources into power,” Falola said.

He argued that Africa could not afford to remain a spectator as global economic and geopolitical arrangements continued to change, stressing that resource ownership without the capacity to add value would not guarantee influence.

Falola said the continent required a combination of knowledge, government policy and industrial capacity to change its economic position.

“There must be universities that generate new knowledge; there must be governments that translate this knowledge into policies; there must be industries that add value to the continent’s natural resources,” he said.

He added that Africa needed more than improved infrastructure and stronger economies if it wanted to exercise greater influence in the global system.

“The future of the continent will require more than just better infrastructure, improved economies, and more effective political institutions,” Falola said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending